Large-Volume Foam-Gel Treatments to Improve Conformance of the Rangely CO2 Flood

1999 ◽  
Vol 2 (01) ◽  
pp. 14-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.L. Hughes ◽  
F. Friedmann ◽  
D. Johnson ◽  
G.P. Hild ◽  
A. Wilson ◽  
...  

Summary Large-volume foam-gel treatments can provide a cost-effective method to achieve in-depth conformance improvement in fractured reservoirs. The applicability and cost effectiveness of the approach depends on the availability of a cheap source of gas, the efficiency with which the foam can be placed into the high permeability thief zone(s), and the effectiveness of the gelled foam barrier in diverting reservoir drive fluids to improve oil recovery. This paper reviews progress in the application of large-volume CO2-foam-gel treatments to improve conformance in the Rangely Weber Sand Unit (RWSU), Colorado. During the period November 1996-November 1997 three large-volume foam-gel treatments were successfully placed into the Rangely reservoir. The first 36?400 bbl treatment, implemented November 1996, increased the pattern oil rate from 260 barrels of oil per day (BOPD) in March 1997 to ±330 BOPD in August 1998; a conservative estimate of incremental oil recovery is ±40?000 bbl by the end of August 1998. The second 43?450 bbl treatment, implemented August-September 1997, increased the pattern oil rate from ±430 BOPD in March 1998 to ±470 BOPD in August 1998; post-treatment, the pattern oil rate data is described by a linear regression with slope, +56 BOPD but it is too early to make a firm estimate of incremental oil recovery. The third 44?700 bbl treatment, implemented October-November 1997, increased the pattern oil rate from ±330 BOPD in May 1998 to ±375 BOPD in July-August 1998; a linear regression of the post-treatment data gives a positive slope but again it is too early to estimate incremental oil recovery. Some general features in the pattern production response given by the three foam-gel treatments were observed. First, each of the treatments induces a stabilization in the pattern oil rate which, for treatments I and II, is accompanied by a decrease in the pattern gas rate. Second, the first positive oil rate response given by each of the treatments is observed 6-8 months after treatment execution and is dominated by the response at producer wells lying to the west/southwest and/or east/southeast of the treated injector well. For a given treatment volume, the cost of a foam-gel treatment at Rangely is 40%-50% below the average cost of polymer gel treatments. As the foam is injected at a higher rate, the total pump time required for a 40?000 bbl foam-gel treatment is similar to a 20?000 bbl polymer gel treatment. Early during pumping treatments II and III, we attempted to increase the CO2 content of the foam from 80 to 85 vol?%; this resulted in a wellhead pressure which was too close to the CO2 pressure limit necessitating a decrease in foam injection rate. Thus, in optimizing foam-gel treatment cost, there is a balance between maximizing the content of the inexpensive CO2 phase and minimizing total pump time. For Treatments II and III, the cost of the liquid phase formulation was reduced by decreasing the concentrations of surfactant and buffer. The implementation and evaluation of three large-volume foam-gel treatments at Rangely indicates that the foam-gel approach provides a cost-effective method to achieve in-depth conformance improvement in fractured reservoirs. Introduction A recent survey1 indicated that the proportion of U.S. EOR production recovered by gas injection has increased from 18% to 41% during the period 1986-1996. A major contribution to this trend has been the strong increase in the number of miscible carbon dioxide (CO2) projects which now account for > 70% of the total number of ongoing gas injection projects in the U.S. The Rangely CO2 flood began in 1986; currently, there are 372 active producer wells and 300 active injector wells, 259 of which are injecting CO2 using the water-alternating-gas (WAG) process. In the application of gas injection to heterogeneous reservoirs, oil recovery efficiency can be limited by poor conformance as an increasing proportion of the injected gas flows through higher permeability thief zones and/or fractures. The importance of conformance improvement has long been recognized at Rangely. The main problem being addressed is poor CO2 conformance due to preferential flow through the natural fracture network leading to premature gas breakthrough at the associated producers. This process increases operating costs and reduces oil recovery. The objective of the Rangely Conformance Improvement Team (CIT) is to improve conformance in order to reduce operating costs and increase the oil recovery to >1 billion bbl (>50% OOIP) compared to the current 815 million bbl (43% OOIP). A number of mechanical methods and chemical treatments have been employed to improve conformance at Rangely. While dual injection strings and selective injection equipment (SIE) have been used for improved injection profile control, chemical treatments using polymer gels2 and CO2 foam3 have been used to improve volumetric sweep efficiency and oil recovery. During the period 1994-1997, 49 injector wells were treated by placing a MARCIT™ gel4 into the fracture network.5 While these treatments have improved local sweep efficiency and oil recovery, economics limit the maximum treatment volume per injector well to 15?000-20?000 bbl. Certain regions of the Rangely reservoir require considerably larger treatment volumes to reduce the permeability of a larger volume of the fracture network and improve conformance in a larger volume of the well pattern.

