scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN NYERI YANG TERJADI 24 JAM PASCA OPERASI PADA PENDERITA YANG DIBERIKAN ANESTESIA UMUM DAN ANESTESIA SPINAL

e-CliniC ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiska M. Muhammad ◽  
Lucky Kumaat ◽  
Iddo Posangi
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Emotional Experience ◽  
P Value ◽  
Inhalation Anesthesia ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anesthesia Spinal

Abstract: Pain can be described as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with tissue damage which has already occured or potentially will be occurred. General anesthesia is oftenly perfomed on a wide range of surgical procedures. There are two techniques of general anesthesia: inhalation anesthesia and intravenous anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia is one of the simplest and most reliable of regional anesthesia technique. This study aimed to compare the pain between general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia 24 hours post operative. This was an analytical prospective study. Samples were 24 patients consisting of 12 patients with general anesthesia and 12 patients with spinal anesthesia. The inclusion criteria were patients aged 20-60 years old, duration of operation 1-4 hours, and the operations were caesarean section and hysterectomy. The pain assessment used VAS score as well as blood pressure, pulse, and respiration. Data were statistically analyzed by using the Mann-Whitney test and showed a p-value 0.876. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in 24-hour-post-operative pain using VAS score among patients with general anesthesia and with spinal anesthesia.Keywords: VAS scores, general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia.Abstrak: Nyeri dapat digambarkan sebagai suatu pengalaman sensorik dan emosional yang tidak menyenangkan yang berkaitan dengan kerusakan jaringan yang sudah atau berpotensi terjadi. Anestesia umum sering dilalukan pada berbagai macam prosedur pembedahan dan terbagi atas anestesia inhalasi dan anestesia intravena. Anestesia spinal merupakan salah satu anestesia yang paling sederhana dan paling dapat diandalkan dari tehnik anestesia regional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan nyeri pada pemberian anestesia umum dan anestesia spinal 24 jam pasca operasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analitik prospektif. Terdapat 24 sampel yang terbagi atas 12 penggunaan anestesia umum dan 12 penggunaan anestesia spinal, dengan kriteria rentang umur pasien 20-60 tahun, lama operasi 1-4 jam serta jenis pembedahan seksio sesarea dan histerektomi. Penilaian nyeri menggunakan skor VAS serta tekanan darah, nadi dan respirasi. Data diolah dengan menggunakan program SPSS versi 20. Hasil uji statistik Mann-Whitney mendapatkan nilai p= 0,876 yang menunjukkan tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna dari skor VAS. 24 jam pasca operasi dengan anestesia umum dan anestesia spinal. Simpulan: Tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna nyeri 24 jam pasca operaasi dinilai dengan skor VAS pada pemberian anestesia umum dan anestesia spinal.Kata kunci: Skor VAS, anestesia general, anestesia spinal

scholarly journals Comparison of General versus Spinal Anesthesia in Patients undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Randomized Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
Rupak Bhattarai ◽  
Chittarranjan Das ◽  
Bandana Paudel ◽  
Sailoj Jung Dangi
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
P Value ◽  
Recovery Duration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hospital Stays ◽  
Surgical Duration

Background Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, widely used procedure by urologists for removing renal stones nowadays. Generally, it is preferred in general anesthesia but here in our study we have compared it with spinal anesthesia to know its safety and efficacy.Material and Methods Sixty patients of either sex, aged between 20-60 years, ASA – Grade I and II, with stones size larger than 15 mm posted for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy were randomly selected. Patient was divided in two groups 30 each, Spinal Anesthesia (S) and General Anesthesia (G). Patient’s stones sizes, numbers & location, Anesthesia duration, Surgical duration, Recovery duration, Blood loss and Blood transfusion, Analgesic demand, post-operative Nausea & Vomiting, Patient satisfaction, Hospital stays and Heart Rate and Mean arterial pressure between two groups were compared.Results There was no significant difference in terms of mean age, weight, stones sizes, and numbers and its location. The p value for Anesthesia duration and surgical duration were 0.144 and 0.22 which was insignificant. Recovery duration (p-value 0.007), Blood loss (p-value 0.004) were significantly lesser in spinal anesthesia group. There was no significant difference in nausea and vomiting, patient satisfaction when compared between two groups. But Analgesic demand, Blood Transfusion and Hospital stays significantly found to be decreased in spinal anesthesia groups (p<0.05). The mean of MAP showed no significant difference except in 10 and 20 minutes.Conclusion Spinal anesthesia tends to be as effective as general anesthesia for PCNL and beneficial in terms of recovery duration, blood loss, analgesic demands, hospital stays, hence decrease the cost of patient. Journal of Nobel Medical CollegeVolume 5, Number 1, Issue 8, January-July 2016, Page: 37-42

