scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF CHANGE IN NT-proBNP AFTER ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKER (ARB) THERAPY IN PATIENT WITH HEART FAILURE

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 305
Author(s):  
Intan Kusuma Dewi ◽  
Muhammad Aminuddin ◽  
Bambang Subakti Zulkarnain
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Wall Stress ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Heart Failure Therapy ◽  
Cardiac Marker ◽  
Primary Parameter ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Secondary Parameter ◽  
Heart Failure Severity

NT-proBNP is an inactive fragment of BNP secreted by stretched ventricle as response to wall stress in patients with heart failure. As a specific cardiac marker, elevated NT-proBNP correlates well with heart failure severity. The principle of heart failure therapy is modulation on neurohormonal activation. ARB can modulate neurohormon on RAA system, that result in decreasing NT-proBNP level and favorable outcomes. Reduction in NT-proBNP more than biologic variability (> 25%) shows a therapy response.This study was to analyze change of NT-proBNP after ARB therapy in ambulatory HF patients. This observational prospective study was carried from September to December 2015. Blood sampling was performed on patients who meet the inclusion criteria of the study at first visit and after 2 months therapy. NT-proBNP was measured by IMMULITE® as primary parameter and creatinin as secondary parameter. There are 14 patients met the inclusion criteria of the study (11 males and 3 females). ARB therapy used in patients were Valsartan (64%), Telmisartan (22%) and Candesartan (14%). After 2 months ARB therapy, a decrease in level of NT-proBNP with initial median 3092.5 (216 – 32112) pg/ml to 2135.5 (350 – 16172) pg/ml respectively were statistically significant (p=0.003). And the secondary parameter creatinin serum convert to eGFR shows a change in eGFR with initial median 73.33 (37.05 – 266.68) ml/minute to 81.04 (39.31 – 167.02) ml/minute respectively were statistically not significant (p=0.657). There were 7 patients (50%) have a decrease > 25%. In this study, we found that ARB therapy can change NT-proBNP level significantly after 2 months therapy.

The Results of the Use of Angiotensin Receptor Inhibitors and Neprilisin in Secondary Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Outpatient Practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 514-522
Author(s):  
Alexey S. Ryazanov ◽  
Konstantin I. Kapitonov ◽  
Mariya V. Makarovskaya ◽  
Alexey A. Kudryavtsev
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Effective Area ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor ◽  
Optimal Drug ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Valsartan Group

Background. Morbidity and mortality in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) remains high, however, no pharmacological therapy has been proven to be effective.Aimsto study the effect of sacubitrile/valsartan and valsartan on functional mitral regurgitation in chronic heart failure.Methods.This double-blind study randomly assigned sacubitrile/valsartan or valsartan in addition to standard drug therapy for heart failure among 100 patients with heart failure with chronic FMR (secondary to left ventricular (LV) dysfunction). The primary endpoint was a change in the effective area of the regurgitation hole during the 12-month follow-up. Secondary endpoints included changes in the volume of regurgitation, the final systolic volume of the left ventricle, the final diastolic volume of the left ventricle, and the area of incomplete closure of the mitral valves.Results.The decrease in the effective area of the regurgitation hole was significantly more pronounced in the sacubitrile/valsartan group than in the valsartan group (0.070.066against0.030.058sm2; p=0.018)in the treatment efficacy analysis, which included 100patients (100%). The regurgitation volume also significantly decreased in the sacubitrile/valsartan group compared to the valsartan group (mean difference:8.4ml; 95%CI, from 13.2 until 1.9;р=0.21). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding changes in the area ofincomplete closure of the mitral valves and LV volumes, with the exception of the index of the final LV diastolic volume (p=0.07).Conclusion.Among patients with secondary FMR, sacubitril/valsartan reduced MR more than valsartan. Thus, angiotensin receptor inhibitors and neprilysin can be considered for optimal drug treatment of patients with heart failure and FMR.

Heart Failure Therapy in 2016

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-82
Author(s):  
Douglas L. Jennings
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Recent Literature ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor ◽  
Heart Failure Therapy ◽  
Call To Action ◽  
Neprilysin Inhibitor ◽  
Drug Regimens ◽  
Contemporary Practice

Heart failure (HF) continues to afflict millions of Americans, resulting in substantial clinical and economic burden to our society. Recent literature has highlighted the role of 2 novel therapies (an angiotensin receptor blocker/neprilysin inhibitor and ivabradine) in further reducing residual disease in HF. Simultaneously, evidence has mounted suggesting that older therapies like digoxin are not effective in contemporary practice and, in fact, may be harmful. This editorial summarizes the most recently published articles pertaining to both new and old HF therapies and provides a call to action to pharmacists on how to shift patients toward effective drug regimens.

