scholarly journals Case Study of False Statement in Notarial Deed in the Perspective of the Law on Notary Position

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 524
Author(s):  
Annisa Khairul ◽  
Elwi Danil ◽  
Aria Zurnetti
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Official ◽  
False Statement ◽  
Complete Proof ◽  
Injured Party ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences

A notary is assigned as a general official who makes a deed in which the deed issued by the notary is a perfect, strongest, and most complete proof that can guarantee legal certainty. Therefore, a notary must carry out his/her position in accordance with his/her authority as a public official as stipulated in the Law. This thesis applies a normative juridical approach and uses data sources which include primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials obtained through literature and field studies using interview guideline and field observation. The research that had been conducted found that the legal consequences for notarial deed containing false statements from appearers are that the party who feels disadvantaged by the existence of the deed can file a lawsuit in a civil court so the judge can decide to cancel the deed. Thus, the deed no longer has legal force because it has been declared legally flawed and null and void by law. The notary’s liability for the deed containing the false statement from appearer is in terms of administrative liability, civil liability, and criminal liability. The form of criminal sanction imposed on the appearer who gave a false statement for the authentic deed to the notary is that the appearer will be threatened with punishment in accordance with the provisions of Article 266 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code; thus, the appearer deserves to be given a prison sentence. In addition, the form of civil sanction imposed on the appearer who gives false statements for authentic deeds to notaries is in the form of giving compensation to the injured party.

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Notaris yang Membuat Keterangan Palsu dalam Akta Otentik

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-106
Author(s):  
Subiyantana Subiyantana ◽  
Nynda Fatmawati Octarina
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
False Information ◽  
False Statement ◽  
Civil Suit ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences

Abstrak  Seorang notaris terkadang tanpa diketahuinya ada keterangan palsu yang disampaikan para pihak, yang kemudian menjadi dasar pembuatan akta autentik. Perlu dikaji dan dianalisis pertanggungjawaban pidana notaris atas akta yang dibuat berdasarkan keterangan palsu serta mengkaji dan menganalisis akibat hukum yang timbul terhadap akta notaris yang didasarkan pada keterangan palsu.Notaris dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap akta yang dibuat olehnya berdasarkan apa yang dilihat, disaksikan, dan dialaminya dalam suatu perbuatan hukum jika secara sengaja atau lalai, notaris membuat akta palsu sehingga merugikan pihak lain. Pertanggungjawaban secara pidana, seorang notaris harus memenuhi unsur-unsur: melakukan tindak pidana; memiliki kemampuan untuk bertanggung jawab; dengan kesengajaan atau kealpaan; dan tidak ada alasan pemaaf. Terhadap akta notaris yang dibuat berdasarkan keterangan palsu tidak dengan sendirinya mengakibatkan akta tersebut batal demi hukum. Para pihak yang dirugikan dengan keberadaan akta seperti itu harus mengajukan gugatan perdata ke pengadilan untuk membatalkan akta tersebut. Pertanggungjawaban pidana notaris perlu diatur dalam UUJN yang akan datang.  Kata Kunci:Notaris, Pidana, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum   Abstract  A notary sometimes without knowing there is a false statement submitted by the parties, which then becomes the basis for making an authentic deed. It is necessary to study and analyze the criminal liability of notaries for deeds made based on false information as well as to study and analyze the legal consequences arising from notary deeds based on false information. The notary can be held liable for criminal responsibility for the deed made by him based on what he has seen, witnessed and experienced in a legal act if intentionally or negligently, the notary makes a fake deed so that it harms other parties. For criminal responsibility, a notary must fulfill the following elements: committing a criminal act; have the ability to be responsible; intentionally or negligently; and there are no excuses. A notarial deed based on false information does not automatically result in the deed being null and void. The parties who are aggrieved by the existence of such a deed must file a civil suit to the court to cancel the deed. The criminal liability of notaries needs to be regulated in the upcoming UUJN.  Keywords : Notary, Criminal, Act against the law    

scholarly journals Concept Of Criminal Liability Of Notary Law In Deed Making Based On Perjury

