Теоретико-эмпирические подходы к оценке влияния мероприятий административной реформы на состояние системы государственного управления (Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to Assessing Administrative Reform Measures on the State of the Public Administration System)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail Dmitriev
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Administrative Reform ◽  
The State ◽  
Administration System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Empirical Approaches

IDENTIFY PROBLEM ISSUES OF SELF-ORDERED DEVELOPMENT MECHANISMS IN THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
pp. 250-259
Author(s):  
Igor Yurievich Rodchenko
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Separation Of Powers ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
State Power ◽  
Administrative Reform ◽  
Administration System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Object Interaction ◽  
Interaction System ◽  
Power Hierarchy

The problematic issues of the development of self-ordering mechanisms in the public administration system are determined, with observance of their division into institutional, functional and evolutionary parts. The institutional part includes self-regulation mechanisms implemented in the models of subject-subject interaction at the levels of higher, central and local government bodies, as well as in models of object-object interaction between them. The most important in the institutional part of self-governing mechanisms are those that ensure: the separation of powers between branches of government; administrative reform of the government structure; separation of public spheres of government between central government bodies; administrative reform of the structure of central executive bodies; delimitation of territorial spheres of government between local authorities; administrative-territorial reform; formation and implementation of the structure of the power hierarchy; administrative reform of the structure of the power hierarchy. The functional part includes the mechanisms of self-regulation, realized in the model of object-object interaction “system of state power — social sphere, industry and relations”. The most important parts of the mechanisms of self-regulation are those that ensure: the formation and implementation of state policies in various spheres of society; formation and implementation of national projects; formation and implementation of state target programs; state budgeting. The evolutionary part includes the mechanisms of self-regulation, realized in the model of object-object interaction “system of state power — the creation of conditions for social development”. The most important parts of the evolutionary part of self-governing mechanisms are those that provide: strategic management and planning; realization of state programs of social and economic development; conducting constant economic and social reforms and transformations.

IDENTIFY PROBLEM ISSUES OF SELF-ORDERED DEVELOPMENT MECHANISMS IN THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. 250-259
Author(s):  
Igor Yurievich Rodchenko
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Separation Of Powers ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
State Power ◽  
Administrative Reform ◽  
Administration System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Object Interaction ◽  
Interaction System ◽  
Power Hierarchy

The problematic issues of the development of self-ordering mecha- nisms in the public administration system are determined, with observance of their division into institutional, functional and evolutionary parts.The institutional part includes self-regulation mechanisms implemented in the models of subject-subject interaction at the levels of higher, central and lo- cal government bodies, as well as in models of object-object interaction between them. The most important in the institutional part of self-governing mechanisms are those that ensure: the separation of powers between branches of government; administrative reform of the government structure; separation of public spheres of government between central government bodies; administrative reform of the structure of central executive bodies; delimitation of territorial spheres of go- vernment between local authorities; administrative-territorial reform; formation and implementation of the structure of the power hierarchy; administrative re- form of the structure of the power hierarchy. The functional part includes the mechanisms of self-regulation, realized in the model of object-object interaction “system of state power — social sphere, indus- try and relations”. The most important parts of the mechanisms of self-regulation are those that ensure: the formation and implementation of state policies in vari- ous spheres of society; formation and implementation of national projects; forma- tion and implementation of state target programs; state budgeting.The evolutionary part includes the mechanisms of self-regulation, realized in the model of object-object interaction “system of state power — the creation of conditions for social development”. The most important parts of the evolutionary part of self-governing mechanisms are those that provide: strategic management and planning; realization of state programs of social and economic development; conducting constant economic and social reforms and transformations.

scholarly journals Theoretical approaches to the conceptual-categorical apparatus of cybersecurity in the system of public administration

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 49-55
Author(s):  
E. V. Kubanov
Keyword(s):  
National Security ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Cyber Security ◽  
Communication Systems ◽  
The State ◽  
Administration System ◽  
The Public ◽  
External Threats ◽  
Theoretical Approaches ◽  
The Creation

The article analyzed the scientific approaches to the concept of «cybersecurity». The author defined the concept of «cybersecurity of the public administration system», which is understood as the basis of the national security of Ukraine, which forms the security of the state, society, public administration system, and the population of the country in the cybernetic space through the creation of legitimate mechanisms for ensuring the cybersecurity of public administration. The article identified internal and external threats. The author highlighted the main elements of the cybersecurity system of public administration, in particular: information, information and communication systems; threats; mechanisms of providing cybersecurity of the public administration system; subjects of the cybersecurity of the public administration system.Integration of Ukraine into the European space and the reform of the spheres of economy, industry and defense has called for a radically new approach to information and cybernetic security. Cyberspace as an arena of conflicts between states, organizations, and officials is one of the most pressing problems of the present.The article analyzes the scientific approaches to the concept of «cyber security» and states that cybersecurity of the system of public administration is the basis of the national security of Ukraine, which forms the security of the state, society, public administration system, and the population of the country in the cybernetic space through the creation of legitimate mechanisms for ensuring the cybersecurity of public administration. Separate internal (corruption actions; hardware bookmarks in chips and firmware of computer and network equipment; weak organization of the cyberspace management system) and external threats (targeted attacks, cyberterrorism, cyberwar, hatcism, attacks on banking systems, attacks on e-government).

