scholarly journals Interim Measures in the Civil Proceedings in England: the Concept and Certain Types

Legal Concept ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 121-128
Author(s):  
Valentina Koncheva
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Judicial Discretion ◽  
Legal Institutions ◽  
Legal Practice ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Civil Remedies ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Interim Measures

Introduction: the legal institutions aimed at creating conditions for the efficiency of justice are now the subject of attention in the field of civil proceedings. This includes the institution of interim measures. The legal regulation of interim measures in the civil proceedings in England has been actively developing for several decades and today is of considerable interest to business, science and legal practice. The purpose of the research is to analyze the concept and features of the legal regulation of the main types of interim measures that can be of interest for forming the ideas about the possibilities of development of the Russian civil process. The obtained research results are based on the analysis of the normative provisions of Civil Procedure Rules 1998, the Senior Courts Act 1981, relating to the powers of the courts, the grounds and procedure for applying interim measures in the civil proceedings. The examples of judicial practice and the opinions of the researchers and practitioners are considered. The paper considers the general features of the legal institutions of interim measures in England and Russia and the peculiarities of understanding the legal possibilities of interim measures in the civil proceedings in England. Conclusions: the experience of England in solving the issues of ensuring the efficiency of civil remedies is of interest for both Russian legal science and practice. The study shows that there are specific features of the approach to the functioning of interim measures. This includes a fairly large amount of judicial discretion, a preliminary guarantee of compensation for the defendant’s losses, and mostly voluntary enforcement of the court requirements. The legal experience of England may be of interest for discussing the ways to improve the domestic procedural regulation of interim measures.

scholarly journals Legal regulation of the institution of the partiesfrom the standpoint of the principle of balance of civil procedural legal relations

2021 ◽  
pp. 90-102
Author(s):  
Оksana Shutenko
Keyword(s):  
Modern Science ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Anthropology ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Legislative Regulation ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Procedural Rights

The modern science of civil procedural law is experiencing a new stage of understanding the institution of the parties, which is associated with the study of the principle of balance of civil procedural law. The basis of non-priority participation in the process of the plaintiff and the defendant determines the legislative regulation of the institution of the parties. This rule should be considered as one of the manifestations of a fair trial, as it is a manifestation of the balance of interests of the parties during the proceedings. In the spirit of this principle, it is proposed to improve the procedures for involving accomplices and replacing an improper party in civil proceedings. The principle of the balance of civil procedural legal relations is, first, that the amount of legal interest of the subject of the process is directly proportional to the scope of his procedural rights. Thus, the purpose of civil process - restoration of the broken right is reached. Meanwhile, the legislator does not always manage to comply with the relevant legal regulations. In particular, the rules relating to the institution of procedural complicity and replacement of the improper party. The mistake of the legislative regulation of this mechanism is, in our opinion, a misunderstanding of the principle of equality of arms: the court cannot involve the co-plaintiff, and therefore cannot involve the co-defendant. The different nature of the institutions of the plaintiff and the defendant does not allow the same approach to legal regulation. This inequality is compensated by other principles, rules and institutions of civil procedural law. But the starting point is that at the beginning of the case the plaintiff attacks, initiates the process, and the defendant is involved in the process. Keywords: civil process, parties of civil process, principle of balance, legal anthropology, procedural complicity, replacement of improper party.

Transformation of Fundamental Origins of Civil Procedure Law in Terms of Digitization of Justice in Civil Cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 42-45
Author(s):  
Yulia A. Lukonina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Technical Progress ◽  
Judicial Independence ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Subject

The article reveals the main trends in the modernization of the civil procedural law principles in the context of the civil process digitalization. From the point of view of introducing the latest digital innovations into the civil process, the guidelines of the branch of the law are analyzed, the conclusions are drawn about the transformation of the legal regulation key areas. It is raised the problem of the procedural and legal collisions between the introduction of technical progress tools into the judicial system, its reflection in the regulatory framework of the state and the application in the legal work of judicial structures and practicing procedural specialists. Taking as a basis the differentiation of the civil procedural law principles by the subject of regulation, the author examines various legal configurations that have appeared in the judicial system as a result of the digitalization of procedural relations of participants in civil proceedings, starting depending on the degree of impact of digitalization. The article highlights the main aspects of the implementation of the principle of the publicity of proceedings, the corresponding principles of openness, publicity, accessibility, transparency and judicial transparency, between which a parallel is drawn. In terms of digitalization the author touches upon the principles of the judicial independence, competition, equality of parties and discretion, thereby coming to the conclusion about digital modernization of the main provisions and ideas that express the essence of civil procedural law, while maintaining the traditional positions characteristic of the Russian judicial system.

