PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PARA PIHAK DALAM PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI TANAH LETTER C DI BAWAH TANGAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 144
Author(s):  
Socha Tcefortin Indera Sakti ◽  
Ambar Budhisulistyawati

<p>Abstract <br />This article aims to analyze and to understand the legal protection provided to the parties involved in under-hand agreement of the sale of Letter C land. The legal protection or all of the parties involved is contained in the agreement if the agreement specifically stated it in its clauses. The kegal protection outside of the agreement is contained in the laws and regulations in force which is Civil Code and Statute. The legal protection is an important aspect to ensure the fulfillment of a person’s legal rights. Furthermore, it also has other objective, which is to realize legal certainty, legal benefits, and justice for the parties. Legal protection can be preventive or repressive. The agreements made in the underhand sale of Letter C land forms a legal relationship between the two parties. The legal relations are relationships that result in legal consequences guaranteed by the laws and regulations. Every legal act that causes legal consequences must have legal protection, especially when there is a dispute between the parties. Dispute can occur after the under-hand agreement of the sale of Letter C Land was agreed, therefore legal protection is needed to provide solutions, certainty and clarity towards the resolution of the existing as well as the potential post-agreement disputes.<br />Keywords: Legal Protection; Under-hand Agreement; the sale of Land.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mengetahui perlindungan hukum yang diberikan bagi para pihak yang terlibat didalam perjanjian dibawah tangan jual beli tanah Letter C. Perlindungan hukum yang diberikan bagi para pihak dalam perjanjian dibawah tangan terdapat di dalam perjanjian apabila dalam perjanjian disebutkan secara khusus dalam klausula-klausula yang telah disepakati dalam perjanjian. Perlindungan hukum yang terdapat diluar perjanjian yaitu dalam ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, yaitu KUHPerdata dan undang-undang. Perlindungan hukum merupakan suatu hal yang penting dalam menjamin terpenuhinya hak-hak hukum seseorang. Selain itu, perlindungan hukum yang diberikan memiliki tujuan lain yaitu guna mewujudkan kepastian hukum, kemanfaatan hukum, dan keadilan bagi para pihak. Perlindungan hukum yang diberikan dapat bersifat preventif (mencegah) maupun represif (memperbaiki). Perjanjian yang disepakati dalam perjanjian jual beli tanah Letter C dibawah tangan menimbulkan suatu hubungan hukum antara dua pihak yang membuatnya. Hubungan hukum sendiri merupakan hubungan yang menimbulkan akibat hukum yang dijamin oleh hukum atau undang-undang. Setiap perbuatan hukum yang menimbulkan akibat hukum harus memiliki perlindungan hukum, terlebih disaat terjadi suatu sengketa diantara para pihaknya. Sengketa pertanahan dapat timbul setelah disepakatinya perjanjian jual beli tanah Letter C, maka dari itu diperlukan perlindungan hokum untuk memberi solusi dan kepastian serta kejelasan akan penyelesaian sengketa yang ada atau yang berpotensi terjadi pasca perjanjian disepakati.<br />Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum; Perjanjian di bawah tangan; Jual Beli Tanah.</p>

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 181
Author(s):  
Chartilia Gendis Napinillit M. ◽  
Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi

<p>This article aims to analyze and know the law protection provided to parties involved in the agreement through the loan-based crowdfunding platform. The legal protection granted to the parties is contained within the agreement itself, namely within the clause of the clause agreed upon by the parties, and there is also an out of the agreement, that is, in the provisions of current laws and regulations. Law protection is an important thing to guarantee the fulfillment of the legal rights of a person. In addition to these objectives, law protection is provided to bring about legal certainty, legal benefit, and justice for the parties. Law protection can be preventive (prevent) or repressive (fix). The agreed agreement on the loan-based crowdfunding platform creates a legal relationship between the two parties of the manufacturer.  Legal Relationship is a relationship that gives rise to the consequences of a law guaranteed by law or law. Any legal action that raises legal consequences on a loan-based crowdfunding platform should have legal protection, especially when there is a dispute between the<br />parties. Peaceful forums or through deliberations can not be guaranteed to resolve existing disputes, therefore legal protection is required to provide a solution and clarity of existing dispute settlement or potentially occurring after the agreement is agreed.</p><p>Keywords: Law Protection, Agreement, Loan-based crowdfunding, .</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mengetahui perlindungan hukum yang diberikan bagi para pihak yang terlibat didalam perjanjian melaui platform loan-based crowdfunding. Perlindungan hukum yang diberikan bagi para pihak terdapat didalam perjanjian itu sendiri, yaitu didalam klausula klausula yang telah disepakati para pihak, dan terdapat juga diluar perjanjian, yaitu didalam ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku saat ini. Perlindungan hukum merupakan suatu hal yang penting untuk menjamin terpenuhinya hak hak hukum dari seseorang. Selain tujuan tersebut, perlindungan hukum yang diberikan guna mewujudkan kepastian hukum, kemanfaatan hukum, dan keadilan bagi para pihak. Perlindungan hukum yang diberikan dapat bersifat preventif (mencegah) atau represif (memperbaiki).  Perjanjian yang disepakati pada platform loan-based crowdfunding menimbulkan suatu hubungan Hukum antara dua pihak pembuatnya. Hubungan Hukum yaitu hubungan yang menimbulkan akibat Hukum yang dijamin oleh Hukum atau Undang-Undang. Setiap perbuatan hukum yang memunculkan akibat hukum pada platform loan-based crowdfunding harus memiliki perlindungan hukum, terlebih disaat terjadi suatu sengketa antar pihak. Forum damai atau melalui cara musyawarah belum dapat menjadi jaminan akan terselesaikannya sengketa yang ada, maka dari itu perlindungan hukum diperlukan untuk  memberi solusi dan kejelasan akan penyelesaian sengketa yang ada atau yang berpotensi terjadi pasca perjanjian disepakati.</p><p>Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum, Perjanjian, Loan based crowdfunding.</p>


Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 436
Author(s):  
Wulan Wiryantari Dewi ◽  
Ibrahim R

The notary's role is to provide legal protection to the people who use his services. The presence of a Notary is indispensable for the community concerned to hold a legal relationship with other individuals so that the Notary may also be liable. In the provisions of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter c of the Amendment Law, it is stipulated that in carrying out his position, the Notary is required to attach fingerprints on the minutes of the deed, giving rise to various polemics, because the said provisions do not stipulate further if in this case the smoker suffers from finger defects or events that result in damage to fingerprints which makes the investigator unable to put his fingerprint. The purpose of this research is to find out how the efforts that can be done by a notary against those who are unable to put fingerprints and the legal consequences of the absence of fingerprints against the strength of the deed. This research is a type of normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that efforts can be made by a notary if there are those who suffer from finger defects or experience events that cause fingerprint damage so that they cannot attach their fingerprints to the minutes of the deed, the relevant Notary can explain the matter at the end of the deed. he made it because the fingerprints attached to the address are an act that is required to a notary that can lead to administrative sanctions as contained in the Amendment Law. Due to the legal absence of fingerprints attached to the strength of the deed that is the deed made by the relevant Notary Public remains an authentic deed even though the fingerprints of the tappers are not attached based on Article 1869 of the Civil Code and the deed is valid and legally binding as long as the provisions contained in Article 1320 are fulfilled Civil Code.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Bella Arwinilita ◽  
Siti Anggraini ◽  
Dwi Wisnu Wardana ◽  
Asep Hermawan ◽  
Setiawan Widiyoko

Legal protection in agreements on the separation of assets in marriage between Indonesian citizens and foreign citizens as well as analyzing the authority of a notary in making an agreement on the separation of assets in marriage between Indonesian citizens. and foreign nationals. This research uses empirical normative research. The approach method used is a statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that the making of a marriage contract can provide legal protection for the party who made it. The agreement deed made in the notary can be used as written evidence in court in case of problems at a later date. Based on Article 1868 of the Civil Code and notary authority in Article 15 of the notary office law, it is stated that notaries have the authority to make authentic deeds related to all agreements. Notaries must be able to provide legal certainty in people's lives because in the deed there is evidence that clearly determines a person's rights and obligations as a legal subject in society. Notary Deed as deed which has perfect evidentiary power makes the position of Notary Deed as the first and main evidence in civil evidentiary law.