scholarly journals Modernization of public-management approaches in the social sphere

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Kolosovska
Keyword(s):  
Civil Society ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Public Management ◽  
The State ◽  
Civil Society Organizations ◽  
Administration System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Social Sphere ◽  
The Social

Problem setting. In the context of modern transformation processes, the modernization of the public administration system becomes important, in particular in the application of qualitatively new strategic approaches, mechanisms and tools in the social sphere. The current priority of public policy implementation at both the national and regional (local) levels is to meet the social needs of the most vulnerable and socially vulnerable categories of citizens. Current trends in public administration practices in developed countries indicate the need for effective intersectoral partnership in the system of public management of the social sphere, which provides for effective participation in this process, both relevant government institutions and civil society actors.Recent research and publications analysis. Problems of public management of the social sphere, public administration influence on social processes are characterized by considerable attention among both foreign and Ukrainian researchers. Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problems. Despite significant scientific interest, the issues of substantiation of the role of decentralization in the formation of the principles of qualitative renewal of the content of the public administration system in the social sphere, the influence of state institutions on social processes, identification of trends and main directions of decentralization on the formation of strategy and modernization of public administration social sphere, etc.Paper main body. Based on the fact that the state level is of decisive and integrated importance in the implementation of the social function, the social responsibility is borne primarily by the state through the system of legislative and executive bodies. In view of this, it is the state that has the power to establish fair and transparent rules for the activities of various actors, including civil institutions, through the functioning of an effective system of control that would ensure their implementation.Researchers and experts point out the inconsistency of the current state policy of social development in Ukraine neither with the challenges formed under the influence of globalization processes and national conditions, nor with European standards for the introduction of this area of public administration.The system of social services provided by the current legislation is largely inconsistent with the current system of budget funding, which is mostly based on a formal approach that does not take into account the real need for material security of vulnerable groups and the real cost of benefits and services.Among the areas set out in the draft of the new National Strategy for Civil Society Development in Ukraine for 2021-2026, emphasis is placed on improving approaches to state support for civil society organizations and strengthening cooperation between them and the executive branch. In particular, one of the main tasks of the Strategy is to expand the mechanisms of support of civil society organizations by the state, as well as to increase the order of services from such organizations.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. Processes of modernization of public administration in the social sphere should include the following key areas: regulatory (provides for the completeness and integrity of regulatory standards for the implementation of sectoral / functional policies and guarantees of social rights); organizational and institutional (consists in improving the institutional support of public management of the social sphere); functional-instrumental (provides for ensuring the integrity of the organizational-functional structure; effective coordination of the functioning of institutions); financial and economic (is to optimize the financial mechanisms for the implementation of tasks of social development and functioning of the social sphere); infrastructural (provides for the modernization of the social services system through the state's demonopolization of the social services market); resource (provides for the development and integration of different types of resource provision).

scholarly journals Kulturowo-antropologiczna mediacyjność organów konsensualnych

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1 (4)) ◽  
pp. 107-115
Author(s):  
Magdalena Tabernacka
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Administration System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Communication And Coordination

Consensual bodies are links in which communication and coordination take place and which enable cooperation of individual structures of the state administrative apparatus. F rom the anthropological point of view, consensual bodies belong to the field of the phenomenon described by this science as mediation. They are a kind of intermediate between separate structures. This causes a number of conditions essential for their functioning in the public administration system.

scholarly journals Problems of realization of political and administrative reformation of public administration management system

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 22-30
Author(s):  
Ю. А. Сак
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Administrative Reform ◽  
Political Support ◽  
The Political ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Administration System ◽  
Information Campaigns ◽  
The Public ◽  
Lack Of Information

