scholarly journals Problems of Implementation of Principles of Transparency and Accessibility in the System of Scientific Personnel Certification in the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 11-22
Author(s):  
A. V. Bekin ◽  
B. A. Zbaratskiy
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Federal Legislation ◽  
Official Publication ◽  
Local Regulation ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Scientific Personnel ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right ◽  
Academic Degrees

The paper is devoted to the implementation of the principles of transparency and accessibility in legal acts regulating the procedure of academic certification in Russia. The authors highlight two characteristic properties of legal principles of accessibility and transparency. The paper examines the manifestation of principles of transparency and accessibility in federal legislation and local regulations of organizations that have the right to award academic degrees independently. The authors have determined local regulations subject to mandatory official publication in order to have the principle of publicity implemented. The paper provides examples of violations of the requirements of the current legislation in local regulations on the issues of independent awarding of academic degrees. The conclusion is made about the need for additional study of local regulation in order to eliminate contradictions and bring it into line with the principles of transparency and accessibility.

scholarly journals Some Issues of the Implementation of Publicity and Availability Principles in the System of Performance Review of Academic Personnel in the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
Sergey S. Zenin ◽  
◽  
Aleksandr V. Bekin ◽  
Bogdan A. Zbaratskiy ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Federal Legislation ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Performance Review ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right ◽  
Academic Personnel ◽  
Academic Degrees

The article discusses the implementation of the principles of transparency and accessibility in the regulations governing the procedure of scientific attestations in Russia. The characteristic properties of the legal principles of accessibility and publicity are highlighted. The article examines the manifestation of the principles of transparency and accessibility in federal legislation and local regulations of organizations that have the right to independently award academic degrees.

scholarly journals Removal of the Governor by the President of the Russian Federation due to the Loss of Trust for Corruption and Improper Performance of Duties : Problems of Theory and Implementation

Lex Russica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 20-32
Author(s):  
A. A. Kondrashev
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Direct Democracy ◽  
Internal Conflict ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Constituent Entity ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Senior Officer ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

The paper has examined the federal legislation, as well as law enforcement related to such a measure of constitutional and legal responsibility of the head of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation as removal from the position of the governor by the President of the Russian Federation due to loss of trust. The paper analyzes the evolution of legal consolidation and application of this constitutional and legal sanction for the period from 2005, the bases and mechanism of its implementation, as well as a number of problems related to the practice of its application in Russia. The author has identified gaps and conflicts (contradiction of the grounds of this constitutional sanction to the main and basic legal principles of direct democracy and presumption of innocence), has analyzed “uncertainty” (revealed the legal fictiousness of the grounds for the loss of trust) and “amorphousness” of its application (inconsistency of the procedure of prosecution with the principles of federalism, norms of criminal procedure legislation and internal conflict of norms of law, i.e. “corruptional” grounds of the loss of trust). The author suggests a different model of application of such a sanction as removal from the position of the head of the constituent entity. Thus, he suggests that deprivation of the President of the right to remove the governor of the constituent entity due to the loss of trust for corruption contradicts the foundations of the federal system and the legal nature of the institute of higher official of a constituent entity. It is proposed to assign the right to apply this sanction to the highest representative (legislative) body of the constituent entity of the Federation, permitting the President of Russia to remove the senior officer for promulgation of legal acts that do not comply with the Constitution and federal laws (confirmed by a court decision) and failure to comply with the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals Judicial Legislative Initiative in Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation

2019 ◽  
pp. 29-37
Author(s):  
В A. Zbaratsky
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Federal Courts ◽  
Federal Legislation ◽  
Structural Units ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legislative Initiative ◽  
The Right

The article investigates the legislative initiative of judicial authorities at the level of constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Comparing legislative initiative assigned to the courts under the Constitution of the Russian Federation and constitutions (charters) of subjects of the Russian Federation, the author has come to the conclusion that the content of the right to legislative initiative in the vast majority of constituent entities of the Russian Federation is similar to the content thereof in federal legislation. The author investigates various approaches of constituent entities’ law-makers to granting legislative initiative to judicial bodies. The author singles out peculiarities of assigning judicial initiative not only to the judicial bodies at the level of constituent entities of the Russian Federation (constitutional (statutory, charter) courts), but also to federal courts (courts of general jurisdiction and arbitrazh courts). The author distinguishes the concepts of judicial bodies, presidents of courts and courts presidiums as subjects endowed with the right of legislative initiative. Analyzing the variety of wordings regarding the allocation of judicial authorities, their officials and internal structural units, the author concludes that the right to legislative initiative could be possessed only by the court as a whole. According to the author, some constitutions (charters) of constituent entities of the Russian Federation contain obvious contradiction to federal legislation. However, it is still necessary to empower the courts with the right of legislative initiative at the level of constituent entities of the Russian Federation.

The right to life: A comparative analysis of the relevant norms of the Constitutions of the Republic of Azerbaijan and Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Human Right ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The relevance of the work is determined by the fact that the right to life belongs to the basic constitutional human rights, therefore, its observance and protection is the duty of the state. Despite its undeniable importance, today the right to life anywhere in the world is not really ensured in sufficient quantities. The constitutional consolidation of the right to life raises a number of issues related to the concept, nature, legislative and practical implementation of this right. It should be noted that various aspects of the human right to life were considered in the scientific works of G.B. Romanovsky, O.G. Selikhova, T.M. Fomichenko, A.B. Borisova, V.A. Ershov and other Russian authors. The aim of the study is to study and comparative analysis of the legal content of the constitutional norm that defines the right to life, to comprehend and identify possible problems of the implementation of this right. To achieve this goal, this article discusses relevant issues of ensuring the right to life, proclaimed by Article 20 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and Article 27 of the Constitution of Azerbaijan Republic. The results of a comparative analysis of these constitutional norms and the relevant norms of industry law allow us to determine, that there is no contradiction between Article 20 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the norms of the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation, which imply the death penalty as an exceptional measure of punishment, because a moratorium has been imposed on the death penalty in the Russian Federation since April 16, 1997. However, after the abolition of the death penalty in the criminal legislation of the Republic of Azerbaijan in 1998, there was a discrepancy between parts II and III of Article 27 of the Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the criminal legislation of Azerbaijan Republic that requires the introduction of the necessary changes in the content of the analyzed constitutional norm. The value of the work is determined by the fact that the introduction of appropriate changes will contribute to the further improvement of the Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the effective implementation of the right to life of everyone.