Author(s):  
Luh Made Asri Dwi Lestari ◽  
Anak Agung Gede Duwira Hadi Santosa

The guarantee agreement (borgtocht) creates legal consequences such as subrogation rights for the guarantor who has borne debtor's debt to creditor. The provisions of Article 1820 of Civil Code and other articles related to borgtocht in other laws and regulations relating to guarantees show that there are no regulations for the protection of subrogation rights that the guarantor obtained in the guarantee agreement, resulting in a vacuum of norm against this matter. Determining the guarantor’s legal standing in guarantee agreement according to the Indonesian guarantee legal system and the binding strength of the authentic deed in protecting the subrogation rights of guarantor in the guarantee agreement are the goals from this research. The normative juridical research method is used in this paper by carrying out legal construction through the argumentum per analogiam method to solve the vacuum of norms, implemented by expanding the meaning of statutory provisions on similar issues and the existence of community interests that demand the same assessment. This research shows that the legal standing of guarantor are implicitly regulated in Articles 1831-1843 Civil Code and based on the argumentum per analogiam method the provisions of the authentic deed formulation in subrogation that occur because the meaning of the agreement is expanded to be applied to this issue, therefore the third parties obtain legal protection for the rights of subrogation that arise, after bearing repayment of debtor's debt. Perjanjian penanggungan (borgtocht) menimbulkan akibat hukum berupa hak subrogasi bagi penanggung yang telah melakukan penanggungan utang debitur terhadap kreditur. Ketentuan Pasal 1820 KUH Perdata dan pasal-pasal lainnya terkait dengan penanggungan serta pasal-pasal dalam peraturan perundang-undangan lainnya terkait dengan jaminan tidak terdapat pengaturan perumusan hak subrogasi yang diperoleh penanggung dalam perjanjian penanggungan, sehingga terjadi suatu kekosongan norma (vacuum of norm) terhadap persoalan ini. Mengetahui kedudukan hukum penanggung dalam perjanjian penanggungan menurut sistem hukum jaminan Indonesia dan kekuatan mengikat akta otentik dalam melindungi hak subrogasi penanggung dalam perjanjian penanggungan menjadi tujuan dalam penelitian ini. Metode penelitian yuridis normatif digunakan dalam penulisan karya tulis ini dengan melakukan konstruksi hukum melalui metode argumentum per analogiam untuk mengatasi kekosongan norma, yaitu perluasan makna ketentuan perundang-undangan terhadap persoalan yang mirip serta adanya kepentingan masyarakat yang menuntut penilaian sama. Hasil penelitian menunjukan kedudukan hukum bagi penanggung diatur secara implisit pada Pasal 1831-1843 KUH Perdara serta berdasarkan metode argumentum per analogiam ketentuan perumusan akta otentik pada peristiwa subrogasi yang terjadi karena persetujuan diperluas maknanya untuk diterapkan pada persoalan ini, sehingga pihak ketiga memperoleh perlindungan hukum atas hak subrogasinya yang timbul setelah dilakukannya penanggungan utang.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-88
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Istri Chintya Paramitha ◽  
I Made Suwitra ◽  
I Nyoman Alit Puspadma

