scholarly journals Fathers and Sons through the Lens of Ownership of Residential Premises

Lex Russica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 26-35
Author(s):  
I. A. Mikhailova
Keyword(s):  
Adult Children ◽  
Economic Significance ◽  
Parents And Children ◽  
Children And Parents ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Fathers And Sons ◽  
The Right ◽  
Families With Children ◽  
Legislative Measures

The paper examines the sociolegal and economic significance of legislative measures taken to support families with children and granting the possibility of using maternal (family) fund for the acquisition, construction or reconstruction of residential premises. It analyzes numerous issues related to the acquisition, registration, exercise and protection of joint tenancy (the right to common share ownership of residential premises) acquired in this way, including: the procedure for determining the share in the ownership of residential premises acquired in this manner. The paper also examines factors on which the size of the share of each of the family members depends and parties to the agreements concluded regarding such a distribution. Much attention is also paid to the issues of whether it is mandatory, when determining the size of a share in the ownership of a dwelling, to take into account the opinion of a child who has reached the age of 10, and the competition between the rights and interests of parents and children in respect of dwellings belonging to them on the basis of a joint tenancy (common share property). On the basis of the analysis of the Soviet and Russian civil and housing legislation in order to prevent the violation of the rights of parents to such property by adult children living with them, the author makes a proposal to legally restrict the administrative powers belonging to children.The author summarizes that the presence of an indissoluble consanguinity in the form of the origin of children from parents and the efforts of parents to take care of the child’s health, to meet the child’s needs, to provide conditions for the child’s full development and education necessitate a special legal consolidation of the rights to living premises belonging to children and parents on the ground of the right to joint tenancy (common shared ownership). The inclusion into Art. 246 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of provisions restricting the administrative powers of adult children will constitute another step towards the humanization of Russian civil legislation.

THE VALUE OF LOVE IN THE SYSTEM OF FORMATION OF THE PROFESSIONAL MATURITY OF THE EDUCATOR

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (10(79)) ◽  
pp. 12-18
Author(s):  
G. Bubyreva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Right

The existing legislation determines the education as "an integral and focused process of teaching and upbringing, which represents a socially important value and shall be implemented so as to meet the interests of the individual, the family, the society and the state". However, even in this part, the meaning of the notion ‘socially significant benefit is not specified and allows for a wide range of interpretation [2]. Yet the more inconcrete is the answer to the question – "who and how should determine the interests of the individual, the family and even the state?" The national doctrine of education in the Russian Federation, which determined the goals of teaching and upbringing, the ways to attain them by means of the state policy regulating the field of education, the target achievements of the development of the educational system for the period up to 2025, approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of October 4, 2000 #751, was abrogated by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 29, 2014 #245 [7]. The new doctrine has not been developed so far. The RAE Academician A.B. Khutorsky believes that the absence of the national doctrine of education presents a threat to national security and a violation of the right of citizens to quality education. Accordingly, the teacher has to solve the problem of achieving the harmony of interests of the individual, the family, the society and the government on their own, which, however, judging by the officially published results, is the task that exceeds the abilities of the participants of the educational process.  The particular concern about the results of the patriotic upbringing served as a basis for the legislative initiative of the RF President V. V. Putin, who introduced the project of an amendment to the Law of RF "About Education of the Russian Federation" to the State Duma in 2020, regarding the quality of patriotic upbringing [3]. Patriotism, considered by the President of RF V. V. Putin as the only possible idea to unite the nation is "THE FEELING OF LOVE OF THE MOTHERLAND" and the readiness for every sacrifice and heroic deed for the sake of the interests of your Motherland. However, the practicing educators experience shortfalls in efficient methodologies of patriotic upbringing, which should let them bring up citizens, loving their Motherland more than themselves. The article is dedicated to solution to this problem based on the Value-sense paradigm of upbringing educational dynasty of the Kurbatovs [15].

