scholarly journals Spinal Anesthesia is Safe and Cost-effective for Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: A Case-Control Study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md Jafrul Hannan ◽  
Mosammat Kohinnor Parveen ◽  
Alak Nandy ◽  
Md Samiul Hasan
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Hospital Discharges ◽  
Operation Theatre ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Control Study

BACKGROUND to the widespread use of general anesthesia, administration of spinal anesthesia in pediatrics is not widely practiced. Yet there is ample positive evidence demonstrating its safety, effectiveness and success. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to demonstrate that laparoscopic appendectomies are successful under spinal anesthesia and elicit clear advantages over general anesthesia. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of 77 pediatric (5-8 year old) laparoscopic appendectomies that took place in a Hospital in Chittagong, Bangladesh in 2019. Approximately half of the patients underwent spinal anesthesia while the other half underwent general anesthesia. Variables such as surgery and operation theatre times, pain score, incidence of post-surgery vomiting, analgesic usage, discharge times and hospital costs were recorded. Statistical analysis was used to analyze the data as a function of form of anesthesia. RESULTS The probability of vomiting when using spinal compared to general anesthesia was much lower within the first 5 hours (P < .001) and after 6 hours (P = .008) of operation. Highly significant difference (P < .001) was observed in the total costs of the procedures. A significantly higher likelihood of patients being discharged the same day of the procedure was noted if spinal anesthesia was used (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS Spinal anesthesia is superior to general anesthesia for pediatric laparoscopic appendectomies. Patient comfort is improved through a significant decrease in vomiting. This enables more rapid hospital discharges and a significant cost saving, without compromising the outcome of the procedure.

scholarly journals Spinal Anesthesia is Safe and Cost-effective for Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: A Case-Control Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md Jafrul Hannan ◽  
Mosammat Kohinoor Parveenl ◽  
Alak Nandy ◽  
Md Samiul Hasan
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Hospital Discharges ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference

STRUCTURED ABSTRACTBackgroundOwing to the widespread use of general anesthesia, administration of spinal anesthesia in pediatrics is not widely practiced. Yet there is ample positive evidence demonstrating its safety, effectiveness and success.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to demonstrate that laparoscopic appendectomies are successful under spinal anesthesia and elicit clear advantages over general anesthesia.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 77 pediatric (5-8 year old) laparoscopic appendectomies that took place in a Hospital in Chittagong, Bangladesh in 2019. Approximately half of the patients underwent spinal anesthesia while the other half underwent general anesthesia. Variables such as surgery and operation theatre times, pain score, incidence of post-surgery vomiting, analgesic usage, discharge times and hospital costs were recorded. Statistical analysis was used to analyze the data as a function of form of anesthesia.ResultsThe probability of vomiting when using spinal compared to general anesthesia was much lower within the first 5 hours (P < .001) and after 6 hours (P = .008) of operation. Highly significant difference (P < .001) was observed in the total costs of the procedures. A significantly higher likelihood of patients being discharged the same day of the procedure was noted if spinal anesthesia was used (P = .008).ConclusionsSpinal anesthesia is superior to general anesthesia for pediatric laparoscopic appendectomies. Patient comfort is improved through a significant decrease in vomiting. This enables more rapid hospital discharges and a significant cost saving, without compromising the outcome of the procedure.MINI-ABSTRACTSpinal anesthesia is seldom used for laparoscopy in children. This retrospective case-controlled study compared spinal anesthesia with general anesthesia in children between 5 and 8 years of age. Spinal anesthesia proved to be safer and cost-effective for laparoscopy in children.

scholarly journals Use of Spinal Anesthesia in Pediatric Laparoscopic Appendectomies: Case Series

JMIRx Med ◽  
10.2196/25204 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. e25204
Author(s):  
Md Jafrul Hannan ◽  
Mosammat Kohinnor Parveen ◽  
Alak Nandy ◽  
Md Samiul Hasan
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Hospital Discharges ◽  
Significant Difference