Effects of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor on renal function in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. postgradmedj-2021-140132
Author(s):  
Yuwu Shi ◽  
Yiwen Wang ◽  
Junhong Chen ◽  
Chi Lu ◽  
Haochen Xuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Serum Potassium ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor ◽  
Neprilysin Inhibitor ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor

The angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) has been recommended as a first-line treatment in patients with heart failure (HF). However, the effects of ARNI on renal function remain controversial.The PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library of Trials and Web of Science were searched in the period from inception to 31 January 2021. Randomised controlled trial, cohort studies and observational studies reporting at least one of renal function indicators were included.In patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), ARNI did not lead to a significant decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, p=0.87), and the risk of worsening renal function (WRF) dropped by 11% compared with control group. Though the level of serum creatinine (SCr) and serum potassium had a slight increase (p=0.01; p=0.02), in contrast to the baseline level, but without clinical significance. In patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), the level of SCr and serum potassium did not have a significant change, and patients with HFpEF assigned to ARNI had a much lower rate of WRF (p=0.0007). In contrast to control group, both patients with HFrEF and HFpEF had a less decrease in eGFR and a lower rate of hyperkalaemia in ARNI group.ARNI did not lead to a significant decrease in eGFR in HFrEF. Compared with control group, ARNI could delay the progression of decrease in eGFR and result in less events of hyperkalaemia in patients with HF. Besides, patients with HFpEF had a lower rate in the events of WRF.

Abstract 343: Trends and Predictors of Use of Angiotensin Receptor Blocker and Neprilysin Inhibitor in Patients With Heart Failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Supriya Shore ◽  
Tanima Basu ◽  
Neil Kamdar ◽  
Patrick Brady ◽  
Scott L Hummel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Neprilysin Inhibitor ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Receptor Blockers

Objective: Current guidelines recommend use of combination therapy with angiotensin receptor blocker and neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) (i.e., Entresto ® ) in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction as a class 1 recommendation. Contemporary data on real-world use of these agents is lacking. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of individuals enrolled in Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, MN from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. We included all individuals ≥ 18 years, with two outpatient encounters or one inpatient encounter with a principal ICD 10 diagnosis for HFand 6 months of continuous enrollment. To further identify patients with reduced ejection fraction, we only included individuals who received prescriptions for beta-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/ angiotensin receptor blockers. Comorbidities were identified using Elixhauser comorbidity index.. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of ARNI use. Results: A total of 154,777 patients were included in our cohort. Overall, 5,834 patients (3.8%) received an ARNI prescription. Use of ARNI increased from 1.4% in 2016 to 3.9% in 2018 (p<0.01). Compared to patients receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, patients receiving ARNI were younger (mean age 69.4 ± 11.1 vs. 72.9 ± 11.0 years;), more likely to be male (69.3% vs. 54.4%) and have commercial insurance (22.1% vs. 16.7%) with a higher comorbidity burden. Predictors of ARNI use after multivariable adjustment included age<65 years (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.3-1.5), Male sex (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.7 - 1.9) and black race (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1 - 1.2). Other predictors of ARNI use are shown in Figure 1. Patients receiving care through a cardiologist compared to a primary care physician were more likely to receive an ARNI (OR 1.8; 95% 1.7 - 1.9). Out of pocket cost for ARNI ranged from $0 to $1006 per month (median $44; IQR $9-$60). Conclusion: Rates of ARNI use remain low among patients with heart failure with racial and gender disparities. Heart Failure patients receiving care with a cardiologist were more likely to receive ARNI. Out of pocket cost for this medication remains high and may be a significant barrier to its use.

Time of Day and Accurate Weights for Patients With Heart Failure

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-115
Author(s):  
Alice M. Siehoff ◽  
Catherine Ryan
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
The United States ◽  
Early Morning ◽  
Time Of Day ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Significant Health

Heart failure (HF) is a significant health problem in the United States. It is estimated that 5.8 million Americans currently live with a diagnosis of HF (American Heart Association, 2010). Despite the fact that daily weight monitoring of patients with HF in the hospital has long been a standard part of monitoring effectiveness of treatment, the literature is lacking recommendations based on evidence specific to the optimal time of day for weighing inpatients. The clinical question under consideration is the following: In hospitalized patients with HF, does consistently measuring weights in the evening compared to early morning accurately reflect differences in net weight gain or loss?In this quasi-experimental, prospective cohort pilot study, 29 patients who met inclusion criteria were weighed in the morning and again in the evening. Results of this study revealed predictable differences for morning (M = 3.09, SD = 2.06) and evening weights (M = 2.47, SD = 1.80); t(28) = −2.602, p = .015. For study patients with three consecutive days of weights (N = 24), Pearson product-moment correlations revealed a statistically significant correlation between individual differences/changes in a.m. and p.m. weights, r(22) = .752, p < .001.The implication for clinical practice is that weights should be measured at a consistent time of day. This may be the morning or evening.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document