AKP and GGT level can provide early prediction of first-line treatment efficacy in colorectal cancer patients with hepatic metastases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhe Gong ◽  
Xiaowei Zhang ◽  
Qirong Geng ◽  
Wenhua Li ◽  
Mingzhu Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Serum Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Hepatic Metastases ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Serum ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Baseline Serum ◽  
Glutamyl Transferase

Aim: It is important to early evaluate or predict the efficacy to avoid ineffective treatment for most colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with liver metastases. Patients & methods: The medical records of 440 patients with histologically confirmed primary CRC admitted to the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center were reviewed. Results: High baseline serum alkaline phosphatase (AKP) and γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) is associated with worse overall survival. In patients with a high serum AKP and GGT a decreased percentage had high objective response rate and better progression-free survival. Conclusion: Measuring the changes of serum AKP or GGT in CRC patients with hepatic metastases before and after the first cycle of treatment is a convenient, fast and economical way to early predict antitumor treatment efficacy.

Bevacizumab plus S-1 and raltitrexed for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16024-e16024
Author(s):  
Ye Chen ◽  
Jiyan Liu ◽  
Hongfeng Gou
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

e16024 Background: There are lack of effective drugs and regimens for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), especially in China. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is the rate limiting enzyme of 5-FU catabolic pathway. Thymidylate synthase (TS) is the target of 5-FU anti-tumor mechanism. Several studies have shown the up-regulation of the two enzymes after the use of 5-FU in colorectal cancer, which may be closely related to the 5-FU resistance. The preliminary research of our center has shown the efficacy and safety of S-1 (containing a DPD inhibitor) plus raltitrexed (a TS inhibitor) in refractory mCRC. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus S-1 and raltitrexed for patients with mCRC after failure to fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Methods: This study is a one-center, single-arm, prospective phase II trial, being carried out in the Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China. The patients who have progressed after the treatment of fluoropyrimidine, irinotecanand oxaliplatin, have at least one measurable lesion according to RECIST 1.1 criteria were enrolled. Patients receive bevacizumab 7.5mg/kg and raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 on days 1 plus S-1 80, 100 or 120 mg/d according to body-surface area on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Results: From Sep 2015 to Nov 2019, 44 patients were enrolled. By Feb 5, 2020, eleven patients were alive. Tumor response evaluation was available in 44 patients at the time of the analysis. There was no complete response, ORR was 15.9%(7/14) and disease control rate was 54.5%(24/44). mPFS and mOS were 110 days (95% confidence interval, 65.0-155.0) and 367 days (95% confidence interval, 310.4-423.6). The most common adverse events were bone marrow depression, dysfunction of digestive system abnormality of liver function and bleeding. Most of these adverse events were mild to moderate. Conclusions: Bevacizumab plus S-1 and raltitrexed further showed its moderate effect for refractory mCRC. Most of the adverse effects were mild to moderate, which could be well controlled. This combined regimen is worthy of further study as third or later line therapy in mCRC. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900020485 .

scholarly journals Radiotherapy Combined with Raltitrexed and Irinotecan for Treating Unresectable Recurrent Colorectal Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinghui Li ◽  
Jinwen Shen ◽  
Fan Xia ◽  
Ji Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Recurrent Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Local Progression ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background:Locally recurrent colorectal cancer is often associated with considerable morbidity and poor quality of life. Moreover, surgical resection is frequently not viable because of tumor fixation in the pelvis. This study aimed to evaluate the effects and safety of intensity-modulated radiotherapy when administered concurrently with raltitrexed and irinotecan to patients with unresectable recurrent colorectal cancer.Methods:Eligible patients had unresectable pelvic recurrence of colorectal cancer, UGT1A1 genotype *1*1 or *1*28, and were refractory to, or intolerant of, chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was delivered to the pelvis with a total dose of 50–60 Gy in 25–30 fractions, concurrently with irinotecan (200 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22) and raltitrexed (3 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22). After completion of radiation treatment, patients underwent surgery or continued the same regimen of chemotherapy and were assessed by a multidisciplinary team. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate, evaluated using RECIST version 1.1. Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), and safety. Clinical and imaging evaluations were scheduled every month during treatment.Results:Between January 1, 2019, and July 14, 2020, 30 patients were enrolled in this study at the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. All patients completed radiotherapy with a median number of 5 chemotherapy cycles (range, 2–10). Twelve patients (40%) experienced an objective response, including two complete responses and ten partial responses. Seventeen patients exhibited stable disease, leading to a DCR of 96.7%. With a median follow-up of 13 (range, 4–25) months, progression was observed in 20 patients (11 loco-regional failures, 11 distant metastases, and 5 deaths). The median PFS was 13 (95% confidence interval [CI], 9–18) months; the median LPFS was 15 (95% CI, 14 to not reached) months. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 26.7%. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was neutropenia (13.3%).Conclusions:IMRT with concurrent raltitrexed and irinotecan exhibited encouraging efficacy with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with unresectable recurrent colorectal cancer.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04499586, registered on July 31, 2020 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04499586.

Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: Are Newer Generation Probes Better?

2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (10) ◽  
pp. 875-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aziz Ahmad ◽  
Steven L. Chen ◽  
Maihgan A. Kavanagh ◽  
David P. Allegra ◽  
Anton J. Bilchik
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Hepatic Metastases ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Alive With Disease ◽  
Disease Free

Second-generation radiofrequency ablation (RFA) probes and their successors have more power, shorter ablation times, and an increased area of ablation compared with the first-generation probes used before 2000. We examined whether the use of the newer probes has improved the clinical outcome of RFA for hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer at our tertiary cancer center. Of 160 patients who underwent RFA between 1997 and 2003, 52 had metastases confined to the liver: 21 patients underwent 46 ablations with the first-generation probes and 31 patients underwent 58 ablations with the newer probes. The two groups had similar demographic characteristics. At a median follow-up of 26.2 months, patients treated with the newer probes had a longer median disease-free survival (16 months vs 8 months, P < 0.01) and a lower rate of margin recurrence (5.2% vs 17.4%); eight patients had no evidence of disease and one patient was alive with disease. By contrast, of the 46 patients treated with the first-generation probes, 2 patients had no evidence of disease and 1 patient was alive with disease. Newer-generation probes are associated with lower rates of margin recurrence and higher rates of disease-free survival after RFA of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

scholarly journals Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Tucker ◽  
Landon C. Brown ◽  
Yu-Wei Chen ◽  
Chester Kao ◽  
Nathan Hirshman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Complete Blood Count ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Median Baseline ◽  
Treatment Naïve

Abstract Background The identification of biomarkers to select patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) most likely to respond to combination immunotherapy (IO) is needed. We sought to investigate an association of the baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) with outcomes to nivolumab plus ipilimumab for patients with mRCC. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients with clear cell mRCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab from Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center and Duke Cancer Institute. Patients with prior receipt of immunotherapy and those without available baseline complete blood count with differential were excluded. Patients were divided into groups by the median baseline NER and analyzed for overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Patients were also divided by median baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and analyzed for clinical outcome. Further analyses of patients above/below the median NER and NLR were performed in subgroups of IMDC intermediate/poor risk, IMDC favorable risk, and treatment naïve patients. Results A total of 110 patients were included: median age was 61 years and 75% were treatment naïve. The median NER (mNER) at baseline was 26.4. The ORR was 40% for patients with <mNER compared to 21.8% among patients with >mNER (OR 2.39, p = 0.04). The median PFS for patients with <mNER was significantly longer at 8.6 months (mo) compared to 3.2 mo for patients with >mNER (HR 0.50, p < 0.01). Median OS was not reached (NR) for patients with <mNER compared with 27.3 mo for patients with >mNER (HR 0.31, p < 0.01). The median NLR (mNLR) was 3.42. While patients with <mNLR showed improvement in OS (HR 0.42, p = 0.02), PFS and ORR did not differ compared with patients in the >mNLR group. Conclusions A lower baseline NER was associated with improved clinical outcomes (PFS, OS, and ORR) in patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, and prospective validation of the baseline NER as a predictive biomarker for response to immunotherapy-based combinations in mRCC is warranted.

Investigate the efficacy of immunotherapy for treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 415-415
Author(s):  
Arish Noor ◽  
Luis E. Aguirre ◽  
Kirsten Blue ◽  
Trenton Avriett ◽  
Estrella M. Carballido ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Duration Of Response

