scholarly journals STRENGTHENING LHKPN: PREVENTION OF ILLICIT ENRICHMENT IN EFFORTS TO ERADICATE CORRUPTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-73
Author(s):  
Vita Mahardhika
Keyword(s):  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
State Administrators ◽  
The Law ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

This research aimed to discuss State Organizer's Asset Report or Laporan Harta Kekayaan Pejabat Negara (LHKPN) problems due to the eradication corruption process in Indonesia. This research is normative legal research with a conceptual, historical, and statutory approach. From the research it can be seen that as an effort to prevent illicit enrichment carried out by state officials, it is necessary to strengthen the wealth reports of state administrators, namely by making changes to Law Number 28 of 1999, from collusion, corruption, and nepotism. related to the form and mechanism of the application of sanctions. The recommendation is the law on the Free Implementation of Corruption should be strictly regulated regarding severe administrative sanctions in the form of types of penalties, that directly impact the position of state administrators, and criminal sanctions for state officials who are indicated to have falsified their reporting.

scholarly journals Manipulation of Transaction Value to Reduce Fees for Acquisition of Land and Building Rights

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-176
Author(s):  
Suhaimi Suhaimi
Keyword(s):  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Financial Resources ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Regional Finance ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law ◽  
One Year ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Transaction Value

The purpose of this study is to analyze the responsibility of taxpayers who manipulate transaction values in order to reduce Fees for Acquisition of Land and Building Rights (BPHTB). This research is inspired by the results of previous research that many BPHTB taxpayers manipulate transaction values to reduce BPHTB, but they are missed from legal responsibility, so that their actions seem normal in society and are not perceived as despicable and violating of the law. This research is a normative legal research using a statutory approach, so that it can be seen how the responsibility of taxpayers who are not honest in paying BPHTB. The results showed that in statutory regulations cannot be found administrative sanctions imposed on taxpayers who manipulated transaction values to reduce BPHTB. In fact taxpayer's actions are really detrimental regional finance, because their taxes are paid to the Regional Treasury as the original financial resources. Sanctions contained in statutory regulations are only criminal sanctions, as regulated in Article 174 of Law Number 28 of 2009 with the threat of imprisonment for a maximum of one year if due to negligence and a maximum of two years if done intentionally.

scholarly journals Penyelenggaraan Pariwisata Olahraga: Perspektif Rekomendasi Pemerintah Daerah

Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Aditya Putra Thama ◽  
Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
The People ◽  
Sports Tourism ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Sports Activities