THE VALUE OF LOVE IN THE SYSTEM OF FORMATION OF THE PROFESSIONAL MATURITY OF THE EDUCATOR

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (10(79)) ◽  
pp. 12-18
Author(s):  
G. Bubyreva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Right

The existing legislation determines the education as "an integral and focused process of teaching and upbringing, which represents a socially important value and shall be implemented so as to meet the interests of the individual, the family, the society and the state". However, even in this part, the meaning of the notion ‘socially significant benefit is not specified and allows for a wide range of interpretation [2]. Yet the more inconcrete is the answer to the question – "who and how should determine the interests of the individual, the family and even the state?" The national doctrine of education in the Russian Federation, which determined the goals of teaching and upbringing, the ways to attain them by means of the state policy regulating the field of education, the target achievements of the development of the educational system for the period up to 2025, approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of October 4, 2000 #751, was abrogated by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 29, 2014 #245 [7]. The new doctrine has not been developed so far. The RAE Academician A.B. Khutorsky believes that the absence of the national doctrine of education presents a threat to national security and a violation of the right of citizens to quality education. Accordingly, the teacher has to solve the problem of achieving the harmony of interests of the individual, the family, the society and the government on their own, which, however, judging by the officially published results, is the task that exceeds the abilities of the participants of the educational process.  The particular concern about the results of the patriotic upbringing served as a basis for the legislative initiative of the RF President V. V. Putin, who introduced the project of an amendment to the Law of RF "About Education of the Russian Federation" to the State Duma in 2020, regarding the quality of patriotic upbringing [3]. Patriotism, considered by the President of RF V. V. Putin as the only possible idea to unite the nation is "THE FEELING OF LOVE OF THE MOTHERLAND" and the readiness for every sacrifice and heroic deed for the sake of the interests of your Motherland. However, the practicing educators experience shortfalls in efficient methodologies of patriotic upbringing, which should let them bring up citizens, loving their Motherland more than themselves. The article is dedicated to solution to this problem based on the Value-sense paradigm of upbringing educational dynasty of the Kurbatovs [15].

SOME PROBLEMIC ISSUES ARISING DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF A PUNISHMENT IN THE FORM OF DEPRIVATION OF THE RIGHT TO TAKE A CERTAIN POSITION OR TO PERFORM CERTAIN ACTIVITIES

2020 ◽  
pp. 54-57
Author(s):  
Ирина Александровна Лакина ◽  
Анна Борисовна Назарова
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Criminal Punishment ◽  
Initial Investigation ◽  
Scientific Analysis ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Character

В статье рассматриваются проблемные вопросы, возникающие при организации исполнения уголовного наказания в виде лишения права занимать определенную должность или заниматься определенной деятельностью. Анализируются статистические данные о количестве назначенных судами Российской Федерации наказаний и мер уголовно-правового характера, не связанных с лишением свободы, о количестве осужденных лиц, состоящих и прошедших по учетам уголовно-исполнительных инспекций Российской Федерации. Авторами статьи обосновывается необходимость осуществления первоначальных розыскных мероприятий в отношении изучаемой категории подучетных лиц и, как следствие, внесение соответствующих изменений в действующее законодательство Российской Федерации, в связи с тем что в настоящее время положения указанных нормативно-правовых актов не предполагают проведение первоначальных розыскных мероприятий и объявления в розыск осужденных к уголовному наказанию в виде лишения права занимать определенную должность или заниматься определенной деятельностью. В формате рекомендаций, направленных на повышение эффективности проведения первоначальных розыскных мероприятий, приводятся конкретные предложения, ориентированные на снижение показателя заведенных розыскных дел. Авторами статьи акцентируется внимание на необходимости дальнейшего научного анализа теоретических, практических и концептуальных аспектов, связанных с правоотношениями, возникающими при реализации уголовного наказания в виде лишения права занимать определенную должность или заниматься определенной деятельностью. The article deals with the problematic issues arising in the organization of execution of criminal punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to hold a certain position or engage in certain activities. Statistical data on the number ordered by the courts of the Russian Federation of punishments and measures criminally-legal character are not related to deprivation of freedom, the number of convicted persons which held the records of the penal inspections of the Russian Federation. The authors of the article substantiates the need to implement the initial investigation governmental activities in the study category of the registered individuals, and as a consequence, appropriate changes to the existing by-law of the Russian Federation, in connection with the, that now provisions of the specified normative legal acts do not assume carrying out initial search actions and announcements in search condemned to criminal punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to occupy a certain position or to be engaged in certain activity. In the format of recommendations aimed at improving the effectiveness of the initial search activities, specific proposals aimed at reducing the rate of opened search cases are presented. The authors of the article focus on the need for further scientific analysis of theoretical, practical and conceptual aspects related to legal relations arising in the execution of criminal punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to hold a certain position or engage in a certain activity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document