scholarly journals Substantiation of Conditions and Factors for Reducing Regional Differentiation of Innovative Activity

2020 ◽  
pp. 65-76
Author(s):  
Maxim Osovin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Innovation Policy ◽  
Patent Application ◽  
Innovative Activity ◽  
Sustainable Growth ◽  
Innovation Activity ◽  
Regional Differentiation ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Production Chain ◽  
The Russian Federation

A comparative analysis of innovation activity in the Russian Federation and EU countries is carried out. The comparison revealed that modern innovation policy should be aimed not only at increasing labor productivity, but also at solving social problems related to ensuring food security, environmental protection and improving the quality of life of the population. Maintaining a balance between the demand for digital technology and the supply of high-tech products on the market is a basic element in the transition to a new stage of scientific and technological structure. Factors that negatively affect the development and implementation of technological, organizational and marketing innovations are identified. It is shown that the synchronization of the chain of implementation of all newly created or improved technologies ensuring the continuity of the innovation cycle requires the combined efforts of all subjects of innovation. The level of diffusion of innovative activity in federal districts of the Russian Federation is estimated. It is concluded that there is a significant differentiation of regional and sectoral intensity of innovative development. It is substantiated that in order to reduce regional differentiation when introducing advanced practices into the production process, one should take into account the type of innovative activity. According to the attractiveness for investment, digital economy instruments are divided into three categories that characterize one or another stage of their life cycle: maturity, sustainable growth, and a breakthrough trend. It was revealed that the further massive penetration of technological innovations into all links of the production chain should clearly follow the global trends of production digitalization, where the key factor for the success of innovation-oriented companies is the search for the most promising investment projects at the stage of filing a patent application. Based on the analysis, recommendations were developed to stimulate innovative susceptibility in the regions of Russia.

scholarly journals Project approach to managing innovative activities in the industry

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-57
Author(s):  
Elena P. Solodova ◽  
Vladimir N. Lazarev
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Innovative Activity ◽  
Sustainable Growth ◽  
Innovation Activity ◽  
Technological Innovations ◽  
Project Approach ◽  
Industrial Enterprises ◽  
Industrial Organizations ◽  
Main Development ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article examines the innovative activity parameters of industrial enterprises in the Russian Federation, studies the main development trends. The dynamics of the main indicators of industrial organizations subdivisions carrying out research and development are presented and the main types of applied innovations are identified. Also, the costs of technological innovations and the sources of their financing were analyzed within this studys framework. The main reasons for the decline in industrial enterprises innovative activity are listed. In addition, the main trends influencing the development of industrial enterprises were presented. The directions of improving the innovative activities management system of industrial enterprises are grounded on the basis of the project approach use. The general characteristics and properties inherent in an innovation and a project are presented. Domestic enterprises awareness of project management prospects will contribute to their sustainable growth and innovation activity indicators improvement.

Industrial economics in the context of globalization: scientific, practical foundations and development priorities

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 117-125
Author(s):  
I. Krasovskaya ◽  
◽  
T. Malysheva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Division Of Labour ◽  
Sustainable Growth ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Industrial Economy ◽  
Industrial Economics ◽  
Depth Analysis ◽  
The World ◽  
The Russian Federation

The relevance of the publication topic is argued by the need for an in-depth study of the globalization process, which is global financial, political and cultural integration, unification, the global division of labour, the planetary migration of capital, human and productive resources, standardization of legislation, and interference of cultures of the world community. The theoretical and practical goals of the publication are to study causal algorithms for the formation of a negative scientific and production balance of the Russian Federation and an increase in disproportions between the import and export of high-tech products, as well as a comparative description of global development as a symbiosis of contradictory trends in the subordination of the world economy to the interests of transnational capital. The theoretical and methodological basis of the publication was the scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists studying the globalization of the industrial economy due to the intensification of international scientific and technological competition and the expansion of the innovation market, deepening of specialization and division of labour, and the increase in the risks of producing high-tech products at the national and world levels. Scientific novelty lies in the authors’ interpretation of such socio-economic advantages of globalization as economies of scale, stimulation of labour productivity, rationalization of production at the interstate level and the spread of innovative technologies, cost reduction, price regression, achieving sustainable growth in the well-being of society, on the basis of which the development is confirmed global industrial economy on a research basis characterized by such attributes interdependence, asymmetry, regionalization and diversification, regression efficiency, inclusiveness, resource and raw material demarcation, a high degree of uncertainty and of the economic risk. The practical significance of the results obtained is determined by an in-depth analysis of the American (based on differentiation of labor and specialization of personnel, demarcation of labor duties, concentration of scientific and production efforts on a purely economic result) and Eurasian (characterized by mobility and compactness of production processes, saving transaction costs, adaptability to market conditions and availability of labour-tolerant staff) strategies for innovative development of industrial economics. Based on a critical rethinking of the American and Eurasian strategies, proposals and recommendations are formulated on the formation of the scientific and technical policy of the Russian Federation

