scholarly journals Chlorophyll fluorescence varies more across seasons than leaf water potential in drought-prone plants

2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 549-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
BRUNO H.P. ROSADO ◽  
EDUARDO A. DE MATTOS
Keyword(s):  
Chlorophyll Fluorescence ◽  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Water Availability ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Tropical Species ◽  
Tropical Plants ◽  
Tropical Vegetation ◽  
Leaf Succulence ◽  
The Relationship

ABSTRACT Among the effects of environmental change, the intensification of drought events is noteworthy, and tropical vegetation is predicted to be highly vulnerable to it. However, it is not clear how tropical plants in drought-prone habitats will respond to this change. In a coastal sandy plain environment, we evaluated the response of six plant species to water deficits across seasons, the relationship between their morpho-physiological traits, and which traits would be the best descriptors of plants' response to drought. Regardless of leaf succulence and phenology, responses between seasons were most strongly related to chlorophyll fluorescence. In this study we have demonstrated that a better comprehension of how tropical species from drought-prone habitats cope with changes in water availability can be based on seasonal variation in leaf water potential and chlorophyll fluorescence. Temporal variation in leaf water potential and chlorophyll fluorescence was found useful for differentiating between groups of sandy soil species that are responsive or unresponsive to water availability. However, chlorophyll fluorescence appeared to be a more sensitive descriptor of their seasonal and short-term responses.

scholarly journals Geospatial variation of grapevine water status, soil water availability, grape composition and sensory characteristics in a spatially heterogeneous premium wine grape vineyard

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1013-1072
Author(s):  
D. R. Smart ◽  
S. Cosby Hess ◽  
R. Plant ◽  
O. Feihn ◽  
H. Heymann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Water Availability ◽  
Water Status ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Sensory Characteristics ◽  
Soil Water Availability ◽  
Wine Grape ◽  
Available Water

Abstract. The geoscience component of terroir in wine grape production continues to be criticized for its quasi-mystical nature, and lack of testable hypotheses. Nonetheless, recent relational investigations are emerging and most involve water availability as captured by available water capacity (AWC, texture) or plant available water (PAW) in the root zone of soil as being a key factor. The second finding emerging may be that the degree of microscale variability in PAW and other soil factors at the vineyard scale renders larger regional characterizations questionable. Cimatic variables like temperature are well mixed, and its influence on wine characteristic is fairly well established. The influence of mesogeology on mesoclimate factors has also been characterized to some extent. To test the hypothesis that vine water status mirrors soil water availability, and controls fruit sensory and chemical properties at the vineyard scale we examined such variables in a iconic, selectively harvested premium winegrape vineyard in the Napa Valley of California during 2007 and 2008 growing seasons. Geo-referenced data vines remained as individual study units throughout data gathering and analysis. Cartographic exercises using geographic information systems (GIS) were used to vizualize geospatial variation in soil and vine properties. Highly significant correlations (P < 0.01) emerged for pre-dawn leaf water potential (ΨPD), mid-day leaf water potential (ΨL) and PAW, with berry size, berry weight, pruning weights (canopy size) and soluble solids content (°Brix). Areas yielding grapes with perceived higher quality had vines with (1) lower leaf water potential (LWP) both pre-dawn and mid-day, (2) smaller berry diameter and weight, (3) lower pruning weights, and (4) higher °Brix. A trained sensory panel found grapes from the more water-stressed vines had significantly sweeter and softer pulp, absence of vegetal character, and browner and crunchier seeds. Metabolomic analysis of the grape skins showed significant differences in accumulation of amino acids and organic acids. Data vines were categorized as non-stressed (ΨPD ≥ −7.9 bars and ΨL ≥ −14.9 bars) and stressed (ΨPD ≤ −8.0 bars and ΨL ≤ −15.0 bars) and subjected to analysis of variance. Significant separation emerged for vines categorized as non-stressed versus stressed at véraison, which correlated to the areas described as producing higher and lower quality fruit. This report does not advocate the use of stress levels herein reported. The vineyard was planted to a vigorous, deep rooted rootstock (V. rupestris cv. St. George), and from years of management is known to be able to withstand stress levels of the magnitude we observed. Nonetheless, the results may suggest there is not a linear relationship between physiological water stress and grape sensory characteristics, but rather the presence of an inflection point controlling grape composition as well as physiological development.

