scholarly journals THE REGULATION URGENCY OF CHILDREN UNDER 12 (TWELVE) YEARS OLD IN THE ACT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 233-241
Author(s):  
Eko Iswahyudi ◽  
◽  
I. Nyoman Nurjaya ◽  
Nurini Aprilianda ◽  
Bambang Sugiri ◽  
...  

In the Act No. 11 of 2012 about the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, it explains the age limit for juvenile criminal responsibility for those who commit criminal acts, as regulated in Article 1 point 3. The children between 12 (twelve) years old and 18 (eighteen) years old are suspected of committing a crime.. The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze the urgency of regulating teenager under the age of 12 in the constitution of Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2021 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System as well as children in conflict with the law.This type of normative legal research uses a statute approach and a case approach through a literature study. The results of the research on the urgency of regulating children under the age of 12 in Act Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System as well as children in conflict with the law. Many cases of crime that occur under the age of 12 years. So that special attention is needed regarding the minimum age limit for children who can be given criminal sanctions related to Article 1 letter 3 and Article 21 paragraph 1 of Act Number 11 of 2021 about the Juvenile Criminal Justice System without ignoring the psychological aspects of the child, whether acting as perpetrators, witnesses or victims. The purpose of punishing children is relatively not just to retaliate against people who commit criminal acts but has a useful purpose.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 252-260
Author(s):  
Eko Iswahyudi ◽  
◽  
I. Nyoman Nurjaya ◽  
Nurini Aprilianda ◽  
Bambang Sugiri ◽  
...  

In the Act No. 11 of 2012 about the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, it explains the age limit for juvenile criminal responsibility for those who commit criminal acts, as regulated in Article 1 point 3. The children between 12 (twelve) years old and 18 (eighteen) years old are suspected of committing a crime. The purpose of this study was to analyze the construction of the regulation of children under the age of 12 in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2021 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. This type of normative legal research uses a statute approach and a case approach through a literature study. The results of the research on the Construction of Regulations for Children under the Age of 12 in Act Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System as Children in Conflict with the Law. There is a need for additional rules or amendments to the provisions of criminal sanctions for children, where criminal sanctions will be given to children aged at least 10 years, where these rules consist of basic criminal sanctions, such as community service or supervision, job training, coaching in institutions. This sanction is carried out by considering the rights of children as perpetrators, children as victims and children as witnesses who are underage, without eliminating the implementation of applicable legal obligations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 232
Author(s):  
I Ketut Arjuna Satya Prema ◽  
Masruchin Ruba'i ◽  
Nurini Aprilianda

This article aims to discuss the age of criminal responsibility of children according to statutory regulations in Indonesia and the legis ratio of determining the age of child responsibility according to Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children. The study uses normative legal research with a statutory approach. The results of the study show that three regulations are governing the age limit for a child to be held criminally responsible, namely the Criminal Code Act, Law Number 3 of 1997 concerning Juvenile Court, Law Number 11 of 2011 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children. These three regulations differ in determining the minimum limit for a child to be held liable for criminal liability. Psychological, sociological, and pedagogical aspects are the base for the ratio of the legal determination of the minimum age of 12 years in the Criminal Justice System for Children. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2S9) ◽  
pp. 1011-1015

This study aims to look at the imposition of sanctions that govern Pancasila for juvenille deliquency. This study uses a historical approach on the grounds that there are changes and developments in the meaning and purpose of punishment from a view that was originally oriented towards traditional retributive views that saw criminal sanctions as punitive towards a more human or humanist conception of punishment by emphasizing the element of corrective action. crimes, namely children and a comparative juridical approach that is focused on the formulation of alternatives to child criminal sanctions in several KUHPs of foreign countries. The results showed that the strategy of developing sanctions against children who committed crimes had been carried out through the enactment of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System three principles of punishment recognized in UUSPPA, namely the principle of criminal responsibility, the principle of the best interes of the child and the ultimum principle remidium. The three principles of punishment are also the basis of the formation of UUSPPA so that two punitive conditions apply for children in conflict with the law, namely the terms of absolute punishment and the conditions for relative punishment. The imposition of sanctions that affect the Pancasila for children who commit criminal acts in the form of verbal sanctions is considered more humanistic because with children's verbal sanctions avoid negative stigma that can affect the future of the child.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evita Monica Chrysan ◽  
Yiska Marva Rohi ◽  
Dini Saputri Fredyandani Apituley

