scholarly journals KONSTRUKSI SANKSI ADMINISTRATIF PERATURAN DAERAH PROVINSI BALI NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2012

Author(s):  
Kadek Putra Arik Persona

The study describes the overlap of arrangements of administrative sanctions in the Law No. 12 of 2011 with the construction of administrative sanctions in the Local Regulation of Bali Province No. 2 of 2012. The arrangements of administrative sanctions according to Law No. 12 of 2011 are stipulated in appendix II number 64 which stipulates that the substance in the form of administrative sanctions or civil sanctions for the violation of these norms are formulated into one part (chapter) with the norms that impose administrative sanctions or civil sanctions, and in appendix II number 65 which regulates if there is more than one norm that provides administrative or civil sanctions, administrative sanctions or civil sanctions are formulated in the last chapter of the section. Thus, it does not formulate the provision of sanctions that also contains criminal sanctions, civil penalties and administrative sanctions in one chapter. The arrangements of administrative sanctions in the Local Regulation of Bali Province No. 2 of 2012 are stipulated in Chapter XIV of Article 33 paragraph (1), (2), and (3), thus it is contrary to the provisions of Appendix II of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 of 2011 numbers 64 and 65.

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Ira Alia Maerani

This study aims to find out to know the form of violations and witnesses to the notary position based on Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary and the perspective of Islamic justice in viewing a notary who is indicated to have committed a crime in connection with an authentic deed he made.            This research uses normative law research or dogmatic law research using the doctrinal method. Normative legal research includes research on legal principles, research on legal systematics, research on vertical and horizontal synchronization stages, comparison of law and legal history.            This research concludes that the notary public is a public official who makes an authentic deed and has the authority as regulated in Article 15,16, 17 of Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary Public. The notary is obliged to act on trust; honest; independent; objective and safeguard the interests of parties involved in legal actions. Notaries in carrying out their duties and positions if convicted of violations, may be subject to sanctions or sanctions in the form of civil, administrative, and notary code of ethics in accordance with Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Positions. Even so, the Notary Position Law does not regulate criminal sanctions against Notaries. Whereas in practice there is an opportunity for a legal action or violation by a notary related to an authentic deed he made that can be qualified as a criminal offense. A notary who is indicated to have committed a crime in carrying out his authority as a Public Official, of course, must be a concern of the government and law enforcement because the law must be upheld against anyone who commits indiscriminate violations. This rule is a manifestation of the principle of "equality before the law" (equality before the law) which is a fundamental element in the concept of the rule of law. Honesty values; keep the mandate; fair; and this objective is synergistic with the values of justice in an Islamic perspective that promotes justice and problems. Described in the Qur'an An-Nisa verses 58 and 135 and QS. Al Ma'idah verse 8. Islamic law also regulates justice in recording a deed, for example just in recording accounts receivable debts (Q.S. Al Baqoroh: 282)Keywords: Islamic Perspective; Justice; Notary Public; Perpetrators; Criminal Act


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 474
Author(s):  
Elisabet . ◽  
Cut Memi

One of the authorities of the Constitutional Court governed by the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945 was the examining of laws against the contitution or judicial review. Inside the regulations which governing the implementation of this authority, the Constitutional Court only acts as a negative legislator, namely canceling or reinforcing a norm tested by the Petitioner. But in practice, the Constitutional Court has changed its role to become a positive legislator, who is forming a new legal norm, which is the authority of legislators. The Constitutional Court should not be able to form a new legal norm because there is no legal basis which regulate that. But Constitutional Court can form a new legal norm in some urgent circumstances, relating to Human Rights, and preventing legal vacuum. In addition, the establishment of laws by lawmakers that require a long process and time. This is compelling Constitutional Court to make substitute norm before the law was established by the legislators. In the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46/PUU-XVI/2016, the Court actually wants to establish a new legal norm, but because the articles in the petitioned have criminal sanctions, and if the Constitutional Court approves the petition, the Constitutional Court has formulated a new criminal act that can only be formed by the lawmaker. Whereas in the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 21/PUU-XII/2014, the Constitutional Court established a new norm because in the article a quo there were no criminal sanctions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-149
Author(s):  
Rama Sari Atiwiz Purba ◽  
Ridho Mubarak ◽  
Rafiqi Rafiqi

Immigration is a form of legal action that is marked by the arrival or presence of foreigners in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia and the departure of Indonesian citizens to the territory of other countries by using or not having immigration travel documents. The method of this research is normative juridical, which is using Library Research. Legal arrangements regarding foreign nationals to Indonesia without going through immigration official inspection are outlined in Article 8 and Article 9 of Law No. 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration and also in Article 3, Article 20 and Article 21 of Government Regulation Number 31 of 2013 concerning Regulations for the Implementation of Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration and Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2014 concerning Passports Ordinary And Travel Letters Like Passports. Law enforcement against criminal offenses of Foreign Citizens to Indonesia without going through the examination of immigration officials then the perpetrators may be subject to administrative sanctions and criminal sanctions, the perpetrators who enter the territory of Indonesia without going through immigration officials have violated Article 113 of Law No. 6 of 2011 concerning immigration and sentenced to six months imprisonment


Author(s):  
Dragan Jovašević

In 2008, the Republic of Serbia adopted a special Law on Liability of Legal Persons for Criminal Offenses. In doing so, on the basis of the international standards contained in the relevant international documents, it joined a large number of countries that introduced criminal liability of legal persons for crimes committed in addition to their responsible persons at the end of the 20th century. For legal persons, the law prescribed a disparate system of criminal sanctions in response to the state-society’s response to such unlawful and punishable conduct. The system of criminal sanctions in the law of the Republic of Serbia includes: penalties, probation and security measures. The law defined the concept, character, legal nature, manner, procedure, pronouncement and execution of criminal sanctions, whose characteristics this particular work speaks of.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-224
Author(s):  
Moch. Choirul Rizal