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF NEONATAL APGAR SCORES AND PATIENT SATISFACTION LEVELS IN SPINAL VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTIONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 1183-87
Author(s):  
Syed Khurram Naseer ◽  
Aijaz Ali ◽  
Shizan Hamid Feroz ◽  
Dr Danish ◽  
Amir Sohail
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
P Value ◽  
Apgar Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Elective Cesarean

Objective: To compare patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal and general anesthesia in terms of neonatal APGAR scores and patient satisfaction. Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Departments of Anesthesia and Gynecology and Obstetrics, Combined Military Hospital Peshawar, for six months from Mar to Aug 2019. Methodology: In this study, 120 females with a singleton pregnancy of 36-40 weeks, and requiring a non-emergency elective cesarean section were enrolled through consecutive sampling in the study. The patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups of 60 women each through random table numbers. Group A received spinal anesthesia and group B general anesthesia. APGAR score was assessed at 5 minutes after delivery, and score of ≥7 was taken as satisfactory. Patient's satisfaction level regarding anesthesia was recorded on a visual analogue scale of 0 (extremely unsatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied), and score of ≥7 was taken as satisfactory. Results: Women receiving general anesthesia were more satisfied as compared to receiving spinal anesthesia (95% vs. 78.3%; p-value 0.007). There was no significant difference in terms of APGAR scores in general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia (83.33% versus 90%; p-value 0.283). Conclusion: After an elective caesarean section, more mothers were satisfied after receiving general anesthesia as compared to spinal anesthesia. However, both types of anaesthesia were found to be equally safe for babies born in terms of APGAR scores at 5 minutes.

scholarly journals POST HEMORRHOIDECTOMY PAIN RELIEF

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (09) ◽  
pp. 1107-1110
Author(s):  
Syed Muhammad Maroof Hashmi ◽  
Shua Nasir ◽  
Lal Shehbaz ◽  
Muhammad Absar Anwar ◽  
Ahmed Ali
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
P Value ◽  
Urine Retention ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Staying Time

Background: The aim of my study is to evaluate post-operative pain reliefon patients who had hemorrhoidectomy. Materials and Methods: 300 patients who hadhemorrhoidectomy were divided equally in to three groups, according to anesthesia type,group 1 (local anesthesia and sedation), while spinal anesthesia was group 2 and generalanesthesia was considered to be group 3. Pain relief, post-operative complications, hospitalstaying time were measured and compared between the three groups. Period: Study wasperformed between Jan 2012 to Dec 2014. Results: The study showed that patients who hadlocal anesthesia infiltration and sedation a significant decrease of post-operative total painscores at 6/12/18/24 hours of more than 50%,200/240/300/320 out of 1000 points in group IIas compared to 420/500/540/580,700/680/660/660 in 3rd groups respectively. The total postoperativeanalgesia doses in the 3 groups were 120:140:180 respectively, total hospital stayingtime were 130:210:260 days, headache in the ratio of 0:8:1, urine retention in 0:6:1 patients,nausea and vomiting in 0:1:5 patients were reduced by 30 %,. P-value < 0.05. On the otherhand, spinal anesthesia which is group 2 showed slight decline of patients numbers who hadrespiratory symptoms, hypotension and urticarial.Conclusion: Post-operative pain, analgesia,total cost, hospital staying time, nausea and vomiting have been significantly reduced by localanesthesia infiltration compared to non-infiltrated groups while spinal anesthesia had a higherrate in post-operative urine retention, headache and hypotension compared to local anesthesiawith sedation and general anesthesia. Respiratory symptoms, urticaria, were slightly reduced inlocal anesthesia with sedation compared to spinal and general anesthesia.

