scholarly journals Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran dan Berpikir Kritis Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sejarah Siswa SMA Kesatuan Bogor

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Iin Iryance

Absrtact The aim of the study is to reveal the empirical data about the effect of instructional methodology and student’s critical thinking capability level on the outcome of history learning on the students of SMA Kesatuan Bogor. The methodology used is the experimental method with a 2x2 factorial design. Research instrumentation will include a test that will be used to measure student’s learning outcome, and a questionnaire that will be used to measure student’s critical thinking capability level on history outcomes. A total of 28 participants will be randomly selected. Data analysis will be performed by using two way variance analysis. The findings of the study will be demonstrate: 1) a higher student’s history learning outcome of those who were taught by PJBL instructional methodology compared to those who were taught by conventional method. 2) There is an interaction effect between instructional methodology and student’s critical thinking level on history learning outcome. 3) History learning outcome of students who has higher critical thinking level and were taught by PJBL method are higher than those with the same level of critical thinking but were taught by conventional method. 4) History learning outcome of students who has lower critical thinking level and were taught by PJBL methodology are not below those with the same critical thinking but were taught by conventional method. Keywords : history learning outcome, instructional methodology, student’s critical thinking

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Naijan Naijan

Abstract The aim of the study is to reveal the empirical data about the effect of instructional methodology and student’s social attitudeon the outcome of history learning on the students of SMAN 12 Tangerang Selatan. The methodology used is the experimental method with a 2x2 treatment design. Research instrumentation will include a test that will be used to measure student’s learning outcome, and a questionnaire that will be used to measure student’s social attitudeon history outcomes. A total of 36 participants will be randomly selected. Data analysis will be performed by using two way variance analysis. The findings of the study will be demonstrate: 1) a higher student’s history learning outcome of those who were taught by Cooperative Learning method typeJigsawcompared to those who were taught by conventional method. 2) There is an interaction effect between instructional methodology and student’s social attitudeon history learning outcome. 3) History learning outcome of students who has positive social attitudeand were taught by Cooperative Learning method typeJigsaware higher than those with the same level of social attitude but were taught by conventional method. 4) History learning outcome of students who has negative social attitudeand were taught by Cooperative Learning method typeJigsaware not below those with the same social attitude but were taught by conventional method. Keywords : history learning outcome, history instructional methodology, student’s social attitude, cooperative learning methodtipe Jigsaw, cooperative learning


2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Victor Andreas Jusup

Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of the task of learning methods, and its relation to the creativity of the students to the history learning outcomes at SMA 7 PSKD Depok. The research method used was experimental. test instruments are also used to measure the learning outcomes of history, and questionnaires used to measure the creativity of students in learning history. A total of 32 participants will be randomly selected. Data analysis will be performed by using two way variance analysis. The findings of the study will be demonstrate: 1) a higher student’s history learning outcome of those who were taught by Recitation instructional methodology compared to those who were taught by conventional method. 2) There is an interaction effect between instructional methodology and student’s creativity level on history learning outcome. 3) History learning outcome of students who has higher creativity level and were taught by Recitation method are higher than those with the same level of creativity but were taught by conventional method. 4) History learning outcome of students who has lower creativity level and were taught by Recitation methodology are not below those with the same creativity level but were taught by conventional method. Keywords : history learning outcome, history instructional methodology, student’s creativity level.


Jurnal KATA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 172
Author(s):  
Fauzan Adhima

