Building Towards Common Psychosocial Measures in U.S. Cohort Studies: A Qualitative Assessment of Principal Investigators’ Views regarding the Role of Spirituality in Human Health
Abstract Background. The goal of this study was to understand prospective cohort Principal Investigators’ (PIs’) attitudes regarding the importance of religion and spirituality (R/S) on disease etiology in order to identify barriers and opportunities for greater inclusion of these domains in high-quality epidemiological research.Methods. One-hour, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 PIs representing 24 National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded prospective cohort studies in the US, collectively capturing health data on 1 in 100 Americans. Sample size was calculated to achieve thematic saturation.Results. The majority of PIs we interviewed saw R/S as a potentially important area to investigate to better understand disease etiology, but some were unsure about the mechanisms through which R/S can impact health and how to translate this knowledge into public health interventions. PIs identified 5 key areas that are lacking in current R/S research that need to be addressed in future research to convince them of collecting more R/S measures in their cohorts: (1) high-quality, prospective studies; (2) examining a plausible biological mechanism; (3) commonly collected, well-validated R/S measures; (4) addressing bias against R/S research; and (5) NIH funding for R/S research.Conclusions. Results of this study provide a roadmap for future R/S research investigating the impact of R/S on disease etiology in the context of U.S. prospective cohort studies. Such research could provide potentially important information concerning how to address existing health disparities in the U.S.