scholarly journals Hemithyroidectomy with or without use of drain a randomized prospective clinical study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 566
Author(s):  
Ravi Kumar G. V. ◽  
Madhu B. S. ◽  
Ajay Kumar Jhajharia
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Histopathological Diagnosis ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Drainage Group

Background: The practice of using the drain in thyroid surgery including hemithyroidectomy is common to avoid complications like a hematoma. The aim of this study is to evaluate the necessity of routine drainage in hemithyroidectomy.Methods: In this randomized prospective clinical study conducted in tertiary care government training hospital,60 patients who underwent hemithyroidectomy for various thyroid disorders were randomly allocated to either non-drainage (group A) or drainage (group B). The various complications including hematoma, seroma, wound infection, post-operative pain, the length of hospital stay was then compared.Results: Both groups were comparable according to age, gender, thyroid size and histopathological diagnosis. A total number of 60 patients evaluated among them 45 females (75%) and 15 males (25%) were there. No significant difference in complications was observed between two groups regarding hematoma, wound infection, but the length of hospital stay was significantly reduced in the non-drainage group compared to drainage group (p-0.004), along with the significant reduction in post-operative pain (p-0.001).Conclusions: In present study, author observed that there is a significant reduction in length of hospital stay and post-operative pain in non-drainage group compared to drainage group. So suction drainage should be done in selected patients rather than a routine procedure and it is safe without suction drain especially in hands of experienced surgeons.

scholarly journals APPENDICECTOMY;

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (01) ◽  
pp. 001-005
Author(s):  
JAHANGIR SARWAR KHAN ◽  
UMAR FAROOQ ◽  
HAMID HASSAN
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Post Operative Pain

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare length of hospital stay, pain scores and the rate of wound infectionsbetween laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Design: Randomized Controlled trial. Place and Duration of study: This study wasconducted in surgical unit I Holy Family hospital, Rawalpindi from 1st June 2009 to 31st May 2010. Patients and methods: The patients weredivided into open and laparoscopy groups and their age, sex, time of discharge, pain scores and wound infection rates were compared andanalyzed. Results: Total of 160 patients were included in the study, 80 in each group. There were 58% male and 42% female patients. Mean agewas 22.78 years (±6.2).Post operative pain scores were significantly less in the laparoscopic group (p<0.05). The length of hospital stay in opengroup was 35.10 hrs (±5.4) hours and in the laparoscopic group was 38.70(4.8) hrs with a p value of 0.592.Wound infection was 0.037% in openand 0.025% in the laparoscopic group. Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendectomy is superior in terms of less morbidity and shorter postoperative hospital stay in the setting of an overworked tertiary care surgical floor of a Pakistani hospital.

scholarly journals Drain versus non drain in thyroid surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 26-29
Author(s):  
Fadhil Ahmed Mohialdeen ◽  
Abdul-Wahid M Salih ◽  
Mohammed IM Gubari ◽  
Soran Ameen Hama-law
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Total Thyroidectomy ◽  
Thyroid Surgery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Pain Patient ◽  
Histopathological Diagnosis ◽  
Suction Drain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hospital Stays

The use of a suction drain in thyroid surgery is common practice in order to avoid hematomas or seromas. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of inserting a routine drainage tube after thyroid surgery. In this retrospective study, 102 patients who underwent either a total thyroidectomy for thyroid disorders were assigned to either the drained or the non-drained groups. The length of hospital stays, postoperative pain, patient comfortability and complications were retrieved. Both groups were homogeneous according to age, gender, type of procedure performed, histopathological diagnosis residency and marital status. No significant difference was found between the two groups in post- operative complications, but the length of hospital stay was significantly reduced in non-drained group (p<0.0001), and drained group needed one more dose of analgesics compared to non-drained group to alleviate the post-operative pain.Our findings, suggesting that the use of drain for thyroid surgery cannot lower the incidence of complications. Furthermore, the use of drains may increase length of hospital stay, postoperative-pain,and the need of analgesic and contribute to the discomfort of the patients. Hence, the routine insertion of drains after total thyroidectomy for benign disorders might not be necessary.

scholarly journals Randomized comparative study of conventional minilaparoscopy (5mm) versus modern minilaparoscopy (2.9mm) in patients of infertility

