scholarly journals Que Modelo é Esse? As Alterações nos Processos de Capacitação de Recursos Humanos nos 20 Anos do Plano MARE

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 298-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea De Oliveira Gonçalves ◽  
Rogério Luiz Alves dos Santos ◽  
João De Abreu Faria Bilhim ◽  
Thiago Dias da Costa

The Master Plan for the Reform of the State Apparatus was implemented by the Brazilian Government in 1995. Among its actions, it instituted the Policy for Staff Development in Public Administration. This action resulted in the guidelines of the public service Training Policyin Brazil. Thus, this article analyzes the main changes in the training processes at the University of Brasilia (UnB), between 1995 and 2015, in the face of the literature on strategic people management. The study is qualitative and as a data collection technique interview and documents were used, being evaluated through content and document analysis respectively. The results were classified into four models of public administration addressed in the literature. The results about the working conditions, planning, execution and control of the training policy as well as the incentives to qualification tend to have one or more public administration models adopted. Keywords: training policy; public administration models; Master Plan for the Reform of the State Apparatus; Brazil.

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-32
Author(s):  
ALIKHAN М. BAIMENOV ◽  

The article emphasizes that modern governments, working in unique socio-economic, historical and cultural conditions, must take into account global trends, as well as the growth of citizens’ expectations associated with the rapid development of information technologies and other factors. In such circumstances, special attention is paid to the effectiveness of public administration. The article discusses some of the significant factors impacting the effectiveness of public administration, such as the professionalization of the state apparatus, the legibility of the institutional framework, the optimization of information flows and corporate culture. In accordance with this, on the basis of work experience in the public administration system and analysis of civil service reforms in the countries of the region, the main challenges and possible solutions are shown. In the professionalization of the state apparatus, the importance of the merit principles in the selection and promotion stages of personnel through the empowerment of human resource (HR) management services, the integrity of tools and approaches at all stages of selection process, and the responsibility of the selection board are noted. The author focuses on the need to ensure a balance of powers, responsibility and resources, delimitation of powers between political and administrative civil servants, optimization of information flows. Particular importance is paid to corporate culture, which is one of the main factors affecting the efficiency of the state apparatus. It is noted that central values of corporate culture and leadership in state bodies of the countries of our region, along with generally accepted in the modern leadership theory, should be respect for the dignity, work and time of employees.


2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 387-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucan A. Way ◽  
Steven Levitsky

This article examines coercive capacity and its impact on autocratic regime stability in the context of post-Soviet Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, and Ukraine. In the post-Cold War era, different types of coercive acts require different types of state power. First, high intensity and risky measures – such as firing on large crowds or stealing elections – necessitate high degrees of cohesion or compliance within the state apparatus. Second, effective low intensity measures – including the surveillance and infiltration of opposition, and various forms of less visible police harassment – require extensive state scope or a well-trained state apparatus that penetrates large parts of society. Coercive state capacity, rooted in cohesion and scope, has often been more important than opposition strength in determining whether autocrats fall or remain in power. Thus, the regime in Armenia that was backed by a highly cohesive state with extensive scope was able to maintain power in the face of highly mobilized opposition challenges. By contrast, regimes in Georgia where the state lacked cohesion and scope fell in the face of even weakly mobilized opposition. Relatively high scope but only moderate cohesion in Belarus and Ukraine has made autocratic regimes in these countries generally more effective at low intensity coercion to prevent the emergence of opposition than at high intensity coercion necessary to face down serious opposition challenges.


Upravlenie ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-71
Author(s):  
Охотский ◽  
Evgeniy Okhotskiy

The article attempts to analyze the scientific relevance and practical relevance for the modern system of public administration mainstreaming mode of governance and management style, their forms and manifestations in practice. Thus explores the underlying quality characteristics and stylistic peculiarities of functioning of the state apparatus, the difficulty of optimizing performance, problematic and contradictory nature of overcoming corruption and bureaucratic pathologies, threats, dysfunctions and other deformations in the practice of public administration. It is emphasized that at some point the corrupt and bureaucratic mechanisms become latent shadow control system, which resist very difficult. In the result remain on top of the bureaucracy, the corruption, the brutality, the callousness and irresponsibility, and the bottom begins to dominate legal nihilism, distrust of authorities, double standards. Analyzing the distinguished types of styles, the author stops at the optimally-effective style performance focuses on the value of the benefits and ways of learning, introduces into scientific circulation the concept of “style of meanness and hypocrisy” – style, based on lies, double standards, fraud, provocations and corruption. This article presents some value judgments made appropriate generalizations and conclusions, analyzes the actions taken by a state in respect of establishing proper order in the system of public administration and public service. Formulated proposals which, in the opinion of the author, will help accurately implement the tasks put by the state in terms of democratic governance and innovation updates of the struggle against formalism, bureaucratic abuse, corruption, hardware isolation.


