scholarly journals Exploring the Relationship Between Social Cognition Deficits and Neurodegenerative Dementia: Protocol for a Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Setién-Suero ◽  
Nancy Murillo-García ◽  
Manuel Sevilla-Ramos ◽  
Georgelina Abreu-Fernández ◽  
Diego Remón-Gallo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Social Cognition ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Critical Evaluation ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Neurodegenerative Dementia ◽  
Detection And Diagnosis ◽  
Neurodegenerative Dementias ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Background:Due to demographic evolution and the progressive aging of the population, the incidence of dementia has increased worldwide. Many questions about this syndrome have not been resolved yet, such as the relationship between dementia and deficits on social cognition.Therefore, the present review aims to explore this relationship and to establish the possible differential patterns of social cognition deficits in diverse types of neurodegenerative dementias.Methods:The literature searchwas conducted in several electronic databases, including MEDLINE database via Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Lilacs, Web of Science (WoS) and PsycINFO.In order to avoid possible bias during the data extraction, all citations, abstracts information and full-text articles will be independently screen by two reviewers. Themethodological quality of thestudies will be appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Evaluation Checklists. All studies published in English or Spanish between October 2009 and October 2019 will be taken into account.Discussion: This systematic review will summarize the evidence provided during the last 10 years regarding the relationship between neurodegenerative dementia and social cognition deficits. This could provide a useful reference to clinicians, since properly defining social cognition profile of each type of neurodegenerative dementia would improve detection and diagnosis, which would undoubtedly guarantee better interventions.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, ID: 152562

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Antalgic Therapies in Patients with Vertebral Bone Metastasis: A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 3991
Author(s):  
Antonio Jose Martin-Perez ◽  
María Fernández-González ◽  
Paula Postigo-Martin ◽  
Marc Sampedro Pilegaard ◽  
Carolina Fernández-Lao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Pharmacological Intervention ◽  
Vertebral Metastasis ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials

There is no systematic review that has identified existing studies evaluating the pharmacological and non-pharmacological intervention for pain management in patients with bone metastasis. To fill this gap in the literature, this systematic review with meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different antalgic therapies (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) in the improvement of pain of these patients. To this end, this protocol has been written according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020135762). A systematic search will be carried out in four international databases: Medline (Via PubMed), Web of Science, Cochrane Library and SCOPUS, to select the randomized controlled clinical trials. The Risk of Bias Tool developed by Cochrane will be used to assess the risk of bias and the quality of the identified studies. A narrative synthesis will be used to describe and compare the studies, and after the data extraction, random effects model and a subgroup analyses will be performed according to the type of intervention, if possible. This protocol aims to generate a systematic review that compiles and synthesizes the best and most recent evidence on the treatment of pain derived from vertebral metastasis.

scholarly journals A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation Interventions for Therapeutic Purposes in the Elderly

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (02/03) ◽  
pp. 104-109
Author(s):  
Farnia Velayati ◽  
Haleh Ayatollahi ◽  
Morteza Hemmat
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Elderly People ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Mobility Limitations ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Many elderly people suffer from chronic health conditions and mobility limitations. Therefore, they may benefit from traditional rehabilitation or telerehabilitation interventions as an alternative for this type of services. Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of telerehabilitation interventions with traditional rehabilitation services for therapeutic purposes in the elderly. Methods This systematic review was conducted in 2018. The searched databases were Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and ProQuest. The search was conducted with no time or language limitation. The selected papers included the randomized clinical trial studies in which elderly people aged 60 and over used telerehabilitation services for treatment purposes. The quality of the studies was evaluated by using the physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scale. Data were extracted by using a data extraction form and findings were narratively synthesized. Results After screening the retrieved papers, eight articles were selected to be included in the study. According to the findings, telerehabilitation was used for the elderly after stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), total knee replacement, and in patients with the comorbidity of COPD and chronic heart failure. Overall, in most studies, there was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups and the level of improvements was similar for most outcomes. Conclusion Telerehabilitation services can be regarded as an alternative to traditional rehabilitation approaches to reduce outpatient resource utilization and improve quality of life. However, more rigorous studies are suggested to investigate the effectiveness of telerehabilitation services for specific diseases or health conditions.