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 675
Author(s):  
Ailina Rahmanita Fauzi ◽  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Element Formulation ◽  
False Information ◽  
Civil Suit

Purpose research These are 1) To analyze the concept of criminal responsibility notary law in the deed that is based on false information. 2) To analyze the legal consequences of the deed notary Based on False Information.The method used by researchers is Empirical Juridical (socio legal research)and specification in this study were included descriptive analysis. Even the sources and types of data in this study are primary data obtained from field studies with an interview with a notary in Grobogan. And secondary data obtained from the study of literature. This study uses qualitative data analysis Based on the results of research that 1) Notaries can not be held criminal liability associated with the manufacture of the deed (partijnakten) based on false information, and can not meet the crime of counterfeiting element formulation in Article 266 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. 2) However, the notary can be held criminal liability against relaas deed or deed of officials (ambtelijke akten) if deliberate or careless notary make a fake deed to the detriment others. That made base on notary deed against false information does not in itself result in the deed null and void. The aggrieved party to the existence of the deed as it should file a civil suit to the court to cancel the deed.Keywords : Concept of Law; Criminal Responsibility; Notary; Deed; Specification False

scholarly journals Guilt in compositions of crimes against bases of national safety of Ukraine: problem questions of theory and fixing in a law on criminal responsibility

2019 ◽  
pp. 136-150
Author(s):  
R. Chorniy
Keyword(s):  
National Security ◽  
Criminal Behavior ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Special Part ◽  
Direct Indication ◽  
General Part ◽  
The Law ◽  
Transfer Of Information

The article is devoted to the investigation of forms and types of guilt in the composition of crimes against the basics of national security of Ukraine. The presence of a number of unresolved issues at the theoretical and legal level on this issue actualizes the need for its scientific elaboration and formulation of proposals to improve the provisions of the law on criminal liability. The purpose of the article is to investigate the problematic issues of forms and types of guilt in crimes against the bases of national security of Ukraine, ways of fixing them in the articles of Section I of the Special part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and to develop sound proposals for their solution based on the provisions of the doctrine of criminal law. The article presents the existing approaches of doctrinal interpretation by scientists of the provisions on wine, its forms and types, through which the research of this feature in the crimes under Art. Art. 109 - 114-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. It is proved that the most reasonable is the psychological concept of guilt, which promotes the insertion of forms and types of guilt in crimes against the basics of national security with a formal composition, the elucidation of forms of guilt in the warehouses of crimes provided by articles of section I of the Special part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, in which the legislator directly does not say that it is one of the preconditions for the proper qualification of the act committed by the person. It is proved that the basis for the conclusion about the intentional form of guilt is based on: 1) a direct indication of it in the norm of the law (Part 1 of Article 110 and Part 1 of Article 111 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine); 2) indication of the specific purpose or motives of the criminal behavior (Part 1 of Article 109, Note 1, Part 1 and Part 2 of Article 110-2, Article 113, Part 1 of Article 114 and Article 112 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) ; 3) combination of the above mentioned features in one norm (Part 1 of Article 110 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine); 4) interpretation of terms used in the dispositions of certain articles and / or through the description in the law of the features of the crime (Part 1 of Article 110, Part 2 of Article 109, Part 1 of Article 110, Part 1 of Article 111, Article 112, Article 113, Part 1 of Article 114 and Part 1 of Article 114-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine); 5) interpretation of terms used in other articles of the Special (espionage as a part of state treason) or articles of the General part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (conspiracy to commit the actions provided for in part 1 of Article 109 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (Article 26 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), attempted murder state or public figure (Article 112 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) (part 1 of Article 15 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine); 6) the orientation of socially dangerous acts. The specifics of constructing all these norms testify to the direct intent of the person who committed the respective crime. On this basis it is substantiated that the lack of specification of intent in part 1 of Art. 111 and Part 1 of Art. 110 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine does not contribute to the clarity of the provisions of the Criminal Code in the specified part, and the direct intent in the composition of these crimes is evidenced by: 1) special purpose (Part 1 of Article 110 of the Criminal Code); 2) the terms used in the dispositions of the said articles (“violation of the order… established by the Constitution of Ukraine” (part 1 of Article 110), “transfer of information…, transition to the enemy's side, rendering… assistance in carrying out subversive activities against Ukraine”) ( Part 1 of Article 111); 3) the focus of socially dangerous action. In order to eliminate the ambiguous interpretation of the provisions of Part 1 of Art. 110 and Part 1 of Art. 111 of the Criminal Code it is proposed to amend them accordingly. The forms and type of guilt in the warehouses of crimes with material composition (Part 3 of Article 110, Part 3 and 4 of Article 110-2, Part 2 of Article 114-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) were not clearly reflected in the relevant rules of the law. It is substantiated that the subject's attitude to socially dangerous consequences (deaths of people (h. 3 Art. 110, h. 2 Art. 114-1), other grave consequences (h. 3 Art. 110, h. 4 Art. 110- 2, Part 2 of Article 114-1) Causing considerable property damage (Part 3 of Article 110-2) can be intentional or negligent.