1999 ◽  
Vol 2 (01) ◽  
pp. 4-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Friedmann ◽  
T.L. Hughes ◽  
M.E. Smith ◽  
G.P. Hild ◽  
A. Wilson ◽  
...  

Summary Thirty-six thousand four hundred barrels of CO2 gelled foam were successfully placed via an injector well into the Rangely Weber Sand Unit in Colorado. The treatment objectives were (1) to improve volumetric conformance in this CO2 flood by reducing excessive CO2 breakthrough through fractures, and (2) to increase oil recovery from the associated producers. Local reservoir characteristics indicate the need for a large-volume treatment to achieve these goals. The required treatment volume is beyond the economic limits of standard gel systems. Foam gel technology is one way to economically achieve in-depth conformance improvement at Rangely by replacing 60 to 80% of the liquid phase by the less expensive CO2 phase. A gelled foam system was specifically designed for application to Rangely conformance problems. The field-tested surfactant/gel system was designed according to the following criteria:to produce strong and robust gelled foams under the harsh pH conditions of a CO2 flood,to provide enough gelation delay to achieve the injection of a large foam volume with manageable injectivity reduction, andto considerably reduce the unit cost of the treatment fluid relative to standard non-foamed gel systems. This paper describes the methodology used to design and test the optimum gelled foam system for Rangely. Laboratory results are presented to support the chemicals system selection, including gelation kinetics experiments, surfactant selection, and corefloods with supercritical CO2 at field conditions. The candidate well selection process is described, including injection profile surveys, offset well response, and bypassed reserves calculation. Data taken during the injection phase of the program, including injectivity history and on-site quality control monitoring of the chemical system behavior, are given. Finally a preliminary assessment of the impact of the treatment on CO2 cycling rates and incremental oil production is presented. Introduction Oil recovery efficiency in CO2 floods can be substantially reduced if premature CO2 breakthrough occurs at offset producers through fractures. Injector polymer gel treatments have successfully improved volumetric sweep in some CO2 field projects.1 CO2 diversion from the fracture network to the adjacent matrix rock resulted in the recovery of additional oil reserves. However, the volume of injector polymer gel treatments can be limited by cost, which in turn limits the potential impact on reservoir sweep. If there is significant crossflow between the thief zone and the remainder of the reservoir, larger treatment volumes impact sweep over a large volume of the reservoir, thereby improving incremental oil recovery.2 Gelled foam technology is one way to economically increase the treatment volume when reservoir characteristics dictate the need for in-depth conformance improvement. Fluid costs can be substantially reduced if 60 to 80% of the expensive aqueous phase can be replaced by a cheap, readily available phase such as CO2 The major difference between gelled foams and aqueous foams is that, after some time, the liquid phase of the gelled foam gels, thereby greatly enhancing the mechanical stability of the foam lamellae network. Ideally the liquid phase of the gelled foam system will not gel during the injection phase. Thus the system behaves like a foam during injection, and, after gelling, it behaves like a gel by forming a flow barrier. Thus the treatment volume can be cost-effectively increased if the foam can be generated/propagated in the fracture network, the gelation of the liquid phase of the foam can be delayed, and the gelled foam can provide sufficient flow resistance to divert reservoir drive fluids. An additional benefit of CO2 entrained in the gel volume is that the system will be less dense than "traditional" gel treatments. This reduced density will make it easier to place the gelled foam where the less dense CO2 travels in the reservoir, i.e., in the upper regions of fractures or thief zones. Mechanistic studies of gelled foam for waterflood diversion have been conducted in etched glass micromodels.3,4 It was found that, below a critical pressure gradient, gelled foam barriers efficiently render porous media impermeable to gas or liquid flow. Above the critical pressure gradient, the gelled lenses rupture, creating a conductive path for the injected fluid. Although the gelled foam lamellae rupture, some of the gel debris remains in pore throats and continues to provide a resistance to flow. The critical pressure gradient depends on foam quality, gel strength, and rock permeability. Based on these preliminary results, a study was undertaken to develop a gelled foam conformance control system for field application. Rangely field was selected as the first target to test this technology. A miscible CO2 flood was initiated in the Rangely Weber Sand Unit in 1986. The field-wide performance of the CO2 project has been successful. However, excessive CO2 cycling through fractures has resulted in inadequate volumetric sweep in some areas of the field. Large-volume injector gel treatments (10,000 to 15,000 bbl) have been conducted, which were successful at improving CO2 utilization.5 However, the magnitude of the CO2 breakthrough problem in specific field areas justifies the placement of even larger slugs to significantly impact volumetric sweep. The successful implementation of a large-volume gelled foam treatment could result in reduced operating costs (OPEX) and increased ultimate recovery. In this paper we report results on the laboratory development of a CO2 gelled foam conformance control system and its performance in a field trial conducted in one Rangely field injector well. Field and Well Selection The Rangely field is located in Rio Blanco County, Colorado, U.S.A. It is the largest field in the Rocky Mountain region in terms of daily and cumulative oil production.