Part III, 7 Families, Parents and Children

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahdar Rex ◽  
Leigh Ian
Keyword(s):  
Corporal Punishment ◽  
Religious Freedom ◽  
Religious Liberty ◽  
Successful Transmission ◽  
Parents And Children ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Right ◽  
Family Autonomy ◽  
Religious Claim

This chapter examines religious freedom issues that concern the family and parents. There can be no doubt that religiously devout parents are vitally interested in the successful transmission of their faith to their offspring. This is one of the prime incidents of religious liberty. One US judge ventured that ‘no aspect of religious freedom is more treasured than the right of parents to teach children to worship God’. The chapter is organized as follows. Section II outlines the current law governing family autonomy and the religious upbringing of children. Section III contrasts liberal and religious conceptions of the family and childrearing. Section IV explores three controversial topics. First, does a maturing child have an independent right of religious liberty? If not, should she? Second, what is the scope of religious childrearing in the fractured family? Do divorced or separated parents have attenuated rights compared to those parents who are still together? Third, do devout parents have any special religious claim to administer corporal punishment to their children amidst the growing international call for the abolition of the parental right of reasonable chastisement?

scholarly journals Discourses about Daily Activity Contracts: A Ground for Children’s Participation?

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Bosisio ◽  
Manuela Olagnero
Keyword(s):  
Daily Activity ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Speaking Up ◽  
Self Confidence ◽  
Parents And Children ◽  
Children And Parents ◽  
Depth Interview ◽  
The Family ◽  
Children’S Participation ◽  
Children's Participation

The paper presents the findings of a secondary analysis of qualitative research conducted in Turin (Northern Italy) in 2012–2013 on autonomy and responsibility in the relationships between children and parents. A total of 46 parents and 48 children aged 9–13 were interviewed. The secondary analysis focuses on a specific section of the in-depth interview dealing with daily activity contracts. The aim is to investigate children’s participation in everyday life through children’s and parents’ narratives about daily activity contracts. Thematic analysis of this section of the interviews shows that children make room for acquiring such relational and dialogue skills as self-confidence and speaking up, which are recognized to be essential for any level and type of participation. Moreover, children’s and parents’ discourses on daily activity contracts provide an opportunity to “cultivate” participation and autonomy through a sort of alliance between parents and children in decision-making. The question is whether these dialogic attitudes and negotiation abilities are a resource not restricted to the family sphere but which extends to other areas of participation that go beyond the realm of private, protected, and reversible choices.

scholarly journals Maternity (Family) Capital as a Support Program for Families with Children: Implementation Results and Development Prospects (Part Two)

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 21-35
Author(s):  
Valeriy Elizarov ◽  
Natal’ya Dzhanayeva
Keyword(s):  
Pension Fund ◽  
Social Protection ◽  
State Budget ◽  
Family Capital ◽  
New Directions ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
C Program ◽  
The Right ◽  
Families With Children ◽  
Development Prospects

Maternity (family) capital (hereinafter referred to as M(F)C) is a certain amount of funds allocated to families with children from the state budget with the goal of creating conditions providing families with children with The article analyzes the theoretical and practical issues of the development of the M(F)C program, the statistics of Rosstat, the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection and the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation, characterizing M(F)C. The article is divided into two parts due to its large volume. The first part of the article explores the conceptual and applied aspects of the origin and development of the M(F)C program. The genesis of the idea of maternal capital and the path from idea to bill is considered. The baseline parameters, such as the size of the capital, the period of action, the directions of use and the conditions governing access to funds M(F)C are analyzed. The second part shows how the initial parameters were adjusted: the extension of the period of action, the reduction of the period preceding the possibility of use, the clarification of the rules of documentation of the right to M(F)C, the removal of unnecessary administrative barriers for filing and consideration of applications, improving the conditions of use by adding new directions. The statistics of M(F)C, changes in the direction of its use and expenditures on these areas are analyzed. Proposals are presented to develop the M(F)C program, to expand its use to better support families with children

Behaviour regulation in the family context in Estonia and Sweden

Pragmatics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boel De Geer ◽  
Tiia Tulviste
Keyword(s):  
Family Context ◽  
Parents And Children ◽  
The Family ◽  
Sentence Form ◽  
Controlling Behaviour ◽  
Families With Children