scholarly journals TECHNOLOGIES IN THE CRIMINAL LEGISLATION OF RUSSIA: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS

2020 ◽  
pp. 85-92
Author(s):  
Vasily N. Nekrasov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Innovative Activity ◽  
Innovation Activity ◽  
Technical Innovations ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Impact

In this paper, the author tried to consider the impact of such innovation results as technology on domestic criminal law and to understand whether the legislator is ready for them. In the current Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the legislator does not once use a single general concept in relation to technical innovations, which allows to characterize its various elements. At the same time, the legislator traditionally uses such private terms as tools, means, equipment, system, etc. When considering this issue, the first thought that comes to mind is that technical innova-tions in the Criminal Code are regarded as instruments or means of committing a crime. In criminal law theory, there are many points of view on the question of distinguishing between "instrument" and "means" of crime. The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation does not clearly understand the concepts under analysis. Technical innovations, such as equipment by domestic lawmakers, are regarded as instruments and means of committing a crime. The above concepts were traditionally used by the legislator to construct the norms of the Russian criminal law. At the same time, due to the active development of innovation activity, new technical innovations are appearing today, which, firstly, did not exist before, and secondly, they have a number of specific features. At the same time, definitions that were not previously used in the Russian criminal law, which allow judging about new possibilities of technology, which only stimulate the discus-sion about the legal status of technology, both in criminal law and in legislation as a whole, are already in place today. Social relations are undergoing certain changes as a result of innovative activities. In this regard, the object of crime is also being transformed. As a result, a new type of property is emerging, namely intellectual property, which is also subject to criminal law protection. It seems that today there is a need to combine the norms in the field of crimes that infringe on innovative activity into a separate group of norms. These social relations have a number of features that make it possible to consider forming them into a separate type of crime object. Separating groups of crimes in the area of innovative activity will be of great importance. In particular, it will make it possible to establish public danger in relation to a group of crimes and to analyse changes in the degree of public danger of crime depending on the type of quali-fying and attracting circumstances.

scholarly journals Analyzing and Classifying Risks Arising During Innovation Project Implementation in Aircraft Motor-Building

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-57
Author(s):  
T. B. Timofeeva ◽  
E. A. Ozdoeva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Innovation Policy ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
Qualitative Assessment ◽  
Aviation Industry ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Aircraft Engines ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Scientific And Technological Development

The current Strategy of Innovative Development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2020 and the Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation determine the goals, priorities and objectives of the state innovation policy and scientific and technological development of the country. A significant role is given to areas that allow us to obtain scientific and technical results that are the basis for increasing the innovative level of production and consolidating the country's position in the foreign market. Among the priority areas is the aviation industry, namely the sector of aircraft engine construction. The creation of aircraft engines is currently one of the most science-intensive and high-tech tasks of the domestic aircraft industry. However, the analysis of the current state of implementation of programms in this area shows that the problems of their functioning and development are not always solved taking into account a wide range of emerging risks, the negative impact of which can lead to significant financial losses. To develop effective methods for assessing and minimizing risks, it is necessary to first analyze and classify them. In the article, based on the analysis, a system of classification of risks arising during development aircraft engines. The results obtained will allow us to give a preliminary qualitative assessment of the negative events that occur at various stages of the development of aircraft engines.

scholarly journals Tendencies of innovative development of the Russian Federation

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 338-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. N. Ustinova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Innovation Activity ◽  
Integrated Analysis ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Scale Production ◽  
Innovative Development ◽  
Innovation Development ◽  
Innovation Activities ◽  
The Russian Federation

