scholarly journals The Measurement of Bank’s Performance; Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital to Fulfill the Qualified ASEAN Bank’s Criteria

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rifzaldi Nasri ◽  
Nuraini .
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Commercial Bank ◽  
Research Design ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Performance Risk

The purpose of this study is to analyze the level of performance of Indonesian banks that meet the Qualified ASEAN Bank (QAB) in terms of aspects of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earning, Capital. The research design is descriptive comparative with quantitative methods. The sampling technique used is Purposive Sampling from Indonesia’s national commercial bank which has the largest capital in ASEAN. The number of samples obtained was three banks, namely, Bank Mandiri, BRI Bank,andBCABank.TheresultsofthestudyshowthatonlyBCAbankshavethebest averageRGECvaluecomparedtoBankMandiriandBRIBank.BCABankcanmeetthe QAB criteria. Therefore, the Bank of BCA can rank I as a QAB Bank. This research is expected to provide information about the importance of measuring RGEC as a basis for meeting Qualified ASEAN Bank standards

scholarly journals Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Mandiri Syariah Dengan Metode Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governace, Earnings and Capital

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 724
Author(s):  
Anik Anik ◽  
Suhesti Ningsih
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Production Factors ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive ◽  
Health Rating

The purpose of this research is to see the soundness level of Bank Syariah Mandiri with the method of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings and Capital. The research method uses quantitative methods. Production factors in the RGEC method are the risk profile using credit risk (NPF), liquidity risk (FDR), income (ROA, ROE and BOPO) and capital (CAR). On the results of Good Corporate Governance using data processed and obtained from PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri. The object of this research is PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri. The sampling technique in this study using purposive sampling. This research period is 2013-2017. The data analysis technique used in this research is quantitative descriptive and using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings and Car), as for the benchmarks to determine the soundness level of a bank after each examination, namely by determining the results of the study classified into the bank's health rating. The results showed that the health of PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri which uses the Risk Profile approach, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital as a whole can be said that Bank Syariah Mandiri is a fairly healthy bank.

scholarly journals Peran Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Profitabilitas Perbankan Syariah

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Surepno Surepno ◽  
Minoto Minoto
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Commercial Bank ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Good Corporate Governance

This study aims to analyze and obtain empirical evidence of the contribution of Good Corporate Governance on return on assets (ROA) as a proxy of sharia banking profitability in the period of 2010-2016. Populations of this research are sharia commercial bank registered in Bank Indonesia in the period of 2010 to 2016. By using purposive sampling technique, there are 7 sharia banks from 13 sharia banks in Indonesia during the period of 2010-2016. Furthermore, research data is obtained from GCG reports that have been published by sharia banking in the period of 2010-2016. The data is analyzed by descriptive analysis and regression analysis. Results show that GCG not contribution for profitability proxied by ROA. Based on the results, it can be concluded that Good Corporate Governance does not affect the profitability of sharia banking. Good Corporate Governance in sharia banking is still not effective and efficient as described by high remuneration and special facilities received by the board in sharia banking.

TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN PENDEKATAN METODE RGEC PADA BANK PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH DIY

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Edy Anan ◽  
Roni Albarqis
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Commercial Bank ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
Profitability Assessment ◽  
Bank Soundness