scholarly journals Dental Caries Diagnosis and Detection Using Neural Networks: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 3579
Author(s):  
María Prados-Privado ◽  
Javier García Villalón ◽  
Carlos Hugo Martínez-Martínez ◽  
Carlos Ivorra ◽  
Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Neural Networks ◽  
Dental Caries ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Infrared Light ◽  
Caries Detection ◽  
Detection And Diagnosis

Dental caries is the most prevalent dental disease worldwide, and neural networks and artificial intelligence are increasingly being used in the field of dentistry. This systematic review aims to identify the state of the art of neural networks in caries detection and diagnosis. A search was conducted in PubMed, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore, and ScienceDirect. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. The quality of the selected studies was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook tool. Thirteen studies were included. Most of the included studies employed periapical, near-infrared light transillumination, and bitewing radiography. The image databases ranged from 87 to 3000 images, with a mean of 669 images. Seven of the included studies labeled the dental caries in each image by experienced dentists. Not all of the studies detailed how caries was defined, and not all detailed the type of carious lesion detected. Each study included in this review used a different neural network and different outcome metrics. All this variability complicates the conclusions that can be made about the reliability or not of a neural network to detect and diagnose caries. A comparison between neural network and dentist results is also necessary.

scholarly journals Association between sepsis and retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e025440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofen Wang ◽  
Kun Tang ◽  
Ling Chen ◽  
Sixiang Cheng ◽  
Huilan Xu
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Premature Infants ◽  
Retinopathy Of Prematurity ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Severe Stage

ObjectiveTo explore the association between sepsis and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in premature infants.DesignA systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesWe performed a systematic search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase from 1 January, 2000, to 1 January, 2018, with no language restrictions and reported the relationship between sepsis and ROP.Eligibility criteriaOriginal observational studies, including cohort studies and case-control studies.Data extraction and synthesisTwo reviewers independently completed the study selection and data extraction. The OR and corresponding 95% CI were used to measure the risk of sepsis in patients with ROP. The heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using Cochran’s Q test and the I2statistic. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was adopted to evaluate the quality of each of the included studies, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess the quality of the evidence.ResultsSixteen studies with a total sample size of 12 466 premature infants and 2494 cases of ROP were included in this meta-analysis. Adjusted analysis showed that sepsis was closely related to any stage of ROP (OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.89) and severe stage of ROP (OR = 2.33, 95% CI 1.21 to 4.51) in premature infants, with 56.3% and 81.8% heterogeneity, respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that heterogeneity was obvious in prospective cohort studies (I2= 62.1%, p<0.001). In a sensitivity analysis, we found that removing any single study did not significantly change the overall effect value. The quality of the evidence was rated as low for both any stage of ROP and severe stage of ROP.ConclusionsSepsis increases the risk of ROP in preterm infants. However, considering that all included studies are observational and causality can rarely be established, additional evidence is needed to substantiate this finding and provide advice for practice.

scholarly journals The relationship between delivery mode and postpartum depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Xin Chen ◽  
Pei Zhao ◽  
ZhuLiduzi Jiesisibieke ◽  
Pei-En Chen ◽  
Tao-Hsin Tung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Postpartum Depression ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Depression Symptoms ◽  
Delivery Mode ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Background: To assess the relationship between delivery mode and postpartum depression and to examine whether cesarean section (CS) has a higher risk of postpartum depression than vaginal delivery (VD). Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE from inception to 30 April 2019 without language limitations. Two authors independently selected studies, assessed the quality of included studies, and extracted data. Any disagreements were resolved by discussion with a third author. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and GRADE methods to assess the quality of the included studies and evidences. This study had four included cohort studies data and carried out fixed-effect model meta-analysis. Results: The findings demonstrated a significant difference in the risk of postpartum depression between CS and VD. Compared with the control group, the CS group was associated with a higher prevalence of postpartum depression symptoms (Risk Ratio =1.29; 95% CI: 1.11-1.51). Conclusions: The findings supported a relationship between delivery mode and postpartum depression. Particularly, we found that CS is associated with a higher risk of postpartum depression. Therefore, we ought to encourage pregnant women who are without medical indication of CS to select VD.r Trial registration: The protocol of this systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO under the number CRD42019148154.