2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. S. Shokoya ◽  
S. A. (Raj) Mehta ◽  
R. G. Moore ◽  
B. B. Maini ◽  
M. Pooladi-Darvish ◽  
...  

Flue gas injection into light oil reservoirs could be a cost-effective gas displacement method for enhanced oil recovery, especially in low porosity and low permeability reservoirs. The flue gas could be generated in situ as obtained from the spontaneous ignition of oil when air is injected into a high temperature reservoir, or injected directly into the reservoir from some surface source. When operating at high pressures commonly found in deep light oil reservoirs, the flue gas may become miscible or near–miscible with the reservoir oil, thereby displacing it more efficiently than an immiscible gas flood. Some successful high pressure air injection (HPAI) projects have been reported in low permeability and low porosity light oil reservoirs. Spontaneous oil ignition was reported in some of these projects, at least from laboratory experiments; however, the mechanism by which the generated flue gas displaces the oil has not been discussed in clear terms in the literature. An experimental investigation was carried out to study the mechanism by which flue gases displace light oil at a reservoir temperature of 116°C and typical reservoir pressures ranging from 27.63 MPa to 46.06 MPa. The results showed that the flue gases displaced the oil in a forward contacting process resembling a combined vaporizing and condensing multi-contact gas drive mechanism. The flue gases also became near-miscible with the oil at elevated pressures, an indication that high pressure flue gas (or air) injection is a cost-effective process for enhanced recovery of light oils, compared to rich gas or water injection, with the potential of sequestering carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung Vo Thanh ◽  
Kang-Kun Lee

Abstract Basement formation is known as the unique reservoir in the world. The fractured basement reservoir was contributed a large amount of oil and gas for Vietnam petroleum industry. However, the geological modelling and optimization of oil production is still a challenge for fractured basement reservoirs. Thus, this study aims to introduce the efficient workflow construction reservoir models for proposing the field development plan in a fractured crystalline reservoir. First, the Halo method was adapted for building the petrophysical model. Then, Drill stem history matching is conducted for adjusting the simulation results and pressure measurement. Next, the history-matched models are used to conduct the simulation scenarios to predict future reservoir performance. The possible potential design has four producers and three injectors in the fracture reservoir system. The field prediction results indicate that this scenario increases approximately 8 % oil recovery factor compared to the natural depletion production. This finding suggests that a suitable field development plan is necessary to improve sweep efficiency in the fractured oil formation. The critical contribution of this research is the proposed modelling and simulation with less data for the field development plan in fractured crystalline reservoir. This research's modelling and simulation findings provide a new solution for optimizing oil production that can be applied in Vietnam and other reservoirs in the world.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilario Martin Rodriguez ◽  
Yalda Barzin ◽  
Gregory James Walker ◽  
Markus Gruenwalder ◽  
Matias Fernandez-Badessich ◽  
...  