Current sports activities are quite closely related to tourism. Tourism is the main source of livelihood for the people of Bali. Along with the development of sports in Bali, the implementation of sports tourism was also developed as an option in the development of local tourism. Bali Provincial Sports Regulation regulates sports tourism in Bali. However, the provisions of Article 14 paragraph (2) of the regulation require regional government recommendations prior to the implementation of sports tourism, which if not fulfilled can be subject to criminal sanctions in contravention of the SKN Law and the implementing regulations give rise to norm conflicts. The purpose of this study is to study the implementation of sports tourism based on the Bali Province Sports Regulations and analyze criminal sanctions for not being given the recommendations of the regional government by the organizers. The method used in this study is a normative legal research method with a statutory approach. The results of the study show that based on the Bali Provincial Sports Regulations the implementation of sports tourism must obtain recommendations from the regional government as Article 14 paragraph (2) of the Provincial Regulation on Sport in Bali. However, higher legal provisions related to sports, namely the SKN Law does not regulate this. The SKN Law which is a reference for organizing sports only requires a recommendation from the relevant organization of sports branch as Article 51 paragraph (2). The criminal provisions as Article 65 paragraph (1) of the Bali Province Sports Regulations for organizers who do not have a recommendation from the regional government are irrelevant and seem excessive considering the recommendation is an administrative requirement for an activity, it will be more relevant if administrative sanctions are imposed rather than criminal sanctions. In the event that this occurs, it will refer to the provisions of the SKN Law as well as the implementation rules. Kegiatan olahraga saat ini cukup erat kaitannya dengan pariwisata. Pariwisata merupakan sumber mata pencaharian utama bagi masyarakat Bali. Seiring dengan berkembangnya olahraga di Bali, penyelenggaraan pariwisata olahraga juga dikembangkan sebagai salah satu pilihan dalam pengembangan pariwisata lokal. Perda Keolahragaan Provinsi Bali mengatur pariwisata olahraga di Bali. Namun ketentuan Pasal 14 ayat (2) pada perda tersebut yang mewajibkan rekomendasi pemerintah daerah sebelum penyelenggaraan pariwisata olahraga, yang apabila tidak dipenuhi dapat dikenakan sanksi pidana bertentangan dengan UU SKN maupun peraturan pelaksanaannya memunculkan konflik norma. Tujuan studi ini yakni untuk mengkaji penyelenggaraan pariwisata olahraga berdasarkan Perda Keolahragaan Provinsi Bali dan menganalisis sanksi pidana atas tidak dikantonginya rekomendasi pemerintah daerah oleh penyelenggara. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan Perda Keolahragaan Provinsi Bali penyelenggaraan pariwisata olahraga wajib mendapatkan rekomendasi dari pemerintah daerah sebagaimana Pasal 14 ayat (2) Perda Keolahragaan Provinsi Bali. Namun ketentuan perundang-undangan yang lebih tinggi terkait dengan keolahragaan, yakni UU SKN tidak mengatur demikian. UU SKN yang merupakan acuan dari penyelenggaraan keolahragaan hanya mewajibkan adanya rekomendasi dari induk cabang olahraga yang bersangkutan sebagaimana Pasal 51 ayat (2). Adapun ketentuan pidana sebagaimana Pasal 65 ayat (1) Perda Keolahragaan Provinsi Bali bagi penyelenggara yang tidak mengantongi rekomendasi dari pemerintah daerah tidaklah relevan dan terkesan berlebihan mengingat rekomendasi adalah sebuah syarat administrasi dari sebuah penyelenggaraan kegiatan, maka akan lebih relevan jika dikenakan sanksi administratif daripada sanksi pidana. Dalam hal itu terjadi, maka akan mengacu pada ketentuan UU SKN maupun aturan pelaksanaannya.

scholarly journals KONSTRUKSI SANKSI ADMINISTRATIF PERATURAN DAERAH PROVINSI BALI NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2012

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kadek Putra Arik Persona
Keyword(s):  
Local Regulation ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

The study describes the overlap of arrangements of administrative sanctions in the Law No. 12 of 2011 with the construction of administrative sanctions in the Local Regulation of Bali Province No. 2 of 2012. The arrangements of administrative sanctions according to Law No. 12 of 2011 are stipulated in appendix II number 64 which stipulates that the substance in the form of administrative sanctions or civil sanctions for the violation of these norms are formulated into one part (chapter) with the norms that impose administrative sanctions or civil sanctions, and in appendix II number 65 which regulates if there is more than one norm that provides administrative or civil sanctions, administrative sanctions or civil sanctions are formulated in the last chapter of the section. Thus, it does not formulate the provision of sanctions that also contains criminal sanctions, civil penalties and administrative sanctions in one chapter. The arrangements of administrative sanctions in the Local Regulation of Bali Province No. 2 of 2012 are stipulated in Chapter XIV of Article 33 paragraph (1), (2), and (3), thus it is contrary to the provisions of Appendix II of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 of 2011 numbers 64 and 65.

scholarly journals REKOMENDASI BADAN PEMERIKSA KEUANGAN UNTUK PENGUATAN TATA KELOLA KEUANGAN NEGARA YANG BAIK

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Djatu Apriellia
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Financial Governance ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Research Show

