scholarly journals Mechanism of replication fork reversal and protection by human RAD51 and RAD51 paralogs

Author(s):  
Petr Cejka ◽  
Swagata Halder ◽  
Aurore Sanchez ◽  
Lepakshi Ranjha ◽  
Angelo Taglialatela ◽  
...  

Abstract SMARCAL1, ZRANB3 and HLTF are all required for the remodeling of replication forks upon stress. Using reconstituted reactions, we show that the motor proteins have unequal biochemical capacities, explaining why they have non-redundant functions. Whereas SMARCAL1 uniquely anneals RPA-coated ssDNA, suggesting an initial function in fork reversal, it becomes comparatively inefficient in subsequent branch migration. We also show that low concentrations of RAD51 and the RAD51 paralog complex, RAD51B-RAD51C-RAD51D-XRCC2 (BCDX2), directly stimulate SMARCAL1 and ZRANB3 but not HLTF, providing a mechanism underlying previous cellular data implicating these factors in fork reversal. Upon reversal, RAD51 protects replication forks from degradation by MRE11, DNA2 and EXO1 nucleases. We show that the protective function of RAD51 unexpectedly depends on its binding to double-stranded DNA, and higher RAD51 concentrations are required for DNA protection compared to reversal. Together, we define the non-canonical functions of RAD51 and its paralogs in replication fork reversal and protection.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jake Hill ◽  
Patrik Eickhoff ◽  
Lucy S. Drury ◽  
Alessandro Costa ◽  
John F.X. Diffley

Origins of eukaryotic DNA replication are ‘licensed’ during G1 phase of the cell cycle by loading the six related minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins into a double hexameric ring around double-stranded DNA. In S phase, some double hexamers (MCM DHs) are converted into active CMG (Cdc45-MCM-GINS) helicases which nucleate assembly of bidirectional replication forks. The remaining unfired MCM DHs act as ‘dormant’ origins to provide backup replisomes in the event of replication fork stalling. The fate of unfired MCM DHs during replication is unknown. Here we show that active replisomes cannot remove unfired MCM DHs. Instead, they are pushed ahead of the replisome where they prevent fork convergence during replication termination and replisome progression through nucleosomes. Pif1 helicase, together with the replisome, can remove unfired MCM DHs specifically from replicating DNA, allowing efficient replication and termination. Our results provide an explanation for how excess replication license is removed during S phase.


Author(s):  
Jake Hill ◽  
Patrik Eickhoff ◽  
Lucy Drury ◽  
Alessandro Costa ◽  
John Diffley

Abstract Origins of eukaryotic DNA replication are ‘licensed’ during G1 phase of the cell cycle by loading the six related minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins into a double hexameric ring around double-stranded DNA. In S phase, some double hexamers (MCM DHs) are converted into active CMG (Cdc45-MCM-GINS) helicases which nucleate assembly of bidirectional replication forks. The remaining unfired MCM DHs act as ‘dormant’ origins to provide backup replisomes in the event of replication fork stalling. The fate of unfired MCM DHs during replication is unknown. Here we show that active replisomes cannot remove unfired MCM DHs. Instead, they are pushed ahead of the replisome where they prevent fork convergence during replication termination and replisome progression through nucleosomes. Pif1 helicase, together with the replisome, can remove unfired MCM DHs specifically from replicating DNA, allowing efficient replication and termination. Our results provide an explanation for how excess replication license is removed during S phase.