Rapid Sequence Spinal Anesthesia Vs General Anesthesia for Category-I Urgency Caesarean Section

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Ravi Gurvani ◽  
Dr. Dharam Veer Chandrakar
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Pregnancy Termination ◽  
P Value ◽  
Group I ◽  
Rapid Sequence ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Aims of study - Rapid Sequence spinal anesthesia Vs general anesthesia for category-I urgency caesarean section. Background - Pregnancy termination by caesarean section (CS) is rapidly increasing all over the world. Hence, it has increasingly become a greater challenge to provide care for the parturient, but this has given obstetric anesthetists a greater opportunity to contribute to obstetric services. While caesarean deliveries were historically performed using general anaesthesia, there is a recent significant move towards regional anaesthesia. Materials and Methods - As per American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASAPS) I 50 patients of category 1 were included in this study and divided into two equal groups, 25 in each group. Group I received GA and group II received RSSA. Result - Time for anesthesia was more in the RSGA group than the RSSA group, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The time for surgical readiness was also significantly higher in the RSGA group in comparison to the RSSA group with P value of < 0.001, which was statistically significant but there was no significant difference in Incision to delivery time.

Postoperative Pain Relief: The Comparison of Bupivacaine before Incision and Near Closure of Wound

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 2622-2624
Author(s):  
Haq dad Durrani ◽  
Rafia Kousar ◽  
Ejaz Iqbal ◽  
Muhammad Abdul Aziz ◽  
Syed Aushtar Abbas Naqvi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Subcutaneous Tissue ◽  
Difficult Problem ◽  
P Value ◽  
Trial Methodology ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Pain is the most common and most difficult problem faced by patients after operation. Due to inadequate management 30-70% patients suffer from post-operative pain. Acute pain resulting in chronic pain reduces quality of life and creates economic burden. Aim: To compare post-operative pain relief between infiltration of 0.25% bupivacaine into skin and subcutaneous tissue in the line of incision before incision and along edges of wound near completion of procedure. Study design: Randomized control trial Methodology: Sixty four patients were randomly divided into two groups i.e. (0.25% Bupivacaine 6 to 30ml) at the site of incision into skin and subcutaneous tissue Preincision (Group P) and (0.25% Bupivacaine 6 to 30ml) along the edges of wound at near closure of procedure (Group C). Intensity of pain was assessed on visual analogue scale in the recovery room, 3, 6 and 24 hours postoperatively.The time of first dose of rescue analgesia within 24 hours was also noted in both groups. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between two groups regarding age (p-value = 0.324), gender i.e. males (p=0.545) females (p=0.763) and duration of operation (P=Value=0.208). The mean time of rescue analgesia in Group P and Group C in minutes was 318.12±149.47 and 374.84±125.67 respectively (p value =1.5) reflecting no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Postoperative analgesia and analgesic requirement do not differ significantly whether bupivacaine is infiltrated before incision or just before closure of wound. Keywords: Postoperative pain, bupivacaine, rescue analgesia, Preincision

Providing Anesthesia Care in Resource-limited Settings

2016 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 561-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Promise Ariyo ◽  
Miguel Trelles ◽  
Rahmatullah Helmand ◽  
Yama Amir ◽  
Ghulam Haidar Hassani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Resource Limited Settings ◽  
Perioperative Mortality ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Resource Limited ◽  
Anesthesia Providers ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Surgical Duration

