scholarly journals Evolution of Legal Regulation of Organization Issues in Terms of Providing Governmental and Municipal Services

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inna Pulyayevskaya
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Municipal Services ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Public ◽  
History Of ◽  
Legal Space ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of

The system of legal regulation of the issues of granting governmental and municipal services in present-day Russia is being formed already after determining the main aspects of the public authorities functioning, which predetermines the peculiarities of the legal norms installing into the single composition of the single legal space. The article examines the history of adoption of the Federal Law No. 210-FZ of July 27, 2010 «On Organizing Provision of Governmental and Municipal Services» on the basis of the analyzing the texts of the draft law in three readings, the comments and the amendments to the draft law, as well as other sources. The purpose of analyzing the adoption history of the Federal Law No. 210-FZ, carried out in the article, is to identify the causes of arising the problems associated with its application in practice. The article examines the evolution of the name of the bill, later codified as Federal Law No. 210-FZ, as well as the subject of its legal regulation. The author identifies the causes and consequences of exclusion of a number of definitions from the draft law. The analysis of the provisions of the law in question shows the need for a legislative definition of the concept of «governmental (municipal) function».

To the Issue of Bringing Legal Definitions in the Normative Legal Regulation of National Security and Its Individual Types into a Single System: Legal and Theoretical Dimension

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
O.A. Kolotkina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Strategic Planning ◽  
National Security ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
National Interests ◽  
Legal Space ◽  
Industry Affiliation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Individual

The article deals with the issues related to the definition of the essence, role and meaning of legal definitions in the regulatory legal regulation of national security. The author emphasizes the uniqueness of the phenomenon of national security, which acts as a guarantor of ensuring the national interests of the state, society, and the individual and as a basis for the unhindered implementation of the strategic national priorities of the state. It is possible to ensure these interests and implement strategic priorities by creating an effective legal regulation that includes various legal means, as well as regulatory requirements. An important role in the regulatory legal regulation is played by legal definitions, which contain definitions of concepts that act as integral elements of the legal basis for ensuring national security. It is indicated that legal definitions of concepts are generally binding and contribute to the formation of a single legal space. It is stated that the current Federal Law «On Security» does not contain a legislative definition of key concepts in the field of national security. The article raises the problem of unification of the conceptual and categorical apparatus in the field of ensuring national security, through the adoption of fundamental documents of strategic planning. The author attempts to evaluate the legal definitions in the field under consideration in terms of their universality and industry affiliation, the problems of the completeness of their textual expression, as well as the state policy implemented in the field of national security. The author proposes the formulation of the concept «national security», which could become the basis for adjusting the legal definitions of certain types of national security, enshrined in legislative acts and strategic planning documents. The functions of legal definitions in the regulatory legal regulation of national security are identified and disclosed.

scholarly journals FEATURES OF PUBLIC OFFICIAL IN CRIMINAL LAW OF UKRAINE

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-120
Author(s):  
Oleksandr Tsyvinskyi ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Code ◽  
Regulatory Function ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Self Administration ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
Regulatory Functions

Introduction. In spite of definitude of the concept of public official directly in Criminal Code of Ukraine, its definition makes many difficulties. As the result there is an absence of the only approach concerning interpretation of context and amount of the concept in theory as well as ambiguous applying of relevant criminal and legal norms in enforcement practice. Purpose. The purpose of the article is to find out the subject matter of public official, as well as preparation of improvement of definition of the public official notion in criminal legislation. Results. Persons, that implement functions of a representative of authority or local self-administration, should also be referred as persons empowering the rights from state and its bodies; municipalities, bodies of local self-government make demands and solve problems, which are necessary for implementation by external respondents (entities, that are not subordinate by position and legal entities) and also implement from state, its bodies, bodies of local self-government enforcement measures in case of violations of legal norms. Organizational and regulatory functions should be exclusively considered as functions of administration working with employees that are implemented by person’s availability to make orders, instructions, commands, take encouragement and penalty measures referring to them. Administrative and economic functions should be perceived as functions of administration or disposal of other people’s property. Conclusion. Based on the research the author suggests to apply the defined term of public official instead of terms "an individual fulfilling functions of representative of authority or local self-government" "organizational and regulatory function" and "administrative and economic functions", terms "an individual empowered fulfilling state functions or local self-government", "functions concerning administration of work with employees" and "functions of administration and disposal of other people’s property" accordingly.

scholarly journals Petty crime: quo vadis?