scholarly journals Institutionalization of Constitutional Norms in the Dynamics of the Subject Matter of the Legal Regulation

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 17-25
Author(s):  
N. E. Taeva
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Natural Law ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Institutions ◽  
Present Stage ◽  
The Subject

In the paper based on conceptual provisions put forward by Prof. Kozlova, the author sets the objective to identify tendencies that manifest themselves in the development of constitutional and legal institutions at the present stage taking into account the dynamics of the subject of legal regulation, as well as the ongoing transformation of the Russian legal system. In this regard, the author has examined the problem of expanding the field of relations regulated under constitutional law. The author has concluded about the blurring of boundaries between institutions of constitutional law, which entails the problem of attribution of norms to a particular institution. The paper has analyzed the issue of emergence of intersectoral institutions that can be characterized as neither public nor private, as neither substantive nor procedural. This leads to the need to change the very approach to the concept of “institution of law.” It is concluded that constitutional law institutions can contain unwritten legal regulators that can include both rules of natural law and rules of conduct developed directly in the society.

Renewal of the Land Lease Agreement: Problems of Theory and Judicial Practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 48-62
Author(s):  
Vitalii Urkevych
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Structural Method ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
Important Object ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Lease Agreement

Land is the most important object of the environment. It is an indispensable means of production in agriculture, the territorial basis for the location of various objects. It is argued that the proper functioning of land lease relations is a guarantee of sustainable economic circulation, a guarantee of the exercise of rights and performance of duties by both the lessor and the lessee of the land. The issue of renewal of the land lease agreement after its expiration is debatable. The purpose of the study is to outline the existing theoretical and law enforcement problems regarding the renewal of the land lease agreement, to make proposals to eliminate the latter. To achieve this purpose, a system-structural method of scientific knowledge was used, which helped analyse the prescriptions of the legislation on renewal of the land lease agreement, their relations and interaction were highlighted. The study proves that the lessee's pre-emptive right exists to renew the land lease agreement only for the same period and on the same terms and in the absence of objections to such renewal by the lessor. If the lessee tries to change the essential terms of the land lease agreement and in the absence of the lessor's consent to such changes, the lessee's pre-emptive right to enter into a land lease agreement for a new term is terminated. It is emphasised that in each dispute it is necessary to establish the good faith of the lessor’s actions to refuse to renew the land lease agreement with one person (lessee) and the subsequent conclusion of the agreement with the new lessee. The use of the category of "less protected" party in land lease legal relations appears debatable, because depending on the subject composition of the parties to these legal relations, such a party can be both a lessee and a lessor. It is concluded that the Supreme Court should unify the practice of applying the provisions of the law on the renewal of the land lease agreement (only in combination with other regulations or autonomously, with the use of the principle of "tacit consent"). The possibility of autonomous application of such instructions is indicated by the provisions of the Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Concerning Counteraction to Raiding”. The revealed shortcomings of the legal regulation of the renewal of the land lease agreement after its expiration indicate the directions of improvement of the legislation in land lease, which has practical significance

scholarly journals Doctrinal approaches to the definition of civil procedural law

2021 ◽  
pp. 82-90
Author(s):  
Olena Shtefan
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
International Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of

Keywords: civil procedural law, civil process, civil proceedings, subject of civil procedurallaw The process of reforming procedural legislation, its harmonization, harmonization with theprinciples and standards of international law, as well as other processes taking place insociety and the state are the factors that affect the need to revise the doctrinal definitions of civil procedural law. One of the most developed issues in the theory of civil procedurallaw is its definition. In turn, the development of science is impossible without reviewingeven established doctrinal approaches and provisions.An analysis of the special literature, mostly educational, led to the conclusion thatscholars use approaches to the definition of the term "civil procedural law", which weredeveloped and included in the theory of civil procedural law in the 50s-60s of the twentiethcentury. Modern definitions of civil procedural law are based on the provisions of theold invalid legislation, or on the provisions of the legislation of other countries (for example,the Russian Federation). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to review the existingdefinitions in the theory of civil procedural law and their harmonization with theprovisions of current legislation of Ukraine.In the process of researching doctrinal approaches to the definition of civil procedurallaw, it was found that researchers invest in the definition of the subject, purpose of thisbranch of law, as well as additional characteristics of civil procedural law (participants,sectoral affiliation, stage, etc.).The lack of a single doctrinal approach to the definition of the subject of civil procedurallaw, which is part of the definition of civil procedural law, prompted to study thesubject of civil procedural law and propose its author's definition.Based on the provisions of current legislation, the article presents the author's definitionof civil procedural law as a branch of law, set and system of legal norms, the subjectof which are public relations arising in civil proceedings on the basis of fair, impartialand timely consideration and resolution of civil cases in order to effectively protect violated,unrecognized or disputed rights, freedoms or interests of individuals, rights and interestsof legal entities, the interests of the state.