The audit board of the republic of Indonesia (BPK) examination results in recommendations that must be followed by the public officials. Recommendations are needed for improvements in the management of financial governance. This research is normative as for the issues discussed in this research are first the follow-up monitoring arrangements on BPK recommendations and the sanctions if the recommendation is not followed by the audited entity. This legal research was conducted by examining the primary legal materials and secondary law. The results of this research show that normatively monitoring arrangements follow up on BPK recommendations currently using Peraturan BPK Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 which will use the information system so that the implementation of the follow-up monitoring of the audit board recommendations will be faster, more accurate, and efficient. Furthermore, if the public officials did not discharge the audit board recommendation then will be subject to administrative sanctions and criminal sanctions, but BPK has not had mechanisms and procedures for reporting to the police departement if the recommendation that has not been or is not acted upon by the audited entity. Hasil pemeriksaan BPK menghasilkan rekomendasi yang wajib ditindaklanjuti oleh pejabat. Rekomendasi diperlukan untuk perbaikan-perbaikan manajemen dalam menciptakan tata kelola keuangan negara yang lebih baik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif adapun permasalahan yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini adalah pertama pengaturan pemantauan tindak lanjut rekomendasi hasil pemeriksaan BPK saat ini dan kedua sanksi apabila rekomendasi BPK tidak ditindaklanjuti oleh entitas yang diperiksa. Penelitian hukum ini dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif pengaturan pemantauan tindak lanjut rekomendasi hasil pemeriksaan BPK saat ini menggunakan Peraturan BPK Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 yang akan menggunakan sistem informasi pemantauan tindak lanjut sehingga pelaksanaan pemantauan tindak lanjut rekomendasi BPK akan lebih cepat, akurat, dan efisien. Selanjutnya apabila pejabat tidak melaksanakan rekomendasi BPK maka akan dikenai sanksi administratif maupun sanksi pidana, namun BPK belum memiliki mekanisme dan prosedur pelaporan kepada pihak kepolisian apabila rekomendasi BPK yang belum atau tidak ditindaklanjuti oleh entitas yang diperiksa.

scholarly journals Pertanggungjawaban terhadap Tindak Pidana Penyelundupan Sepeda Motor Harley oleh Direktur PT. Garuda Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 500-504
Author(s):  
I Dewa Gede Pramana adhi ◽  
I Nnyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Developing Country ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The People ◽  
The Law ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

Indonesia is a developing country where each region has its own natural wealth. This advantage cannot be used because there are many people who send out of the region without permission and vice versa, goods from outside countries are smuggled into Indonesia only to avoid the applicable taxes. This study aims to examine the regulation of smuggling in criminal law in Indonesia and reveal the responsibility of the director of PT. Garuda Indonesia, which carried out the act of smuggling luxury motorcycles. This research is a type of normative legal research conducted with research methods based on legal materials, while the problem approach used is a legislative and conceptual approach. Sources of data used are primary and secondary legal materials. Another bad example is shown by one of the people who has a big name in Indonesia, the smuggling case by the president of Garuda Indonesia is an illustration of how weak the law in Indonesia is and this incident has resulted in criminal and administrative sanctions. The results of the study indicate that the regulation of smuggling crimes in Indonesia is contained in Law Number 17 of 2006 concerning Customs. Handling of violations of customs provisions is more focused on the fiscal settlement, namely in the form of payment of a sum of money to the State in the form of a fine. The criminal liability of smugglers is regulated in Law No. 17 of 2006 the president director of PT. Garuda Indonesia is threatened with criminal and administrative sanctions

scholarly journals Criminal Liability in Environmental Crimes Committed by Corporations after the Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 at Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fitriani Rahmadia ◽  
Hari Sutra Disemadi ◽  
Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Corporate Crime ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Environmental Crimes ◽  
Legal Entities

Corporations are organized groups of people and / or properties, both in the form of legal entities or non-legal entities. In relation to the corporation as a legal subject in environmental crime, it is formulated in Article 1 number 32 of the Law Number 31 Year 2009 about Environmental Protection and Management, each person is an individual or business entity, both legal entities and non-legal entities. The context of corporate crime in the environment is still not solid enough to ensure corporations in criminal sanctions because there is no legal basis regarding the procedures for handling environmental crimes committed by corporations. The Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Handling Corporate Crime provides a basis for enforcement of criminal law, then the purpose of writing this article is to find out the form of criminal liability for corporations for environmental crimes and legal consequences after the Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2013.The type of research used is legal research which is included in the normative legal research typology where this study focuses on positive legal norms in the form of legislation. The theory used by the author in analyzing is using the theory of criminal liability which is based on the principle of legality. The conclusions include: criminal sanctions that can be applied to corporations based on Article 4 of Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 are in the form of criminal fines, additional crimes, and disciplinary actions except prisons and confinement. Last, the legal consequences of the application Article 25 Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 with the principal criminal is a criminal fine and then the criminal added according to the law governing environmental criminal acts is the Law Number 32 Year 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management.

scholarly journals Law Enforcement of Fisheries Crime in North Maluku Province through Transcendental Paradigm