Author(s):  
Alasdair Roberts

This chapter highlights how the field of public administration was invented to achieve the goal of leaders to gain control, to establish mastery over their circumstances, so that the potential of American democracy could be realized. For leaders, the first aspect of mastery consists of knowing the territory over which sovereignty is claimed. The next step toward mastery is gaining a deeper understanding of the environment in which states operate. However, mastery requires more than information and understanding. Leaders need tools to influence the dynamics of systems; or, in other words, to influence circumstances. People outside the state apparatus need to be induced to change their behavior, whether by persuasion, material inducement, or threat of punishment. Whatever the preferred method of influence, leaders must have the administrative capacity to apply it: they must establish their own bureaucracies or delegate responsibilities to other public or private organizations. The chapter then explains that the extent of control enjoyed by leaders today is vastly greater than it was a century ago. For example, advances in information technology are producing ever-larger amounts of data about the behavior of governed populations. Indeed, the obstacle to mastery may no longer be a dearth of information. Today, the obstacle might be a tsunami of information that overwhelms the capacity of leaders to make sense of it and respond appropriately.


Author(s):  
Alasdair Roberts

This chapter summarizes the propositions that are emphasized within the proposed macro-level approach to public administration. These propositions suggest that the fundamental unit of political organization is the state. Every state has leaders; that is, a relatively small group of people who have substantial influence over the ordering of state goals and the means by which those goals are pursued. Generally, leaders try to maintain and improve their own positions within the state apparatus; increase power and legitimacy within the state system; increase power and legitimacy within the state's own territory; and increase national prosperity. In addition, leaders ought to advance human rights for the population that is subject to their authority. The behavior of leaders is guided by governance strategies that describe priorities and the means by which those priorities will be pursued. The chapter then details the aspects of the governing environment which must be taken into account as leaders set priorities and decide how those priorities will be pursued. Ultimately, scholars and practitioners in the field of public administration should be experts in the overall design, construction, administration, and renovation of those institutions that constitute a state. They should use this expertise to help leaders craft governing strategies that are effective, durable, and normatively defensible.


AUC IURIDICA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 93-105
Author(s):  
Iwona Niżnik-Dobosz

In view of the obligation of affirmative duty of public administration in the timely way, the author of this paper is verifying the thesis that failing to meet this obligation, in Poland, during the COVID-19 epidemic, the Council of Ministers did not introduce the state of natural disaster regulated by the Constitution and the natural disaster management act.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-230
Author(s):  
Tuty Mutiah ◽  
Dhefine Armelsa ◽  
Faqihar Risyan ◽  
Agung Raharjo

Dystopia in Film Tiga Liberalism Conditions (Roland Barthes Semiotics Studies about Dystopia on Liberalism in Jakarta in Film Tiga). This study goals is to determine the meaning of dystopian condition of Jakarta in the Film Tiga through the sign, signifier and signified. Three films is a film that adopts Liberal describe the depravity of Jakarta twenty years in the future in 2036. The method used semiotic analysis of Roland 2 Bartes.The object of research is the Film Tiga were directed by Anggy Umbara and classified through five objects dystopia condition of Jakarta, dystopian condition of the state apparatus, dystopia conditions of religion, dystopia technology, and dystopias journalism to find signs and markers and meaning at the level of the first and second, the denotation, connotations and myths.These results indicate that the situation of Jakarta transformed into an increasingly metropolis marked by the increasing number of high-rise buildings, as well as demonstrations marked depicted in 2015 until 2025. In 2026, the revolution ended and became State Liberalism. Changes in the State apparatus are characterized by the wish to dominate the world to create freedom in the face of the earth. One is to get rid of religion, by damaging the face of religion. State Officials do havoc with bring into conflict of the Religion. Changes religion marked by shifting religious values, is marked by religion becomes a thing wrong choice. The lack of freedom is depicted in this film, must be eradicated in order to function in a Liberal to be ideal. Technological changes are interpreted as changes in technology that convey information quickly, as well as the ability to hacked That meaning is characterized by technological devices that undergo changes such as, mobile phones, flash, televisions, doors, computers, laptops and so forth is now transformed into transparent. The changes meant the journalistic agenda setting media that is still happening characterized by lack of freedom of the press.