ABSTRACTThis study is aimed to determine the soundness of commercial bank at PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY during the years 2011 until 2015 based on RGEC method that consisted of risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings and capital. The method that used to collect data isnonparticipant observation by documenting. Descriptive analysis technique based on the Bank Indonesia Circular Letter No. 13/24/DPNP about Assessment of Commercial Bank Soundness. The results show that the soundness level of Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY in 2011 until 2015 wasproved. NPL and LDR that measured Risk Profile factor prove a well executed risk management. Good Corporate Governance factor shows BPD DIY has applied corporate governance well. Earnings factor or profitability assessment consist of ROA and NIM has increased and this sign of theincreasing of total assets owned by BPD DIY that followed by increasing of profit gained by BPD DIY. Using the CAR indicator, the author proved that BPD DIY has good Capital factor, which is above Bank Indonesia provision that 8%. Conclution of the result showed that soundness level ofBank Pembangunan Daerah DIY in 2011 until 2015 overall was in the first place of composite ranked with a very healthy predicate and the total of composite score for each year is 93%, 93% , 97%, 97% and 97%.ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat kesehatan bank pada PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY selama tahun 2011 hingga 2015 berdasarkan metode RGEC yang terdiri dari risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings dan capital. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah observasi nonpartisipan dengan cara dokumentasi. Teknik analisis deskriptif dengan berpedoman pada Surat Edaran Bank Indonesia No. 13/24/DPNP tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kesehatan BPD DIY pada tahun 2011 sampai dengan 2015 secara keseluruhan dapat dikatakan bank yang sehat. Faktor Risk Profile yang dinilai melalui NPL dan LDR secara keseluruhan menggambarkan pengelolaan risiko yangtelah dilaksanakan dengan baik. Faktor Good Corporate Governance, BPD DIY sudah menerapkan tata kelola perusahaan dengan baik. Faktor Earnings atau rentabilitas yang penilaiannya terdiri dari ROA dan NIM mengalami kenaikan dan hal ini menandakan bertambahnya jumlah aset yang dimiliki BPD DIY diikuti dengan bertambahnya keuntungan yang didapat oleh BPD DIY. Dengan menggunakan indikator CAR, peneliti membuktikan bahwa BPD DIY memiliki faktor Capital yang baik, yaitu diatas ketentuan Bank Indonesia sebesar 8%. Kesimpulan hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY pada tahun 2011 hingga 2015 secara keseluruhan berada pada peringkat komposit satu dengan predikat sangat sehat serta masing-masing total nilai komposit sebesar 93%, 93%, 97% , 97% dan 97%

scholarly journals ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN KINERJA KEUANGAN BANK PEMERINTAH (BUMN) DAN BANK UMUM SWASTA NASIONAL (BUSN) DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE PENDEKATAN RGEC (RISK PROFIL E,GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNING AND CAPITAL)YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA TAHUN 2014-2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Debby Suciani ◽  
Yulita Triadiarti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
T Test ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Return On Equity ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Whitney Test ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Mann Whitney Test ◽  
Capital Adequacy Ratio

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji apakah terdapat perbedaan kinerja keuangan yang signifikan antara bank pemerintah (BUMN) dengan Bank Umum Swasta Nasional (BUSN) di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2014-2018. . Kinerja keuangan diukur dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan RGEC yaitu Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning, and Capital. Aspek Risk Profile diukur menggunakan rasio Non Performing Loan (NPL),aspek Good Corporate Governance diukur menggunakan nilai komposit GCG, aspek Earning diukur menggunakan rasio Return on Equity (ROE), dan aspek Capital diukur menggunakan Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh bank yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) tahun 2014 - 2018. Dari 42 perbankan yang terdaftar, dipilih 4 bank pemerintah (BUMN) dan 4 Bank Umum Swasta Nasional dengan menggunakan purposive sampling. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder, yang diperoleh dari situs www.idx.co.id, www.ojk.go.id, dan www.bi.go.id. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis deskriptif kuantitatif, uji normalitas, Independent Sample T-test dan Mann Whitney Test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan kinerja keuangan yang signifikan antara bank pemerintah (BUMN) dan Bank Umum Swasta Nasional (BUSN) dilihat dari aspek Earning yang diukur dengan rasio Return on Equity (ROE). Dan tidak terdapat perbedaan kinerja keuangan yang signifikan antara bank pemerintah (BUMN) dan Bank Umum Swasta Nasional (BUSN) jika dilihat dari aspek Risk Profile yang diukur dengan rasio Non Performing Loan (NPL), aspek Good Corporate Governance yang diukur dari nilai komposit GCG, dan aspek Capital yang diukur dengan Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). Kata Kunci : Perbandingan, Kinerja Keuangan, Non Performing Loan, Nilai Komposit GCG, Return on Equity, dan Capital Adequacy Ratio. 

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, PROFITABILITY AND COMPANY SIZE ON SUSTAINABILITY REPORT DISCLOSURE

2021 ◽  
pp. 69-80
Author(s):  
Putri Renalita Sutra Tanjung
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Company Size ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Sustainability Report

This study aims to analyze the influence of Good Corporate Governance, Profitability, Good Corporate Governance, and Company Size on Sustainability Report Disclosure. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. The research was conducted on the participating companies of the Indonesia Sustainability Report Award (ISRA) during the 2015-2019 period. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Good Corporate Governance, Profitability and Company Size on Sustainability Report Disclosure. The results of this study indicate that the profitability and size of the company have no effect on the Sustainability Report Disclosure. Good Corporate Governance has a significant effect on Sustainability Report Disclosure.