<p><em>The aim of the study is to reveal the empirical data about the effect of cooperative learning and learning styles on the outcome of germany writting of SMA Negeri 42 Jakarta. The methodology used is the experimental method with a 2x2 factorial design. Data analysis performed by using two way variance analysis. The findings of the study demonstrated: 1)   The teaching cooperative leraning type STAD was higher than students who take cooperative leraning type Pair Cheks teaching. 2) The visual learning style was higher than students who have auditory learning style. 3) The students who take the teaching  cooperative leraning type Pair Cheks and have a visual learning style higher than students who take cooperative leraning type STAD and have a visual learning style . 4) The cooperative leraning type STAD and auditory learning style is higher than  cooperative leraning type Pair Cheks and have auditory learning styles. 5) The teaching cooperative leraning type STAD and have a auditory learning style was higher than the teaching cooperative leraning type STAD and have visual learning styles. 6) The cooperative leraning type Pair Cheks and have a visual learning style is higher than cooperative leraning type Pair Cheks and have auditory learning styles. 7) There is an interaction effect between  cooperative leraning  and learning style of the germany writting outcome.</em></p><p><em><br /></em></p><p> </p><p>Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh pembelajaran kooperatif (tipe STAD dan tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em>) dan gaya belajar (visual dan auditori) terhadap keterampilan menulis bahasa Jerman Siswa SMA N 42 Jakarta. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode eksperimen menggunakan desain faktorial 2 X 2. Pengukuran keterampilan menulis bahasa Jerman menggunakan tes tulis sedangkan gaya belajar menggunakan kuesioner. Teknik analisis data dalam penelitian ini adalah teknkik analisis variansi (ANAVA) 2 jalur dan dilanjutkan dengan uji Tuckey untuk melihat interaksi antar kelompok.  Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa: (1) keterampilan menulis tipe STAD lebih baik dari pada tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em>, (2) gaya belajar visual lebih baik dari auditori, (3) gaya belajar auditori lebih baik menggunakan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dari pada tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em>, (4) keterampilan menulis bahasa Jerman kelompok siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih baik menggunakan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em> dari pada tipe STAD, (5) Belajar dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD lebih baik diterapkan pada siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar auditori dari pada gaya belajar visual, (6) belajar dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em> lebih baik diterapkan pada siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dari pada auditori, dan (7) terdapat pengaruh interaksi antara pembelajaran kooperatif dan gaya belajar terhadap keterampilan menulis bahasa Jerman.</p><p>Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh pembelajaran kooperatif (tipe STAD dan tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em>) dan gaya belajar (visual dan auditori) terhadap keterampilan menulis bahasa Jerman Siswa SMA N 42 Jakarta. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode eksperimen menggunakan desain faktorial 2 X 2. Pengukuran keterampilan menulis bahasa Jerman menggunakan tes tulis sedangkan gaya belajar menggunakan kuesioner. Teknik analisis data dalam penelitian ini adalah teknkik analisis variansi (ANAVA) 2 jalur dan dilanjutkan dengan uji Tuckey untuk melihat interaksi antar kelompok.  Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa: (1) keterampilan menulis tipe STAD lebih baik dari pada tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em>, (2) gaya belajar visual lebih baik dari auditori, (3) gaya belajar auditori lebih baik menggunakan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dari pada tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em>, (4) keterampilan menulis bahasa Jerman kelompok siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih baik menggunakan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em> dari pada tipe STAD, (5) Belajar dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD lebih baik diterapkan pada siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar auditori dari pada gaya belajar visual, (6) belajar dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe <em>Pair Cheks</em> lebih baik diterapkan pada siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dari pada auditori, dan (7) terdapat pengaruh interaksi antara pembelajaran kooperatif dan gaya belajar terhadap keterampilan menulis bahasa Jerman.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 285
Author(s):  
Mohamad Nor Aufa ◽  
Sutarto Hadi ◽  
Syahmani Syahmani ◽  
Rusmansyah Rusmansyah ◽  
Muhammad Hasbie ◽  
...  

This study aims to produce a science module based on mobile-collaborative-based science learning (m-CBSL) with the topic of temperature and heat and describe the resulting module's validity and practicality. The research design was Educational Design Research (EDR). The data collection techniques used were literature study, walkthrough, interview, and questionnaire. The instrument used in this study was a questionnaire of validity and practicality. Data analysis techniques include descriptive data analysis, validation sheets, and questionnaires. Module validation sheets were given to 5 validators. In contrast, practicality sheets were given to 9 students of class VII SMP Negeri 12 Banjarmasin (small group) and 62 students and three science teachers at SMP Negeri 6 & 12 Banjarmasin field test. The validity questionnaire analysis results concluded that the validity of the module was 3.71 "very valid" categories. The practicality level based on the teacher's questionnaire scored 87.04 in the "very practical" category. The small group questionnaire scored 85.19 in the "very practical" category, and the field trial questionnaire scored 86.42 in the "very practical" category. It means that the m-CBSL based science module is valid and practical in the learning process to improve critical thinking skills and collaboration.


2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Nita Agustinawati

Abstract The aim of the study is to reveal the impact of instructional method and learning autonomy on the outcome of history learning students. This research is conducted in SMAN 7 Cirebon academic year 2013/2014. The result of the research: (1) From the history learning outcome of students who used instructional method of Think Pair Share were higher than those who used learning conventional method; (2) There were interactions between instructional method and learning autonomy on history learning outcome; (3) The History learning outcome of students were taught by Think Pair Share and who has higher and learning autonomy level has higher than were taught by conventional method; (4) The history learning outcome of students were taught by Think Pair Share and who has lower learning autonomy level has lower than were taught by conventional method. Keywords : history learning outcome, instructional method, learning autonomy


