Analisa Pengaruh Human Error Terhadap Kecelakaa Kerja Di PT. Industri Kapal Indonesia Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Cross Sectional Method

Zona Laut : Jurnal Inovasi Sains Dan Teknologi Kelautan ◽

10.20956/zl.v2i2.14369 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 40-46

Author(s):

Jaiyen Pagau ◽

Pahrizah Puji Anugrah

Keyword(s):

Human Error ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional

Salah satu proses yang kritikal ketika fabrikasi offshore yaitu proses transfer offshore module (Top Side) dari atas jetty ke PT. Indusri Kapal Indonesia merupakan perusahaan yang berusaha dalam bidang pembuatan kapal dan perbaikan kapal, Perusahaan ini telah menerapkan sistem manajemen lingkungan, keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja. terdapat hubungan antara faktor manusia dengan kecelakaan kerja. Karena itu diperlukan suatu penelitian yang bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor manusia yang menyebabkan kecelakaan kerja, mempelajari karakteristik faktor manusia pada responden terhadap kecelakaan kerja dan menganalisis pengaruh faktor manusia terhadap kecelakaan. Penelitian ini akan menerapkan metode kuesioner sebanyak 30 respoden untuk mengumpulkan data primer dari beberapa responden dan merupakan penelitian cross-sectional study (pendekatan silang). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat 15 respoden(50%) pekerja mengalami cedera ringan, 3 respoden (10%) pekerja perna mengalami kecelakaan berat, dan 12 respoden (40%) pekerja tidak pernah mengalami cedera. Diharapkan perusahaan memberikan informasi yang cukup kepada pekerja tentang pentingnya K3, lebih intensif dalam memberikan program pelatihan (training), mengadakan kontes-kontes keselamatan dengan memberikan reward bagi pekerja, serta pekerja mampu meningkatkan kedisiplinan dalam penggunaan APD dan meningkatkan kesadaran untuk menciptakan lingkungan kerja yang aman.

Download Full-text

Analisis Faktor yang Memengaruhi Kejadian Kecelakaan Kerja pada Karyawan PT. Maruki Internasional Indonesia Makassar Tahun 2019

Jurnal Sosial Teknologi ◽

10.36418/jurnalsostech.v1i11.250 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1 (11) ◽

Author(s):

Muqtashida Patsal

Keyword(s):

Human Error ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Purposive Sampling

Latar belakang: Kesehatan dan keselamatan kerja merupakan salah satu faktor penting dalam kelancaran produksi sehingga program K3 harus diterapkan di perusahaan dan bukan hanya sekadar wacana. Kecelakaan kerja merupakan kecelakaan yang terjadi dalam lingkungan kerja yang dapat terjadi karena kondisi lingkungan kerja yang tidak aman ataupun karena human error dan faktor peralatan. Tujuan penelitian: Untuk menganalisis faktor determinan terjadinya kecelakaan kerja di PT. Maruki Internasional Indonesia Makassar Tahun 2019 ditinjau dari karakteristik responden, sikap kerja, kepatuhan terhadap prosedur, penggunaan APD, kondisi mesin, alat pengaman mesin dan letak mesin. Metode penelitian: Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah observasional analitik dengan pendekatan cross sectional study. Teknik pengambilan sampel dengan purposive sampling sebanyak 84 dengan menggunakan rumus Slovin. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan observasi lingkungan kerja dan instrumen kuesioner. Hasil penelitian: Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada pengaruh antara variabel umur, jenis kelamin, lama kerja, kondisi mesin dan alat pengaman mesin dengan kecelakaan kerja pada karyawan PT. Maruki Internasional Indonesia. Ada pengaruh antara variabel sikap, kepatuhan terhadap prosedur, penggunaan APD dan letak mesin dengan kecelakaan kerja pada karyawan PT. Maruki Internasional Indonesia. Kesimpulan: Tidak ada pengaruh umur terhadap kejadian kecelakaan kerja pada karyawan PT. Maruki Internasional Indonesia Tahun 2019. Tidak ada pengaruh jenis kelamin terhadap kejadian kecelakaan kerja pada karyawan PT. Maruki Internasional Indonesia Tahun 2019. Tidak ada pengaruh lama kerja terhadap kejadian kecelakaan kerja pada karyawan PT. Maruki Internasional Indonesia Tahun 2019. Ada pengaruh sikap terhadap kejadian kecelakaan kerja pada karyawan PT. Maruki Internasional Indonesia Tahun 2019. Ada pengaruh kepatuhan terhadap prosedur dengan kejadian kecelakaan kerja pada karyawan PT. Maruki Internasional Indonesia Tahun 2019. Ada pengaruh penggunaan APD terhadap kejadian kecelakaan kerja pada karyawan PT. Maruki Internasional Indonesia Tahun 2019. Tidak ada pengaruh kondisi mesin terhadap kecelakaan kerja pada karyawan PT. Maruki Internasional Indonesia Tahun 2019 Tidak ada pengaruh alat pengaman mesin terhadap kecelakaan kerja pada karyawan PT. Maruki Internasional Indonesia Tahun 2019. Ada pengaruh letak mesin terhadap kejadian kecelakaan kerja pada karyawan PT. Maruki Internasional Indonesia Tahun 2019.