scholarly journals Jurisdiction over claims made against public-legal institutions

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Nikolay Basmanov ◽  
Andrei Vladimirovich Ilin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Practical Importance ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Institutions ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Arbitration Procedure ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

This article discusses the question of territorial jurisdiction over claims made against public-legal institutions (Russian Federation, constituent entities of the Russian Federation, municipal formations). The subject of this research is the current procedural norms regulating the questions of jurisdiction, and the established law enforcement practice. Attention is turned to the existence of gaps in legal regulation of the question of jurisdiction over claims made against public-legal institutions in the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. The authors analyze the established approaches in law enforcement practice towards solution of the aforementioned problem. Methodological framework includes the comparative-legal method and such formal-logical methods, as analysis, synthesis and induction. The relevance and practical importance are substantiated by the subject of research – the law enforcement practice formed by the Russian judicial authorities over the recent years. The conclusion is made on the need for elimination of the existing gap in the normative-legal regulation by amending the current procedural legislation.

scholarly journals Current issues of the implementation of a criminal penalty

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-100
Author(s):  
Ekaterina V. Avdeeva
Keyword(s):  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Current Trends ◽  
Criminal Penalty ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Subject

The subject of the research is the criminal-legal aspects of the implementation of a fine as a type of criminal punishment. In this regard, an analysis of the materials of judicial practice is carried out, which makes it possible to reveal the current trends in the appointment of a criminal fine by the court. The dynamics of the appointment of a fine by the court as the main and additional punishment has been established. The purpose of the study is to uncover the problems of implementing a criminal fine as a type of punishment and to develop proposals for improving the mechanism for imposing a criminal fine by a court. The methodological basis of the research is formed by a set of general scientific and private scientific methods that predetermined an integrated approach to the study of the purpose of a fine as a type of punishment. In the course of achieving the goal of the study, special legal methods of cognition were used to facilitate the analysis of the legal regulation of the appointment of a fine, the determination of the property status of a person, and other income of the convict. The main results of the study contain conclusions and proposals aimed at improving the measures for the appointment of a fine in relation to minors, for the aggregate of crimes, when replacing a fine in case of malicious evasion from its payment. Conclusions are formulated regarding the methodological, organizational and practical aspects of the legal impact of a fine as a type of punishment aimed at achieving the goals of punishment. The novelty of the research topic lies in the formulation and solution of the problem associated with the appointment of a fine: 1) for the aggregate of crimes; 2) in relation to minors. Conclusions and proposals for improving the criminal law governing the basis and procedure for imposing a criminal fine are formulated.

scholarly journals INTERIM MEASURES IN ARBITRATION

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 2155-2160
Author(s):  
Emilija Gjorgjioska ◽  
Zorica Stoileva ◽  
Dijana Gorgieva
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
State Court ◽  
Republic Of Macedonia ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Interim Measures