Today in Russia there is a definite situation in the field of innovative development, characterized by a number of distinctive features. In a dynamic environment of industrial production and entrepreneurship, the need for the formation and development of non-proprietary resources is beyond doubt. The dynamics of productivity growth, the development of new high-tech production systems, the growth of the patent base in enterprises, trends in innovative development in general in the sector of the economy and large-scale production.The state of development of the economic system, depending on the structure of the innovation development of the subjects. At the same time, the innovative development of companies is manifested both in investments in advanced production technologies and in the production of high-tech products. The purpose of the scientific article is to analyze the innovative development in the Russian Federation.The goal necessitated the following tasks:1. To analyze the indirect indicator of innovation development – the volume of domestic expenditures on research and development in the context of country adaptability;2. To analyze the innovation activity of organizations by districts of the Russian Federation;3. To produce a factor analysis of indicators on the innovative development of the Russian Federation;4. Formulate recommendations for improving innovation activities in Russia.The article used modern methods and tools for integrated analysis based on the systematization and structuring of thematic material. So, in the article in which you will find information about what is happening in Russia.The above studies have become conclusions and recommendations regarding the features of the innovative development of the Russian Federation, recommendations for improving innovation activities in the Russian Federation.Significance is expressed in the practical possibility of using the results of research results. 

scholarly journals Economic Entities in the Context of Technological Modernization of Economy: Priority Trends Taking into Account Digital Transformation

2021 ◽  
pp. 74-87
Author(s):  
Anna Shkalenko ◽  
Yulia Tymchuk
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Main Idea ◽  
Digital Transformation ◽  
Innovative Activity ◽  
Innovation Activity ◽  
State Support ◽  
Tax Legislation ◽  
Technological Modernization ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Impact

The basis of this study is the use of elements of an innovative methodology of post-institutional analysis based on the interdisciplinary synthesis, which involves overcoming the monodimensionality, dichotomization and dogmatism of many concepts of orthodox neo-institutionalism. The main idea of this study is to apply an interdisciplinary approach to study the impact of technological modernization on economic entities and identify priority trends taking into account digital transformation of public relations. The assessment of the current problems under study and the conceptual framework of the study were carried out on the basis of studying and rethinking the results of numerous works by European and Russian scientists, as well as the legislation of the Russian Federation. The regulatory framework covers current domestic legislation in the field of civil, business and tax law, which regulates innovative activities. As a result of the conducted research, it is established that innovative activity is managed by a large number of regulations of various industry affiliation, which do not have any systemic connection with each other. The existing terminological intricacy is revealed in innovation legislation. The current legislation, including at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, does not set the criteria and the indicators of an innovative organization. This serves as a factor that both complicates obtaining state support and hinders the wider introduction of innovations. The mechanisms of stimulating innovative activity provided by the tax legislation are investigated, and their effectiveness is also evaluated. The article proves the need for adoption of a special Federal Law aimed at regulating innovative legal relations. The need to improve the tax legislation is justified in terms of creating a special tax regime for subjects of innovative activity. It is proposed to expand the measures of state support for innovation activity within the subjects in the Russian Federation by introducing the institute of innovation voucher. The role of responsible innovations for sustainable business development in the period of digital transformation of society is defined.

scholarly journals PROBLEMS OF STATE REGULATION OF INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY IN CONSTRUCTION

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetiana Zaiats ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Innovation Policy ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
Innovative Activity ◽  
Information Modeling ◽  
Innovation Activity ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Innovative Development ◽  
Resource Saving ◽  
Development Organization ◽  
State Management

The article identifies the problems of state regulation of innovation in construction and substantiates the main directions of improving its efficiency. The Bloomberg Innovation Index was used to assess the general state of innovation in Ukraine. Dynamic analysis of Ukraine's position in the ranking of the Bloomberg Innovation Index as a whole and by individual sub-indices of 2018–2020 revealed such problems as the reduction of production of high-tech goods, labor productivity, intensity of research and development. The study of innovation management was performed using a situational approach. It is established that the state regulation of innovation is mainly based on the methods of indirect influence. It is emphasized that in the conditions of economic crisis it is expedient to prefer methods of direct state regulation. The analysis revealed a range of problems related to forecasting and programming of innovation development, organization and coordination of relevant bodies in the implementation of innovation policy, regulation, financial and investment support for innovation, insufficient stimulation of demand for innovative products, unsatisfactory state of protection of intellectual property rights. The problems of state management of innovation activity are specified. The imbalance of the branch, national and regional programs of innovative development coordinating was revealed. Problems and directions of development of infrastructure of innovative activity are defined. Perspective directions of technological renewal of construction are defined, in particular development of resource-saving, energy-efficient technologies, introduction of Building Information Modeling technologies. The organization of public and private mortgage funds is offered, which will allow to receive financial resources at a low interest rate. It is established that the underdevelopment of the financial market of Ukraine most slows down the solution of problems of financing innovative activities in construction through the attraction of credit, venture capital, state budget funds for innovative development of the construction sector.