scholarly journals The Rule against Multiple Fictions

1969 ◽  
pp. 160
Author(s):  
Bruce Ziff
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Mens Rea ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
The Law

The author explores aspects of the constructive mens rea found in the Criminal Code, primarily as these relate to accomplices to murder. By examining both basic principles of criminal liability in Canada and the rationale of constructive mens rea, the author seeks to expose the harshness of the current rules, which, when applied to accomplices, tend to compound constructive mens rea provisions. In result, the author proposes that the law adopt a 'rule against multiple fictions', designed to preclude that compounding.

scholarly journals ANALISIS PUTUSAN NOMOR 559/PID.B/2017/PN.BYW. PENGADILAN NEGERI BANYUWANGI TENTANG PENYEBARAN AJARAN KOMUNISME/MARXISME-LENINISME SECARA MELAWAN HUKUM BERDASARKAN PASAL 107A KUHP

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1108
Author(s):  
Andreas Purba ◽  
Firman Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Basic Element ◽  
District Court ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
State Security ◽  
Individual Accountability

Budi Pego was charged with violating Article 107a of Law Number 27 of 1999 concerning Amendment to the Criminal Law Code relating to crimes against State security, because of. Because of these accusations, Budi Pego was charged with a 10-month prison sentence in the Banyuwangi District Court. The problem faced is how criminal liability on the perpetrators of the spread of the teachings of communism in terms of Article 107A of the Criminal Code (case study of decision No. 559 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN.Byw)? The research method used is normative legal research. The results showed that criminal liability on the perpetrators of the spread of the teachings of communism in terms of Article 107A of the Criminal Code in Decision No. 559 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN.Byw. it is inappropriate if this criminal liability model is applied to criminal liability to individuals. Considering that individual accountability still requires actions and mistakes as a basic element of accountability. That is, without any deeds and mistakes, there is no criminal liability. Regarding the Budi Pego case, the policy of criminalizing the ideology of Communism/Marxism-Leninism was decriminalized. If this cannot be done, then the legislators need to revise Law No. 27 of 1999 with the concept of eliminating articles containing formal offenses and replacing them with the formulation of material offenses and in the formulation of the weight of sanctions.

scholarly journals SANKSI YANG DITERIMA OLEH PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTE TANAH DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA AUTENTIK YANG CACAT HUKUM (STUDI PUTUSAN: PN JAKSEL NO. 124/PDT.G/2017/PN.JKT.SEL)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 314
Author(s):  
Andi Pratono ◽  
Tjempaka Tjempaka
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Community People ◽  
Is Theory ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Made In

