Ethical conflicts around the procedure preimplantation genetic diagnosis
and their overcoming by legal remedies based on foreign experience
Objectives. The purpose of this study is to study the essence of ethical conflicts arising over the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and to identify ways to overcome them by legal means, taking into account existing foreign experience. Materials. The legal acts and doctrinal sources of Australia, Great Britain, Canada, China, New Zealand, USA are investigated. The methods used are: general philosophical, general scientific, private scientific, special (structural-legal, comparative-legal, formal-legal). Results. Ways to resolve ethical conflicts around the PGD procedure that are relevant for use in Russian conditions are proposed. Conclusions. It was established that the resolution of ethical conflicts around the procedure should be based on state legal regulation of requirements related to informing patients about the content of the services provided and the consequences of the procedure, methods and procedures for the independent interpretation of the results. In addition to the official fixing of the list of genetic diseases, for the presence of markers which are allowed to conduct research, the legislation on the protection of the health of citizens must establish a procedure for authorizing PGD in exceptional cases, as well as factors and circumstances that must be taken into account and evaluated when an appropriate decision is made (including the features of a family history, an assessment of the degree of impaired function of the organism, the state of individual organs and their systems during development of the corresponding disease, etc.). Regulatory requirements can be supplemented and developed in the content of professional manuals