AbstractBullying or so-called harassment is an act where one or more people try to hurt or control another person by means of physical violence, such as hitting, pushing, and so on as well as verbal bullying such as insulting, shouting, using harsh words, post things that can intimidate someone on social media or anywhere. Acts of bullying generally occur in school children who are underage. Bullying is a matter that must be considered and needs to be treated seriously, considering that the action can endanger the mental and life of a person if done in an excessive manner as well as each person has a limit on themselves regarding the level of bully that exceeds that limit. The regulation of legislation governing criminal sanctions for children is Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System. Therefore the bullying action that has a negative impact is a criminal offense and it is necessary to apply sanctions on the bullying child in a strict manner which not only causes a deterrent effect but the sanction is sought in order to improve behavior considering that a child is the nation's next generation as well as the application of action sanctions for children regulated in Article 82 paragraph (1) letter e of Law Number 11 Year 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children, namely the obliga-tion to attend formal education and/or training provided by the government or private bodies.Keywords: application of sanction actions on children; bullying; criminal justice system for childrenAbstrakBullying atau disebut perundungan adalah tindakan dimana satu orang atau lebih mencoba untuk menyakiti atau mengontrol orang lain dengan cara kekerasan baik menyakiti dalam bentuk fisik, seperti memukul, mendorong, dan sebagainya serta bullying dalam bentuk verbal seperti menghina, membentak, menggunakan kata-kata kasar, memposting hal yang dapat mengintimidasi seseorang di sosial media atau di tempat manapun. Tindakan bullying pada umumnya terjadi pada anak sekolah yang masih di bawah umur. Tindakan bullying menjadi hal yang harus diperhatikan serta perlu mendapat penanganan serius mengingat tindakan tersebut dapat membahayakan mental serta nyawa seseorang apabila dilakukan dengan cara berlebihan sebagaimana pula tiap-tiap orang memiliki batasan pada diri masing-masing mengenai tingkatan bully yang melampaui batas tersebut. Regulasi dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur sanksi pidana bagi anak adalah Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Maka dari itu tindakan bullying yang menimbulkan dampak negatif tersebut merupakan suatu tindak pidana dan diperlukan penerapan sanksi pada anak pelaku bullying secara tegas yang bukan saja menimbulkan efek jera namun sanksi tersebut diupayakan agar dapat memperbaiki perilaku mengingat seorang anak adalah generasi penerus bangsa seperti halnya penerapan sanksi tindakan pada anak yang diatur dalam Pasal 82 ayat (1) huruf e Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak yaitu kewajiban mengikuti pendidikan formal dan/atau pelatihan yang diadakan oleh pemerintah atau badan swasta.Kata kunci: bullying; penerapan sanksi tindakan pada anak; sistem peradilan pidana anak


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-186
Author(s):  
Khairida Khairida ◽  
Syahrizal Syahrizal ◽  
Mohd. Din

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor  35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan dari Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak dimana dalam Undang-Undang tersebut menjelaskan kewajiban memberikan perlindungan kepada anak, namun ketentuan pidana bagi pelaku pelecehan terhadap anak dalam Undang-Undang tersebut masih sangat lemah sebagai dasar untuk menangani kasus pelecehan terhadap anak. Qanun  Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang  Hukum Jinayat, memberikan pengertian tentang Pelecehan Seksual pada Bab I ketentuan umum Pasal (1) ayat ke - 27 yaitu:  Pelecehan seksual adalah perbuatan asusila atau perbuatan cabul yang sengaja dilakukan seseorang didepan umum atau terhadap orang lain sebagai korban baik laki-laki maupun perempuan tanpa kerelaan korban. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana Penegakan Hukum Pelecehan Seksual pada Anak, dalam Sistem Peradilan Jinayat, hubungan sistem Peradilan Jinayat dengan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Penulisan karya ilmiah ini  menggunakan jenis  penelitian  hukum  normatif, di mana penelitian hukum yang menggunakan sumber data primernya merupakan norma-norma yang berlaku baik yang berupa Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan peraturan Perundang-Undangan, Qanun, dengan pendekatan library research. Disarankan kepada Pemerintah perlu secepatnya membuat langkah-langkah strategis, rencana aksi dan penerapan sanksi yang tegas terhadap prilaku seks yang menyimpang. Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Aceh (DPRA) perlu membuat aturan lebih lanjut termasuk aturan acaranya agar permasalahan ini menjadi lebih jelas dan pasti sehingga terhdap korban mendapatkan suatu kepastian hukum dan nasibnya menjadi lebih jelas serta terpenuhi hak-haknya.The Act Number 35, 2014 which is the revision of the Act Number 23, 2002 on the Child Protection which in the Act explains the obligation to provide protection to children, but the criminal provisions for perpetrators of child abuse in the Act are still very weak as a basis for dealing with child abuse cases. The Law Number 11, 2012 on the Juvenile Justice System in the first chapter of the General Provision, precisely in Article (1) paragraph (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) states that; The Child Criminal Justice System is the whole process of settling children's cases against the law, from the investigation stage to the guidance stage after undergoing criminal. Qanun Aceh (local law) Number 6, 2014 on Jinayat Law (Islamic Criminal Law), provides understanding on Sexual Harassment in Chapter I general provisions of Article (1) of the 27th verse: Sexual harassment is an immoral act or obscene acts committed personally in public or against another person as a victim both men and women without the victim's willingness. This study aims to find out how Law Enforcement of Sexual Harassment in Children, in Jinayat Jurisdiction System, Relation of Jinayat Justice System with Child Criminal Justice System and To know the fulfillment of children. The paper applies normative legal research, in which legal research using its primary data sources are the norms that apply both in the form of the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the Laws and Regulations, Qanun, with the approach of library research. It is recommended that to the Government should establish strategic measures, action plans and the imposition of strict sanctions against deviant sexual behavior. The House of Representatives of Aceh (DPRA) needs to make further rules including the rules of the show so that this matter becomes clearer and more certain that the victim gets a legal certainty and his fate becomes clearer and fulfilled his rights.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-207
Author(s):  
I Made Dwi Satya Anggara ◽  
A.A Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani

