scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF LEARNING STYLES FOR ENGLISH SPEAKING SKILL

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abd Ghofur
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Ex Post ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ex Post Facto ◽  
Speaking Skill ◽  
English Speaking

Everyone has a dominant learning style that allows them to easily absorb the information it receives. Thispaper is the result of a study corresponding author modalities influence students to absorb information onthe differences in the English speaking skill. This research was conducted in class X SMA N 1 Lamongan.The study design using the ex post facto with a population of 383 and the number of samples 70. The datacollection technique using questionnaires and tests the ability to speak English. Analysis using descriptiveanalysis and ANOVA one lane using parametric statistical methods. This is done because it is based on astatistical test, the normal distribution of research data and homogeneous. The results showed thatstudents who have a visual learning style as many as 32 people, with a mean of 69.56 and a standarddeviation of 12.281. Then students who have auditory learning styles as many as 20 people with a mean of66.10 with a standard deviation of 10.935. While students who have a kinesthetic learning style as manyas 18 people with a mean of 66.28 and a standard deviation of 12.942. The results of data analysis knownthat the significance value (sig.) Of 0.511. This showed that no significant difference in the Englishspeaking skill among students who have learning styles of visual, auditory and kinesthetic.

scholarly journals Komparasi Tingkat Hasil Belajar Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-48
Author(s):  
Nastiti ◽  
Wahyu Rika Agustin
Keyword(s):  
Social Studies ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Ex Post ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Good Learning

The purpose of the study was to determine whether there was a difference between learning outcomes based on VAK learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) in Integrated Social Studies subjects for seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. Researchers used a comparative quantitative approach with a comparative causal design or ex post facto. The population in the study were all students of class VII, amounting to 295 students and the sample was 59 students taken from class VII H and I. The sample was taken using simple random sampling technique. The study used a questionnaire and documentation as data collection instruments. While the data analysis technique used kruskal wallis. The results showed that good learning outcomes based on visual learning styles were 20%, low learning outcomes were 60%, and moderate learning outcomes were 20%. Furthermore, good learning outcomes based on auditory learning styles are 68%, low learning outcomes are 3%, and moderate learning outcomes are 29%. Finally, good kinesthetic learning outcomes are 22%, low learning outcomes are 73%, and low learning outcomes are 5%. Based on these results, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in learning outcomes based on learning styles using the VAK learning style in Integrated Social Studies subjects class VII SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. This can be seen from the sig value. namely 0.000 <from the significance level of 5% (0.05).

scholarly journals Students' Mathematical Connection Skills Reviewed From Learning Styles

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ujang Suprianto ◽  
Heni Pujiastuti
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematical Connections ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mathematical Connection ◽  
Student Learning Styles

The purpose of this study is to determine the distribution of student learning styles, to determine the average mathematical communication skills that have Auditory, Visual, and Kinestatic learning styles. and to find out if there are significant differences in the ability of mathematical connections between students who have auditory, visual, and kinesthetic learning styles. This research was conducted at SMAN 17 Pandeglang in class XII MIPA. The instrument used was in the form of a learning style questionnaire and a test of mathematical connection abilities. This type of research is a comparative study with a quantitative approach. Based on the results of data processing, that the distribution of student learning styles is included in the Auditory learning style of 34% of students, Visual 46% of students, and Kinesthetic 19% of students. By using a scale of 0-50, the average mathematical connection ability of students is 29.58, whereas when viewed from each distribution of learning styles, the average mathematical ability of auditory students is 24.89, visual students 28.33, and kinestatic students 34,40. Based on the results of the analysis with the ANOVA test and t test (Dunnet) that there is a significant difference in the ability of students' mathematical connections between auditory, visual and kinesthetic learning styles with a significant level of ? = 0.05, and the results of the value of Fcount &gt; Ftable = 3.62 &gt; 3,42, where the kinesthetic learning style has higher mathematical connection ability than auditory and visual learning styles.

scholarly journals Effect of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Learning Strategies and Student Learning Styles on PKn Learning Outcomes of Grade V Students of Elementary School Experimental District of Kota Medan

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 404-410
Author(s):  
Ramiyah Ramiyah ◽  
Reh Bungana Beru Perangin Angin ◽  
Yusnadi Yusnadi
Keyword(s):  
Elementary School ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Citizenship Education ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Significant Difference