415 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been approved in solid tumors with dMMR. However, only limited data are available for PDAC with dMMR given the rarity of dMMR in PDAC. We evaluated efficacy of ICIs in PDAC with dMMR. Methods: Retrospective clinical and pathologic data were collected for patients (pts) with pancreatic adenocarcinoma from May 2017 to June 2020 at Moffitt cancer center. Results: We identified 10 pts with dMMR PDAC. The median age was 64.5 years (range: 42-86) and 4 pts were male. 4 pts had resectable disease, 3 had locally advanced and 3 had metastatic disease at initial diagnosis. MSH6 deficiency (def) was found in 2 cases, PMS2 def in 2, MLH/PMS2 def in 5, and MSH2/MSH6 in 1. 7 pts were treated with ICIs. 3 pts had locally advanced and 4 had metastatic disease when they started ICIs. 5 received Pembrolizumab (pem), 1 received ipilimumab/ nivolumab (ipi/nivo), and 1 received pem then ipi/nivo after progressive disease (PD) on pem. The median number of prior lines of chemotherapy was 1 (range 0-2). 6 pts were evaluable, and 1 had rapid disease progression after 1 dose of pem. Among 6 evaluable pts, 3 had an objective response (1: complete response and 2: partial response), and 2 had stable disease (SD). Median progression-free survival was 8.2 mo, and median overall survival was not reached with median follow-up (FU) of 6.8 mo. The median duration of response was not reached with a median FU of 22.6 mo. The pt with CR remained disease-free for up to 22 months. The pt whose treatment was switched to ipi/nivo after PD on pem achieved SD > 4mo on ipi/nivo. While on immunotherapy, one patient with ipi/nivo developed immunotherapy associated rash requiring systemic steroids, and another on pem developed hypothyroidism requiring levothyroxine. Conclusions: This series suggest ICIs can provide durable clinical efficacy in pts with dMMR PDAC.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhui Jin ◽  
Xiaodan Zhu ◽  
Xiaona Huang ◽  
Tingjie Gong ◽  
Zhipeng Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Adverse Event Rate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Deficient Mismatch Repair

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 and/or CTLA-4 inhibitors in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) by meta-analysis. Methods: Electronic databases were searched. Eligible studies included investigations of efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4 agents in patients with CRC. Corresponding indicators were calculated. Results: A total of 15 articles were included. The pooled objective response rate, overall survival rate, progression-free survival rate and adverse event rate were 33, 56, 46 and 59%, respectively. The objective response rates for CRC with deficient mismatch repair and CRC with proficient mismatch repair were 43 and 3%, respectively, in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Conclusion: The authors' study indicates that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors manifest promising clinical responses in the treatment of CRC with deficient mismatch repair with acceptable treatment-related adverse events.

Association of the neutrophil to eosinophil ratio with response to immunotherapy-based combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 341-341
Author(s):  
Matthew D Tucker ◽  
Katy Beckermann ◽  
Kristin Kathleen Ancell ◽  
Kerry Schaffer ◽  
Renee McAlister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Exact Test

341 Background: Neutrophilia is known to be associated with worse prognosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC); however, less is known about the role of eosinophils in the response to immunotherapy (IO). We investigated the association of the baseline neutrophil to eosinophil ratio (NER) with outcomes to IO-based combination treatment in mRCC. Methods: Patients with mRCC treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab, pembrolizumab plus axitinib, or avelumab plus axitinib at the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center were retrospectively identified. Patients on >10mg prednisone and patients with prior IO were excluded. Baseline NER (at time of first IO) and association with progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were investigated. Data cutoff was 9/1/2020. Analysis for PFS and OS was performed using the log-rank test and Mantel-Haenszel method, and analysis of the odds ratio for ORR was performed using Fischer’s exact test. Results: Sixty-one patients were identified: 89% clear cell histology, 74% prior nephrectomy, 69% IMDC intermediate risk, and 72% treatment-naïve. Patients with baseline NER < median (N=31) had improved clinical outcomes compared to patients with baseline NER > median (N=30) (Table). Improvement in PFS by NER was maintained when stratified by anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 and anti-PD(L)-1/VEGF (p= 0.0062 and p= 0.049); however, differences in OS and ORR were no longer significant. The median baseline NER among patients with partial response (PR) was significantly lower at 22.7 (95% CI 18.9-31.1) vs. 51.6 (95% CI 39.5-93.1) among those with progressive disease (PD) (p= 0.0054). For comparison, the median neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio was not significantly different between PR (2.60) and PD (3.84, p= 0.056). Conclusions: Patients with a low baseline NER treated with IO-based combinations had improved clinical outcomes compared to patients with a high baseline NER. Additional investigation of this parameter in larger cohorts is warranted. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Primary Tumor Location Is a Prognostic Factor for Intrahepatic Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Undergoing Portal Vein Embolization as Preparation for Major Hepatic Surgery

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1638
Author(s):  
Lea Hitpass ◽  
Daniel Heise ◽  
Maximilian Schulze-Hagen ◽  
Federico Pedersoli ◽  
Florian Ulmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Portal Vein Embolization ◽  
Hepatic Metastases ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Right Hemihepatectomy