Lately, the number of children who often do criminal traffic violations, It is so menghawatirkan because it is not uncommon to traffic violations cause a crash to arise the victim died. Not only that, problems also arises in terms of responsibilities, in this case the victim died from a traffic offence committed. The purpose of this research is to analyse the responsibility of children against traffic offences which cause the victim's death. The method used in writing this essay is primary legal material. Based on the research conducted found that the age of the child greatly influences the overthrow of punishment on the child. Children aged under 14 years can only be charged penalties act whereas the provision of criminal sanctions is a child aged over 14 years to 18 years old according age limit child according to Act No. 35-year 2014 About child protection article 1 point 1. Provision of criminal sanctions of prison-related responsibilities against the crime that he had arranged with the penalty provisions based on ½ (one-) maximum threat from adults in accordance to article 81 paragraph (2) of Act No. 11 years 2012 about the criminal justice system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-190
Author(s):  
Saut Parulian Manurung

AbstractIn this study aims to determine the legal phenomena that arise as a result of the criminal justice system, as a reflection of the development of criminal law both at the theoretical and practical level. The findings in this research are based on two approaches namely the statute approach as an approach based on the rule of law and the conceptual approach based on the conceptual approach. There are 3 (three) findings of legal phenomena in this study, namely: first, the presence of a double track system in the criminal mechanism in Indonesia. Secondly, there is a phenomenon of paradigm shifting the character of punishment in Indonesia and third, re-measuring restorative justice in the form of diversion mechanism based on the perspective of utilitarianism. In principle, crime is always closely related to criminal sanctions, but in the double track criminal system is directed at criminal actions. On the other hand, the phenomenon of paradigm shift in the character of punishment occurs in the juvenile justice system, namely the approach to criminal responsibility is done by bargaining an agreement between the perpetrators, victims and community involvement. Furthermore, measuring restorative justice based on a utility perspective, this finding found coherence between restorative justice in the form of diversion and utilitarianism. Therefore, the overall legal phenomena above are some manifestations of the legal reality that is present in the criminal system in Indonesia.Keywords: criminal paradigm shift; double track system; utilitarianismAbstrakPada penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui fenomena-fenomena hukum yang timbul akibat dari sistem peradilan pidana, sebagai suatu refleksi atas perkembangan hukum pidana baik pada tataran teoritis maupun praktik. Penemuan dalam penelitian didasari dengan dua pendekatan yaitu statute approach sebagai suatu pendekatan berdasarkan peraturan undang-undang dan conceptual approach yang didasari dengan pendekatan koseptual. Terdapat 3 (tiga) temuan fenomena hukum dalam penelitian ini yaitu: pertama, hadirnya double track system dalam mekanisme pemidanaan di Indonesia. Kedua, adanya fenomena pergeseran paradigma karakter pemidanaan di Indonesia dan ketiga, menakar kembali keadilan restoratif dalam bentuk mekanisme diversi berdasarkan perspektif utilitarianisme. Pada prinsipnya kejahatan tindak pidana selalu erat hubungannya dengan pidana sanksi namun dalam double track system pemidanaan diarahkan pada pidana tindakan. Di sisi lain, fenomena pergeseran paradigma karakter pemidanaan terjadi pada sistem peradilan pidana anak, yaitu pendekatan pertanggungjawaban pidana dilakukkan dengan cara bargaining kesepakatan antara pelaku, korban dan keterlibatan masyarakat. Selanjutnya menakar keadilan restoratif berdasarkan perspektif utilitis, dalam temuan ini ditemukan koherensi antara keadilan restoratif dalam bentuk diversi dengan aliran utilitarianisme. Oleh karena itu, keseluruhan fenomena-fenomena hukum tersebut diatas merupakan beberapa wujud kenyataan hukum yang hadir di sistem pidana di Indonesia.Kata kunci: double track system, pergeseran paradigma pidana, utilitarianisme