scholarly journals The relationship between delivery mode and postpartum depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Xin Chen ◽  
Pei Zhao ◽  
Zhu Liduzi Jiesisibieke ◽  
Pei-En Chen ◽  
Tao-Hsin Tung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Postpartum Depression ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Depression Symptoms ◽  
Delivery Mode ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Background To assess the relationship between delivery mode and postpartum depression and to examine whether cesarean section (CS) has a higher risk of postpartum depression than vaginal delivery (VD). Methods We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE from inception to 30 April 2019 without language limitations. Then two authors independently selected the studies, assessed the quality of the included studies, and extracted data. Any disagreements were resolved by discussion with a third author. Next, we used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and GRADE methods are used to evaluate the quality of the included studies and evidences, respectively. This study had four included cohort studies data and carried out fixed-effect model meta-analysis. Results The findings demonstrated a significant difference in the risk of postpartum depression between CS and VD. Compared with the control group, the CS group was associated with a higher prevalence of postpartum depression symptoms (Risk Ratio = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.11–1.51). Conclusions The results showed that delivery mode has nonnegligible effects on the risk of postpartum depression. Particularly, we found that CS is associated with a higher risk of postpartum depression compared with VD. Therefore, we ought to encourage pregnant women who are without medical indication of CS to select VD. Trial registration: The protocol of this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42019148154.

scholarly journals The predictive value of PRDM2 in solid tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e8826
Author(s):  
Caroline Tanadi ◽  
Alfredo Bambang ◽  
Indra Putra Wendi ◽  
Veronika M. Sidharta ◽  
Linawati Hananta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cancer Control ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Diagnostic Biomarker ◽  
The Relationship

Background Many studies have reported the presence of Positive Regulatory/Su(var)3-9, Enhancer-of-zeste and Trithorax Domain 2 (PRDM2) downregulation in cancer. However, its potential as a diagnostic biomarker is still unclear. Hence, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to address this issue. Introduction As of 2018, cancer has become the second leading cause of death worldwide. Thus, cancer control is exceptionally vital in reducing mortality. One such example is through early diagnosis of cancer using tumor biomarkers. Having a function as a tumor suppressor gene (TSG), PRDM2 has been linked with carcinogenesis in several solid tumor. This study aims to assess the relationship between PRDM2 downregulation and solid tumor, its relationship with clinicopathological data, and its potential as a diagnostic biomarker. This study also aims to evaluate the quality of the studies, data reliability and confidence in cumulative evidence. Materials & Methods A protocol of this study is registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the following registration number: CRD42019132156. PRISMA was used as a guideline to conduct this review. A comprehensive electronic search was performed from inception to June 2019 in Pubmed, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, EBSCO and ScienceDirect. Studies were screened and included studies were identified based on the criteria made. Finally, data synthesis and quality assessment were conducted. Results There is a significant relationship between PRDM2 downregulation with solid tumor (RR 4.29, 95% CI [2.58–7.13], P < 0.00001). The overall sensitivity and specificity of PRDM2 downregulation in solid tumors is 84% (95% CI [39–98%]) and 86% (95% CI [71–94%]), respectively. There is a low risk of bias for the studies used. TSA results suggested the presence of marked imprecision. The overall quality of evidence for this study is very low. Discussion We present the first meta-analysis that investigated the potential of PRDM2 downregulation as a diagnostic biomarker in solid tumor. In line with previous studies, our results demonstrated that PRDM2 downregulation occurs in solid tumor. A major source of limitation in this study is the small number of studies. Conclusions Our review suggested that PRDM2 is downregulated in solid tumor. The relationship between PRDM2 downregulation and clinicopathological data is still inconclusive. Although the sensitivity and specificity of PRDM2 downregulation are imprecise, its high values, in addition to the evidence that suggested PRDM2 downregulation in solid tumor, hinted that it might still have a potential to be used as a diagnostic biomarker. In order to further strengthen these findings, more research regarding PRDM2 in solid tumors are encouraged.

scholarly journals AB0240 EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS, MULTIMORBIDITY AND ADVERSE HEALTH-RELATED OUTCOMES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1420.3-1420
Author(s):  
J. Canning ◽  
S. Siebert ◽  
B. Jani ◽  
F. Mair ◽  
B. Nicholl
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Long Term Conditions ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Health Related ◽  
The Relationship