2020 ◽  
pp. 20-29
Author(s):  
Elena Aleksandrovna Suponina ◽  
Igor' Petrovich Dolgikh
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Academic Community ◽  
Public Place ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Systemic Analysis ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Quo Vadis ◽  
Definition Of

The subject of this research is the normative gaps that have been an intrinsic part of petty crime for many years. Among most discussible within the academic community problems related to such legal violation, the author selected the following: absence of legal definition of the concept of obscenities in the national legislation; complexity of delimitation of petty crime from the adjacent administrative and criminal offences; disaccord in interpretation of the concept of “public place”. Particular attention is paid to the prospects of optimization of administrative-legal norms established in the Article 20.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation. The main conclusion of the conducted research lies in the statement that from the perspective of legal technique, the article 20.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation is in a permanent motion. However, this motion is chaotic and inconsequential. The introduced amendments to the text of codified law did not enhanced the protection of public order, as well as created the additional difficulties for the law enforcer. This article makes an attempt of systemic analysis of provisions of the Federal Law No.28-FZ of 03.18.2019 that complemented the article 20.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation with the Sections 3-5.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS ON THE DEFINITION OF THE SUBJECT OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL LAW

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Оlena Shtefan ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Judicial Reform ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Relationship

The subject of this article was one of the fundamental and debatable provisions of the doctrine of civil procedural law - its subject. The author on the basis of the analysis of scientific sources, the legislation carried out the retrospective analysis of formation and development of scientific thought concerning definition of a subject of civil procedural law. The paper identifies two main approaches to understanding the subject of the industry and elements of its structure. Analyzing the "narrow" approach to defining the subject of civil procedural law and certain areas of its coverage in the works of scholars, the author substantiates the position on the relationship between procedural activities and social relations that arise between the court and the parties. Particular attention is paid to the history of inclusion in the subject of civil procedural law enforcement proceedings. The author's position on the subject and system of civil procedural law is substantiated. The essence of the "broad" approach to the definition of the subject of the industry by including in its structure of non-jurisdictional forms of legal protection is revealed. The essence of two opposite tendencies in scientific researches concerning structure of a subject of civil procedural law is revealed: the first tendency is reduced to expansion of a subject at the expense of inclusion in it of economic procedural law, at ignoring independent character of this branch of law; the second - the narrowing of the subject of civil procedural law by removing from its structure of enforcement proceedings, the relations arising in the consideration of labor cases. The connection between the definition of the subject of civil procedural law and the jurisdiction of the court defined in the legislation is substantiated. It is proved that the tendency to narrow the subject of civil procedural law was embodied in the legislation of the country as a result of judicial reform in 2016, which led to conflicts in legislation and problems in law enforcement. Based on the theoretical model of determining the subject of legal regulation and using the analogy of determining its structure, the elements of the structure of the subject of civil procedural law are distinguished and its definition is formulated.

scholarly journals On the procedure for calculating the time periods of non-exploitation of agricultural lands at their withdrawal from users

2019 ◽  
pp. 39-46
Author(s):  
Galina Leonidovna Zemlyakova
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Agricultural Lands ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Unused Land ◽  
Special Scientific ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Subject

The subject of the research is the legal norms regulating the procedure for calculating the terms of non-use of agricultural lands, which allow state authorities to apply the procedure for their withdrawal from unscrupulous owners. In this regard, the author performs a retrospective analysis of the law regulating the turnover of agricultural land, taking into account all the changes and amendments, and identifies the shortcomings in the legal regulation of this sphere which prevent the involvement of land plots in agricultural turnover.The study is based on such general scientific methods as analysis, synthesis, generalization, comparison, as well as the following special scientific methods: historical-legal, formal-legal.The author concludes that repeatedly introduced amendments to article 6 of the Federal law of July 24, 2002 No. 101-FZ "on the turnover of agricultural land" have specified the rules governing the procedure for the withdrawal of unused land plots from owners. However, it has not solved the problem of non-use of land suitable for agricultural production.

Legal regulation of operational and search activities in correctional institutions

2020 ◽  
pp. 140-149
Author(s):  
Кирилл Вячеславович Капустин
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Current State ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of

В статье проводится анализ теоретических положений правового регулирования оперативно-розыскной деятельности и современного состояния нормативного регулирования рассматриваемой деятельности в исправительных учреждениях. На основе сравнительного анализа современной научной литературы по рассматриваемому вопросу автором делается вывод, что исследователи, как правило, отождествляют понятия «правовое регулирование» и «правовая основа» и не уделяют должного внимания правовому регулированию оперативно-розыскной деятельности как процессу, а также формулируется авторское определение «правовое регулирование оперативно-розыскной деятельности». Автор предлагает разделить нормативное регулирование оперативно-розыскной деятельности в исправительных учреждениях на три уровня: конституционный, федеральный, ведомственный и межведомственный. В рамках проведенного исследования были выявлены недостатки ряда правовых норм и предложены пути по их решению. The article analyses both the theoretical provisions of the legal regulation of operational and search activities and the current state of the regulatory regulation of the activities in correctional institutions. On the basis of a comparative analysis of the current scientific literature on the subject, the author concludes that researchers generally identify the concepts of "legal regulation" and "legal basis" and do not pay due attention to the legal regulation of operational-search activities as a process, as well as the author 's definition of "legal regulation of operational-search activities." The author proposes to divide the normative regulation of operational-search activities in correctional institutions into three levels: constitutional; federal; departmental and interdepartmental. The study identified shortcomings in a number of legal norms and suggested ways to address them.