Author(s):  
Bénédicte Michel ◽  
Anurag K. Sinha ◽  
David R. F. Leach

SUMMARYIn all organisms, replication impairments are an important source of genome rearrangements, mainly because of the formation of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) ends at inactivated replication forks. Three reactions for the formation of dsDNA ends at replication forks were originally described forEscherichia coliand became seminal models for all organisms: the encounter of replication forks with preexisting single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) interruptions, replication fork reversal, and head-to-tail collisions of successive replication rounds. Here, we first review the experimental evidence that now allows us to know when, where, and how these three different reactions occur inE. coli. Next, we recall our recent studies showing that in wild-typeE. coli, spontaneous replication fork breakage occurs in 18% of cells at each generation. We propose that it results from the replication of preexisting nicks or gaps, since it does not involve replication fork reversal or head-to-tail fork collisions. In therecBmutant, deficient for double-strand break (DSB) repair, fork breakage triggers DSBs in the chromosome terminus during cell division, a reaction that is heritable for several generations. Finally, we recapitulate several observations suggesting that restart from intact inactivated replication forks and restart from recombination intermediates require different sets of enzymatic activities. The finding that 18% of cells suffer replication fork breakage suggests that DNA remains intact at most inactivated forks. Similarly, only 18% of cells need the helicase loader for replication restart, which leads us to speculate that the replicative helicase remains on DNA at intact inactivated replication forks and is reactivated by the replication restart proteins.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abid Javed ◽  
Balazs Major ◽  
Jonathan A. Stead ◽  
Cyril M. Sanders ◽  
Elena V. Orlova

AbstractHexameric helicases are motor proteins that unwind double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) during DNA replication but how they are optimised for strand separation is unclear. Here we present the cryo-EM structure of the full-length E1 helicase from papillomavirus, revealing all arms of a bound DNA replication fork and their interactions with the helicase. The replication fork junction is located at the entrance to the helicase collar ring, that sits above the AAA + motor assembly. dsDNA is escorted to and the 5´ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) away from the unwinding point by the E1 dsDNA origin binding domains. The 3´ ssDNA interacts with six spirally-arranged β-hairpins and their cyclical top-to-bottom movement pulls the ssDNA through the helicase. Pulling of the RF against the collar ring separates the base-pairs, while modelling of the conformational cycle suggest an accompanying movement of the collar ring has an auxiliary role, helping to make efficient use of ATP in duplex unwinding.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juli Bai ◽  
Feng Liu

AbstractThe cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase (cGAS) has been identified as a cytosolic double stranded DNA sensor that plays a pivotal role in the type I interferon and inflammation responses via the STING-dependent signaling pathway. In the past several years, a growing body of evidence has revealed that cGAS is also localized in the nucleus where it is associated with distinct nuclear substructures such as nucleosomes, DNA replication forks, the double-stranded breaks, and centromeres, suggesting that cGAS may have other functions in addition to its role in DNA sensing. However, while the innate immune function of cGAS is well established, the non-canonical nuclear function of cGAS remains poorly understood. Here, we review our current understanding of the complex nature of nuclear cGAS and point to open questions on the novel roles and the mechanisms of action of this protein as a key regulator of cell nuclear function, beyond its well-established role in dsDNA sensing and innate immune response.


1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 4056-4066
Author(s):  
S A Greenfeder ◽  
C S Newlon

The 120 bp of yeast centromeric DNA is tightly complexed with protein to form a nuclease-resistant core structure 200 to 240 bp in size. We have used two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis to analyze the replication of the chromosomal copies of yeast CEN1, CEN3, and CEN4 and determine the fate of replication forks that encounter the protein-DNA complex at the centromere. We have shown that replication fork pause sites are coincident with each of these centromeres and therefore probably with all yeast centromeres. We have analyzed the replication of plasmids containing mutant derivatives of CEN3 to determine whether the replication fork pause site is a result of an unusual structure adopted by centromere DNA or a result of the protein-DNA complex formed at the centromere. The mutant centromere derivatives varied in function as well as the ability to form the nuclease-resistant core structure. The data obtained from analysis of these derivatives indicate that the ability to cause replication forks to pause correlates with the ability to form the nuclease-resistant core structure and not with the presence or absence of a particular DNA sequence. Our findings further suggest that the centromere protein-DNA complex is present during S phase when replication forks encounter the centromere and therefore may be present throughout the cell cycle.