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1539
Author(s):  
Kallol Kumar Roy ◽  
Nandini Joshi nee Jahagirdar ◽  
Murali Subbaiah ◽  
Sunesh Kumar Jain ◽  
J. B. Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Diagnostic Laparoscopy ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Group I ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

Background: To compare diagnostic conventional minilaparoscopy (5mm) with diagnostic modern minilaparoscopy (2.9mm) in patients of infertility in terms of operating time, post-operative pain, hospital stay.Methods: A prospective randomized comparative study was done in a tertiary care centre involving eighty patients of infertility undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy. Diagnostic laparoscopy was done using 5mm laparoscope (Conventional minilaparoscope-Group I) in 40 patients and using 2.9mm laparoscope (Modern minilaparoscope-Group II) in 40 patients. Operating time was measured from the point of skin incision to closure, post op pain was assessed with VAS scoring system, total hours of hospital stay from shifting to day care recovery ward till discharge was noted.Results: Both conventional minilaroscope and modern minilaparoscopes were comparable to each other. Operating time in both groups was similar (7.7min in Group I vs 8.7min in Group II). In both groups, there was no statistically significant difference in post-operative pain as assessed by VAS scoring System (39 in Group I vs 38 in Group II had mild post-op pain and 1 in Group I vs 2 in Group II had moderate pain). The difference in duration of post-op hospital stay in both Group I and group II was not statistically significant (3.5 hours vs 3.3 hours).Conclusions: Both conventional minilaparoscopy (5mm laparoscope) and modern miniaparoscopy (2.9mm laparoscope) are comparable with respect operating time, post-op pain, hospital stay. Modern minilaparoscope is no better than conventional minilaparoscope.

scholarly journals TLH versus TAH: a 2 year retrospective comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 3939
Author(s):  
Anju Dogra ◽  
Vinay Kumar ◽  
Nishu Bhushan
Keyword(s):  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy ◽  
Total Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Background: Laparoscopic hysterectomy has become a widely accepted technique worldwide, since its introduction by Reich in 1989. The aim of the study was to compare the surgical results and intra- operative and post-operative complications between total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH).Methods: Authors conducted a retrospective study at SMGS hospital, GMC Jammu between October 2016 to September 2018, 126 patients who underwent TLH and 126 patients who underwent TAH, were included.Results: Authors observed that there was no significant difference between the two groups in respect to patient’s age, parity and indication of surgery. Duration of surgery was found to be longer in TLH than TAH. The length of hospital stay was less in TLH than TAH. Hb drop was more in TAH group. 25 patients of TAH were given post op blood transfusion but only 9 patients of TLH were given post op blood transfusion. The time to ambulation in patients of TLH was much shorter than TAH. Wound infection was more common in TAH as compared to TLH, 5 patients had wound infection and in 4 patients resuturing was done for wound dehiscence. In 8 patients laparoscopy was converted to laparotomy because of adhesions, vascular injury and in one case because of bowel injury.Conclusions: This study showed that TLH can be safely performed by the experienced surgeon as an alternative to abdominal hysterectomy. It offers several benefits over TAH such as smaller incision, earlier ambulation, shorter hospital stay, faster recovery time and does not increase more serious complications than TAH.

Effect of Chewing Gum on Bowel Motility in Women Undergoing Post-Operative Cesarean Section

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr.Randa Mohammed AboBaker
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Chewing Gum ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Bowel Motility ◽  
Gum Chewing ◽  
Significant Difference

Postoperative Ileus (POI) is one of the most common problems after obstetrics, gynecologic and abdominal surgeries. Sham feeding, such as gum chewing, accelerates the return of bowel function and the length of hospital stay. The present study aims to evaluate the effect of chewing gum on bowel motility in women undergoing post-operative cesarean section. Intervention study was used at the Postpartum Department of Maternity and Children Hospital, KSA. A randomized controlled clinical trial research design. Through a convenience technique, 80 post Caesarian Section (CS) women were included in the study. Data were collected through three tools: Tool (I): Socio-demographic data and reproductive history interview schedule. Tool (II): Postoperative Assessment Sheet. Tool (III): Outcomes of gum chewing and the length of hospital stay.  Method: subjects were assigned randomly into two groups of (40) the experimental and (40) the control. Subjects in the study group were asked to chew two pieces of sugarless gum for 30 min/three times daily in the morning, noon, and evening immediately after recovery from anesthesia and in Postpartum Department; while subjects in the control group followed the hospital routine care. Each woman in both groups was tested abdominally using a stethoscope to auscultate the bowel sounds and asked to report immediately the time of either passing flatus or stool. Results: illustrated that a highly statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups concerning their gum chewing outcomes. Where, P = 0.000. The study concluded that gum chewing is safe, well tolerated and appears to be effective in reducing the incidence and consequences of POI following CS.

