Background: The present study was conduct in Motilal Nehru Medical College, Swaroop Rani Nehru
Hospital Prayagraj, a tertiary care center and data was collected over a period from January 2019 to April
2020. All 78 patients of CKD attending OPD & IPD of General Medicine and Nephrology, diagnosed by suggestive symptoms
and conrmed by physical examination and laboratory investigations were taken , Among the subjects, those having NAFLD
were grouped as cases. Patients of Chronic Kidney disease not having NAFLD were grouped as controls.
Aim & Objective: To study the prevalence of NAFLD in patients of CKD and establish the association between NAFLD and CKD
by studying the effect of NAFLD on eGFR.
Methodology: This was a 16 month case control study. Total 78 patients with age 18-65 years , Either sex with Chronic kidney
disease diagnosed by USG, KFT, physical examination and having NAFLD Patients with known diagnosis of metabolic
syndrome, diabetes and/or hypothyroidism. Those on hepatotoxic medication (amiodarone, barbiturates, glucocorticoids,
etc.). The data so collected was entered into computer using Microsoft Excel 2013 software and was subjected to statistical
analysis.
Result : The ndings of present study thus reafrm the observations of previous studies that highlight a high prevalence of
NAFLD in CKD patients and link it to the deranged metabolic factors. In present study we could not found a convincing evidence
supporting a relationship between NAFLD and its severity with progression of CKD, probably owing to three major factors –
rst, owing to Discussion 71 limitation of study population in only CKD stage 3 and secondly, owing to absence of retrospective
data tracing the time of development of NAFLD in these patients and thirdly, inability to carry out long-time follow-up of
patients. In present study, though minor changes in eGFR values in patients were seen, however, during the limited period of
follow-up no shift from Stage 3 to other stages of CKD was observed. All the patients were regular in follow-up and had a good
medical compliance and in general did not show a phenomenal deterioration in renal function within the short span of study.
Keeping in view these limitations, further studies are recommended on a larger sample size with inclusion of patients from
different stages of CKD spanning over a longer duration of follow-up to see whether NAFLD presence and its severity has a
relationship with long-term progression of CKD.
Conclusion: The present study showed that, CKD patients had a high prevalence of NAFLD. The ndings also show that FIB-4
scores are useful noninvasive methods for detection of NAFLD in CKD patients. The ndings showed a possible signicant
association between NAFLD and lower eGFR rates. One of the limitations of the present study was presence of only Stage 3
CKD patients, owing to which the linear correlations between eGFR and NAFLD severity could not be assessed properly. Further
studies on larger sample size with inclusion of patients with other CKD stages too are recommended.