scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness analysis of hernioplasties before and after the implementation of the ACERTO project

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOSÉ EDUARDO DE AGUILAR NASCIMENTO ◽  
ALBERTO BICUDO SALOMÃO ◽  
MARA REGINA ROSA RIBEIRO ◽  
ROBERTA FERREIRA DA SILVA ◽  
WESLEY SANTANA CORREA ARRUDA
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Cost Information ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Two Phases

ABSTRACT Objective: to compare hospital costs and clinical outcomes in inguinal and incisional hernioplasty before and after implementation of the ACERTO project in a university hospital. Methods: retrospective study of 492 patients undergoing either inguinal hernioplasty (n=315) or incisional hernioplasty (n=177). The investigation involved two phases: between January 2002 and December 2005, encompassing cases admitted before the implementation of the ACERTO protocol (PRE-ACERTO period), and the other phase, with cases operated between January 2006 and December 2011, after the implementation of the protocol (ACERTO period). The main outcome variable was the comparison of the mean hospital costs between the two periods. As secondary endpoints, we analyzed the length of stay, the surgical site infection rate and mortality. We used the cost method suggested by Public Sector Cost Information System. Results: surgical site infection was higher (p = 0.039) in the first phase of the study for both inguinal hernia operations (2 (1.6%) versus 0 (0%) cases) and incisional hernioplasty (5 (7.6%) versus 3 (2.7%) cases). The length of stay decreased one day after the implementation of the ACERTO protocol (p=0.005). There was a reduction in costs per patient from R$ 4,328.58 per patient in the first phase to R$ 2,885.72 in the second phase (66.7% reduction). Conclusion: there was a reduction in infectious morbidity, length of stay and hospital costs in hernioplasty after the implementation of the ACERTO protocol.

Surgical Site Infection After Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony A. Sochet ◽  
Alexander M. Cartron ◽  
Aoibhinn Nyhan ◽  
Michael C. Spaeder ◽  
Xiaoyan Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Heart Surgery ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Congenital Heart Surgery ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Cardiothoracic Surgery ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Site Infection

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) occurs in 0.25% to 6% of children after cardiothoracic surgery (CTS). There are no published data regarding the financial impact of SSI after pediatric CTS. We sought to determine the attributable hospital cost and length of stay associated with SSI in children after CTS. Methods: We performed a retrospective, matched cohort study in a 26-bed cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) from January 2010 through December 2013. Cases with SSI were identified retrospectively and individually matched to controls 2:1 by age, gender, Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery score, Society of Thoracic Surgeons–European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery category, and primary cardiac diagnosis and procedure. Results: Of the 981 cases performed during the study period, 12 with SSI were identified. There were no differences in demographics, clinical characteristics, or intraoperative data. Median total hospital costs were higher in participants with SSI as compared to controls (US$219,573 vs US$82,623, P < .01). Children with SSI had longer median CICU length of stay (9 vs 3 days, P < .01), hospital length of stay (18 vs 8.5 days, P < .01), and duration of mechanical ventilation (2 vs 1 day, P < .01) and vasoactive administration (4.5 vs 1 day, P < .01). Conclusions: Children with SSI after CTS have an associated increase in hospital costs of US$136,950/case and hospital length of stay of 9.5 days/case. The economic burden posed by SSI stress the importance of infection control surveillance, exhaustive preventative measures, and identification of modifiable risk factors.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Albumin Utilization in a Major Teaching Hospital in Iran Before and After Guideline Implementation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahriyar Shahbazi Khamas ◽  
Iman Mirbagheri ◽  
Anoush Dehnadi-Moghaddam ◽  
Asieh Ashouri ◽  
Atefeh Jafari
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Guideline Implementation ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
P Value ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Inappropriate Use ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Major Teaching Hospital ◽  
Major Teaching ◽  
Two Phases

Background: Inappropriate use of drugs is one of the major issues in health care system. Rational drug utilization based on the appropriate guidelines has an important role in management of use of expensive medications. We aimed to evaluate albumin usage's appropriateness based on evidence-based indications before and after implementing albumin prescription guideline in a teaching hospital. Methods: This study was performed in two phases. During two-month periods, all the patients who were ordered to receive albumin were evaluated. The first phase was done in November and December of 2017, during which, based on physicians' comments, the guideline was finalized and then implemented. Phase two was performed in May and June 2018. Results: Albumin was prescribed appropriately in 33 patients (55%) in the first phase and 43 (70%) patients in the second phase. 299 vials in the first phase and 456 vials in the second phase were prescribed which 198 vials (66%) and 394 (86%) vials were used with appropriate indications, respectively. The number of vials consumed with inappropriate indication decreased significantly from 101 vials (34%) in the first phase to 62 vials (14%) in the second phase (P-value=0.01). The average cost of the inappropriate indication per patient decreased from $197.3 ± 131.6 in the first phase to $183.5 ± 126.8 in the second phase (P-value=0.52). Conclusion: This study showed implementing a DUE program and designing a guideline for rational prescribing of albumin and interventional methods can optimize treatment duration, significantly decrease inappropriate usage, and avoid unnecessary hospital costs.