Download Full-text

Survey of Nursery Errors in Healthcare Centers, Isfahan, Iran

Global Journal of Health Science ◽

10.5539/gjhs.v8n3p43 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 8 (3) ◽

pp. 43 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Ali Ayoubian ◽

Mansooreh Habibi ◽

Pouria Yazdian ◽

Hossein Bagherian-Mahmoodabadi ◽

Peyman Arasteh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Health Service ◽

Human Error ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Sample Population ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Isfahan Province ◽

Nursing Services ◽

Age Range ◽

And Control

BACKGROUND & AIM: Nurse’s mistakes usually have a strong effect on the patients trust and satisfaction in the health services systems, and it can also lead to stress and moral contradicts among nurses. This study has aimed to survey the rate of nurses’ mistakes, according to documents in the Isfahan Province during 2007-2012. METHODS: The study was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The sample population consisted of all complaints concerning nursing services provided in hospitals, private clinics and other health service centers between 2007 and 2012, submitted to the Forensic Medicine Commission Office, in Isfahan. The data were collected by a cheklist and analyzed using SPSS version 16.0 software. RESULTS: Out of 708 complaints, 70 (9.8%) cases were related to nurses. Twenty-four cases led to awards. The age range of nurses was 35-40 (25.7%). Out of 70 nurses with a record, 75% (53 people) were female and the rest were male. Sixty four nurses (91.4%) were working in hospitals. Negligence was the first basis of the court rulings (16 cases out of 24). Nurses’ recklessness in providing services was due to their convictions among 66.7% of the cases CONCLUSION: Although efforts to reduce and control nurses’ faults and mistakes depends on using a system for studying and removing the factors which lead to faults, human error is inevitable in every occupation and a 100% accurate operation is unreachable.

Download Full-text

Critical Incidents during Anesthesia and Early Post-Anesthetic Period: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

Journal of Nepal Medical Association ◽

10.31729/jnma.4821 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 58 (224) ◽

Author(s):

Binod Gautam ◽

Babu Raja Shrestha

Keyword(s):

Human Error ◽

Critical Incidents ◽

Elective Surgery ◽

Maintenance Phase ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Risk Patients ◽

Obstetric Surgery

Introduction: Critical incidents related to peri-operative anesthesia carry a risk of unwanted patientoutcomes. Studying those helps detect problems, which is crucial in minimizing their recurrence. Weaimed to identify the frequency of peri-anesthetic critical incidents. Methods: This is a hospital-based descriptive cross-sectional study of voluntarily reported incidents,which occurred during anesthesia or following 24 hours among patients subjected to non-cardiacsurgery within the calendar year 2019. Patient characteristics, anesthesia, and surgery types, category,context, and outcome of incidents were recorded in an indigenously designed form. Incidents wereassigned to attributable (patient, anesthesia or surgery) factor, and were analyzed for the system,equipment or human error contribution. Results: Altogether 464 reports were studied, which consisted of 524 incidents. Cardiovascularcategory comprised of 345 (65.8%) incidents. Incidents occurred in 433 (93%) otherwise healthypatients and during 258 (55.6%) spinal anesthetics. Obstetric surgery was involved in 179 (38.6%)incidents. Elective surgery and anesthesia maintenance phase included the context in 293 (63%)and 378 (72%) incidents respectively. Majority incidents 364 (69.5%) were anesthesia-attributable,with system and human error contribution in 196 (53.8%) and 152 (41.7%) cases respectively. Allrecovered fully except for 25 cases of mortality, which were mostly associated with patient factors,surgical urgency, and general anesthesia. Conclusions: Critical incidents occur even in low-risk patients during anesthesia delivery. Patientfactors and emergency surgery contribute to the most serious incidents.