The Innovation Activity of Russian Enterprises from 2010 to 2020 according to Federal State Statistics Service

2021 ◽  
pp. 56-64
Author(s):  
Nataliya Levkina ◽  
Tatyana Averina
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Innovative Activity ◽  
Scale Transformation ◽  
Innovation Activity ◽  
Federal State ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Regional Programs

In modern conditions, there is a large-scale transformation of the Russian economy in the direction of its digitalization, accordingly, the innovative activity of enterprises and organizations is of particular importance. This work is devoted to the assessment of the dynamics of innovation activity of Russian enterprises for the period from 2010 to 2020 according to Rosstat of the Russian Federation. The analysis of the main indicators of innovation activity indicates that the level of innovation activity in the whole country is low, and most of the indicators show negative dynamics, which jeopardizes the implementation of many large-scale innovative projects. The results of the study can be used in planning and adjusting federal and regional programs for digitalization of certain industries and areas of activity.

scholarly journals Budget funds for financing investments in innovative development of the region (on the example of the Central Black Earth Region)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Konstantin Konstantinovich Pozdnyakov
Keyword(s):  
Research And Development ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Innovative Activity ◽  
Innovation Activity ◽  
Innovative Development ◽  
Goods And Services ◽  
Strategic Factor ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Impact

The strategic factor for economic growth of the Russian regions is the activation of innovative processes. The problem of increasing innovative activity has been particularly acute in recent years due to the unfolding crisis and extended restrictions on the budget expenditures. The goal of this article consists in the analysis of indicators of innovative activity, and assessment of the impact of budget investments in fixed capital upon the indicators of innovative process in the Central Black Earth Region. The analysis employs the available statistical data on financing of investment processes and results of innovative activity in the Russian Federation, Central Federal District, and Central Black Earth Region. The research relies on the system approach, economic-statistical, logical and expert methods of analysis. The conducted analysis reveals the insufficient level of innovative development in all six zones of the Central Black Earth Region. The innovative processes in the Central Black Earth Region are characterized by low output of innovative products and investment in research and development. The dynamics of innovative processes in the region is of differential nature. There are substantial interregional differences in the indicator values of the expenditures for research and development, and innovation activity, as well as the volatility of indicators of production of innovative goods and services. The clear outsider in the Central Black Earth Region in the Oryol Oblast. The author formulates recommendations that can be used by the authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in elaboration of state support measures for innovative activity in the Central Black Earth Region aimed at acceleration of their economic development.

scholarly journals Factor analysis of innovation activity of companies in the Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
pp. 95-105
Author(s):  
Marina Viktorovna Ledeneva ◽  
Natalia Amirovna Mishura
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Research And Development ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Principal Components ◽  
Innovation Activity ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Method Of Principal Components ◽  
Principal Factors ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Statistical Indicators

This research is aimed at determination and interpretation of the factors that influence the indicator values of innovation activity of enterprises in the Russian Federation. The author sets the following goals: carry out factor analysis of innovation activity of companies in the Russian Federation using the method of principal components and maximum likelihood; determine and interpret the factors; compare the acquired results; develop recommendations on improvement the composition of statistical indicators used for efficiency assessment of innovation activity of companies on meso- and macro levels. The empirical basis contains the data provided by Rosstat on 10 indicators for the period from 2009 to 2016 (657 observations). The scientific novelty consists in identification of latent generalizing characteristics and correlations between the indicators used for assessing the innovation activity of companies in the Russian Federation. Both methods, of principal components and principal factors, allowed similarly distinguishing the two factors: via the method of principal components: development of science in the region and specialization of the region in high-tech industries; via the method of principal factors: research organizations in the region, their number and indicators; specialization of the region in high-tech industries. The second factor reflects commercialization of research and development. A relatively small number of indicators is used for assessing commercialization of research and development. The author notes the lack of statistical data for assessing the efficiency of innovation activity of companies. The statistical indicators of innovation activity of enterprises should include the economic effect indicators. This would allow using the performance indicators of research and development not only on micro-, but also meso - and macro-levels in elaboration and assessment of measures stimulating innovation activity of businesses at the country level.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document