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Myristica Imanita

Abstract This study aimed to determine the effect of learning methods and student’s intrepersonal intelligence on the outcome of history learning on the students. This research is quantitative research using design treatment by level 2x2 The research date was taken from the observation, tests and questionnaires. The results showedthat(1) history learning outcome of students who follow STAD instructional methods higher than students whofollow conventional linstructional methods, (2) there is interaction effect between instructional methods and interpersonal intelligence on history learning outcome of students, (3) history learning outcomesof studentswhofollow STAD instructionalmethodwithhighinterpersonalintelligence, higher thanstudents who followconventional linstructionalmethod, (4)historylearning outcomesof studentswhofollow STAD instuctionalmethodswithlowinterpersonalintelligence, lower thanstudents who followconventional instructional methods Keywords : History learning outcome, instructional method, interpersonal intelligence


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-29
Author(s):  
Poy Saefullah Zevender

This research was motivated by observations and interviews stating that the critical thinking skills by taking into account the motivation of learners is still low. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is influence from learning model Active Learning Type Quiz Team about the critical thinking skills of learners, whether there is influence learning motivation of students towards critical thinking skills of learners, and whether there is an interaction effect between teaching model active learning type of quiz team  to learning motivation towards critical thinking skills of learners. The method used is experimental method with factorial design. This caused the hypothesis testing is done by using two way analisys of variance in order to avoid noise or a possibility that states there is an effect due to mixing of the data analysis. Meanwhile, the population in this study were all students of class X as many as 309 students and the sample is class X-2 as the experimental class and X-3 as the control class, each of which consists of 39 students. Based on the results of the study showed: There is the influence of learning model Active Learning type Quiz Team of the critical thinking skills of learners with sig. 0.000 <0.05. There is the influence of learning motivation towards the critical thinking skills of learners with sig. 0.003 <0.05. There is an interaction effect between the active learning teaching model type quiz team with the learning motivation towards the critical thinking skills of learners with sig. 0.000 <0.05. To reach the maximum critical thinking skills, it is recommended that the teachers continue to practice, formulate and present problems that exist into the learning process as a stimulus for students to get them used to find the solution of a problem that occurs in daily life.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1630-1635
Author(s):  
Liqing Wang

Incorporating the existing theoretical models of critical thinking (CT) with empirical data analysis, this paper proposes an analytical framework for English debate in a Chinese EFL context. The framework divides the core tasks of debate into four stages: information assessment, argumentation, presentation, and reflection. Each stage requires different CT skills and sub-skills. After analyzing the 24 students’ debating and subsequent reflective practice, this paper discusses the key points and difficulties in developing CT skills in the process of English debate and tries to explore the operable teaching methods.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhan Harie

<p>The aim of this study was to determine 1) The interaction effect between teaching methods and learning styles of the ability to think criticism biology, 2) Critical thinking skills of biology that uses the learning Problem Solving and Problem Posing, and, 3) Critical thinking skills biology to has studied the style of visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. The method used is experiment. Affordable population are students of class IX in south Jakarta SMPN 131 is 198 students. Samples numbered 72 students. The sampling technique was multistage sampling<em>. </em>The instrument used is a biological test critical thinking skills and test results learners learning styles questionnaire. The data analysis using descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA) in both directions. The results of the study hypothesis was obtained conclusions: 1) There is no interaction effect between teaching methods and learning styles on learning outcomes biology students. Interaction analysis using ANOVA obtained Fo = 2.235 and Sig. = 0.115&gt; 0.05 at the 5% significance level. 2) There is a learning method influence on the ability to think criticism. Results of the analysis of data between classes using ANOVA obtained Fo = 20.309 and Sig. = 0.000 &lt;0.05 at the 5% significance level. 3) There is no learning styles influence on the ability to think criticism biology. The results of data analysis using ANOVA obtained Fo = 0.414 and Sig. = 0.663&gt; 0.05 at the 5% significance level.</p><p> Keywords: Method of Learning, Learning Styles, Thinking Criticism.</p><p><strong> </strong></p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Mirla Safrina Boru

The research aim to investigate the influence of instructional models cognitive style toward history learning outcome of students at SMA Negeri 28 Kab. Tangerang. This research is quantitative research using design treatment by level 2x2. The population of this research is all students of X IIS grade. The sample consist of two classes that X IIS 2 and X IIS 4 with 67 people amount. For the experimental class X IIS 2 are 32 student and from control class X IIS 4 are 35 student will be selected. The instrument used to assess students achievement is in the multiple choice form, while the instrument used to assess students cognitive style is in test GEFT. Among the result of the research are: (1) History learning outcome of students who follow TGT instructional models higher than the student who studied with direct instruction model, (2) History learning outcome of students who have Field Independent cognitive style higher than student who have a Field Dependent cognitive style, (3) There is interaction effect between models of instructional and cognitive style on history learning outcome of student.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document