This study aims to analyse the legal certainty of land rights certificates through the complete systematic land registration program regulated in Permen ATR / BPN No.6 / 2018. The issues examined include the legal certainty of land rights certificates issued based on Permen ATR / BPN No.6 / 2018 and legal protection of certificates issued under Permen ATR / BPN No.6 / 2018 for holders of certificates of land rights. This study uses normative legal research. The data was primary and secondary legal materials related to land registration. The results of the study are associated with legal objectives, then Permen ATR / BPN No. 6/1997 provides great advantages and can create an element of justice by issuing certificates throughout the community, so that legal certainty is given but it becomes weak due to disharmony between the two rules. So that applies the legal principle of the lex superiori derogat legi inferiori. The lower provisions are null and void and have no binding legal force as a result, land rights certificates issued based on Permen ATR / BPN No.6 / 2018 do not have legal power. In order to achieve legal certainty and protection, the provisions of Article 24 paragraph (2) Permen ATR / BPN No.6 / 2018 is adjusted to Article 26 paragraph (1) PP No. 24/1997 or the rules regarding PTSL are made in laws and regulations of the same level or higher than PP No.24 / 1997.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-26
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Istri Agung ◽  
I Nyoman Sukandia

The inheritance and the division of inheritance that is felt to be unfair is often a source of dispute. The disputes that occur can sometimes be resolved by making a peace agreement between the disputing parties. The peace desired by the parties is, of course, expected to end disputes/conflict and to provide legal certainty among those in dispute. However, sometimes peace agreements that have been made between those in dispute are disputed again in court. This study aims to examine the settlement of Balinese traditional inheritance disputes through a binding peace agreement between the parties make it. The method used in this study is a normative legal research, using a statute approach and a case approach. The result of this study showed that the settlement of Balinese indigenous inheritance disputes through a binding peace agreement of the parties that make it if the peace agreement is made based on the validity of the agreement as stipulated in article 1320 of the Civil Code, based on good faith as the principles in the law of the agreement, and must be made in the form of a notary deed is in accordance with the provisions for conciliation in book III of the Civil Code.  


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Fauzi Sumardi ◽  
Ridho Mubarak

<p><em>Juridical Review Of Work Agreements Made Orally</em></p><p><em><br /></em></p><p><em>A verbal work agreement is a work relationship that is made without the signing of a work agreement, a verbal work agreement is sufficient with a statement that is mutually agreed upon by both parties and should be witnessed by at least two witnesses. The purpose of this study was to find out how the legal strength of work agreements made verbally and how legal protection for workers whose employment relationships are based on verbal work agreements. The research method used is the library research method, namely by conducting research on various written reading sources, and the Field Research method, which is a juridical review of workers whose work relations are based on verbal work agreements. The purpose of this study is to find out the answers to the problems discussed. The results of the study indicate that the legal strength of the work agreement made orally is not specifically regulated in the Civil Code or in other laws and regulations so that the arrangement of oral agreements only follows the arrangement of work agreements in general</em></p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaldi Pratama Bagus Putra

The legal consequences of the issuance of the land title certificate whose application is made by a party who is not the right holder / owner is legally flawed. Issuance of a legally invalid certificate and no binding force and cancellation by the court. The defendant obtains a parcel of land through an auction, the auction is proven by photocopies of the auction object certificate, according to Article 21 of the 2016 Bidding Guidelines that the registered land auction must include an original certificate, so The Defendant did not go through the correct legal procedures. For the issuance of a double certificate for the same land field, the buyer of the land field loses the ownership certificate that is purchased by another party as a buyer with good intentions, because it has been carried out in accordance with the correct legal procedure, which means that the purchaser's certificate is guaranteed legal certainty. Legal protection for the purchaser of good land rights, that the buyer as a buyer has good intentions, with the issuance of the HGB certificate Number 181 Village / Cicau Village covering an area of ​​26,700 m2 in the name of the Defendant, is impaired, so that legal protection provided to the Plaintiff is filing an objection to the issuance HGB certificate to the Land Office as a preventive legal protection. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-182
Author(s):  
Yussy A. Mannas