Prevalence, Correlates and Management of Hyperglycemia in Diabetic Non-critically Ill Patients at a Tertiary Care Center in Lebanon

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghada El Khoury ◽  
Hanine Mansour ◽  
Wissam K. Kabbara ◽  
Nibal Chamoun ◽  
Nadim Atallah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Diabetic Patients

Background: Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic metabolic disease that affects 387 million people around the world. Episodes of hyperglycemia in hospitalized diabetic patients are associated with poor clinical outcomes and increased morbidity and mortality. Therefore, prevention of hyperglycemia is critical to decrease the length of hospital stay and to reduce complications and readmissions. Objective: The study aims to examine the prevalence of hyperglycemia and assess the correlates and management of hyperglycemia in diabetic non-critically ill patients. Methods: The study was conducted on the medical wards of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Lebanon. A retrospective chart review was conducted from January 2014 until September 2015. Diabetic patients admitted to Internal Medicine floors were identified. Descriptive analysis was first carried out, followed by a multivariable analysis to study the correlates of hyperglycemia occurrence. Results: A total of 235 medical charts were reviewed. Seventy percent of participants suffered from hyperglycemia during their hospital stay. The identified significant positive correlates for inpatient hyperglycemia, were the use of insulin sliding scale alone (OR=16.438 ± 6.765-39.941, p=0.001) and the low frequency of glucose monitoring. Measuring glucose every 8 hours (OR= 3.583 ± 1.506-8.524, p=0.004) and/or every 12 hours (OR=7.647 ± 0.704-79.231, p=0.0095) was associated with hyperglycemia. The major factor perceived by nurses as a barrier to successful hyperglycemia management was the lack of knowledge about appropriate insulin use (87.5%). Conclusion: Considerable mismanagement of hyperglycemia in diabetic non-critically ill patients exists; indicating a compelling need for the development and implementation of protocol-driven insulin order forms a comprehensive education plan on the appropriate use of insulin.

scholarly journals A Study of Factors Affecting the Length of Hospital Stay of COVID-19 Patients by Cox-Proportional Hazard Model in a South Indian Tertiary Care Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110002
Author(s):  
Gayathri Thiruvengadam ◽  
Marappa Lakshmi ◽  
Ravanan Ramanujam
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Hazard Model ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard Model ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Proportional Hazard ◽  
Proportional Hazard Model ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard ◽  
South Indian

Background: The objective of the study was to identify the factors that alter the length of hospital stay of COVID-19 patients so we have an estimate of the duration of hospitalization of patients. To achieve this, we used a time to event analysis to arrive at factors that could alter the length of hospital stay, aiding in planning additional beds for any future rise in cases. Methods: Information about COVID-19 patients was collected between June and August 2020. The response variable was the time from admission to discharge of patients. Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify the factors that were associated with the length of hospital stay. Results: A total of 730 COVID-19 patients were included, of which 675 (92.5%) recovered and 55 (7.5%) were considered to be right-censored, that is, the patient died or was discharged against medical advice. The median length of hospital stay of COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized was found to be 7 days by the Kaplan Meier curve. The covariates that prolonged the length of hospital stay were found to be abnormalities in oxygen saturation (HR = 0.446, P < .001), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (HR = 0.742, P = .003), levels of D-dimer (HR = 0.60, P = .002), lactate dehydrogenase (HR = 0.717, P = .002), and ferritin (HR = 0.763, P = .037). Also, patients who had more than 2 chronic diseases had a significantly longer length of stay (HR = 0.586, P = .008) compared to those with no comorbidities. Conclusion: Factors that are associated with prolonged length of hospital stay of patients need to be considered in planning bed strength on a contingency basis.