The relationship between steady-state transpiration rates and leaf water potential in cassava (Manihot esculenta cv. Llanera)

1978 ◽  
Vol 56 (13) ◽  
pp. 1537-1539 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. F. Ike ◽  
G. W. Thurtell ◽  
K. R. Stevenson
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Manihot Esculenta ◽  
Regression Line ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Dew Point ◽  
Manihot Esculenta Crantz ◽  
The Relationship

The relationship between leaf water potential (ψL) and transpiration rate (T) was investigated using indoor-grown cassava plants (Manihot esculenta Crantz cv. Llanera). Leaf water potentials were measured with in situ dew-point hygrometer and transpiration rates by gas exchange analysis technique.Regression analyses of the data showed that T was consistently linearly related to ψL (r2 = 0.94). This implies that the plant resistance to flow was constant and hence that an Ohm's Law analog is valid for the transpiration range studied. Extrapolated values of leaf water potential at zero transpiration were close to the osmotic potential of the nutrient solution. Calculated resistance values (slope of regression line for individual plants) varied between 2.90 and 3.05 bars dm2 h g−1 (1 bar = 100 kPa).

scholarly journals Paraheliotropic Leaf Movement of Bush Bean in Response to Water Availability and Air Temperature

HortScience ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 798D-798
Author(s):  
M. Raeini-Sarjaz ◽  
N.N. Barthakur
Keyword(s):  
Stomatal Conductance ◽  
Water Potential ◽  
Air Temperature ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Water Availability ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Leaf Angle ◽  
Bush Bean ◽  
Leaf Movements ◽  
Positive Correlations

Paraheliotropic leaf movements of bush bean were studied in relation to water availability, ambient temperature, leaf water potential, and stomatal conductance in a growth chamber. Unifoliate leaf angle from the horizontal (LA), stomatal conductance (G), and leaf water potential (WP) were measured at noon to minimize the effect of leaf movements due to circadian rhythm. Photoperiod and light intensity on the foliage were kept constant at 14 h, and 200 μmol·m–2·s–1, respectively, throughout the measurements. Negative correlations were obtained between water availability (WA) and LA (R = –0.93), and WP and LA (R = –0.85), whereas positive correlations were shown between WA and WP (R = 0.90), WA and G (R = 0.90), and WP and G (0.84) at 35C air temperature. Similar correlations were observed at 25C between WA and LA (R = –0.91), WP and LA (R = –0.79), WA and WP (R = 0.91), WA and G (R = 0.68), and WP and G (R = 0.76). Air temperature significantly (P ≤ 0.01) affected leaf movements.

scholarly journals Rootstock Genotypes Shape the Response of cv. Pinot gris to Water Deficit

Agronomy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Michele Faralli ◽  
Pier Lugi Bianchedi ◽  
Massimo Bertamini ◽  
Claudio Varotto
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Water Use ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Water Availability ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Daily Water ◽  
Shallow Soils ◽  
Reduced Water