SMART CONTRACT: CONCEPT, LEGAL REGULATION, ASPECTS OF CONSUMER PROTECTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 236-247
Author(s):  
IRINA VIKTOROVNA ERMAKOVA ◽  
◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Smart Contracts ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Smart Contract ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of

The subject of the research is legal norms aimed at regulating by law relations in the field of concluding and executing smart contracts, including issues of protecting the rights of the parties to such contracts, including consumers. The object of the research is social relations arising in the process of creating, concluding and executing of smart contracts. Particular attention is paid to the theoretical and practical aspects of the definition of the concept of “smart contract” and its essence, as well as its legal status. In addition, the article considers approaches to defining the essence of institutions that are closely related to the category of “smart contract”, such as “cryptocurrency”, “digital ruble”, “mining”. The aspects of the protection of fundamental rights of the parties involved in the considered legal relationship, including consumers, are also analyzed. Examples of court decisions regarding the corresponding category of cases are given. The novelty of the research lies in determining the current approaches in relation to the essence, concept and legal status of smart contracts, including the current position of law enforcement practice in relation to this issue. In addition, the novelty of the study lies in considering the practical aspects of the conclusion and execution of smart contracts, including, indicating examples of blockchain platforms on the basis of which smart contracts can function. Ultimately, the study led to the development by the author of some proposals in order to improve the relevant legislation. In particular, the author proposed to consolidate at the legislative level the legal definition of the concept of “smart contract”, indicating the appropriate wording.

scholarly journals COOPERATION BETWEEN THE POLICE FORCES AND NGOs WITH RESPECT TO THE PROVISION OF SECURITY

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 28-32
Author(s):  
Dariusz Szydłowski ◽  
Kamil Martyniak
Keyword(s):  
Public Authorities ◽  
Non Profit ◽  
The Public ◽  
Governmental Organizations ◽  
Non Governmental Organizations ◽  
Law Enforcement Agency ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Charitable Activities

The Police as the largest uniformed law enforcement agency in Poland (more than 100,000 functionaries) with strictly hierarchical command structure is capable of entering into cooperation with external entities including non-governmental organizations. NGOs are all entities which are not public administration organs or units and which operate on a non-profit basis. A characteristic feature of an NGO is the lack of links to the public authorities. In Poland the status of NGOs is regulated by the Public Benefit and Volunteer Work Act of 2003 which introduced an extended definition of non-governmental organizations as entities engaged in public interest and charitable activities (ngo.pl, 2018). The paper presents the subject matter related to the cooperation of the Polish Police with non-governmental organizations with respect to their statutory tasks, determines the place of NGOs in the security system and draws conclusions and recommendations regarding the cooperation.

scholarly journals TO THE ISSUE OF THE CONCEPT OF THE STATE TASK AS A FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT IN THE SPHERE OF EDUCATION AND ITS LEGAL REGULATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1(63)) ◽  
pp. 201-211
Author(s):  
Надежда Николаевна АНДРЕЯНОВА ◽  
Лариса Владимировна НАУМОВА
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Municipal Services ◽  
Empirical Methods ◽  
Financial Instrument ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Theoretical Foundations

The financial provision of state and municipal services is being actively improved at the legislative level, and therefore is the subject of interest of jurisprudence and economics, which determines the relevance of the chosen topic. Purpose: to study scientific literature on the theoretical foundations of the concept of «finance», and regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation related to the concepts of «financing» and «state task» for disclosing the concepts of financial provision of state and municipal services in the sphere of education. Methods: the authors use the empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation, legal-dogmatic and as well as the method of interpretation of legal norms. Results: the authors’ interpretation of the concept of «state task» is given, it is concluded that the state task is a financial instrument in the budgetary sphere.

scholarly journals PROBLEM ASPECTS OF DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPT OF PREDUDICATION IN THE MODERN CRIMINAL PROCESS

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 163-168
Author(s):  
Olexiy Scriabin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Rule ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Space ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Legal Consequences

The article considers the issue of defining the essence of the concept of prejudice in criminal proceedings. Prejudice is a complex and multifaceted concept. Depending on the meaning of the concept, the scope and effect of the institution of prejudice in criminal proceedings may be narrowed or expanded. The approaches of modern scientists to the definition of prejudice are highlighted. Prejudice is a rule of evidence, which establishes the procedure and grounds for use in the process of proof by the investigator, prosecutor, body of inquiry, judge, court of legal conclusions and facts established by those that have entered into force on the basis of the investigator, prosecutor , courts in administrative, commercial, civil or criminal cases, which essentially resolved the case, as those that do not require re-proof. The classification of prejudices according to the scale of application in the legal space is considered; depending on the subordination in legal regulation; by the nature of the connection with other cases; depending on the legislative consolidation; by legal consequences; depending on the subject of legal regulation; depending on the ability of the participants in the process to challenge the prejudice; by the subject of the creation of the prejudice. The problematic aspects of determining prejudices are analyzed. Necessary and important in determining the essence of the concept of prejudice is its distinction with the concepts of presumption, precedent and prejudice. The difference between precedent and presumption is manifested in the fact that precedent contains a legal rule for resolving a legal dispute, and prejudice is an evidentiary rule for the use of facts and legal conclusions. Prejudice and prejudice are not identical, as prejudice is a manifestation of such a characteristic of the legal force of a court decision as binding. The difference between a presumption and a prejudice lies primarily in their scope.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document