Download Full-text

FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KEJADIAN KECELAKAAN KERJA PADA KARYAWAN DI PT. MARUKI INTERNASIONAL INDONESIA MAKASSAR TAHUN 2018

Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Diagnosis ◽

10.35892/jikd.v14i1.97 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

pp. 53-57

Author(s):

Nur Aisah Latuconsin ◽

Yahya Yahya Thamrin ◽

Suharni A. Fachrin

Keyword(s):

Human Error ◽

Safety Analysis ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Purposive Sampling ◽

Job Safety

Kesehatan dan keselamatan kerja merupakan salah satu faktor penting dalam kelancaran produksi sehingga program K3 harus diterapkan di perusahaan dan bukan hanya sekadar wacana. Kecelakaan kerja merupakan kecelakaan yang terjadi dalam lingkungan kerja yang dapat terjadi karena kondisi lingkungan kerja yang tidak aman ataupun karena human error. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis faktor determinan terjadinya kecelakaan kerja di PT. Maruki Internasional Indonesia Makassar Tahun 2018 ditinjau dari karakteristik responden, sikap kerja dan pengetahuan. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah observasional analitik dengan pendekatan cross sectional study. Teknik pengambilan sampel dengan purposive sampling sebanyak 84 dengan menggunakan rumus slovin. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan observasi lingkungan kerja dan instrumen kuesioner. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa ada hubungan antara variabel, sikap dan pengetahuan dengan kecelakaan kerja pada karyawan PT. Maruki Internasional Indonesia. Variable sikap dan pengetahuan harus mendapat perhatian khusus untuk mencegah kecelakaan kerja di PT. Maruki Internasional Indonesia. Diharapkan agar pihak perusahaan memberikan sosialisasi K3 dalam bentuk poster yang mudah dan jelas terbaca serta menarik perhatian. Perusahaan juga harus memperbaharui job safety analysis jika terjadi perubahan proses kerja.

Download Full-text

Determining the Agreement Between an Automated Respiratory Rate Counter and a Reference Standard for Detecting Symptoms of Pneumonia in Children: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study in Ethiopia (Preprint)

10.2196/preprints.16531 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Charlotte Ward ◽

Kevin Baker ◽

Sarah Marks ◽

Dawit Getachew ◽

Tedila Habte ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Respiratory Rate ◽

Human Error ◽

Health Workers ◽

Addis Ababa ◽

Scale Up ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Mean Difference ◽

Reference Standard ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional

BACKGROUND Acute respiratory infections (ARIs), primarily pneumonia, are the leading infectious cause of under-5 mortality worldwide. Manually counting respiratory rate (RR) for 60 seconds using an ARI timer is commonly practiced by community health workers to detect fast breathing, an important sign of pneumonia. However, correctly counting breaths manually and classifying the RR is challenging, often leading to inappropriate treatment. A potential solution is to introduce RR counters, which count and classify RR automatically. OBJECTIVE This study aims to determine how the RR count of an Automated Respiratory Infection Diagnostic Aid (ARIDA) agrees with the count of an expert panel of pediatricians counting RR by reviewing a video of the child’s chest for 60 seconds (reference standard), for children aged younger than 5 years with cough and/or difficult breathing. METHODS A cross-sectional study aiming to enroll 290 children aged 0 to 59 months presenting to pediatric in- and outpatient departments at a teaching hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, was conducted. Enrollment occurred between April and May 2017. Once enrolled, children participated in at least one of three types of RR evaluations: (1) agreement—measure the RR count of an ARIDA in comparison with the reference standard, (2) consistency—measure the agreement between two ARIDA devices strapped to one child, and (3) RR fluctuation—measure RR count variability over time after ARIDA attachment as measured by a manual count. The agreement and consistency of expert clinicians (ECs) counting RR for the same child with the Mark 2 ARI timer for 60 seconds was also measured in comparison with the reference standard. RESULTS Primary outcomes were (1) mean difference between the ARIDA and reference standard RR count (agreement) and (2) mean difference between RR counts obtained by two ARIDA devices started simultaneously (consistency). CONCLUSIONS Study strengths included the design allowing for comparison between both ARIDA and the EC with the reference standard RR count. A limitation is that exactly the same set of breaths were not compared between ARIDA and the reference standard since ARIDA can take longer than 60 seconds to count RR. Also, manual RR counting, even when aided by a video of the child’s chest movements, is subject to human error and can result in low interrater reliability. Further work is needed to reach global consensus on the most appropriate reference standard and an acceptable level of agreement to provide ministries of health with evidence to make an informed decision on whether to scale up new automated RR counters. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03067558; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03067558 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR1-10.2196/16531