Background Owing to the widespread use of general anesthesia, administration of spinal anesthesia in pediatric patients is not widely practiced. Yet there is ample positive evidence demonstrating its safety, effectiveness, and success. Objective The objective of this study is to compare postoperative patient comfort, length of hospital stay, and cost-effectiveness of pediatric laparoscopic appendectomies performed under spinal and general anesthesia with the usual standard-of-care procedures employed in the hospital. Methods This is a case series of 77 consecutive pediatric laparoscopic appendectomies (involving 5-8–year-old children) that took place in a hospital in Chittagong, Bangladesh, in 2019. A total of 40 patients underwent spinal anesthesia and 37 patients underwent general anesthesia. Variables such as surgery and operation theater times, pain score, incidence of postsurgery vomiting, analgesic usage, discharge times, and hospital costs were recorded. Statistical analysis was used to analyze the data as a function of anesthesia type. Results The probability of vomiting when using spinal compared to general anesthesia was lower within the first 5 hours (P<.001) and 6 hours (P=.008) postoperation. A significant difference (P<.001) was observed between the total costs of the two procedures, with spinal anesthesia being less expensive. Patients were more likely to be discharged the same day of the procedure when spinal anesthesia was used (P=.008). Conclusions Spinal anesthesia has many advantages compared to general anesthesia for pediatric laparoscopic appendectomies. Patient comfort is improved due to a significant decrease in vomiting. This allows for more rapid hospital discharges and substantial cost savings, without compromising the outcome of the procedure.

scholarly journals EMERGENCY LAPAROTOMIES UNDER SPINAL ANESTHESIA: A RETROSPECTIVE, FACILITY BASED OBSERVATIONAL STUDY, IN KABUL, AFGHANISTAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (06) ◽  
pp. 751-756
Author(s):  
Wais Farda ◽  
◽  
Ahmad Bashir Nawazish ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Abdominal Incision ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Background: Laparotomy is most commonly performed under general anesthesia, but spinal anesthesia (SA) is considered an alternative to in the context of limited resources. The safety and efficacy of using SA as substitute for general anesthesia(GA) has not been explored in Afghanistan. Methodology: We conductedan observational study in the general surgery department of Isteqlal hospital in Kabul, Afghanistan on 196 adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy under spinal anesthesia betweenApril 2018-April 2020. Results: The mean age of patients was 41.5 years (SD=19.4), the ratio of males to females was 1.9:1 and almost half (44.4%) had comorbidities. 21% were classified as ASA grade III and IV with a similar pattern among males and females. A total of 11 (5.6%) cases were converted to GA. Conversion pattern to GA was similar amongmales and females(P=0.71), ASA grade (P=0.432) and age group (P=0.642). The mean length of stay after operation was 6.5 days (SD=4.1). 32 (16.3%) patients suffered SA complications with no significant difference in terms of sex (P=0.134). Hypotension and headache accounted for 97% of complications. Complication rates were similar in terms of intervertebral level (P=0.349), type of abdominal incision (P>0.1) and average length of stay (P=0.156). 18 patients (9.2%) died due to MOF, sepsis, respiratory failure, thromboembolism and cardiogenic shock. Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia is considered a safe and effective anesthesia for emergency laparotomies, even for those with comorbidities. Based on our findings we would recommend spinal anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesiain emergency laparotomy in Afghanistan.

scholarly journals Comparison of General versus Spinal Anesthesia in Patients undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Randomized Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
Rupak Bhattarai ◽  
Chittarranjan Das ◽  
Bandana Paudel ◽  
Sailoj Jung Dangi
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
P Value ◽  
Recovery Duration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hospital Stays ◽  
Surgical Duration

Background Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, widely used procedure by urologists for removing renal stones nowadays. Generally, it is preferred in general anesthesia but here in our study we have compared it with spinal anesthesia to know its safety and efficacy.Material and Methods Sixty patients of either sex, aged between 20-60 years, ASA – Grade I and II, with stones size larger than 15 mm posted for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy were randomly selected. Patient was divided in two groups 30 each, Spinal Anesthesia (S) and General Anesthesia (G). Patient’s stones sizes, numbers & location, Anesthesia duration, Surgical duration, Recovery duration, Blood loss and Blood transfusion, Analgesic demand, post-operative Nausea & Vomiting, Patient satisfaction, Hospital stays and Heart Rate and Mean arterial pressure between two groups were compared.Results There was no significant difference in terms of mean age, weight, stones sizes, and numbers and its location. The p value for Anesthesia duration and surgical duration were 0.144 and 0.22 which was insignificant. Recovery duration (p-value 0.007), Blood loss (p-value 0.004) were significantly lesser in spinal anesthesia group. There was no significant difference in nausea and vomiting, patient satisfaction when compared between two groups. But Analgesic demand, Blood Transfusion and Hospital stays significantly found to be decreased in spinal anesthesia groups (p<0.05). The mean of MAP showed no significant difference except in 10 and 20 minutes.Conclusion Spinal anesthesia tends to be as effective as general anesthesia for PCNL and beneficial in terms of recovery duration, blood loss, analgesic demands, hospital stays, hence decrease the cost of patient. Journal of Nobel Medical CollegeVolume 5, Number 1, Issue 8, January-July 2016, Page: 37-42