1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 6268-6278
Author(s):  
V Dhar ◽  
C L Schildkraut

The 20-member family of 30-bp tandem repeats located within the oriP region of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) can act as a transcriptional enhancer in the presence of EBV nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA-1). A replication fork barrier and a termination site of plasmid replication in human B cells is also found within or near the EBV tandem repeats. Within each tandem repeat is a consensus binding sequence for the EBNA-1 protein that is required for extrachromosomal maintenance of oriP-containing plasmids. To investigate the factors that contribute to the arrest of replication forks and termination in the region of the family of repeats, we have used an in vitro replication system in which replication of EBV recombinant plasmids is initiated from the simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA replication origin in the presence of SV40 T antigen and soluble extracts prepared from human cells. The system can support bidirectional replication, initiating from the SV40 DNA origin with termination occurring in a region opposite the origin. Using two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis, we observed a barrier to replication forks in the presence of EBNA-1 in the region of the EBV repeats. Termination occurs at or near the tandem repeats in a manner similar to that observed in vivo (T.A. Gahn and C.L. Schildkraut, Cell 58:527-535, 1989). Reducing the number of repeats from 20 to 6 had little effect on the strength of the replication fork barrier. In the absence of EBNA-1, replication forks also arrested at the EBV repeats, but at a much lower efficiency. The addition of competitor DNA containing the EBV family of repeats can almost completely abolish the replication barrier produced in the presence of EBNA-1.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe de La Roche Saint-André ◽  
Vincent Géli

AbstractDNA replication is a highly regulated process that occurs in the context of chromatin structure and is sensitive to several histone post-translational modifications. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the histone methylase Set1 is responsible for the transcription-dependent deposition of H3K4 methylation (H3K4me) throughout the genome. Here we show that a combination of a hypomorphic replication mutation (orc5-1) with the absence of Set1 (set1Δ) compromises the progression through S phase, and this is associated with a large increase in DNA damage. The ensuing DNA damage checkpoint activation, in addition to that of the spindle assembly checkpoint, restricts the growth of orc5-1 set1Δ. Interestingly, orc5-1 set1Δ is sensitive to the lack of RNase H activity while a reduction of histone levels is able to counterbalance the loss of Set1. We propose that the recently described Set1-dependent mitigation of transcription-replication conflicts becomes critical for growth when the replication forks accelerate due to decreased origin firing in the orc5-1 background. Furthermore, we show that an increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, likely a consequence of the elevated DNA damage, is partly responsible for the lethality in orc5-1 set1Δ.Author summaryDNA replication, that ensures the duplication of the genetic material, starts at discrete sites, termed origins, before proceeding at replication forks whose progression is carefully controlled in order to avoid conflicts with the transcription of genes. In eukaryotes, DNA replication occurs in the context of chromatin, a structure in which DNA is wrapped around proteins, called histones, that are subjected to various chemical modifications. Among them, the methylation of the lysine 4 of histone H3 (H3K4) is carried out by Set1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, specifically at transcribed genes. We report that, when the replication fork accelerates in response to a reduction of active origins, the absence of Set1 leads to accumulation of DNA damage. Because H3K4 methylation was recently shown to slow down replication at transcribed genes, we propose that the Set1-dependent becomes crucial to limit the occurrence of conflicts between replication and transcription caused by replication fork acceleration. In agreement with this model, stabilization of transcription-dependent structures or reduction histone levels, to limit replication fork velocity, respectively exacerbates or moderates the effect of Set1 loss. Last, but not least, we show that the oxidative stress associated to DNA damage is partly responsible for cell lethality.


Author(s):  
Casey Toft ◽  
Morgane Moreau ◽  
Jiri Perutka ◽  
Savitri Mandapati ◽  
Peter Enyeart ◽  
...  

In Escherichia coli, DNA replication termination is orchestrated by two clusters of Ter sites forming a DNA replication fork trap when bound by Tus proteins. The formation of a ‘locked’ Tus-Ter complex is essential for halting incoming DNA replication forks. However, the absence of replication fork arrest at some Ter sites raised questions about their significance. In this study, we examined the genome-wide distribution of Tus and found that only the six innermost Ter sites (TerA-E and G) were significantly bound by Tus. We also found that a single ectopic insertion of TerB in its non-permissive orientation could not be achieved, advocating against a need for ‘back-up’ Ter sites. Finally, examination of the genomes of a variety of Enterobacterales revealed a new replication fork trap architecture mostly found outside the Enterobacteriaceae family. Taken together, our data enabled the delineation of a narrow ancestral Tus-dependent DNA replication fork trap consisting of only two Ter sites.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document