Modernization changes the basic target, functional, structural principles of building public administration, thereby there is a paradigm shift in understanding its place and mission in the state-market-civil society relationship. The bureaucratic model of public administration belongs to the old paradigm, the new government and network models belong to the new paradigm. These models are contradictory intertwined under the influence of globalization and decentralization on modernization processes in public administration, which creates new problems in adapting administrative hierarchies (bureaucracies) to global challenges and the requirements of devolution. The problem arises of integrating new horizontal connections (networks) into traditional vertical structures. At the same time, the problem of the state’s ability to increase the efficiency of officials’s actions in conditions of rapid environmental transformation is exacerbating. In addition, there is a problem of scale, traditional for public administration, i.e. the correspondence of functions and resources at different managerial levels to the nature and volume of existing tasks. The solution of these problems at the transit stage largely depends on the nature of the emerging institutional paths and the reform strategy, its focus on maintaining a balance of stability and changes based on the experience of previous transformations. The managerial model of priority for many reformers, with its inevitable decentralization carried out in an institutional environment that has not reached the necessary level of self-organization and accountability, will obviously entail the progressive loss of autonomy by the state bureaucracy from special interest groups. Strengthening the role of informal managerial practices in the face of non-established norms of administrative ethics will not provide unbiased impersonal law enforcement. However, criticism of the new government does not make the choice of bureaucratic or network models justified. The priority is not the choice of one or another theoretical model of modernization as its goal, but the process of developing a policy for its implementation. The criterion of manageability, reflecting the development of modernization abilities of public administration, provides guidance for institutional construction.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-25
Author(s):  
Охотский ◽  
Evgeniy Okhotskiy

In presented to attention of readers article the author attempted to analyze the scientific relevance and practical relevance for the modern system of public administration the problems of bureaucracy and red tape. The article explores the basic qualitative characteristics and peculiarities of functioning of the state apparatus, the difficulties of optimization of style, performance, problematic and contradictory nature of overcoming corruption and bureaucratic pathologies, threats, dysfunctions and other deformations in the practice of human resource management and public administration in General. It is emphasized that at some point the corrupt and bureaucratic mechanisms become latent shadow control system, which resist very difficult. In the result remain on top of the bureaucracy, the corruption, the brutality, the callousness and irresponsibility, and at the bottom of legal nihilism, distrust in the sincerity of the authorities ‘ double standards. In confirmation are the concrete facts relevant statistical and sociological data. In parallel, we analyze the phenomenon of bureaucracy, explores the essence of bureaucracy and corruption, their causes and origins, manifestations, shadow side and negative social consequences. This article presents some value judgments made appropriate generalizations and conclusions, analyzes the actions taken by the state for the improvement of personnel management and guidance of proper administrative procedure in the public administration and civil service. Formulated proposals which, in the opinion of the author, will help to more efficiently realize the tasks put by the state in terms of bureaucratic control and innovation updates of the struggle against formalism, assessorship, corruption and corporate reticence.


Author(s):  
Александр Киселев ◽  
Alyeksandr Kisyelyev ◽  
Петр Киричёк ◽  
Petr Kirichek

The scientific publication examines various aspects of the dialectical synthesis of information, communication and management in modern conditions, determines the Genesis of the phenomenon of management information. The essence and properties of the system of public administration carried out in the transforming society are analyzed, the features of personnel policy at the Federal and regional levels are highlighted. Ideological and technological concepts of public administration in the perimeter of reformation transformations of the Russian society are formulated. The role and importance of media-communicative professionalism of employees of the state apparatus as one of the leading bases of efficiency of work of managers is characterized.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document