Stereotactic Electroencephalography Is Associated With Reduced Pain and Opioid Use When Compared with Subdural Grids: A Case Series

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan P Scoville ◽  
Evan Joyce ◽  
Joshua Hunsaker ◽  
Jared Reese ◽  
Herschel Wilde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been shown to decrease length of hospital stay and opioid use. OBJECTIVE To identify whether surgery for epilepsy mapping via MIS stereotactically placed electroencephalography (SEEG) electrodes decreased overall opioid use when compared with craniotomy for EEG grid placement (ECoG). METHODS Patients who underwent surgery for epilepsy mapping, either SEEG or ECoG, were identified through retrospective chart review from 2015 through 2018. The hospital stay was separated into specific time periods to distinguish opioid use immediately postoperatively, throughout the rest of the stay and at discharge. The total amount of opioids consumed during each period was calculated by transforming all types of opioids into their morphine equivalents (ME). Pain scores were also collected using a modification of the Clinically Aligned Pain Assessment (CAPA) scale. The 2 surgical groups were compared using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS The study identified 43 patients who met the inclusion criteria: 36 underwent SEEG placement and 17 underwent craniotomy grid placement. There was a statistically significant difference in median opioid consumption per hospital stay between the ECoG and the SEEG placement groups, 307.8 vs 71.5 ME, respectively (P = .0011). There was also a significant difference in CAPA scales between the 2 groups (P = .0117). CONCLUSION Opioid use is significantly lower in patients who undergo MIS epilepsy mapping via SEEG compared with those who undergo the more invasive ECoG procedure. As part of efforts to decrease the overall opioid burden, these results should be considered by patients and surgeons when deciding on surgical methods.

scholarly journals Effects of early corticosteroid use in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Hoon Hyun ◽  
Moo Hyun Kim ◽  
Yujin Sohn ◽  
Yunsuk Cho ◽  
Yae Jee Baek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Case Fatality ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Corticosteroid Treatment ◽  
Threshold Value ◽  
Steroid Use ◽  
Corticosteroid Administration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Early Use

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome, and corticosteroids have been considered as possible therapeutic agents for this disease. However, there is limited literature on the appropriate timing of corticosteroid administration to obtain the best possible patient outcomes. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study including patients with severe COVID-19 who received corticosteroid treatment from March 2 to June 30, 2020 in seven tertiary hospitals in South Korea. We analyzed the patient demographics, characteristics, and clinical outcomes according to the timing of steroid use. Twenty-two patients with severe COVID-19 were enrolled, and they were all treated with corticosteroids. Results Of the 22 patients who received corticosteroids, 12 patients (55%) were treated within 10 days from diagnosis. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics. The initial PaO2/FiO2 ratio was 168.75. The overall case fatality rate was 25%. The mean time from diagnosis to steroid use was 4.08 days and the treatment duration was 14 days in the early use group, while those in the late use group were 12.80 days and 18.50 days, respectively. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio, C-reactive protein level, and cycle threshold value improved over time in both groups. In the early use group, the time from onset of symptoms to discharge (32.4 days vs. 60.0 days, P = 0.030), time from diagnosis to discharge (27.8 days vs. 57.4 days, P = 0.024), and hospital stay (26.0 days vs. 53.9 days, P = 0.033) were shortened. Conclusions Among patients with severe COVID-19, early use of corticosteroids showed favorable clinical outcomes which were related to a reduction in the length of hospital stay.

Nosocomial Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-SusceptibleStaphylococcus AureusPrimary Bacteremia: At What Costs?

1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 408-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murray A. Abramson ◽  
Daniel J. Sexton
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Tertiary Care Medical Center ◽  
Matching Criteria ◽  
Nested Case Control

Objective:To determine the attributable hospital stay and costs for nosocomial methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistantS aureus(MRSA) primary bloodstream infections (BSIs).Design:Pairwise-matched (1:1) nested case-control study.Setting:University-based tertiary-care medical center.Patients:Patients admitted between December 1993 and March 1995 were eligible. Cases were defined as patients with a primary nosocomialS aureusBSI; controls were selected according to a priori matching criteria.Measurements:Length of hospital stay and total and variable direct costs of hospitalization.Results:The median hospital stay attributable to primary nosocomial MSSA BSI was 4 days, compared with 12 days for MRSA (P=.023). Attributable median total cost for MSSA primary nosocomial BSIs was $9,661 versus $27,083 for MRSA nosocomial infections (P=.043).Conclusion:Nosocomial primary BSI due toS aureussignificantly prolongs the hospital stay. Primary nosocomial BSIs due to MRSA result in an approximate threefold increase in direct cost, compared with those due to MSSA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document