Political and administrative reform of the public administration system is the implementation of a setof public administration mechanisms aimed at modernizing and developing the public administrationsystem, optimizing public authorities and local self-government, changing communication between publicauthorities, forming an innovative model of public administration, and professionalizing the system of publicadministration directed on the formation of an efficient and effective system of public administration.The main problems of the implementation of the political and administrative reform of the publicadministration system should include the following:firstly, the absence of a substantiated and systematic Concept for the implementation of political andadministrative reform of the public administration system;secondly, the lack of specially trained personnel in the public administration system that are able to formulate and implement government-management decisions;thirdly, there are no systemic and optimal mechanisms for implementing the political and administrativereform of the public administration system;fourth, the lack of continuity in the implementation of reforms in society and their validity;fifth, the lack of scientifically substantiated models of the optimal system of public administration that canbe implemented in Ukraine;sixthly, the lack of a system for evaluating reforms in the public administration system;seventh, the slow struggle against corruption, affecting the quality of not only socio-economic reforms,but also reforming the system of public administration. Corruption not only impedes the development of theeconomy and civil society but also threatens modern reforms in Ukraine;eighth, the lack of political support for systemic reforms as the basis for the quality of such processes;ninth, lack of rationalization of the activities of state authorities and local self-government through therestructuring of the authorities and their optimization;tenth, the lack of information campaigns on the introduction of certain reforms, which negatively affectstheir perception by the population.

scholarly journals The Implementation of State Policy of Power Cleaning in the Conditions of Political Transformation: Experience of Ukraine and Countries of Central and Eastern Europe

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 405-421
Author(s):  
Valentyna Goshovska ◽  
Volodymyr Goshovskyi ◽  
Liudmyla Dubchak
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Eastern Europe ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
State Policy ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Communist Regime ◽  
Administration System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Wide Range

The article analyzes the problems of realization of the state policy of power cleaning in the countries of Central-Eastern Europe (Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, Baltic countries), and in particular in Ukraine. It has been found that in various countries this step in the public administration was taken since the fall of the communist regime. However, everywhere it was carried out by its own rules. The attention is drawn to the fact that the power cleaning through lustration should be ensured in the light of a wide range of threats that pertain to the human rights sphere and the principle of the presumption of innocence. This was relevant for every state that embarked on the path of transformational change to the implementation of a state policy of power cleaning. None of the countries that have taken such a political step in the public administration system went this route easily (there were both claims to the laws with subsequent legislative initiatives to amend them, and suits to courts of various instances to restore human and citizen’s rights and freedoms). However, there were also positive consequences, which resulted in the cleaning of the authorities of the respective countries from the influences of interested pro-communist political forces, which hindered democratic transformations in the states. Regarding the characteristics of the state policy of power cleaning by lustration in Ukraine, which began only in 2014, we drew attention to the fact that it had a different meaning: it was not aimed at combating the communist past, but at overthrowing the current political regime of “Yanukovych times”. There were some problems, which reflected the emergence of relevant issues in such events of the public administration system, which caused criticism from a number of external international human rights organizations (for example, the Venice Commission), and led to massive claims to courts of various instances aimed to restore of claimants' rights. Also the article draws attention to the fact that lustration, as a mechanism of power cleaning, is an appropriate political step on the way to democratization of society and overcoming the negative consequences of the activity of undemocratic political regimes. However, its implementation requires a prudent approach to defining the principles of legal regulation, the establishment of appropriate institutions to ensure the implementation of lustration and guaranteeing the protection of human and citizen's rights and freedoms from political persecution.  Keywords: sustainable development, public policy, cleaning of power, lustration, protection of human and citizen's rights and freedoms.

REFORMING THE PUBLIC GOVERNANCE SYSTEM IN UKRAINE

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoryana Buryk ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Policy Development ◽  
Effective Interaction ◽  
Monitoring And Evaluation ◽  
The State ◽  
Dynamic State ◽  
Governance System ◽  
Administration System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Administration Reform

The article considers the theoretical and methodological foundations of reforming the public administration system in Ukraine. This issue does not lose its relevance, because, under the constant influence of various factors (economic, political, social), this area is constantly in a dynamic state, changing and modernizing. It is determined that public administration should be understood as a type of activity related to the management of state affairs. It was found that public administration includes mechanisms for managing human, financial, material resources, communication and information systems, as well as management related to the provision of public services. It is noted that it is important to constantly modernize the mechanisms of public administration in order to build the most effective interaction between the state and society and achieve a balance of interests. The basic principles on which the reform of the public administration system is based and which are the vectors of public administration development in modern conditions are considered. It is proved that the main purpose of public administration reform is to strengthen the managerial and administrative capacity of the state apparatus, which will contribute to the sustainable development of Ukraine. In order to achieve this goal, a number of key areas of reforming the public administration system are substantiated, in particular, improving the functions of the state, civil service, regulatory support, financial support and public administration processes. It is determined that the implementation of public administration reform measures should significantly improve the quality of policy development and its tools, increase the effectiveness of implementation, as well as ensure appropriate monitoring and evaluation of the process of achieving policy goals and expected results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document