In the arbitration, just like in civil litigation, it may be necessary before the final merit award is rendered by the arbitral tribunal, the relations between the parties to be temporarily settled. The need for ordering interim measures before or during an arbitration may arise in order to create conditions for maintaining the existing situation untilthe arbitration settlement of the dispute, facilitating the enforcement of the potential condemnatory arbitration award or faster conduct of the arbitration.Due to these advantages of the interimmeasures, the problem of interim measures in the modern arbitration process theory and practice gets more and more important. In the context of this, the questions arise what types of interim measures and under what conditions can be ordered in the arbitration?Who has the authority to order inerim measures: the state court or arbitrator of the arbitration tribunal or arbitrator for emergencies, and etc. Regarding the types of interim measures that can be ordered before or during the arbitration, there are: conservation, temporary, procedural-facilitating, record-keeping and execution-enforcement measures. The conditions for ordering each of these measures are specific and depend on the purpose and function of the interim measure itself. Regarding the dilemma who is auhtorized to order interim measures in the arbitration, it must be emphasized that the older arbitration theory and practice that has been created around state protectionist legal politics accepts the position that only the state court can order inerim measures while the contemporary arbitration theory and practice proves that the arbitrator of the arbitration court (more often) or an emergency arbitrator (less often) should order the imerim measures in the arbitration. It is precisely because of these problems and dilemmas that still baffle the science of the arbitration procedural law the subject of this paper will be the legal regulation of the subject matter of the interim measures in the Macedonian arbitration legislation. For this purpose, an analysis will be made of the positive legal provisions of the Law on Litigation Procedure of the Republic of Macedonia which regulates the domestic arbitration, the Law on International Commercial Arbitration of the Republic of Macedonia, which regulates the international arbitration and the Rules of The Permanent court of Arbitration attached to the Economic Chamber of Republic of Macedonia that apply to resolve arbitration disputes with and without a foreign element and will be analyzed whether they regulate and to what extent they regulate the issue of ordering of inrim measures in the arbitration. This will be done in order to conclude whether there is a need for amendments of the Macedonian Arbitration Legislation in order for the Macedonian arbitration procedural right to be in line with the modern arbitration tendencies for ordering interim measures in the arbitration, primarily the UNCITRAL Model Law.

scholarly journals The Relations Between the Institution of Procedural Responsibility, Legal Relationships and Legal Practice

2019 ◽  
pp. 73-85
Author(s):  
Elena Valerievna Chuklova
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Basic Research ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Practice ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Functional Relations ◽  
Genetic Level ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Basic Research Project

The subject of this research is the institution of procedural responsibility and its relations with legal relationships and legal practice. In her research Chuklova defines genetic, coordination, subordination and functional relations. According to the author, implementation of procedural responsibility provisions creates both material and procedural legal relations. The author demonstrates that the institution of procedural responsibility either relates to legal relationships at the functional genetic level disregarding the definition of a particular legal relationship or acts as a result of legal regulation or means of regulation. There should be legal grounds for creating such an institution, too. The institution of procedural responsibility creates conditions for discovering the truth in criminal, civil or administrative cases, thus demonstrating subordination relations. The research is based on general and special research methods such as comparative law, formal law analysis, functional and systems approaches, etc. As a result of the research, the author concludes that judicial practice is a coordination link between procedural form and material law, however, many court decisions demonstrate a negative tendency in implementation of the procedural responsibility provisions when there is a total substitution of one term with the other. For example, contempt of court includes such actions as numerous continuous disqualifications, non-submission of documents, failure to appear in court, non-compliance with court orders, negative remarks about a judge's professional or personal qualities. The article is funded by The Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project No. 19-011-00103 А 'Legal Responsibility in Russia's Legal System: the Concept of Interaction, Interconnection and Elimination of Contradictions with Other Elements of Legal System'. 

scholarly journals Certain aspects of giving legal aid in the courts of Ukraine in civil process in modern conditions

2021 ◽  
pp. 49-55
Author(s):  
Maksym Volodymyrovych Shpak
Keyword(s):  
Legal Aid ◽  
Further Training ◽  
Professional Skills ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Family Case ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Court Proceedings

Modern legal and judicial practice is constantly faced with problems of shortage of judges and as a result there is a big amount of unresolved cases in civil proceedings. This trend is observed from year to year. This problem is closely related to the fact that due to the insufficient number of judges in some courts of Ukraine, the process of providing legal aid by different groups of subjects is significantly complicated due to the actual impossibility of implementing proceedings in a particular court. Moreover, in Ukraine there are cases when there are no judges in the courts who have the power to administer justice. In this regard, in this research, the author is trying to examine the situation of legal aid cases in civil proceedings, taking into account statistics on the number of judges in Ukraine and the number of civil cases considered by courts in recent years. It is seemed that providing a legal aid in civil proceedings depends not only on the professional skills of the representative. It depends on the legal environment where it is provided. This is due to the fact that, for example, due to the absence of judges in a particular court, a lawyer cannot provide other types of legal aid, except drawing up and filing a statement of claim. For example, this may be the case in a family case where persons have filed a lawsuit for divorce at the place of residence, but due to the absence of judges in court, the case cannot be considered. Because of this: 1) representatives (including lawyers) cannot provide the legal aid in the court proceedings; 2) the parties in such case will have to wait a long time, when a judge will be appointed to the case. In recent years, legal aid in the civil process of Ukraine has become increasingly in demand. For the full implementation of legal aid in civil cases in Ukraine, it is necessary that persons who provide it, constantly further training, improve professional skills and abilities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document