The problem in this study is the low learning achievement of Pancasila and Citizenship Education. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of learning styles on the Learning Outcomes of Pancasila and Citizenship Education. The type of research used is a 2x2 factorial design study. The population of this study amounted to 60 students and the sample was taken as a whole from the total population of 60 people consisting of 30 from class Va and 30 from class Vb Elementary School Experiment in Medan. Data collection techniques using questionnaires (questionnaires) and tests. Data analysis techniques used product moment correlation and Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) programs. The results obtained indicate that the value of students who have a visual learning style has a difference with students who have auditory learning styles with a sig value of 0.000 and a mean difference of 4.5756. Between students who have a visual learning style, have a significant difference with students who have kinesthetic learning styles, with a sig value of 0.002 and a mean difference of 4.4940. Between students who have auditory learning styles did not have a significant difference with students who have kinesthetic learning styles, with a sig value of 0.998 and a mean difference of only 0.815. The results showed that there was a significant effect between learning styles on the learning outcomes of Pancasila and Citizenship Education in the fifth grade students of SD Negeri Experiment City Medan

STUDENTS’ LEARNING STYLES IN LEARNING ENGLISH SPEAKING OF X GRADE AT SMA NEGERI 1 SIMPANG EMPAT

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Novita Sari Lubis And Indra Hartoyo
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Dominant Type ◽  
Tenth Grade ◽  
English Speaking ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Auditory Learners ◽  
Academic Year

The title of this thesis is Students Learning Style in Learning Speaking of Ten Students at SMA Negeri 1 Simpang Empat. The purpose of conducting this research was to find out whether the most dominant type of students learning style in learning speaking and to find out what is the learning style realized in English Speaking of ten students at SMA Negeri 1 Simpang Empat in academic year 2016/2017. There were 10 students as the subject of this research. In this case, the researcher collected the data by using learning style questionnaire and observation. The result showed that auditory learning style is the most dominant learning style at the tenth grade students at SMA Negeri 1 Simpang Empat, the percentage was 60%, it means 6 from 10 students prefer to hear than read and move. The second was kinaesthetic learning style, the score, 20%, means that only 2 students prefer to move. Then, visual learning style has same dominant with kinesthetic, the score, 20% , means that 2 from 10 students prefer to read. For the fastest student’s in reading comprehension came from auditory students or auditory learners. They get score 50%, followed visual 20%, and visual 10%.

HUBUNGAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP ASPEK PENGETAHUAN SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN SISTEM KOMPUTER DI SMK IT RAHMATAN KARIMAH BENGKULU TENGAH

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-20
Author(s):  
Dian Saputra
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Computer System ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Post Test ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Relationship

This study aims to find out the relationship between learning style and students’ knowledge aspect on Computer System Subject at SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu, the type of research is quantitative and the subject of research is grade X in SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu. Data collection techniques using observation, Questionnaire and documentation. Data analysis techniques used were Descriptive Analysis, and inferential Statistical Analysis. The results of visual learning style post-test were 11 people with a mean of 76.36, an auditory learning style of 8 people at a mean of 62.14, a kinesthetic learning style of 3 people at a mean of 50.33, apart from that (r x y = 2.35) and the magnitude of r is reflected in the table (r table = 0.4132). Then rxy > r table ie = 2.35> 0.4132. In other words, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. It has a significant relationship between the learning styles of students and students’ knowledge aspect on Computer System Subject of grade X TKJ in SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu

The Effect of Instructional Approaches and Learning Styles on Students’ Achievement of Grammar

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rista Damesari Saragih ◽  
Lince Sihombing ◽  
Eddi Setia
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Significant Interaction ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Cluster Sampling ◽  
Instructional Approaches ◽  
Vocational High School ◽  
Instructional Approach ◽  
Auditory Learning