Indonesia is the law of state or law state, as a law state country, Indonesia must have 3(three) important element such as legal certainty, justice, and expediency. Those main elements represent all the law state. In community, people everyday acts always relate to legal act, such as contract, buying or selling object that promised. To ensure those legal act have the ability perfect proof power, those legal act poured in the form of deed. In buying and selling land, a deed of sale and purchase must be made in front authorized official like land deed officer. However land deed officer as public official do make mistake on duty, with the result that party at a disadvantage. Party that loss because of mistake land deed officer, do ask for responsibility by suing the land deed officer to compensate the losses. Land deed officer in carrying out their duties must apply the precautionary principle so as to minimize any mistakes in making the deed. Author is using normative legal research methods, supported by a data which is theory and interviews some expert in land deed officer and Code of Ethics. The legal consequences to the land deed officer due the legal acts are against the law, which is a sanction will be given. The sanction will divided in three types such as sanction according to the Civil Law, Criminal Law and Code of Ethics or Government Regulation about land deed officer.

Cyber crime, computer crime or cyber offense? The analysis of the features of a terminology application

2021 ◽  
pp. 85-90
Author(s):  
R. Baranenko
Keyword(s):  
Computer Networks ◽  
Cyber Security ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Computer Systems ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Computer Crime ◽  
International Treaties ◽  
Computer Data ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
The Law

Today cybercrime and computer terrorism are identified as one of the threats to Ukraine’s national security in the information sphere. Cybersecurity measures include achieving and maintaining security features in the resources of an institution or users, aimed at preventing relevant cyber threats. Cybercrime is a set of criminal offenses committed in cyberspace by computer systems or by using computer networks and other means of access to cyberspace, within computer systems or networks, as well as against computer systems, computer networks and computer data, has been widely developed. The paper considers such terms as «computer crime», «information crime», «crime in the field of computer information», «crimes in the field of information technology». Scientific works of domestic and foreign researchers on the issues of countering cybercrime are analyzed. The connection of the concept of «cybersecurity» with the terms «cybercrime», «computer crime» and «cybercrime» the concepts of «cybercrime» was given. The difference in the interpretation of the concepts «cybersecurity» and «information security» was considered. The definitions of «cybercrime», «computer crime» and «cyber offense» were given for comparison. Their main features were considered. The concept of «computer victimhood» and its components were considered. With the introduction of the institute of criminal offenses in the national criminal law, the terms «cybercrime» and «computer crime» should lose their relevance, as evidenced by the change of title of Chapter XVI of the Criminal Code of Ukraine to «Criminal offenses in the use of electronic computing machines (computers), systems and computer networks and telecommunications networks». Therefore, instead, we can recommend the use of the term «cyber offense», which we propose to understand as «socially dangerous criminal act in cyberspace and/or using it, liability for which is provided by the law of Ukraine on criminal liability and/or which is recognized as a criminal offense by international treaties of Ukraine, and cybercrime is a set of cyber offences». It is clear that this will require the introduction of appropriate terminological changes in the Law of Ukraine «On the Basic Principles of Cyber Security of Ukraine» and other regulations.

GÄFGEN V. GERMANY. CASE STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 138 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-235
Author(s):  
KRYSTYNA PATORA ◽  
EMIL ŚWIĄDER
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
The Law

The article focuses on the case of Gäfgen v. Germany, which con-cerns the restrictions imposed on police offi cers who work on cases involving terror and violence posing a risk to human life, and on the ones who have to make decisions protecting victims’ lives. The choice of measures serving the protection of the highest value, i.e. human life, is not easy. At the same time, police offi cers are assessed in terms of criminal law as regards the protection of the basic human rights enjoyed by perpetrators who pose a risk to other people’s lives. The case of Gäfgen v. Germany regards the choice of values, and the criminal liability of police offi cers, connected with thereof, as well as the problem of the admissibility of evidence obtained in breach of the law in criminal proceedings, and the limitations of the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.

scholarly journals Tanggung Jawab Notaris atas Pemalsuan yang Dilakukan oleh Klien dalam Proses Pembuatan Akta

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 583-596
Author(s):  
Ayu Rizkie ◽  
Muhammad Arifin ◽  
Ramlan Ramlan
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Legal Consequences