Download Full-text

Determining the Agreement Between an Automated Respiratory Rate Counter and a Reference Standard for Detecting Symptoms of Pneumonia in Children: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study in Ethiopia

JMIR Research Protocols ◽

10.2196/16531 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (4) ◽

pp. e16531

Author(s):

Charlotte Ward ◽

Kevin Baker ◽

Sarah Marks ◽

Dawit Getachew ◽

Tedila Habte ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Respiratory Rate ◽

Human Error ◽

Health Workers ◽

Addis Ababa ◽

Scale Up ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Mean Difference ◽

Reference Standard ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional

Background Acute respiratory infections (ARIs), primarily pneumonia, are the leading infectious cause of under-5 mortality worldwide. Manually counting respiratory rate (RR) for 60 seconds using an ARI timer is commonly practiced by community health workers to detect fast breathing, an important sign of pneumonia. However, correctly counting breaths manually and classifying the RR is challenging, often leading to inappropriate treatment. A potential solution is to introduce RR counters, which count and classify RR automatically. Objective This study aims to determine how the RR count of an Automated Respiratory Infection Diagnostic Aid (ARIDA) agrees with the count of an expert panel of pediatricians counting RR by reviewing a video of the child’s chest for 60 seconds (reference standard), for children aged younger than 5 years with cough and/or difficult breathing. Methods A cross-sectional study aiming to enroll 290 children aged 0 to 59 months presenting to pediatric in- and outpatient departments at a teaching hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, was conducted. Enrollment occurred between April and May 2017. Once enrolled, children participated in at least one of three types of RR evaluations: (1) agreement—measure the RR count of an ARIDA in comparison with the reference standard, (2) consistency—measure the agreement between two ARIDA devices strapped to one child, and (3) RR fluctuation—measure RR count variability over time after ARIDA attachment as measured by a manual count. The agreement and consistency of expert clinicians (ECs) counting RR for the same child with the Mark 2 ARI timer for 60 seconds was also measured in comparison with the reference standard. Results Primary outcomes were (1) mean difference between the ARIDA and reference standard RR count (agreement) and (2) mean difference between RR counts obtained by two ARIDA devices started simultaneously (consistency). Conclusions Study strengths included the design allowing for comparison between both ARIDA and the EC with the reference standard RR count. A limitation is that exactly the same set of breaths were not compared between ARIDA and the reference standard since ARIDA can take longer than 60 seconds to count RR. Also, manual RR counting, even when aided by a video of the child’s chest movements, is subject to human error and can result in low interrater reliability. Further work is needed to reach global consensus on the most appropriate reference standard and an acceptable level of agreement to provide ministries of health with evidence to make an informed decision on whether to scale up new automated RR counters. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03067558; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03067558 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR1-10.2196/16531

Download Full-text

Patients' understanding of words used to describe lumps: a cross-sectional study

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology ◽

10.1017/s0022215105006481 ◽

2005 ◽

pp. 1

Author(s):

Neil K Chadha ◽

Costa Repanos

Keyword(s):

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional

Download Full-text

Does a Graduate Course in Fluency Disorders Make a Difference?

Perspectives on Fluency and Fluency Disorders ◽

10.1044/ffd20.1.10 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

pp. 10-14 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Evelyn R. Klein ◽

Barbara J. Amster

Keyword(s):

Undergraduate Students ◽

Graduate Programs ◽

The United States ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Graduate Course ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Fluency Disorders ◽

Introductory Course ◽

Communicative Disorders

Abstract A study by Yaruss and Quesal (2002), based on responses from 134 of 239 ASHA accredited graduate programs, indicated that approximately 25% of graduate programs in the United States allow students to earn their degree without having coursework in fluency disorders and 66% of programs allow students to graduate without clinical experience treating people who stutter (PWS). It is not surprising that many clinicians report discomfort in treating PWS. This cross-sectional study compares differences in beliefs about the cause of stuttering between freshman undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory course in communicative disorders and graduate students enrolled and in the final weeks of a graduate course in fluency disorders.

Download Full-text