scholarly journals RISIKO, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, PROFITABILITAS, CAPITAL TERHADAP KESEHATAN BANK UMUM SWASTA NASIONAL DEVISA DI INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Shanty Rahayuningtyas ◽  
Emanuel Kristijadi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Foreign Exchange ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Health Score ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Good Corporate Governance

ABSTRACT  The purpose of this study was determine whether CKPN, ALR, BOPO, IRR, GCG, ROA and ETA have a significant effect either simultaneously or in part. This study used the population of the National Private Foreign Exchange Bank in Indonesia, with a purposive sampling technique. The data used are secondary data taken from the Financial Services Authority website and the Infobank Research Bureau, with data collection methods using the documentation method and data analyzed using panel data and multiple linear regression. The results of this study indicate that CKPN, ALR, BOPO, IRR, GCG, ROA and ETA simultaneously have a significant effect on the Health Scores of National Foreign Exchange Private Banks in Indonesia. CKPN, ALR, GCG partially have insignificant negative influence, BOPO and ETA partially have insignificant positive influence, IRR partially has significant negative influence and ROA partially has a significant positive effect on the Health Score of Private Foreign Exchange National Banks in Indonesia. Keywords                   : Business Risk; Good Corporate Governance; Health Score ABSTRAKTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menentukan apakah CKPN, ALR, BOPO, IRR, GCG, ROA dan ETA memiliki pengaruh signifikan baik secara simultan atau sebagian terhadap Skor Kesehatan Bank Umum Swasta Nasional Devisa di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan populasi Bank Nasional Devisa Swasta di Indonesia, dengan teknik pengambilan sampel purposive sampling. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang diambil dari situs web Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dan Biro Riset Infobank, dengan metode pengumpulan data menggunakan metode dokumentasi dan data dianalisis menggunakan data panel serta regresi linier berganda. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa CKPN, ALR, BOPO, IRR, GCG, ROA dan ETA secara simultan memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap Skor Kesehatan Bank Umum Swasta Nasional Devisa di Indonesia. CKPN, BOPO, ALR, GCG dan ETA secara parsial memiliki pengaruh tidak signifikan, IRR secara parsial memiliki pengaruh negatif signifikan dan ROA secara parsial memiliki pengaruh positif signifikan terhadap Skor Kesehatan Bank Nasional Devisa Swasta di Indonesia. Kata kunci                  : Risiko Usaha; Good Corporate Governance; Skor Kesehatan

scholarly journals Determinan Profitabilitas Dengan Ukuran Perusahaan Sebagai Variabel Moderasi Pada Bank Umum Syariah

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Aida Maudi ◽  
Amrizal Amrizal ◽  
Rizky Maulana Pribadi ◽  
Silvi Reni Cusyana
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Commercial Bank ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Company Size ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

This research is to empirically examine the effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR), good corporate governance (GCG), and zakat on profitability with company size being a moderating variable. The sample was selected utilizing a purposive sampling technique using 35 samples obtained from the Sharia Commercial Bank financial statements for the 2012-2018 periods. These results prove that CSR and zakat also have a significant effect on profitability, besides CSR cannot affect profitability. Company size can moderate the relationship between CSR and GCG with profitability, While the size of the company weakens the relationship of zakat with profitability.

scholarly journals PENGARUH FREE CASH FLOW DAN FINANCIAL LEVERAGE TERHADAP MANAJEMEN LABA DENGAN GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI

SIMAK ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 118-134
Author(s):  
Jihana Safira Tualeka ◽  
Tenriwaru Tenriwaru ◽  
Ummu Kalsum
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Cash Flow ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Free Cash Flow ◽  
Financial Leverage ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Good Corporate Governance

This research aimed to examine whether free cash flow and financial leverage affected profit management and whether good corporate governance as a moderating variable moderated the effect of free cash flow and financial leverage on profit management on textile and garment companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2016-2018. This study used sample of 16 companies from the textile and garment listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period of 2016-2018, and used a purposive sampling technique. Based on the results of research conduct shows that free cash flow has a negative and significant effect on earnings management. Financial leverage has a negative and not significant effect on earnings management. Good corporate governance can moderate or strengthen the influence between free cash flow and profit management. And good corporate governance can moderate or strengthen the influence between financial leverage and profit management.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK MENGGUNAKAN METODE PROFIL RISIKO, TATA KELOLA PERUSAHAAN YANG BAIK, PENDAPATAN & MODAL (Studi Komparasi Antara Bank Umum Konvensional dan Bank Umum Syariah Di Indonesia Lemabaga yang Terdaftar Pada Otoritas Layanan Keuangan