Abstract This study has double objectives: investigation of the main recovery mechanisms affecting the performance of the gas huff-n-puff (GHnP) process in a shale oil reservoir, and application of optimization techniques to modelling of the cyclic gas injection. A dual-permeability reservoir simulation model has been built to reproduce the performance of a single hydraulic fracture. The hydraulic fracture has the average geometry and properties of the well under analysis. A history match workflow has been run to obtain a simulation model fully representative of the studied well. An optimization workflow has been run to maximize the cumulative oil obtained during the GHnP process. The operational variables optimized are: duration of gas injection, soaking, and production, onset time of GHnP, injection gas flow rate, and number of cycles. This optimization workflow is launched twice using two different compositions for the injection gas: rich gas and pure methane. Additionally, the optimum case obtained previously with rich gas is simulated with a higher minimum bottom hole pressure (BHP) for both primary production and GHnP process. Moreover, some properties that could potentially explain the different recovery mechanisms were tracked and analyzed. Three different porosity systems have been considered in the model: fractures, matrix in the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV), and matrix in the non-SRV zone (virgin matrix). Each one with a different pressure profile, and thus with its corresponding recovery mechanisms, identified as below: Vaporization/Condensation (two-phase system) in the fractures.Miscibility (liquid single-phase) in the non-SRV matrix.Miscibility and/or Vaporization/Condensation in the SRV matrix: depending on the injection gas composition and the pressure profile along the SRV the mechanism may be clearly one of them or even both. Results of this simulation study suggest that for the optimized cases, incremental oil recovery is 24% when the gas injected is a rich gas, but it is only 2.4% when the gas injected is pure methane. A higher incremental oil recovery of 49% is obtained, when injecting rich gas and increasing the minimum BHP of the puff cycle above the saturation pressure. Injection of gas results in reduction of oil molecular weight, oil density and oil viscosity in the matrix, i.e., the oil gets lighter. This net decrease is more pronounced in the SRV than in the non-SRV region. The incremental oil recovery observed in the GHnP process is due to the mobilization of heavy components (not present in the injection gas composition) that otherwise would remain inside the reservoir. Due to the main characteristic of the shale reservoirs (nano-Darcy permeability), GHnP is not a displacement process. A key factor in success of the GHnP process is to improve the contact of the injected gas and the reservoir oil to increase the mixing and mass transfer. This study includes a review of different mechanisms, and specifically tracks the evolution of the properties that explain and justify the different identified mechanisms.


SPE Journal ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (04) ◽  
pp. 1140-1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Fernø ◽  
J.. Gauteplass ◽  
M.. Pancharoen ◽  
A.. Haugen ◽  
A.. Graue ◽  
...  

Summary Foam generation for gas mobility reduction in porous media is a well-known method and frequently used in field applications. Application of foam in fractured reservoirs has hitherto not been widely implemented, mainly because foam generation and transport in fractured systems are not clearly understood. In this laboratory work, we experimentally evaluate foam generation in a network of fractures within fractured carbonate slabs. Foam is consistently generated by snap-off in the rough-walled, calcite fracture network during surfactant-alternating-gas (SAG) injection and coinjection of gas and surfactant solution over a range of gas fractional flows. Boundary conditions are systematically changed including gas fractional flow, total flow rate, and liquid rates. Local sweep efficiency is evaluated through visualization of the propagation front and compared for pure gas injection, SAG injection, and coinjection. Foam as a mobility-control agent resulted in significantly improved areal sweep and delayed gas breakthrough. Gas-mobility reduction factors varied from approximately 200 to more than 1,000, consistent with observations of improved areal sweep. A shear-thinning foam flow behavior was observed in the fracture networks over a range of gas fractional flows.


2020 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 02001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Bila ◽  
Jan Åge Stensen ◽  
Ole Torsæter

Extraction of oil trapped after primary and secondary oil production stages still poses many challenges in the oil industry. Therefore, innovative enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technologies are required to run the production more economically. Recent advances suggest renewed application of surface-functionalized nanoparticles (NPs) for oil recovery due to improved stability and solubility, stabilization of emulsions, and low retention on porous media. The improved surface properties make the NPs more appropriate to improve microscopic sweep efficiency of water flood compared to bare nanoparticles, especially in challenging reservoirs. However, the EOR mechanisms of NPs are not well understood. This work evaluates the effect of four types of polymer-functionalized silica NPs as additives to the injection water for EOR. The NPs were examined as tertiary recovery agents in water-wet Berea sandstone rocks at 60 °C. The NPs were diluted to 0.1 wt. % in seawater before injection. Crude oil was obtained from North Sea field. The transport of NPs though porous media, as well as nanoparticles interactions with the rock system, were investigated to reveal possible EOR mechanisms. The experimental results showed that functionalized-silica NPs can effectively increase oil recovery in water-flooded reservoirs. The incremental oil recovery was up to 14% of original oil in place (OOIP). Displacement studies suggested that oil recovery was affected by both interfacial tension reduction and wettability modification, however, the microscopic flow diversion due to pore plugging (log-jamming) and the formation of nanoparticle-stabilized emulsions were likely the relevant explanations for the mobilization of residual oil.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document