The objectives of this research are to investigate whether: (1) students’ achievement of grammar taught by applying inductive approach higher than taught by applying deductive approach, (2) achievement of grammar of visual learning style students higher than achievement of grammar of auditory learning style students, and (3) there is an interaction between instructional approaches and learning styles on the students’ achievement of grammar. The population was students of Grade X of Vocational High School 1 Beringin Deli Serdang. Based on Cluster Sampling technique, two classes were chosen, namely Grades X1 and X3. The data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA with 2 × 2 factorial design. The result reveals that (1) Students` grammar achievement taught by using inductive instructional approach is higher than that taught by using deductive instructional Approach (81,20 > 72,10), (2) Students with visual learning style have higher achievement in grammar than students with auditory learning style (81,90 > 72) and (3) there is significant interaction between instructional approaches and learning styles on students` achievement of grammar (4.906 > 3.96). Thus, it can be concluded that the application of instructional approaches and learning styles can affect students` achievement in grammar.   Keywords: Grammar; Instructional Approach; Learning Styles

THE EFFECT BETWEEN COOPERATIVE LERANING AND LEARNING STYLE OF THE GERMANY WRITTING OUTCOM

Jurnal KATA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 172
Author(s):  
Fauzan Adhima
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Factorial Design ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Interaction Effect ◽  
Empirical Data ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Design Data ◽  
Auditory Learning

<p><em>The aim of the study is to reveal the empirical data about the effect of cooperative learning and learning styles on the outcome of germany writting of SMA Negeri 42 Jakarta. The methodology used is the experimental method with a 2x2 factorial design. Data analysis performed by using two way variance analysis. The findings of the study demonstrated: 1)   The teaching cooperative leraning type STAD was higher than students who take cooperative leraning type Pair Cheks teaching. 2) The visual learning style was higher than students who have auditory learning style. 3) The students who take the teaching  cooperative leraning type Pair Cheks and have a visual learning style higher than students who take cooperative leraning type STAD and have a visual learning style . 4) The cooperative leraning type STAD and auditory learning style is higher than  cooperative leraning type Pair Cheks and have auditory learning styles. 5) The teaching cooperative leraning type STAD and have a auditory learning style was higher than the teaching cooperative leraning type STAD and have visual learning styles. 6) The cooperative leraning type Pair Cheks and have a visual learning style is higher than cooperative leraning type Pair Cheks and have auditory learning styles. 7) There is an interaction effect between  cooperative leraning  and learning style of the germany writting outcome.</em></p><p><em><br /></em></p><p> </p><p>Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh pembelajaran kooperatif (tipe STAD dan tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em>) dan gaya belajar (visual dan auditori) terhadap keterampilan menulis bahasa Jerman Siswa SMA N 42 Jakarta. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode eksperimen menggunakan desain faktorial 2 X 2. Pengukuran keterampilan menulis bahasa Jerman menggunakan tes tulis sedangkan gaya belajar menggunakan kuesioner. Teknik analisis data dalam penelitian ini adalah teknkik analisis variansi (ANAVA) 2 jalur dan dilanjutkan dengan uji Tuckey untuk melihat interaksi antar kelompok.  Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa: (1) keterampilan menulis tipe STAD lebih baik dari pada tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em>, (2) gaya belajar visual lebih baik dari auditori, (3) gaya belajar auditori lebih baik menggunakan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dari pada tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em>, (4) keterampilan menulis bahasa Jerman kelompok siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih baik menggunakan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em> dari pada tipe STAD, (5) Belajar dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD lebih baik diterapkan pada siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar auditori dari pada gaya belajar visual, (6) belajar dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em> lebih baik diterapkan pada siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dari pada auditori, dan (7) terdapat pengaruh interaksi antara pembelajaran kooperatif dan gaya belajar terhadap keterampilan menulis bahasa Jerman.</p><p>Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh pembelajaran kooperatif (tipe STAD dan tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em>) dan gaya belajar (visual dan auditori) terhadap keterampilan menulis bahasa Jerman Siswa SMA N 42 Jakarta. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode eksperimen menggunakan desain faktorial 2 X 2. Pengukuran keterampilan menulis bahasa Jerman menggunakan tes tulis sedangkan gaya belajar menggunakan kuesioner. Teknik analisis data dalam penelitian ini adalah teknkik analisis variansi (ANAVA) 2 jalur dan dilanjutkan dengan uji Tuckey untuk melihat interaksi antar kelompok.  Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa: (1) keterampilan menulis tipe STAD lebih baik dari pada tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em>, (2) gaya belajar visual lebih baik dari auditori, (3) gaya belajar auditori lebih baik menggunakan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dari pada tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em>, (4) keterampilan menulis bahasa Jerman kelompok siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih baik menggunakan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em> dari pada tipe STAD, (5) Belajar dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD lebih baik diterapkan pada siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar auditori dari pada gaya belajar visual, (6) belajar dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em> lebih baik diterapkan pada siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dari pada auditori, dan (7) terdapat pengaruh interaksi antara pembelajaran kooperatif dan gaya belajar terhadap keterampilan menulis bahasa Jerman.</p>

scholarly journals The Implementation of Flipped Classroom using Screencast-O-Matic to Improve Students’ Verbal Linguistic Intelligence

