Inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts and other microbes in water and wastewater by electrochemically generated mixed oxidants

2000 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 127-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Casteel ◽  
M. D. Sobsey ◽  
M. J. Arrowood
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cell Culture ◽  
Cryptosporidium Parvum ◽  
Propidium Iodide ◽  
Treated Wastewater ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Water And Wastewater ◽  
Cryptosporidium Parvum Oocysts ◽  
Cell Culture Assay ◽  
Escherichia Coli B

Alternative disinfectants of water and wastewater are needed because conventional chlorination is ineffective against C. parvum oocysts. Reliable indicators of disinfection efficacy against C. parvum also are needed. Mixedoxidants (MO) electrochemically generated from brine were evaluated in batch disinfection experiments for inactivation of C. parvum oocysts and Cl. perfringensspores in both oxidant demand-free (ODF) water and treated wastewater. Coliphage MS2 and Escherichia coli B were also tested under some conditions. C. parvum oocyst infectivity was quantified by cell culture assay, and the dyes DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) and propidium iodide (PI) were used to assess oocyst viability in wastewater experiments. In treated wastewater dosed with 10–13 mg/L MO, inactivation after 90 minutes was about 3 log10 for C. parvum and about 2.5 log10 for Cl. perfringens spores; MS2 and E. coli were rapidly inactivated by > 5 log10. In ODF water, a 4 mg/L dose of MO inactivated ∼3 log10 of C. parvum oocysts and ∼1.5 log10 of Cl. perfringens spores. Inactivation of C. parvum oocysts and Cl. perfringensspores was less extensive at a lower MO dose of 2 mg/L. The use of DAPI and PI to determine viability of oocysts treated with MO did not correlate with, and greatly overestimated, cell culture infectivity. At practical doses and contact times, MO disinfection of water and wastewater achieves appreciable inactivation of both C. parvum oocysts and Cl. perfringens spores. Cl. perfringens spores reliably indicated oocyst inactivation by MO, but E. coli and coliphage MS2 were inactivated much too rapidly to indicate C. parvum inactivation.

Inactivation of enteric microbes in water by electro-chemical oxidant from brine (NaCl) and free chlorine

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.V. Venczel ◽  
C.A. Likirdopulos ◽  
C.E. Robinson ◽  
M.D. Sobsey
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Drinking Water ◽  
Vibrio Cholerae ◽  
Clostridium Perfringens ◽  
Cryptosporidium Parvum ◽  
Free Chlorine ◽  
Inactivation Kinetics ◽  
Nacl Solution ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Cryptosporidium Parvum Oocysts

Oxidant solutions of mostly free chlorine can be electrochemically produced on-site from brine (NaCl) solution and used to disinfect water at the household or community level. In this study electrochemical oxidant (ECO) from brine and free chlorine were evaluated under laboratory conditions for inactivation of test microbes. Purified suspensions of Escherichia coli, the rugose strain of Vibrio cholerae, Clostridium perfringens spores, MS2 coliphage and Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts were treated with 2 mg/L or 5 mg/L solutions of ECO or free chlorine at 5°C and 25°C and pH 6, 8, and 10 (pH 7 and 25°C only for C. parvum oocysts) for contact times <60 min. Under nearly all conditions, inactivation kinetics were more rapid for E. coli, V. cholerae, C. perfringens spores and MS2 coliphage with ECO than with free chlorine. ECO reduced E. coli, V. cholerae and MS2 by >4 log10 within 30 min and C. perfringens spores by >2 log10 within 10 min at pH 8 and 25°C. Contrary to previous results, however, C. parvum oocysts were not inactivated by ECO, and the reasons for this difference are uncertain. The on-site electrolytic generation of oxidants from brine provided a convenient and inexpensive disinfectant containing free chlorine that was effective against many enteric microbes, for the treatment of household and community drinking-water supplies worldwide. However, the effectiveness of such oxidants for inactivating C. parvum oocysts was variable and sometimes ineffective.

Sites of Adsorption of the Bacteriophages T3 and T5 on the Wall of Escherichia Coli B.

1967 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 96-97
Author(s):  
Manfred E. Bayer
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cell Wall ◽  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Uranyl Acetate ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Receptor Sites ◽  
Rigid Cell Wall ◽  
Host Cell Surface ◽  
Bacterial Viruses ◽  
Escherichia Coli B

Bacterial viruses adsorb specifically to receptors on the host cell surface. Although the chemical composition of some of the cell wall receptors for bacteriophages of the T-series has been described and the number of receptor sites has been estimated to be 150 to 300 per E. coli cell, the localization of the sites on the bacterial wall has been unknown.When logarithmically growing cells of E. coli are transferred into a medium containing 20% sucrose, the cells plasmolize: the protoplast shrinks and becomes separated from the somewhat rigid cell wall. When these cells are fixed in 8% Formaldehyde, post-fixed in OsO4/uranyl acetate, embedded in Vestopal W, then cut in an ultramicrotome and observed with the electron microscope, the separation of protoplast and wall becomes clearly visible, (Fig. 1, 2). At a number of locations however, the protoplasmic membrane adheres to the wall even under the considerable pull of the shrinking protoplast. Thus numerous connecting bridges are maintained between protoplast and cell wall. Estimations of the total number of such wall/membrane associations yield a number of about 300 per cell.