The aim of the study is to compare the regulatory speech used by parents and children in three different groups: Swedes in Sweden, and Estonians in Estonia and Sweden. 54 families with children of 9-13 were videotaped during mealtime. All regulatory speech aimed at controlling behaviour was identified and coded according to sentence form used for regulation as well as outcome (response). Estonians in Estonia used behaviour directives most frequently, and favoured the direct imperative form of regulatory language over declaratives and questions used by Estonians and Swedes in Sweden. Although the outcomes of regulation were mainly compliance in all groups, Estonian children living in Sweden complied significantly less than Swedish children. The results also show that Estonian children in Sweden have been influenced by the Swedish preference for regulating by declaratives and questions, using more questions and fewer imperatives than their mothers.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Pola Asuh Orang Tua Kristen Terhadap Kecerdasan Emosi Anak

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-152
Author(s):  
Kristina Herawati
Keyword(s):  
Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Important Thing ◽  
The Bible ◽  
Parents And Children ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Right ◽  
Effective Education

Pendidikan adalah hal yang sangat penting untuk dilakukan, pendidikan yang paling efektif terjadi adalah pendidikan di dalam keluarga. Oleh karena keluarga adalah tempat di mana orang tua dan anak lebih banyak menghabiskan waktu, dibanding sekolah atau gereja. Keluarga adalah satu lembaga pertama yang tercatat dalam Alkitab. Keluarga dirancang dan ditetapkan oleh Allah, jauh sebelum umat pilihan atau bangsa terpilih eksis. Tetapi kurangnya penerapan pola asuh yang benar kepada anak pada masa pra sekolah sehingga berdampak pada pembentukan karakter dan emosi yang kurang baik. Dengan demikian, orang tua yang mengerti pola asuh yang benar dan menjalankannya, akan mempengaruhi kecerdasan emosi anak. Inilah yang akan dibahas oleh penulis dengan membahas pengaruh pola asuh orang tua Kristen terhadap kecerdasan emosi anak usia 6-12 tahun. Education is a very important thing to do, the most effective education occurs is education in the family. Because the family is a place where parents and children spend more time, than school or church. The family is the first institution recorded in the Bible. The family was designed and established by God, long before the chosen people or chosen people existed. But the lack of proper adoption of parenting to children in pre-school has an impact on the formation of character and emotions that are not good. Thus, parents who understand the right parenting and practice it, will affect children's emotional intelligence. This is what the author will discuss by discussing the influence of parenting Christian parents on emotional intelligence of children aged 6-12 years.

scholarly journals Improving the situation of children in divorced families — the way to reduce poverty in Russia

POPULATION ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-32
Author(s):  
Lyudmila Rzhanitsyna ◽  
Sergey Rybalchenko
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Child Support ◽  
Child Poverty ◽  
Poverty Rate ◽  
Full Potential ◽  
National Goal ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Parents And Children ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

The level of child poverty in Russia is almost twice the national poverty rate. According to UNICEF's definition, "children living in poverty are those who are deprived of the material, spiritual and emotional resources necessary for survival, development and prosperity, which deprives them of the opportunity to enjoy their rights, to reach their full potential and to participate as full and equal members of society". One of the reasons for child poverty in Russia is the evasion of parents living separately from children from paying child support. The total alimony debt in Russia reached 156 billion rubles in 2020 and continues to grow. According to Rosstat and the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation, one in five children under the age of 16, for whom there is arrears on alimony payments appointed by the court, does not receive money. That's almost 1.5 million children. The Family Code of the Russian Federation has established the right of every child to receive maintenance from parents, and children should not experience deprivation due to their parents' irresponsibility, otherwise society and public authorities should be obliged to take special care of children, who do not have sufficient means of subsistence. This algorithm of actions is also contained in paragraph 4 of Article 67.1 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation — the State takes over the responsibilities of parents in relation to children left without care. To achieve the national goal of reducing the level of poverty, fundamentally new approaches to the system of alimony recovery are required, including creation of a State Alimony Fund in Russia, as well as improving the value of the child's quality of life in the eyes of parents and society, strengthening the moral responsibility of parents for children.