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN NYERI YANG TERJADI 24 JAM PASCA OPERASI PADA PENDERITA YANG DIBERIKAN ANESTESIA UMUM DAN ANESTESIA SPINAL

e-CliniC ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiska M. Muhammad ◽  
Lucky Kumaat ◽  
Iddo Posangi
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Emotional Experience ◽  
P Value ◽  
Inhalation Anesthesia ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anesthesia Spinal

Abstract: Pain can be described as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with tissue damage which has already occured or potentially will be occurred. General anesthesia is oftenly perfomed on a wide range of surgical procedures. There are two techniques of general anesthesia: inhalation anesthesia and intravenous anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia is one of the simplest and most reliable of regional anesthesia technique. This study aimed to compare the pain between general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia 24 hours post operative. This was an analytical prospective study. Samples were 24 patients consisting of 12 patients with general anesthesia and 12 patients with spinal anesthesia. The inclusion criteria were patients aged 20-60 years old, duration of operation 1-4 hours, and the operations were caesarean section and hysterectomy. The pain assessment used VAS score as well as blood pressure, pulse, and respiration. Data were statistically analyzed by using the Mann-Whitney test and showed a p-value 0.876. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in 24-hour-post-operative pain using VAS score among patients with general anesthesia and with spinal anesthesia.Keywords: VAS scores, general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia.Abstrak: Nyeri dapat digambarkan sebagai suatu pengalaman sensorik dan emosional yang tidak menyenangkan yang berkaitan dengan kerusakan jaringan yang sudah atau berpotensi terjadi. Anestesia umum sering dilalukan pada berbagai macam prosedur pembedahan dan terbagi atas anestesia inhalasi dan anestesia intravena. Anestesia spinal merupakan salah satu anestesia yang paling sederhana dan paling dapat diandalkan dari tehnik anestesia regional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan nyeri pada pemberian anestesia umum dan anestesia spinal 24 jam pasca operasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analitik prospektif. Terdapat 24 sampel yang terbagi atas 12 penggunaan anestesia umum dan 12 penggunaan anestesia spinal, dengan kriteria rentang umur pasien 20-60 tahun, lama operasi 1-4 jam serta jenis pembedahan seksio sesarea dan histerektomi. Penilaian nyeri menggunakan skor VAS serta tekanan darah, nadi dan respirasi. Data diolah dengan menggunakan program SPSS versi 20. Hasil uji statistik Mann-Whitney mendapatkan nilai p= 0,876 yang menunjukkan tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna dari skor VAS. 24 jam pasca operasi dengan anestesia umum dan anestesia spinal. Simpulan: Tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna nyeri 24 jam pasca operaasi dinilai dengan skor VAS pada pemberian anestesia umum dan anestesia spinal.Kata kunci: Skor VAS, anestesia general, anestesia spinal

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Efficacy of Low-Dose Naloxone for the Prevention of Acute Remifentanil-Induced Hyperalgesia in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia for Laparotomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jalil Makarem ◽  
Hossein Majedi ◽  
Fateme Bahmaee ◽  
Seyed Mohammad Mireskandari ◽  
Fatemeh Amraei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Concomitant Administration ◽  
Remifentanil Infusion ◽  
Morphine Dose ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Opioid Administration ◽  
American Society