Background:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterised by inflammation of the synovial joints causing pain, swelling and stiffness. Multimorbidity (the presence of two or more long-term conditions) affects approximately two thirds of people with RA. However, the relationship between RA and multimorbidity is poorly understand, as is the effect of this relationship on mortality and other health-related outcomes, particularly those relating to physical functioning and well-being.Objectives:To explore existing literature to determine what is known about the effect, if any, of multimorbidity on mortality and other health-related outcomes in people with RA.Methods:A systematic review was conducted following a protocol prepared using PRISMA-P 2015 reporting guidelines, ensuring the quality of the review. Studies were sourced from electronic medical databases, specifically MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library and Scopus, using a pre-defined search strategy. Studies were selected based on specified eligibility criteria and quality appraised using the Cochrane Prognosis Methods Group-developed, Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool. A narrative synthesis of findings was conducted.Results:In total, 15 studies fulfilled our criteria for inclusion in our review. Of these, 7 studies had mortality as an outcome, with 6 reporting a significant association between multimorbidity and increased risk of all-cause mortality in people with RA. Nine studies had functional status/disability as an outcome, with 2 of these studies also including quality of life. All 9 studies reported significant associations between multimorbidity and the aforementioned health-related outcomes, demonstrating poorer functional status/increased disability and reduced quality of life in people with RA and multimorbidity.Conclusion:Multimorbidity in people with RA is significantly associated with increased mortality and poor health-related outcomes in current literature. A better understanding of this relationship will provide an important foundation of knowledge to guide future health service design.Acknowledgments:This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC) [Grant Reference: MR/N013166/1].Disclosure of Interests:Jordan Canning: None declared, Stefan Siebert Grant/research support from: BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Bhautesh Jani: None declared, Frances Mair: None declared, Barbara Nicholl: None declared

scholarly journals Effectiveness of orofacial myofunctional therapy in orthodontic patients: A systematic review

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 94-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Márcio Alexandre Homem ◽  
Raquel Gonçalves Vieira-Andrade ◽  
Saulo Gabriel Moreira Falci ◽  
Maria Letícia Ramos-Jorge ◽  
Leandro Silva Marques
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Myofunctional Therapy ◽  
Present Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present systematic review was to determine the existence of scientific evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT) as an adjuvant to orthodontic treatment in individuals with orofacial disorders. A further aim was to assess the methodological quality of the studies included in the review. METHODS: An electronic search was performed in eight databases (Medline, BBO, LILACS, Web of Science, EMBASE, BIREME, Cochrane Library and SciELO) for papers published between January 1965 and March 2011, with no language restrictions. Selection of articles and data extraction were performed by two independent researchers. The quality of the selected articles was also assessed. RESULTS: Search strategy resulted in the retrieval of 355 publications, only four of which fulfilled the eligibility criteria and qualified for final analysis. All papers selected had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present systematic review demonstrate the scarcity of consistent studies and scientific evidence supporting the use of OMT in combination with orthodontic treatment to achieve better results in the correction of dentofacial disorders in individuals with orofacial abnormalities.

scholarly journals Tinnitus and its relationship with anxiety and depression in the elderly: a systematic review

Revista CEFAC ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Carolina Dias Gibrin ◽  
Daiane Soares de Almeida Ciquinato ◽  
Isabela Caroline Gonçalves ◽  
Vitória de Moraes Marchiori ◽  
Luciana Lozza de Moraes Marchiori
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Psychological Symptoms ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Boolean Operator ◽  
Tinnitus Severity ◽  
The Cochrane Library ◽  
The Relationship

ABSTRACT Objective: to verify, in the literature, a probable association of tinnitus with anxiety and depression in the elderly. Methods: a systematic review (through a search in the indexed databases - Lilacs, Scielo, Pubmed, Science Direct, The Cochrane Library) of studies published between 2013 and 2018, in Portuguese and in English, involving adults and/or elderly (18 years and older). The descriptors used were: “tinnitus", "depression", "anxiety", "adult", "elderly", interspersed by the Boolean operator AND. Results: 11 studies were selected, from which, 5 compared adults to elderly and only 2 evaluated such relationship in the elderly alone. Studies suggest that, as age increases, tinnitus severity and psychological symptoms also increase, affecting both men and women. Conclusion: few studies compared the relationship between the variables among the elderly. A probable association between the variables for both genders has been found, suggesting that the advancing age contributes to the increase of tinnitus severity and its psychological symptoms, affecting the quality of life of these individuals. Further studies are suggested to confirm the association between tinnitus, anxiety and depression in the elderly. Multi-professional work is important for the evaluation and treatment of these people.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document