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-77
Author(s):  
Gusganda Suria Manda ◽  
Rina Maria Hendriyani
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Commercial Bank ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Quantitative Approach ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Good Rating ◽  
Descriptive Method ◽  
Better Than

This analysis aims to find out, analyze and explain how the bank's soundness level compares with the Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital methods in accordance with applicable regulations. This research was conducted using a comparative descriptive method with a quantitative approach. The results of the analysis of this study the authors get that Conventional Commercial Banks have a Risk Profile (NPL ratio) with a rating of "Good" better than a Sharia Commercial Bank with a rating of "Fairly Good". Conventional Commercial Banks have a Risk Profile (LDR) higher than Islamic Commercial Banks with a rating of "Fairly Good". Conventional Commercial Banks have Good Corporate Governance (GCG) better than Sharia Commercial Banks with a "Good" rating. Conventional Commercial Banks have better Earning (ROA) with a "Very Good" rating than a Sharia Commercial Bank with a "Very Poor" rating. Sharia Commercial Banks have a Capital (CAR) higher than Conventional Commercial Banks with a rating of "Very Good

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN METODE RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNING, CAPITAL) PADA PT. BANK MANDIRI (PERSERO) PERIODE 2015 - 2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Pingkan Aprilia Maramis
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Credit Risk ◽  
Commercial Bank ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Public Funds ◽  
Good Corporate Governance

ABSTRAK Dunia perbankan begitu penting dalam masyarakat maupun dalam memajukan perekonomian suatu Negara. Bank dijadikan sebagai tempat untuk melakukan berbagai transaksi yang berhubungan dengan keuangan seperti, tempat mengamnkan uang, melakukan investasi, pengiriman uang, melakukan pembayaran atau melakukan penagihan, Kasmir (2014:2). Menyadari pentingnya peranan bank, maka kesehatan bank harus terjaga karena bank mengelola dana masyarakat yang dipercayakan kepada bank. Berdasarkan Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 13/1/PBI/2011 tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesahatan Bank Umum dengan Risk-Profile, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earnings, dan Capital yang selanjutnya disebut dengan metode RGEC. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penilaian tingkat kesehatan Bank Mandiri Periode 2015-2018 dilihat dari factor Risk-Profile, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earnings, dan Capital. Dalam penelitian ini penilaian pada factor Risk-Profile dilihat dari risiko kredit diukur dengan rasio NPL dan risiko likuiditas diukur dengan rasio LDR, factor Good Corporate Governance (GCG) diukur dengan penilaian self assessment bank, factor Earning diukur dengan rasio ROA, dan factor Capital diukur dengan rasio CAR. Hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan menunjukan Bank Mandiri selama periode 2015-2018 pada factor Risk Profile dengan rasio NPL mendapatkan predikat Sehat, dengan rasio LDR mendapatkan predikat Cukup Sehat, pada factor GCG mendapatkan predikat Sangat Baik, pada factor Earnings mendapatkan predikat Sangat  Sehat, dan factor Capital mendapatkan predikat Sangat Sehat. Kata Kunci: profil risiko, GCG, Rentabilitas, Permodalan, Kesehatan Bank             ABSTRACT Banking is very important in society as well as in advancing the economy of a country. Banks are used as a place to carry out various financial-related transactions such as, a place to deposit money, make investments, send money, make payments or make collections, Kasmir (2014: 2).Recognizing the important role of banks, bank health must be maintained because banks manage public funds entrusted to banks. Based on Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 13/1 / PBI / 2011 concerning Evaluation of Commercial Bank Health Levels with Risk-Profile, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earnings, and Capital , hereinafter referred to as the RGEC method. This study aims to determine the level of soundness of Bank Mandiri for the period of 2015-2018 seen from thefactors Risk-Profile, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earnings, and Capital. In this study the assessment on factors Risk-Profile views of credit risk is measured by the ratio of NPL and liquidity risk is measured by the LDR, factor Good Corporate Governance (GCG) was measured with the assessment of self-assessment of banks, the factor Earning measured by ROA, and factors Capital is measured with a CAR ratio. The results of research that have been done show that Bank Mandiri during the 2015-2018 period on thefactor Risk Profile with the NPL ratio received the title of Healthy, with the LDR ratio getting the Pretty Healthy predicate, the GCG factor received the Very Good predicate, thefactor Earnings earned the Very Healthy predicate, and the factor Capital gets the title of Very Healthy. Keywords: risk profile, GCG, Profitability, Capital, Bank Health

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document