The Children Act 1989: Success or failure

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simonetta Agnello Hornby
Keyword(s):  
Social Services ◽  
Extended Family ◽  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Governmental Agency ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Children And Parents ◽  
The Family ◽  
The World ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Right

Heralded as the most progressive legislation of the world, the Children Act of 1989 revolutionized children’s law in England and Wales. It is underpinned by six principles: the supremacy of the child’s interest in all decisions concerning their upbringing and education; the recognition that it is best for any chid to be brought up by their blood family, that his religious and ethnic background must be respected, and that siblings should not be separated; the abolition of the stigma of illegitimacy and its replacement with the attribution at birth of paternal responsibility to the child’s father; the unification of public and private law, and the creation of the ‘menu’ of Residence, Contact, Prohibition, and Specific Issue orders available to the court; the establisment of the new principle that time is of the essence in all cases relating to children; and the creation of the presumption that ‘no order is better than an order’ thus the ingerence of the court must be minimal. I believed in those principles and in the benefits that the Children Act would bring to my clients—children and parents alike. I had some reservations: the system was expensive to implement on two counts: first, it gave the child a ‘guardian’ (a qualified social worker appointed by the court through CAFCASS, a governmental agency), as well as their own solicitor paid for by Legal Aid, as was the representative of the parents, who had the right to instruct independent experts; second, because its requirements of social services and other agencies involved further training and increased resources, as well as further involvement of the judiciary, and increased court time. Hornby and Levy were at the forefront of its implementation: our entire staff received in-house training that was open to other disciplines, within the spirit of cooperation between agencies that permeated the Act and its implementation. I also lectured in Britain and abroad and was proud to tell others that social services were under a duty to keep families united, rather than removing children from parents, and make efforts to return to the family the child removed from it, or if this failed, to place the child within the extended family, or with adoptive parents, within a year.

Family Values

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry Brighouse ◽  
Adam Swift
Keyword(s):  
Social Inequality ◽  
Intimate Relationships ◽  
Social Institution ◽  
Family Values ◽  
Healthy Development ◽  
Parents And Children ◽  
The Family ◽  
Familial Relationship ◽  
The Right ◽  
Parent Child Relationships

The family is hotly contested ideological terrain. Some defend the traditional two-parent heterosexual family while others welcome its demise. Opinions vary about how much control parents should have over their children's upbringing. This book provides a major new theoretical account of the morality and politics of the family, telling us why the family is valuable, who has the right to parent, and what rights parents should—and should not—have over their children. The book argues that parent–child relationships produce the “familial relationship goods” that people need to flourish. Children's healthy development depends on intimate relationships with authoritative adults, while the distinctive joys and challenges of parenting are part of a fulfilling life for adults. Yet the relationships that make these goods possible have little to do with biology, and do not require the extensive rights that parents currently enjoy. Challenging some of our most commonly held beliefs about the family, the book explains why a child's interest in autonomy severely limits parents' right to shape their children's values, and why parents have no fundamental right to confer wealth or advantage on their children. The book reaffirms the vital importance of the family as a social institution while challenging its role in the reproduction of social inequality and carefully balancing the interests of parents and children.

Quality of sibling relationship and family functioning in Greek families with school-age children

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-205
Author(s):  
Anastasia Tsamparli ◽  
Helias Halios
Keyword(s):  
Family Functioning ◽  
Birth Order ◽  
Sibling Relationship ◽  
University Education ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
School Age ◽  
Parents And Children ◽  
The Family ◽  
Families With Children

AbstractThe aim of the current study is to examine the quality of sibling relationships in relation to family functioning in Greek families with typically developing school-age children. The sample: 251 intact Greek families with two children (251 parents — 1 parent participated from each family — and 251 children). Research instruments: (a) the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales III (FACES III; Olson, 1986), administered to both parents and children), (b) the Sibling Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ; Furman& Buhrmester, 1985); and (c) the family constellation: number of children, birth order, gender and socioeconomic level. According to the findings, the quality of a sibling relationship is associated with family cohesion and adaptability. Regarding children’s gender, the Warmth/Closeness scale is lower in families with children of different gender compared to families with children of the same gender. Regarding birth order, first-born children report higher levels of cohesion (ideal and actual), as well as higher Warmth/Closeness (children and parents), in comparison to the second-born children. Regarding parental educational level, parents and children report a higher level when it comes to ideal family and cohesion type (ideal level), as well as higher Warmth/Closeness (parents) when at least one of the parents has a university education background.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document