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.15) ◽  
pp. 435
Author(s):  
Cahyo Hasanudin ◽  
Ayu Fitrianingsih ◽  
. .
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
First Year ◽  
First Year Students ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Data Collection Technique ◽  
Normalized Gain ◽  
Academic Year

This research aims to 1) implement flipped classroom model using screencast-o-matic, 2) investigate the improvement of verbal linguistic intelligence through the implementation of flipped classroom model using screencast-o-matic for the students of IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro in academic year 2017-2018. This research is classroom action research (CAR) conducted at IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro, the subjects of the research are the first year students in second semester of academic year 2017-2018. The indicators of the research are measured using N-Gain test with the normalized Gain index interpretation category. Data sources in this research are 1) learning activities 2) informants, 3) documentary data. Data collection technique used documentation methods,observations, and verbal linguistic test of Thomas Armstrong by using Likert scale. The results of this research show that 1) the implementation of flipped classroom uses six stages, 2) the improvement of students’ verbal linguistic intelligence can be seen from the actions in every cycle. In the preliminary research, the researcher had measured the students’ learning styles, from 30 students who were the subject of research. There were 6 students who had visual learning style, 7 students had auditory learning style, and 17 students had kinesthetic learning style. In cycle I, FLIP model is implemented and students’ verbal linguistic intelligence is 61,43. In cycle II, students’ verbal linguistic intelligence is 81, 03. The conclusion of this research are 1) the the implementation of flipped classroom model using Screencast-O-Matic uses FLIP model, 2) the improvement of students’ verbal linguistic intelligence in IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro can be classified into average category.  

scholarly journals IDENTIFIKASI GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Jeanete Ophilia Papilaya ◽  
Neleke Huliselan
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Survey Method ◽  
Guidance And Counseling ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Survey Results

The objective of this study was to identify learning styles of students. The approach used in this study is a quantitative approach with survey method. The variable in this study is a single variable , namely the identification of student learning styles. The study population is students of Guidance and Counseling FKIP Pattimura University totaling 388 people. Samples were used as samples in the amount of 10% of the population of 39 people. The sampling technique using Simple Random Sampling. Learning styles questionnaire prepared based on the opinion of De Poter & Hernacki is used as a data collection tool. Learning styles identified as visual learning style, auditorial learning style, and kinesthetic learning style. Data analysis techniques in this study is the descriptive statistical analysis methods. Based on the survey results revealed that students of guidance and counseling FKIP Pattimura University has a tendency to one learning style. Of the 39 students found that 6 students had a tendency visual learning style, 20 students have a tendency to auditory learning style, 1 student has a tendency kinestheticlearning style, and 12 students have a tendency to mix between learning styles and learning styles visual auditorylearning styles.

scholarly journals Pemilihan Gaya Belajar untuk Meningkatkan Keaktifan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-36
Author(s):  
Asih Riyanti ◽  
Sungkono
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Success ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Learning Objectives ◽  
Psychomotor Development ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Processing Information ◽  
Bahasa Indonesia

Every success in the learning process will affect environmental factors, schools, attitudes, or students themselves. Each student enhances cognitive, affective, and psychomotor development. Student trading has the uniqueness and character of each in the learning process to respond to and understand teaching material or information obtained. Student learning independence can be seen from the achievements of students in responding, solving, and processing information by completing various tasks. Every student has a learning style that is prominent in him, and the teacher must be able to accommodate it. That is to achieve the learning objectives well and effectively. Learning style is the key to student success in learning. There are models (Type) of learning styles (Fleming, 2001), VARK (Visual, auditory, Reading, Kinesthetic) that can increase student activity in learning Indonesian. Students can learn through the senses that they have with a visual learning style that learns from what is seen, students with an auditory learning style that is learning through what is heard, and a kinesthetic learning style that is learning through motion and opening.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document