Abstract Background Anesthesia is integral to improving surgical care in low-resource settings. Anesthesia providers who work in these areas should be familiar with the particularities associated with providing care in these settings, including the types and outcomes of commonly performed anesthetic procedures. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of anesthetic procedures performed at Médecins Sans Frontières facilities from July 2008 to June 2014. The authors collected data on patient demographics, procedural characteristics, and patient outcome. The factors associated with perioperative mortality were analyzed. Results Over the 6-yr period, 75,536 anesthetics were provided to adult patients. The most common anesthesia techniques were spinal anesthesia (45.56%) and general anesthesia without intubation (33.85%). Overall perioperative mortality was 0.25%. Emergent procedures (0.41%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 15.86; 95% CI, 2.14 to 115.58), specialized surgeries (2.74%; AOR, 3.82; 95% CI, 1.27 to 11.47), and surgical duration more than 6 h (9.76%; AOR, 4.02; 95% CI, 1.09 to 14.88) were associated with higher odds of mortality than elective surgeries, minor surgeries, and surgical duration less than 1 h, respectively. Compared with general anesthesia with intubation, spinal anesthesia, regional anesthesia, and general anesthesia without intubation were associated with lower perioperative mortality rates of 0.04% (AOR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.18), 0.06% (AOR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.92), and 0.14% (AOR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.45), respectively. Conclusions A wide range of anesthetics can be carried out safely in resource-limited settings. Providers need to be aware of the potential risks and the outcomes associated with anesthesia administration in these settings.

scholarly journals EMERGENCY LAPAROTOMIES UNDER SPINAL ANESTHESIA: A RETROSPECTIVE, FACILITY BASED OBSERVATIONAL STUDY, IN KABUL, AFGHANISTAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (06) ◽  
pp. 751-756
Author(s):  
Wais Farda ◽  
◽  
Ahmad Bashir Nawazish ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Abdominal Incision ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Background: Laparotomy is most commonly performed under general anesthesia, but spinal anesthesia (SA) is considered an alternative to in the context of limited resources. The safety and efficacy of using SA as substitute for general anesthesia(GA) has not been explored in Afghanistan. Methodology: We conductedan observational study in the general surgery department of Isteqlal hospital in Kabul, Afghanistan on 196 adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy under spinal anesthesia betweenApril 2018-April 2020. Results: The mean age of patients was 41.5 years (SD=19.4), the ratio of males to females was 1.9:1 and almost half (44.4%) had comorbidities. 21% were classified as ASA grade III and IV with a similar pattern among males and females. A total of 11 (5.6%) cases were converted to GA. Conversion pattern to GA was similar amongmales and females(P=0.71), ASA grade (P=0.432) and age group (P=0.642). The mean length of stay after operation was 6.5 days (SD=4.1). 32 (16.3%) patients suffered SA complications with no significant difference in terms of sex (P=0.134). Hypotension and headache accounted for 97% of complications. Complication rates were similar in terms of intervertebral level (P=0.349), type of abdominal incision (P>0.1) and average length of stay (P=0.156). 18 patients (9.2%) died due to MOF, sepsis, respiratory failure, thromboembolism and cardiogenic shock. Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia is considered a safe and effective anesthesia for emergency laparotomies, even for those with comorbidities. Based on our findings we would recommend spinal anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesiain emergency laparotomy in Afghanistan.

scholarly journals The effect of Curcuminvs. Curcumin combined Antibiotic Ointmentson the Healing of skin wound

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 1587-1593
Author(s):  
Emad K. Abbas ◽  
Hussein H. Echrish ◽  
Sabaa A. Mohammed
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Biological Effects ◽  
Skin Wound ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Average Weight ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Animal House