The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors affecting intrahepatic progression-free survival (ihPFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) undergoing portal vein embolization (PVE) and subsequent (extended) right hemihepatectomy. A total of 59 patients (mean age: 60.8 ± 9.3 years) with CRCLM who underwent PVE in preparation for right hemihepatectomy were included. IhPFS and OS after PVE were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression analyses were conducted to investigate the association between the following factors and survival: patient age, laterality of the colorectal cancer (right- versus left-sided), tumor location (colon versus rectal cancer), time of occurrence of hepatic metastases (synchronous versus metachronous), baseline number and size of hepatic metastases, presence or absence of metastases in the future liver remnant (FLR) before PVE, preoperative carcinoembryogenic antigen (CEA) levels, time between PVE and surgery, history of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, and the presence or absence of extrahepatic disease before PVE. Median follow up was 18 months. The median ihPFS was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval: 6.2–10.2 months), and median OS was 34.1 months (95% confidence interval: 27.3–40.9 months). Laterality of the primary colorectal cancer was the only statistically significant predictor of ihPFS after PVE (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.242; 95% confidence interval: 1.125, 4.465; p = 0.022), with patients with right-sided colorectal cancer having significantly shorter median ihPFS than patients with left-sided cancer (4.0 ± 1.9 months versus 10.2 ± 1.5 months; log rank test: p = 0.018). Other factors, in particular also the presence or absence of additional metastases in the FLR, were not associated with intrahepatic progression-free survival. The presence of extrahepatic disease was associated with worse OS (HR = 3.050, 95% confidence interval: 1.247, 7.459; p = 0.015).

A dose attenuated schedule of irinotecan and capecitabine in combination with celecoxib in advanced colorectal cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3584-3584
Author(s):  
B. F. El-Rayes ◽  
A. F. Shields ◽  
U. Vaishampayan ◽  
L. K. Heilbrun ◽  
M. M. Zalupski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Cox 2

3584 Background: The cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme is overexpressed in the majority of colorectal cancers. Inhibition of the COX-2 enzyme can sensitize colorectal cancer cells to the apoptotic effects of chemotherapeutic agents and block angiogenesis. This phase II study was undertaken to determine the effects of adding celecoxib to a dose attenuated irinotecan and capecitabine regimen. Methods: The primary objective was to estimate the objective response rate of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan, capecitabine, and celecoxib. Previously untreated patients, except for adjuvant therapy, with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were eligible for this study. Patients received irinotecan 70 mg/m2 (over 30 minutes) on days 1 and 8, and capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/day from day 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle. Celecoxib was administered at a dose of 400 mg twice-daily starting on day -7 until termination from study. Results: A total of 51 patients (median age 58 years) have been enrolled on the study. The results presented are for the first 48 patients registered to the study. Median performance status was 1. A median number of 5.5 cycles (range 0- 18) were administered. In an intention to treat analysis, objective response rate was 50%. The median progression free survival was 6.9 months (90%CI; 4.7–8.2). Median survival is ≥19.4 months. No treatment related deaths were observed. The only grade 4 toxicity was diarrhea in 2 (4%) patients. Grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea (33%), hand-foot syndrome (8%), nausea (13%), vomiting (8%) and neutropenia (12%). Conclusion: Lowering the dose intensity of irinotecan in this study did not appear to compromise the treatment outcome and markedly improved the therapeutic index of this combination. Celecoxib can be safely administered in combination with irinotecan and capecitabine. Based on the observed progression free survival and response rate, the regimen has promising activity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II study of combination chemotherapy with biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan for wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 561-561
Author(s):  
S. Yuki ◽  
K. Shitara ◽  
M. Yoshida ◽  
D. Takahari ◽  
S. Utsunomiya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Free Survival

561 Background: Weekly cetuximab and irinotecan is a standard regimen in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of combination chemotherapy with biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with pretreated MCRC harboring wild-type KRAS. Methods: Patients with wild- type KRAS MCRC that had progressed after chemotherapy with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidine were included in this study. Cetuximab was administered at 500 mg/m2 biweekly with irinotecan. The primary endpoint was response rate. The secondary endpoints included adverse events, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The pharmacokinetics of cetuximab was also evaluated in five patients. Results: From May, 2009 to February, 2010, a total of 31 patients were enrolled from five institutions. One patient was not eligible. Among the 30 assessable patients, ECOG PS was 0 in 12, 1 in 16, and 2 in two patients. The objective response rate was 30.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.7-49.4), and the disease control rate (complete response, partial response, or stable disease) was 76.7% (95%CI, 61.4-92.3). The median progression-free survival was 5.3 months (95%CI, 3.4-7.3). Grade 3 skin toxicity was observed in 3 patients (10%), and treatment related death due to pneumonia occurred in one patient. Conclusions: The efficacy data are similar to those of standard dose of cetuximab plus irinotecan. Combination chemotherapy with biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan is effective for pretreated metastatic wild-type KRAS MCRC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document