Notary is a public official who is authorized to make an authentic deed whose authority has been determined by law, in fact there are not a few notaries who commit violations or crimes in making a deed so as to result in the emergence of criminal acts, it can be seen in the decision of the Padang District Court Number 535 / Pid.B / 2013 / PN.Pdg, in this case the notary public commits an act of forgery so that the notary is liable to criminal liability against him. This writing aims to review and analyze the legal consequences of the deed which in the process of making that contain elements of forgery and analyze criminal liability against a notary in the Padang District Court's decision No. 535 / Pid.B / 2013 / PN.Pdg. the results of this paper show that the legal consequences of the deed which in the process of making it contain elements of forgery can be canceled, the cancellation of a deed is a sanction against legal actions that contain elements of juridical defects (causes of cancellation) and also has no legal consequences since the cancellation of parties referred to in the deed. The criminal liability against the notary public in the decision of the Padang District Court Number 535 / Pid.B / 2013 / PN.Pdg, has fulfilled both elements in terms of the ability to be responsible and errors, and the absence of forgiving reasons, all three elements have been fulfilled so that the legal notary as the defendant can be held liable for criminal action against him.

scholarly journals Grounds and Conditions for the Application of Restrictive Measures Applied to Persons who have Committed Domestic Violence

2021 ◽  
pp. 100-110
Author(s):  
Tetiana NIKIFOROVA
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Restrictive Measure ◽  
The Law ◽  
Restrictive Measures ◽  
National Police

The grounds and conditions for the application of restrictive measures applied to persons, who have committed domestic violence, are provided in Art. 911 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. It is established that in the science of criminal law there is a unanimous position that the basis for the application of restrictive measures under Art. 911 of the Criminal Code is the commission by a person of a crime related to domestic violence, and the conditions are: 1) sentencing a person not related to imprisonment; 2) release of a person from criminal liability on the grounds provided by the Criminal Code; 3) release of a person from punishment on the grounds provided by the Criminal Code. These conditions are alternative. The content of the concept of «crime related to domestic violence» is analyzed and it is established that it should be understood more broadly than the act provided for in Art. 1261 of the Criminal Code «Domestic Violence». It is proposed to add to Art. 911 of the Criminal Code a note explaining the meaning of the term «criminal offense related to domestic violence», where it is necessary to note that this concept is broader than the crime under Art. 1261 of the Criminal Code. The content of each of the conditions of application of restrictive measures is analyzed. It has been established that in the application of restrictive measures during the imposition of non-custodial sentences in practice there are problems with the interpretation of the relevant concept. It is proposed to clarify the meaning of the concept of «punishment not related to imprisonment» in Art. 911 of the Criminal Code. It is also established that the application of restrictive measures in releasing a person from criminal liability is a declarative norm and is subject to exclusion from the conditions of application of restrictive measures due to the incompatibility of the latter with the nature of exemption from criminal liability. The legislation clearly regulates the procedure for applying restrictive measures to persons released from serving a probation sentence. A number of problems that arise during the control over the behaviour of persons to whom restrictive measures have been applied by the probation authorities have also been identified. The solution to these problems is possible by harmonizing the provisions of the Criminal Code and the Law of Ukraine «On Probation», as well as other regulations governing the activities of probation bodies. It is proposed to refer the application of restrictive measures to supervisory probation, which will lead to a number of changes to the articles of the Law of Ukraine «On Probation» in terms of regulation of supervisory probation, to refer to probation subjects persons subject to restrictive measures, and to exclude the fact that it is assigned to a person released from serving a probation sentence, and in the regulations governing the development and implementation of probation programs to provide for their application to persons to whom restrictive measures have been applied. It is concluded that the probation body should be endowed with a coordinating function to implement all restrictive measures and it is necessary at the level of bylaws to establish a clear procedure for interaction of the probation body with the National Police, local state administrations and local governments to control the behaviour of individuals, which the appropriate restrictive measure is applied.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document