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Ramdani Ramdani

Penelitian ini membahas tentang “Hak Anak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia”. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengentahui, menganalisis dan membahasn konsep serta bentuk dari hak anak dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normativ dengan menggunakan pendekatan studi kepustakaan dengan menelaah, meneliti dan mengkaji perundang-undangan yang membahas tentang hak anak baik secara konsep maupun bentuk. Hasil dari penelitian ini secara garis besar dapat disimpulkan bahwa anak dalam dalam perkara pidana mendapat jaminan perlindungan hukum dalam berbagai bentuk seperti jaminan keselamatan baik fisik, mental maupun sosial dan memiliki akses terhadap informasi mengenai perkembangan perkara. Anak harus mendapatkan haknya berdasarkan kepentingan terbaik anak penghargaan terhadap anak. Jaminan perlindungan yang didapat tidak hanya dari Undang-undang No 11 tahun 2012 tentang sistem peradilan pidana anak namun juga dari Undang-undang No 13 tahun 2006 tentang perlindungan saksi dan korban. Negara dalam hal ini pemerintah dan aparatur penyelenggara memperhatikan implementasi yang efektif dengan pertimbangan kepentingan terbaik anak.Kata kunci: Sistem peradilan pidana anak, perlindungan anak, hak anakThis research discusses "Children's Rights in the Child Criminal Justice System in Indonesia". This study aims to identify, analyze and discuss the concepts and forms of children's rights in the juvenile justice system in Indonesia. This research is a normative study using a literature study approach by examining, researching and examining laws that discuss children's rights both in concept and form. The results of this study can be broadly concluded that children in criminal cases receive legal protection guarantees in various forms such as safety guarantees both physically, mentally and socially and have access to information regarding case developments. Children must get their rights based on the best interests of the child and respect for the child. The guarantee of protection is obtained not only from Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the juvenile criminal justice system but also from Law No. 13 of 2006 concerning the protection of witnesses and victims. The state in this case the government and the apparatus organizers pay attention to effective implementation with consideration of the best interests of children.Keywords: Child criminal justice system, child protection, children's rights


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-138
Author(s):  
Mustakim Mahmud

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan sanksi berdasarkan Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dengan permasalahan penelitian, Pertama, Bagaimana penerapan Sanksi Pidana dan Tindakan Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak? Kedua, Bagaimanakah hambatan-hambatan apa yang ditemukan dalam penerapan Sanksi pidana dan Tindakan Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dan penelitian hukum empirik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, Pertama, Penerapan sanksi pidana menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradila Pidana Anak bahwa Penegak mencari alternatif penyelesaian terbaik bagi kepentingan anak. Kedua, Hambatannya yaitu belum adanya persamaan persfektif dalam penanganan terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum di antara para penegak hukum serta hambatan dari faktor masyarakat yaitu banyak masyarakat yang belum mengerti tentang peraturan undang-undang yang berhubungan dengan anak. This study aims to analyze the application of sanctions based on the Child Criminal Justice System Law with research issues, First, How is the application of Criminal Sanctions and Actions According to Law Number 11 of 2012 Concerning the Child Criminal Justice System? Second, what are the obstacles found in the application of criminal sanctions and actions according to Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children. The research method uses normative legal research and empirical legal research. The results showed, First, the application of criminal sanctions according to Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children that the Enforcement Seekers seek the best alternative solutions for the interests of children. Second, the obstacle is the lack of equality in the perspective of handling children in conflict with the law among law enforcers as well as obstacles from community factors, namely that many people do not understand the laws relating to children


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Rifqi Qowiyul Iman

This paper aims to describe the differences and the position of the legal rules for juvenile crimes between Qanun 6 of 2014 and Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System.  This research is descriptive qualitative research. The results show that Qanun Number 6 of 2014 also regulates criminal sanctions for children, which are normatively regulated in Law Number 11 of 2012. In addition, Qanun, as Aceh Islamic criminal law legalizes canning punishment for children, as well as the double-track system adopted by The Law of Juvenile Criminal Justice System is not explicitly accommodated in Qanun. Qanun at the level of a Regional Regulation is part of the hierarchy of laws and regulations that should be in line with what generally applies at the national level. Law Number 11 of 2006 is being the basis of the authority to make Qanun, as long as there is no court decision invalidates it, Qanun Number 6 of 2014, which is a derivative of Law Number 11 of 2006, can be declared as "lex specialis" of The Juvenile Criminal Justice System law which regulates child crime. However, it does not rule out the possibility that in the future, the judicial review of the article can be conducted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document