Understanding the physiological basis underlying the water stress responses in grapevine is becoming increasingly topical owing to the challenges that climate change will impose to grapevine agriculture. Here we used cv. Pinot gris (clone H1), grafted on a series of tolerant (1103Paulsen; P), sensitive (SO4) and recently selected (Georgikon28; G28, Georgikon121; G121, Zamor17; Z17) rootstocks. Plants were either subjected to reduced water availability (WS) or maintained at pot capacity (WW). Photosynthetic (light response curves), stomatal and in vivo gas exchange analysis were carried out as well as dynamics of daily water use (WU), leaf area accumulation with affordable RGB imaging pipelines and leaf water potential. Significant genotypic variation was recorded between rootstocks for most of the traits analyzed under optimal conditions with P and SO4 showing a more vigorous growth, higher CO2 assimilation rate, stomatal conductance and stomatal density per unit of leaf area than G28, G121, Z17 (p < 0.001). Under WS, rootstocks induced different water stress response in Pinot gris, with G28 and G121 showing a higher sensitivity of water use to reduced water availability (WS) (p = 0.021) and no variation for midday leaf water potential until severe WS. P, Z17 and to some extent SO4 induced a pronounced near-anisohydric response with a general WU maintenance followed by reduction in leaf water potential even at high levels of soil water content. In addition, G28 and G121 showed a less marked slope in the linear relationship between daily water use and VPD (p = 0.008) suggesting elevated sensitivity of transpiration to evaporative demand. This led to an insensitivity for total dry weight biomass of G28 and G121 under WS conditions (p < 0.001). This work provides: (i) an in-depth analysis for a series of preferable traits under WS in Pinot gris; (ii) a characterization of Pinot gris × rootstock interaction and a series of desirable traits under WS induced by several rootstocks; (iii) the potential benefit for the use a series of affordable methods (e.g., RGB imaging) to easily detect dynamic changes in biomass in grapevine and quickly phenotype genotypes with superior responses under WS. In conclusion, the near-isohydric and conservative behavior observed for G28 and G121 coupled with their low vigor suggest them as potential Pinot gris rootstock candidates for sustaining grapevine productivity in shallow soils likely to develop terminal stress conditions.

The Relationship between Leaf Water Potential and Stem Diameter in Sorghum

2001 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 1341-1343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamal G. Yatapanage ◽  
Hwat Bing So
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Stem Diameter ◽  
The Relationship

Water Relations of the Mistletoe, Amyema miquelii, and Its Host Eucalyptus fasciculosa

1988 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 239 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Whittington ◽  
R Sinclair
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Water Flow ◽  
Water Relations ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Transpiration Rate ◽  
Water Status ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Tissue Water ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Seasonal Data

Mistletoes have frequently been found to transpire more rapidly than their hosts, and usually maintain a more negative water potential. Leaf water potential and diffusive conductance were monitored from the end of a dry summer (March) through a wet winter (to August) on the mistletoe Amyema miquelii (Lehm. ex Miq.) Tieghem and its host Eucalyptus fasciculosa F. Muell. The calculated transpiration rate of the mistletoe was greater than that of its host, but water potential data showed two unusual features. Firstly, the parasite pre-dawn water potential always remained lower than that of the host, regardless of the host's water status. Secondly, the parasite water potential during the day was on one occasion less negative than that of the host, i.e. a reverse gradient. Tissue water relations studies showed that A. miquelii leaves had more negative solute potential and a larger water capacitance than E. fasciculosa leaves. The unusual features of the seasonal data were explained in terms of a large haustorial resistance to water flow and hysteresis in the relationship between transpiration and water potential in the mistletoe leaf. This hysteresis was thought to be due to the contribution of stored leaf water to transpiration.

Soil water reserve estimation and vegetation relationships in a Mediterranean sub-humid forested catchment

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Martínez-Fernández ◽  
V. Hernández-Santana
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Water Content ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Balance Model ◽  
Forested Catchment ◽  
Water Reserve ◽  
Stem Water ◽  
The Relationship

A simple water balance model was used to calculate soil water reserve in a Mediterranean forested catchment. The relationship between soil water reserve and leaf water potential and stem water content was analysed. The usefulness of these variables as plant water status indicators was tested. The analyses were developed with a seven-year-long database (2001–2007) in the case of soil water content and with a four-year long one (2004–2007) for the tree variables. The soil water reserve showed similar types of behaviour for every year, with minimum values at the end of summer (75.2 mm in September 2003) and maxima in winter (204.7 mm in January 2001). The balance model built with precipitation, runoff and ETo simulated the soil moisture content well (r2 = 0.85, p &lt; 0.001). Seasonal variations in the tree variables followed a typical trend, maximum values (−0.18 MPa in June 2007 and 0.654 cm3 cm−3 in May 2004, respectively) being observed at the end of spring, and minimums due to summer drought (−1.5 MPa and 0.520 cm3 cm−3 in August 2005). The relationship was stronger between soil water reserve and stem water content (r2 = 0.85) than with leaf water potential (r2 = 0.67), suggesting stem water content is a more sensitive indicator of water limitation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document