Abstract:The emergence rights and obligations as a result of legal relationship between doctors and patients could potentially trigger a dispute between doctors and patients or medical disputes. In an effort to avoid or reduce medical disputes, it is necessary to understand the construction of the legal relationship between doctor and patient. From this legal relationship which will result legal actions and gave rise to legal consequences. In a legal effect, it can’t be separated is about who is responsible, as far as what responsibility can be given. It describes that relationship and the patient's physician if constructed, it can be divided based on two factors; transaction of therapeutic and act. In relation patient - physician based therapeutic, known as therapeutic relationship or transaction therapeutic, there is a binding between patients and physicians in the treatment of the disease or treatment. Engagements happens is inspanningsverbintennis and not resultaatsverbintennis, and must comply with the provisions of Article 1320 of the Civil Code. The relationship between doctor and patient is based on the Act - legislation occurred under Article 1354 of the Civil Code, which formulates zaakwaarneming. Legal relationship that occurs by two things above give rise to legal liability for doctors, the responsibility in the field of disciplinary law, criminal law, civil law and administrative law.Keywords: Doctor, Patient and Legal Relationship.Abstrak:Munculnya hak dan kewajiban sebagai akibat hubungan hukum antara dokter dan pasien berpotensi memicu terjadinya sengketa antara dokter dengan pasien atau sengketa medik. Dalam upaya menghindari atau mengurangi sengketa medik yang terjadi, maka perlu dipahami mengenai konstruksi hubungan hukum antara dokter dengan pasien. Dari hubungan hukum inilah yang akan melahirkan perbuatan hukum dan menimbulkan adanya akibat hukum. Dalam suatu akibat hukum, hal yang tidak dapat dipisahkan adalah mengenai siapa yang bertanggung jawab, sejauh apa tanggung jawab dapat diberikan. Dalam tulisan ini diuraikan bahwa hubungan dokter dan pasien ini jika dikonstruksikan maka dapat dibagi berdasarkan dua hal, yaitu transaksi terapeutik dan undang-undang. Pada hubungan pasien- dokter berdasarkan terapeutik, dikenal hubungan terapeutik atau transaksi terapeutik, yaitu terjadi suatu ikatan antara pasien dan dokter dalam hal pengobatan atau perawatan penyakitnya. Perikatan yang terjadi ialah inspanningsverbintennis dan bukan resultaatsverbintennis, dan harus memenuhi ketentuan Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata. Hubungan dokter dan pasien berdasarkan undang–undang terjadi berdasarkan Pasal 1354 KUHPerdata yang merumuskan tentang zaakwaarneming. Hubungan hukum yang terjadi oleh dua hal diatas menimbulkan tanggung jawab hukum bagi dokter, yaitu tanggung jawab dalam bidang hukum, hukum pidana, hukum perdata dan hukum administrasi.Kata Kunci: Dokter, Pasien dan Hubungan Hukum. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 314
Author(s):  
Andi Pratono ◽  
Tjempaka Tjempaka

Indonesia is the law of state or law state, as a law state country, Indonesia must have 3(three) important element such as legal certainty, justice, and expediency. Those main elements represent all the law state. In community, people everyday acts always relate to legal act, such as contract, buying or selling object that promised. To ensure those legal act have the ability perfect proof power, those legal act poured in the form of deed. In buying and selling land, a deed of sale and purchase must be made in front authorized official like land deed officer. However land deed officer as public official do make mistake on duty, with the result that party at a disadvantage. Party that loss because of mistake land deed officer, do ask for responsibility by suing the land deed officer to compensate the losses. Land deed officer in carrying out their duties must apply the precautionary principle so as to minimize any mistakes in making the deed. Author is using normative legal research methods, supported by a data which is theory and interviews some expert in land deed officer and Code of Ethics. The legal consequences to the land deed officer due the legal acts are against the law, which is a sanction will be given. The sanction will divided in three types such as sanction according to the Civil Law, Criminal Law and Code of Ethics or Government Regulation about land deed officer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document