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-60
Author(s):  
Muhammad Amin Hanafi ◽  
Absori Absori ◽  
Khudzaifah Dimyati ◽  
Ajid Abdul Syawal ◽  
Arief Budiono
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Illegal Fishing ◽  
Bay Area ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The Law

Objective: This article aims to discuss the enforcement of customary law in North Maluku, the deliberation value in the BMA Sultanate of Ternate, and the implementation of customary criminal sanctions by the Badan Musyawarah Adat.Methodology: The methodology used in this study was legal research conducted in a non-doctrinal qualitative approach. In this study, the law is not only conceptualized as all the principles and rules that regulate human life in society but also includes institutions and processes that actualize the validity of these rules in society.Findings: Law enforcement of fisheries crimes is based on the provisions of Indonesian Law No. 45 of 2009 concerning Fisheries. Criminal provisions are regulated by Articles 84 to 104. One of them is about sinking the ship used to commit fishing crimes. Sanctions given to the fish theft (illegal fishing) perpetrators in territorial waters that have been determined by the local customary head are 1) warning; (2) monetary charges according to the agreement of the local customary community; and (3) boat (pajeko in Ternate) or motorboat seized by the sultanate to be used by the community through profit sharing.Utility: Customary Institute of Ternate Sultanate in 2018 has decided on three cases in the Kao bay area concerning fish catching. Besides the traditional law enforcement that is implemented by the Sultanate, North Maluku recognizes Sasi Customs (Adat Sasi), which is regulation of tradition that limits people for catching fish or taking other sources in a certain type and particular period. Thus, the ecological balance is still maintained.Novelty/Originality: The concept of transcendental law enforcement is substantially in line with the values in the Segulaha tradition that has been applied for a long time in North Maluku. In Segulaha customary law, there is a traditional element in a person who has the same soul with transcendental values by positioning revelation as the source of the law. Keywords: Law Enforcement, Fisheries Crimes, Transcendental Approach

scholarly journals Advokasi Dualisme Kebebasan Visa di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 608
Author(s):  
Dewa Krisna Prasada
Keyword(s):  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Domestic Affairs ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Tourism Economy ◽  
And Control

Visa is a written letter that has an element of legality used when one visits another country. In 2016 the President of the Republic of Indonesia issued a Presidential Regulation regarding Visa-Free Visit. Presidential Decree Number 21 Year 2016 concerning Visa-Free Visit (BVK) provides an opportunity for 169 countries to freely visit the territory of the Republic of Indonesia without a visa. With this provision, it creates dualism in a social environment. On one hand, this provision is beneficial in increasing the tourism economy, and on the other hand, the growth of the risk of criminalization by foreigners is increasing. This study aims to provide a solution to the problem in legal provisions to prevent and control the traffic of foreigners to Indonesia after the enactment of the BVK and how to sanction citizens who abuse the visa-free visit permit. This study uses normative legal research methods. The results of this study indicate that the rules that determine the supervision and implementation of the rules systematically against foreigners who abuse BVK are specified in Law Number 6 Year 2011, Regulation of the Ministry of Law and Human Affairs (Permenkumham) Number 17 Year 2016, and Regulation of the Ministry of Domestic Affairs (Permendagri) Number 49 Year 2010. In addition, for foreigners who are caught having committed violations, the government can provide administrative sanctions up to criminal sanctions and deportation. From the perspective of the ius constituendum, the provisions regarding BVK need to carry out legal reconstruction to determine specific sanctions against foreigners who commit violations. Besides, there is a need for provisions regarding the system for providing BVK to foreigners in detail so that it is right on target. Visa merupakan sesuatu surat tertulis yang memilki unsur legalitas yang digunakan dalam kegiatan kunjungan menuju negara lain. Pada tahun 2016 Presiden Republik Indonesia mengeluarkan Peraturan Presiden mengenai bebas visa kunjungan. Perpres Nomor 21 Tahun 2016 tentang Bebas Visa Kunjungan (BVK) memberikan kesempatan bagi 169 negara untuk bebas berkunjung ke wilayah Republik Indonesia tanpa visa. Ketentuan tersebut menimbulkan dualisme dalam suatu lingkungan sosial. Di satu sisi, ketentuan ini menguntungkan dalam peningkatan ekonomi pariwisata, dan di sisi lain pertumbuhan resiko kriminalisasi oleh orang asing kian bertambah. Kajian ini bertujuan memberikan suatu jawaban dari permasalahan dalam ketentuan hukum untuk mencegah dan mengendalikan lalu lintas orang asing ke Indonesia pasca berlakunya BVK dan bagaimana sanksi kepada warga yang menyalahgunakan izin bebas visa kunjungan. Kajian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif (normative legal research). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa aturan-aturan yang menentukan mengenai pengawasan dan berjalannya aturan secara sistematis terhadap orang asing yang menyalahgunakan BVK ditentukan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2011, Permenkumham Nomor 17 Tahun 2016, dan Permendagri Nomor 49 Tahun 2010. Selain itu bagi orang asing yang tertangkap telah melakukan pelanggaran, pemerintah dapat memberikan sanksi administratif sampai sanksi pidana dan deportasi. Dari prespektif ius constituendum ketentuan mengenai BVK perlu dilakukan rekonstruksi hukum guna menentukan sanksi secara khusus terhadap warga asing yang melakukan pelanggaran. Selain itu, perlu adanya ketentuan mengenai sistem pemberian BVK kepada orang asing secara mendetail agar tepat sasaran.