Background: Hyperalgesia is a major complication of continuous or intermittent opioid administration. The evidence suggests that concomitant administration of low-dose naloxone could prevent the development of acute opioid-induced hyperalgesia, with no effect on pain control. Objectives: The current study aimed to assess the effects of intraoperative low-dose naloxone, adding to remifentanil infusion on preventing acute postoperative hyperalgesia in patients undergoing general anesthesia for laparotomy. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, patients undergoing general anesthesia for laparotomic hysterectomy in a tertiary referral teaching hospital from February to December 2019 were randomly assigned to one of three groups of remifentanil-naloxone (remifentanil 0.3 μg/ kg/min with low-dose naloxone 0.25μg/kg /h prepared in 50 mL of normal saline), remifentanil (0.3 μg/kg/min), and control (receiving 50 mL saline infusion), intraoperatively. Patients and researchers were blinded to the type of intervention. The severity of hyperalgesia, as the main outcome, was evaluated by the static Tactile test. The severity of pain was assessed by visual analogous scale 0.5, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. Results: In total, 75 patients were evaluated. The results showed no difference concerning the independent variables (age, body mass index, hypertension, surgery duration, anesthesia duration, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class) between the three groups. Heart rate was significantly different in all study time points between the three groups (P < 0.001), but mean arterial pressure and systolic and diastolic blood pressure showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) throughout the study. Assessment of hyperalgesia using the tactile test revealed a higher incidence of hyperalgesia in the remifentanil group in 0.5, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery compared to the other two groups, which was statistically significant between the groups at 0.5, 2, and 6 hours after surgery (P < 0.05). Shivering incidence, Morphine dose in 24 hours post-surgery, morphine dose in the recovery room, and VAS for pain were significantly different during the study between the three groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions: This study demonstrated the efficacy of intraoperative low-dose naloxone (0.25 μg/kg/h) added to remifentanil infusion on reducing the frequency and severity of acute postoperative hyperalgesia in patients undergoing general anesthesia for laparotomy hysterectomy.

scholarly journals Effects of General Anesthesia Versus Spinal Anesthesia on Serum Cytokine Release after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Vosoughian ◽  
Mastaneh Dahi ◽  
Shideh Dabir ◽  
Mohammadreza Moshari ◽  
Soodeh Tabashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Necrosis Factor Alpha ◽  
General Anesthesia Group ◽  
Anesthesia Group ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Tissue damage caused by major surgery, such as cesarean section, may lead to a poor host immune response and excessive release of cytokines. These responses may increase the risk of infection, cause postoperative pain, and exert damaging effects on various body organs. Objectives: Anesthesia methods may affect cytokine production after surgery. This study aimed to compare the serum levels of cytokines in general and spinal anesthesia among women undergoing cesarean section. Methods: Thirty parturients (ASA class I and II) undergoing cesarean section were randomly assigned into two equal groups of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia. Blood samples were taken for measuring the levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) before induction of anesthesia and 30 minutes after entering the recovery room. Results: In the general anesthesia group, the postoperative serum levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were significantly higher than the corresponding preoperative levels. Significant differences were found between the two groups in the preoperative and postoperative levels of TNF-α. Changes in the IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations were significantly higher in the general anesthesia group as compared to the spinal anesthesia group. However, there was no significant difference in the IL-6:IL-10 and TNF-α: IL-10 ratios between the two groups. Conclusions: General anesthesia, as compared to spinal anesthesia, significantly increased the IL-6 and TNF-α levels after cesarean section. Therefore, the spinal anesthesia technique may be a better option for patients undergoing cesarean section.

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF NEONATAL APGAR SCORES AND PATIENT SATISFACTION LEVELS IN SPINAL VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTIONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 1183-87
Author(s):  
Syed Khurram Naseer ◽  
Aijaz Ali ◽  
Shizan Hamid Feroz ◽  
Dr Danish ◽  
Amir Sohail
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
P Value ◽  
Apgar Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Elective Cesarean

Objective: To compare patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal and general anesthesia in terms of neonatal APGAR scores and patient satisfaction. Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Departments of Anesthesia and Gynecology and Obstetrics, Combined Military Hospital Peshawar, for six months from Mar to Aug 2019. Methodology: In this study, 120 females with a singleton pregnancy of 36-40 weeks, and requiring a non-emergency elective cesarean section were enrolled through consecutive sampling in the study. The patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups of 60 women each through random table numbers. Group A received spinal anesthesia and group B general anesthesia. APGAR score was assessed at 5 minutes after delivery, and score of ≥7 was taken as satisfactory. Patient's satisfaction level regarding anesthesia was recorded on a visual analogue scale of 0 (extremely unsatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied), and score of ≥7 was taken as satisfactory. Results: Women receiving general anesthesia were more satisfied as compared to receiving spinal anesthesia (95% vs. 78.3%; p-value 0.007). There was no significant difference in terms of APGAR scores in general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia (83.33% versus 90%; p-value 0.283). Conclusion: After an elective caesarean section, more mothers were satisfied after receiving general anesthesia as compared to spinal anesthesia. However, both types of anaesthesia were found to be equally safe for babies born in terms of APGAR scores at 5 minutes.