Correlation of perioperative risk scores with hospital costs in neurosurgical patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (3) ◽  
pp. 818-824
Author(s):  
Sasha Vaziri ◽  
Joseph M. Abbatematteo ◽  
Max S. Fleisher ◽  
Alexander B. Dru ◽  
Dennis T. Lockney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Risk Calculator ◽  
Surgical Risk ◽  
Acs Nsqip ◽  
Neurosurgical Patients ◽  
Predicted Risk

OBJECTIVEThe American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) online surgical risk calculator uses inherent patient characteristics to provide predictive risk scores for adverse postoperative events. The purpose of this study was to determine if predicted perioperative risk scores correlate with actual hospital costs.METHODSA single-center retrospective review of 1005 neurosurgical patients treated between September 1, 2011, and December 31, 2014, was performed. Individual patient characteristics were entered into the NSQIP calculator. Predicted risk scores were compared with actual in-hospital costs obtained from a billing database. Correlational statistics were used to determine if patients with higher risk scores were associated with increased in-hospital costs.RESULTSThe Pearson correlation coefficient (R) was used to assess the correlation between 11 types of predicted complication risk scores and 5 types of encounter costs from 1005 health encounters involving neurosurgical procedures. Risk scores in categories such as any complication, serious complication, pneumonia, cardiac complication, surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, venous thromboembolism, renal failure, return to operating room, death, and discharge to nursing home or rehabilitation facility were obtained. Patients with higher predicted risk scores in all measures except surgical site infection were found to have a statistically significant association with increased actual in-hospital costs (p < 0.0005).CONCLUSIONSPrevious work has demonstrated that the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator can accurately predict mortality after neurosurgery but is poorly predictive of other potential adverse events and clinical outcomes. However, this study demonstrates that predicted high-risk patients identified by the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator have a statistically significant moderate correlation to increased actual in-hospital costs. The NSQIP calculator may not accurately predict the occurrence of surgical complications (as demonstrated previously), but future iterations of the ACS universal risk calculator may be effective in predicting actual in-hospital costs, which could be advantageous in the current value-based healthcare environment.

EFFICACY OF ANTIBIOTICS PROPHYLAXIS IN PATIENTS WITH LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION UNDERGOING LUMBAR DISCETOMY

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
Tri Truong Van ◽  
Tri Tran Duc Duy ◽  
Khai Vo Le Quang
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Surgical Wound ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Length Of Hospitalization

Introduction: Surgical wound infection in developing coutries is about 3%. Antibiotics prophylaxis may help to reduce the surgical site infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotics prophylaxis in patients with lumbar disc herniation who were treated with lumbar discectomy at Hue University hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted at Hue University hospital from March 2015 to May 2018 on 54 patients with lumbar disc herniation who were used antibiotics prophylaxis when undergoing discectomy. Results: The infection rate in our study was 0%. Antibiotics prophylaxis reduced the length of hospitalization as well as the medical cost. Conclusion: Antibiotics prophylaxis was effective in preventing surgical site infection despite the fact that the condition of operating rooms did not meet the standard rules. Key words: prophylaxis antibiotics, lumbar disc herniation

HOSPITAL INFECTION IN SURGICAL DEPARTMENTS AT HUE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL IN 2015

2016 ◽  
pp. 39-43
Author(s):  
Dinh Binh Tran ◽  
Dinh Tan Tran
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Hospital Infections ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Hospital Acquired Infections ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Objective: To study nosocomial infections and identify the main agents causing hospital infections at Hue University Hospital. Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study of 385 patients with surgical interventions. Results: The prevalence of hospital infections was 5.2%, surgical site infection was the most common (60%), followed by skin and soft tissue infections (35%), urinary tract infections (5%). Surgical site infection (11.6%) in dirty surgery. There were 3 bacterial pathogens isolated, including Staphylococcus aureus (50%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcusspp (25%). Conclusion: Surgical site infection was high in hospital-acquired infections. Key words: hospital infections, surgical intervention, surgical site infection, bacteria

Prospective Surveillance Effectively Reduced Rates of Surgical Site Infection Associated With Elective Colorectal Surgery at a University Hospital in Japan

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 526-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi Konishi ◽  
Toshiaki Watanabe ◽  
Keita Morikane ◽  
Kazuhiko Fukatsu ◽  
Joji Kitayama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Prospective Surveillance ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Nationwide Surveillance ◽  
Surveillance Database

At a university hospital in Japan, the introduction of prospective surveillance and subsequent interventions was effective in reducing the rate of surgical site infection associated with elective colorectal surgery from 27.5% to 17.8% of surgeries. Japan should both recognize the importance of broader surveillance for surgical site infection and establish its own nationwide surveillance database.

scholarly journals Biphasic pattern in the effect of severe measles infection; the difference between additive and multiplicative scale

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nhat Thanh Hoang Le ◽  
Nhan Thi Ho ◽  
Bryan Grenfell ◽  
Stephen Baker ◽  
Ronald B. Geskus
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Measles Virus ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Two Phases ◽  
Additive Scale

Abstract Background Infection with measles virus (MeV) causes immunosuppression and increased susceptibility to other infectious diseases. Only few studies reported a duration of immunosuppression, with varying results. We investigated the effect of immunosuppression on the incidence of hospital admissions for infectious diseases in Vietnamese children. Methods We used retrospective data (2005 to 2015; N = 4419) from the two pediatric hospitals in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. We compared the age-specific incidence of hospital admission for infectious diseases before and after hospitalization for measles. We fitted a Poisson regression model that included gender, current age, and time since measles to obtain a multiplicative effect measure. Estimates were transformed to the additive scale. Results We observed two phases in the incidence of hospital admission after measles. The first phase started with a fourfold increased rate of admissions during the first month after measles, dropping to a level quite comparable to children of the same age before measles. In the second phase, lasting until at least 6 years after measles, the admission rate decreased further, with values up to 20 times lower than in children of the same age before measles. However, on the additive scale the effect size in the second phase was much smaller than in the first phase. Conclusion The first phase highlights the public health benefits of measles vaccination by preventing measles and immune amnesia. The beneficial second phase is interesting, but its strength strongly depends on the scale. It suggests a complicated interaction between MeV infection and the host immunity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document