Background:Turmeric is typically used as a spicy food preservative and colorant. It has been proved that curcumin has a wide range of biological effects including anti-inflammatory, anti-viral, anti-fungal, and curcumin activity that can improve antibiotic activity on the wounds. Objectives: To evaluate the effects of Curcumin with and without antibiotics on skin wound treatment. Materials and Methods: The protocol was approved by the animal house in medical college / Basra university. This study used nine male rabbits aged about 6 months and an average weight of (1.083 g). Each group consists of 3 rabbits: control group (normal saline) A, topical curcumin in group B, topical curcumin, and tetracycline ointment in group C. Regular treatments were given to rabbits in therapeutic groups. Result: The lowest Mean ± SDof swelling of suturing area was noted in both groups that treated by curcumin alone (9.07 ± 0.97 vs 15±1 mm, p value = 0.002) and that treated with curcumine and antibiotic (9.1±0.9vs 15±1 mm, p value = 0.002) versus the control group ( that treated by normal saline) and the lowest Mean ± SD of elevation of suture line was noted in both group that treated by curcumin alone (2.63 ± 0.06 vs 4.07±0.21 mm, p value >0.001) and that treated with curcumin and antibiotic (2.7 ± 0.2 vs 4.07±0.21 mm, p value =0.001) versus control group. There is no significant statistical difference between the Mean ± SD neither of swelling of suture area nor of elevation of suture lines of groups that treated by curcumin alone and group that treated with curcumin and antibiotic [(9.07 ± 0.97 vs 9.1 ±0.9, p value=0.97),(2.63±0.06 vs 2.7 ± 0.2, p value=0.61) respectively]. The histopathological evaluation is consistent with morphological changes as at day 3 of wound healing in both groups that treated by curcumine with and without antibiotic, there is formation a thin layer of keratin and absence of features that indicate delay wound healing such as hemorrhage, inflammatory cell infiltrate of (Neutrophils, macrophages and lymphocytes) and debris, which are detected in control group. Furthermore, at day 7 of control group, there is decrease of inflammation, presence of gap between the two edgesof the wound but no keratin formation. No clear histopathological difference in wound healing between tested groups that treated by curcumin with and without antibiotic. Conclusion: There issignificant clinical and histological evidences that the curcumin not only prevent delay of wound healing but it is also enhanced wound healing. No significant difference in using curcumin alone or combine it with local antibiotic.

scholarly journals Effects of General Anesthesia Versus Spinal Anesthesia on Serum Cytokine Release after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Vosoughian ◽  
Mastaneh Dahi ◽  
Shideh Dabir ◽  
Mohammadreza Moshari ◽  
Soodeh Tabashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Necrosis Factor Alpha ◽  
General Anesthesia Group ◽  
Anesthesia Group ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Tissue damage caused by major surgery, such as cesarean section, may lead to a poor host immune response and excessive release of cytokines. These responses may increase the risk of infection, cause postoperative pain, and exert damaging effects on various body organs. Objectives: Anesthesia methods may affect cytokine production after surgery. This study aimed to compare the serum levels of cytokines in general and spinal anesthesia among women undergoing cesarean section. Methods: Thirty parturients (ASA class I and II) undergoing cesarean section were randomly assigned into two equal groups of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia. Blood samples were taken for measuring the levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) before induction of anesthesia and 30 minutes after entering the recovery room. Results: In the general anesthesia group, the postoperative serum levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were significantly higher than the corresponding preoperative levels. Significant differences were found between the two groups in the preoperative and postoperative levels of TNF-α. Changes in the IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations were significantly higher in the general anesthesia group as compared to the spinal anesthesia group. However, there was no significant difference in the IL-6:IL-10 and TNF-α: IL-10 ratios between the two groups. Conclusions: General anesthesia, as compared to spinal anesthesia, significantly increased the IL-6 and TNF-α levels after cesarean section. Therefore, the spinal anesthesia technique may be a better option for patients undergoing cesarean section.

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF ONDANSETRON AND METOCLOPRAMIDE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (07) ◽  
pp. 1197-1202
Author(s):  
Hajra Shuja ◽  
Mehmood Ali Shah ◽  
Sadaf Bokhari
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
P Value ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Trial Setting

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a standard treatment for cholelithiasis. It is a safe and effective treatment in many cases. General anesthesia has a high incidence for PONV. But anti-emetic drugs can help in preventing PONV. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of ondansetron and metoclopramide in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of Anaesthesia, Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore. Period: 6 months i.e. from 15-2-2017 to 15-8-2017. Material & Methods: The patients were divided into two groups. Ondansetron was given to group A patients within 15 minutes of induction, and metoclopramide to group B patients within 15 minutes of induction. Then patients were shifted to the ward after surgery and followed-up for 24 hours for assessment of PONV. All the data was entered and analyzed on SPSS version 20. Results: The mean age of patients in group A was 38.40±12.07 years and in group B was 42.63±11.77 years. The efficacy achieved in 53 were from group A and 39 were from group B Statistically significant difference was found between the study groups i.e. p-value=0.003. Conclusion: Ondansetron showed significantly better efficacy than metoclopramide in preventing PONV after laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document