scholarly journals Modification by an R determinant for streptomycin of hissd phenotype in a mutant strain of Escherichia coli B

1968 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Molina ◽  
L. Calegari ◽  
G. Conte
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cell Membrane ◽  
Mutant Strain ◽  
Minimal Medium ◽  
Specific Requirement ◽  
Resistance Level ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Level Characteristic ◽  
Escherichia Coli B

When an R determinant for streptomycin is transferred into a conditionally streptomycin-dependent E. coli B mutant—which requires in minimal medium either histidine or streptomycin—the latter behaves like a histidineless strain. This phenotype modification shows that the repairing action of streptomycin is prevented. The specific requirement of the strain is not now replaced even by streptomycin concentrations up to 10000 µg/ml at which the conditionally streptomycin-dependent mutant could originally grow, and which are well beyond the resistance level characteristic of the R determinant itself. These data seem to suggest that a reduction in permeability of the cell membrane cannot be held responsible for the phenomenon observed.

Microwave Inactivation of Cyclospora cayetanensis Sporulation and Viability of Cryptosporidium parvum Oocysts

2006 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 1957-1960 ◽  
Author(s):  
YNES R. ORTEGA ◽  
JYEYIN LIAO
Keyword(s):  
Cryptosporidium Parvum ◽  
Propidium Iodide ◽  
Cryptosporidium Oocyst ◽  
Cooking Time ◽  
Cyclospora Cayetanensis ◽  
The Third ◽  
Infectivity Assay ◽  
Cryptosporidium Oocysts ◽  
Cryptosporidium Parvum Oocysts ◽  
Cooking Times

The efficacy of microwave heating on the viability of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts and on the sporulation of Cyclospora cayetanensis oocysts for various periods of cooking times (0, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 45 s) at 100% power was determined. Cyclospora oocysts were stored in 2.5% dichromate at 23°C for 2 weeks, and sporulation rates were then determined. The 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and propidium iodide vital stain and the neonate animal infectivity assay determined Cryptosporidium oocyst viability. Cryptosporidium oocysts could be completely inactivated with as little as 20 s of cooking time, whereas Cyclospora sporulation was observed up to 45 s. Two of the examined microwave ovens were more effective at reducing sporulation and viability than the third one. Because of the variability of temperature achieved by the various ovens, cooking time was not an accurate parameter for parasite inactivation. Cryptosporidium oocysts could be inactivated only when temperatures of 80°C or higher were reached in the microwave ovens.

scholarly journals Role of enteric pathogens in the aetiology of neonatal diarrhoea in lambs and goat kids in Spain

1996 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Muñoz ◽  
M. Álvarez ◽  
I. Lanza ◽  
P. Cármenes
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Synergistic Effect ◽  
Cryptosporidium Parvum ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Enteric Pathogens ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Neonatal Diarrhoea ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

SummaryFaeces samples from diarrhoeic and non-diarrhoeic lambs and goat kids aged 1–45 days were examined for enteric pathogens.Cryptosporidium parvumwas detected in both diarrhoeic lambs (45%) and goat kids (42%) but not in non-diarrhoeic animals. F5+(K99+) and/or F41+Escherichia colistrains were isolated from 26% and 22% of the diarrhoeic lambs and goat kids, respectively, although these strains, which did not produce enterotoxins ST I or LT I, were found with similar frequencies in non-diarrhoeic animals. A F5−F41−ST I+E. colistrain was isolated from a diarrhoeic lamb (0·6%). VerotoxigenicE. coliwas isolated from both diarrhoeic and non-diarrhoeic lambs (4·1% and 8·2%, respectively) and there was no association between infection and diarrhoea. The prevalence of group A rotavirus infection in diarrhoeic lambs was very low (2·1%). Groups A and B rotaviruses were detected in three (8·1%) and five (13·5%) diarrhoeic goat kids from two single outbreaks. Group C rotaviruses were detected in four non-diarrhoeic goat kids. An association of diarrhoea and infection was demonstrated only for group B rotavirus.Clostridium perfringenswas isolated from 10·8% of the diarrhoeic goat kids but not from non-diarrhoeic goat kids or lambs.Salmonella arizonaewas isolated from a diarrhoeic goat kid (2·7%) and the clinical characteristics of the outbreaks where these two latter enteropathogens were found different from the rest. Picobirnaviruses were detected in a diarrhoeic lamb. No coronaviruses were detected using a bovine coronavirus ELISA. No evidence was found of synergistic effect between the agents studied. Enteric pathogens were not found in four (8·7%) and three (20%) outbreaks of diarrhoea in lambs and goat kids, respectively.

scholarly journals Persistence of Escherichia coli O157:H12 and Escherichia coli K12 as Non-pathogenic Surrogates for O157:H7 on Lettuce Cultivars Irrigated With Secondary-Treated Wastewater and Roof-Collected Rain Water in the Field