scholarly journals Juridical Studies On Notary Deed Which Can Be Canceled And Void By The Law And Responsibilities Of Notary According To Law

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 433
Author(s):  
Arif Bahtiar Jefry ◽  
Lathifah Hanim
Keyword(s):  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Judicial Decisions ◽  
Subjective Element ◽  
Injured Party ◽  
The Law ◽  
Article 50 ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

Notary deed can be canceled and void by law because of an error when a deed is contrary to the Act either intentionally or unintentionally by the parties who made it. Deed can be canceled, remain valid and binding as long as there has been no judicial decisions have permanent legal force canceling the deed. Unlike the deed can be canceled due to the manufacturing process does not satisfy the subjective element as set forth in Article 1320 paragraph (1) and (2) of the Civil Code. Deed null and void occurs due to the mechanism of making abuse substance UUJN Regarding the authority of notary in making authentic act and Article 1320 paragraph (3) and (4) of the Civil Code which is the objective conditions in performing an agreement, which is about a certain thing and the cause or causes of the allowed. In UUJN that as a notary in running his offense is proven, the notary must responsibility by way of sanction or sanctions, in the form of civil sanctions, administrative sanctions, criminal sanctions, the code of conduct or a combination of office notary witnesses. In Article 84 UUJN which reads: Actions violations committed by the notary of the provisions referred to in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter i, Article 16 paragraph (1) letter k, Article 41, Article 44, Article 48, Article 49, Article 50 Article 51 or Article 52 that resulted in a deed only has the strength of evidence as the deed under the hand or a certificate becomes null and void may be the reason for the injured party to demand reimbursement of losses, damages, and interest to the notary.Keywords: Notary Deed, Canceled, Cancel By The Law, Responsibility, Notary.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Melalui Sertifikasi Halal pada Produk Obat-obatan Berdasarkan Undang- Undang No 33 Tahun 2014 tentang Jaminan Produk Halal

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 288-293
Author(s):  
Lsye Aprilia ◽  
Ni Luh Made Mahendrawati ◽  
Ni Made Jaya Senastri
Keyword(s):  
Medicinal Product ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Medicinal Products ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
The Law ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

Medicines must have halal certification to ensure the halalness of the product. Article 4 of the Law on Halal Product Guarantee, stipulates that all products circulating in Indonesia must be certified halal. In fact, many medicinal products are already circulating in the community but do not yet have a halal certificate. So this raises legal problems related to consumer protection. The purpose of this research is to reveal the authority of related institutions in halal certification of medicinal products circulating in Indonesia as well as legal protection for consumers if a medicinal product that has been disseminated has a halal label even though it does not have a halal label. This study uses a normative legal research method with a conceptual approach and legislation. The source of legal material in this study is the primary and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials by analyzing and quoting applicable laws from books, literature, and other sources. The results showed that with the establishment of the Halal Product Guarantee Organizer, the halal regulation of drugs circulating in Indonesia is subject to the Halal Product Guarantee Law No. 33 of 2014 which regulates that certification and labeling of halal products is mandatory. If business actors violate their obligations under these regulations, they will be subject to administrative sanctions in the form of written warnings, administrative fines, and suspension of halal certification.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document