scholarly journals Risk of Attention Deficit Hyper Activity Disorder After Early Exposure to General Anesthesia; A Case Control Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbas Sedighnejad ◽  
Soheil Soltanipour ◽  
Alia Saberi ◽  
Maryam Kousha ◽  
Elham Bidabadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Early Exposure ◽  
Anesthetic Agents ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
History Of ◽  
Development Methods ◽  
Control Study

Background: Over the past decade, following the discovery that developing brain of immature animals was affected by anesthetic agents, the safety of general anesthesia (GA) in early life has been questioned. Objectives: We investigated the association between anesthesia exposure in children and ADHD development. Methods: This case-control study was conducted at pediatric psychology clinic of our institution and a pediatric neurology private clinic during 2019. Firstly the responsible resident of anesthesiology separated new ADHD cases. Then a questionnaire was filled out through an almost 10 minute’s telephone interview. Finally, frequency distribution of GA was compared between ADHD cases and controls. Results: Finally, the data from 210 children were analyzed. Among 105 ADHD cases, 19% had a history of a procedure requiring GA while it was 3.8% in control group. Comparing the two groups a significant difference was observed regarding the age of receiving GA (P = 0.004), gender (P < 0.001), the history of receiving GA (P = 0.001) and the number of anesthesia exposures (P = 0.001). According to logistic regression analysis, male gender (P = 0.001) OR 3.11 (95CI = 1.63 - 5.93) and age (P = 0.003) OR 0.92 (95CI = 0.87 - 0.97) were significant predictors of early exposure to GA and ADHD development. Conclusions: It was revealed that early exposure to GA might be a risk factor for later developing ADHD. Boys might be more sensitive to the long term adverse effects of anesthetic agents than girls. Further prospective well-planned studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Is there a role of functional endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in aiding tracheotomy decannulation post oral cancer surgery?

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18523-e18523
Author(s):  
Vibhu Ranjan Sahni ◽  
Shamit Chopra ◽  
Anubha Bharthuar
Keyword(s):  
Oral Cancer ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Older Individuals ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Swallowing Therapy ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Swallowing Dysfunction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Square Analysis

e18523 Background: A significant proportion of patients with oral cancer require perioperative tracheotomy. The altered oral anatomy post surgery significantly impairs the first and second stages of swallowing, resulting in swallowing dysfunction and potential aspiration. There is no priordata on utilization of FEES or other objective tools to predict successful tracheotomy decannulation in patients with oral cancer. Methods: This constituted a retrospective analysis of 237 patients with oral cancer treated at our institution between Feb 2017 and Dec 2019. Seventy two (30.4%)patients underwent perioperative tracheotomy. Post surgery,after excluding patients who were not considered candidates for early decannulation, 48 (65.7%) underwent FEES with the endpoint of tracheotomy decannulation. The number of FEES procedures required for decannulation was correlated with patient and disease-specific variables utilizing Chi square analysis. Results: The rate of successful decannulation was 100%. The mean number of days from tracheotomy to decannulation was 24.9. Thirty two (66.7%) patients underwent decannulation post the first FEES, notablyupon documentation of no penetration or aspiration to three bolus consistencies. However, 33.3% patients needed swallowing therapy followed by a second (18.8%) or a third (14.6%) FEES before they could be decannulated (late decannulation). No patients required a repeat tracheotomy. A significantly higher proportion of individuals at or younger than median age were decannulated earlier, compared with individuals above median age ( p= 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between early (T1/2) and advanced (T3/4) primary lesions and timing of decannulation ( p= 0.83). The presence of comorbid diabetes mellitus did not correlate with decannulation timing ( p= 0.81). Conclusions: FEES constitutes a reliable, minimally invasive and cost-effective tool to aid successful decannulation across all stages of oral cancer. It may be indicated especially in older individuals. It helps guide swallowing therapy, and thus potentially augments quality of life by tailoring serial evaluations to aid early decannulation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document