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsin-Bai Yin ◽  
Nidhi Gupta ◽  
Chi-Hung Chen ◽  
Ashley Boomer ◽  
Abani Pradhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Pathogenic Bacteria ◽  
Water Source ◽  
Water Sources ◽  
Rain Water ◽  
Treated Wastewater ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Water Characteristics ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Alternative Water

Treated wastewater (TW) and roof-collected rain water (RW) that meet the required microbial quality as per Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) regulation may serve as alternative irrigation water sources to decrease the pressure on the current water scarcity. Alternative water sources may have different water characteristics that influence the survival and transfer of microorganisms to the irrigated produce. Further, these water sources may contain pathogenic bacteria such as Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli. To evaluate the risk associated with TW and RW irrigation on the fresh produce safety, the effect of TW and RW irrigation on the transfer of two non-pathogenic E. coli strains as surrogates for E. coli O157:H7 to different lettuce cultivars grown in the field was investigated. Lettuce cultivars “Annapolis,” “Celinet,” and “Coastline” were grown in the field at the Fulton farm (Chambersburg, PA). Approximately 10 days before harvest, lettuce plants were spray-irrigated with groundwater (GW), TW, or RW containing 6 log CFU ml−1 of a mixture of nalidixic acid-resistant E. coli O157:H12 and chloramphenicol-resistant E. coli K12 in fecal slurry as non-pathogenic surrogates for E. coli O157:H7. On 0, 1, 3, 7, and 10 days post-irrigation, four replicate lettuce leaf samples (30 g per sample) from each group were collected and pummeled in 120 ml of buffered peptone water for 2 min, followed by spiral plating on MacConkey agars with antibiotics. Results showed that the recovery of E. coli O157:H12 was significantly greater than the populations of E. coli K12 recovered from the irrigated lettuce regardless of the water sources and the lettuce cultivars. The TW irrigation resulted in the lowest recovery of the E. coli surrogates on the lettuce compared to the populations of these bacteria recovered from the lettuce with RW and GW irrigation on day 0. The difference in leaf characteristics of lettuce cultivars significantly influenced the recovery of these surrogates on lettuce leaves. Populations of E. coli O157:H12 recovered from the RW-irrigated “Annapolis” lettuce were significantly lower than the recovery of this bacterium from the “Celinet” and “Coastline” lettuce (P < 0.05). Overall, the recovery of specific E. coli surrogates from the RW and TW irrigated lettuce was comparable to the lettuce with the GW irrigation, where GW served as a baseline water source. E. coli O157:H12 could be a more suitable surrogate compared to E. coli K12 because it is an environmental watershed isolate. The findings of this study provide critical information in risk assessment evaluation of RW and TW irrigation on lettuce in Mid-Atlantic area.

scholarly journals Rapid Extraction of DNA From Escherichia coli and Cryptosporidium parvum for Use in PCR

2001 ◽  
Vol 67 (11) ◽  
pp. 5321-5324 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Higgins ◽  
Mark C. Jenkins ◽  
Daniel R. Shelton ◽  
Ron Fayer ◽  
Jeffrey S. Karns
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cryptosporidium Parvum ◽  
Matrix Methods ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Rapid Extraction ◽  
Instagene Matrix

ABSTRACT The Xtra Amp tube, Isocode paper, Instagene matrix, and PrepMan matrix methods were evaluated for their ability to rapidly extract PCR-quality DNAs from Escherichia coli O157:H7 andCryptosporidium parvum. All methods provided satisfactory DNA from E. coli, and the Xtra Amp and Instagene reagents provided satisfactory DNA from C. parvum.

scholarly journals Photoelectrocatalytic disinfection of water and wastewater: performance evaluation by qPCR and culture techniques

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danae Venieri ◽  
Efthalia Chatzisymeon ◽  
Eleonora Politi ◽  
Spiridon S. Sofianos ◽  
Alexandros Katsaounis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Charge Carriers ◽  
Treated Wastewater ◽  
Bacterial Inactivation ◽  
Culture Techniques ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Water Matrix ◽  
Water And Wastewater ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Photoelectrocatalytic oxidation (PEC) was evaluated as a disinfection technique using water and secondary treated wastewater spiked with Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis. PEC experiments were carried out using a TiO2/Ti-film anode and a zirconium cathode under simulated solar radiation. Bacterial inactivation was monitored by culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Inactivation rates were enhanced when the duration of the treatment was prolonged and when the bacterial density and the complexity of the water matrix were decreased. E. coli cells were reduced by approximately 6 orders of magnitude after 15 min of PEC treatment in water at 2V of applied potential and an initial concentration of 107 CFU/mL; pure photocatalysis (PC) led to about 5 log reduction, while electrochemical oxidation alone resulted in negligible inactivation. The superiority of PEC relative to PC can be attributed to a more efficient separation of the photogenerated charge carriers. Regarding disinfection in mixed bacterial suspensions, E. coli was more susceptible than E. faecalis at a potential of 2V. The complex composition of wastewater affected disinfection efficiency, yielding lower inactivation rates compared to water treatment. qPCR yielded lower inactivation rates at longer treatment times than culture techniques, presumably due to the fact that the latter do not take into account the viable but not culturable state of microorganisms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document