Wahana Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia (Walhi) of East Java noted that 30% of forest in East Java is deforested every year due to land conversion, illegal logging, fire, and erosion. In fact, East Java has a legal policy in the form of local regulations that have a spirit against deforestation. However, the policy of such law substantially contains problematics, for example, the equation of formulation of criminal acts with the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2013 on Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction, which resulted in the regional regulations will be ruled out. Therefore, this conceptual study offers an idea of ​​the need for an update to the criminalization policy on deforestation in the local regulation. In the future, the criminalization policy on deforestation in regional regulations in East Java should contain specific and unregulated formulations of criminal acts in the law, for example, prohibit any form of action that results in the capacity of communities to participate in the prevention and eradication of deforestation practices.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 252-260
Author(s):  
Eko Iswahyudi ◽  
◽  
I. Nyoman Nurjaya ◽  
Nurini Aprilianda ◽  
Bambang Sugiri ◽  
...  

In the Act No. 11 of 2012 about the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, it explains the age limit for juvenile criminal responsibility for those who commit criminal acts, as regulated in Article 1 point 3. The children between 12 (twelve) years old and 18 (eighteen) years old are suspected of committing a crime. The purpose of this study was to analyze the construction of the regulation of children under the age of 12 in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2021 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. This type of normative legal research uses a statute approach and a case approach through a literature study. The results of the research on the Construction of Regulations for Children under the Age of 12 in Act Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System as Children in Conflict with the Law. There is a need for additional rules or amendments to the provisions of criminal sanctions for children, where criminal sanctions will be given to children aged at least 10 years, where these rules consist of basic criminal sanctions, such as community service or supervision, job training, coaching in institutions. This sanction is carried out by considering the rights of children as perpetrators, children as victims and children as witnesses who are underage, without eliminating the implementation of applicable legal obligations.


Author(s):  
Djatu Apriellia

The audit board of the republic of Indonesia (BPK) examination results in recommendations that must be followed by the public officials. Recommendations are needed for improvements in the management of financial governance. This research is normative as for the issues discussed in this research are first the follow-up monitoring arrangements on BPK recommendations and the sanctions if the recommendation is not followed by the audited entity. This legal research was conducted by examining the primary legal materials and secondary law. The results of this research show that normatively monitoring arrangements follow up on BPK recommendations currently using Peraturan BPK Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 which will use the information system so that the implementation of the follow-up monitoring of the audit board recommendations will be faster, more accurate, and efficient. Furthermore, if the public officials did not discharge the audit board recommendation then will be subject to administrative sanctions and criminal sanctions, but BPK has not had mechanisms and procedures for reporting to the police departement if the recommendation that has not been or is not acted upon by the audited entity. Hasil pemeriksaan BPK menghasilkan rekomendasi yang wajib ditindaklanjuti oleh pejabat. Rekomendasi diperlukan untuk perbaikan-perbaikan manajemen dalam menciptakan tata kelola keuangan negara yang lebih baik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif adapun permasalahan yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini adalah pertama pengaturan pemantauan tindak lanjut rekomendasi hasil pemeriksaan BPK saat ini dan kedua sanksi apabila rekomendasi BPK tidak ditindaklanjuti oleh entitas yang diperiksa. Penelitian hukum ini dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif pengaturan pemantauan tindak lanjut rekomendasi hasil pemeriksaan BPK saat ini menggunakan Peraturan BPK Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 yang akan menggunakan sistem informasi pemantauan tindak lanjut sehingga pelaksanaan pemantauan tindak lanjut rekomendasi BPK akan lebih cepat, akurat, dan efisien. Selanjutnya apabila pejabat tidak melaksanakan rekomendasi BPK maka akan dikenai sanksi administratif maupun sanksi pidana, namun BPK belum memiliki mekanisme dan prosedur pelaporan kepada pihak kepolisian apabila rekomendasi BPK yang belum atau tidak ditindaklanjuti oleh entitas yang diperiksa.


Temida ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasa Mrvic-Petrovic

The author is particularly emphasizing peculiarities of the provision on community service as a main penalty (which is foreseen together with the fine and the prison). This solution requires not only the profound regulations in the Law on the execution of the criminal sanctions, but also a careful creation of the by-laws. In the paper, particular attention is paid to the new solutions in the Law on the execution of the criminal sanctions, which aim is to enable the implementation of the community service and the conditional sentence with the protective surveillance. The author states that previous changes of the Criminal Procedure Code, which introduced the principle of opportunity in prosecuting, made a basis for taking victim?s interests related to the redress more into account while starting the prosecution. However, the possibility of using the redress as a basis for the elimination/diversion of the criminal procedure is still not used in an appropriate way in the practice.


Author(s):  
Dewa Krisna Prasada

Visa is a written letter that has an element of legality used when one visits another country. In 2016 the President of the Republic of Indonesia issued a Presidential Regulation regarding Visa-Free Visit. Presidential Decree Number 21 Year 2016 concerning Visa-Free Visit (BVK) provides an opportunity for 169 countries to freely visit the territory of the Republic of Indonesia without a visa. With this provision, it creates dualism in a social environment. On one hand, this provision is beneficial in increasing the tourism economy, and on the other hand, the growth of the risk of criminalization by foreigners is increasing. This study aims to provide a solution to the problem in legal provisions to prevent and control the traffic of foreigners to Indonesia after the enactment of the BVK and how to sanction citizens who abuse the visa-free visit permit. This study uses normative legal research methods. The results of this study indicate that the rules that determine the supervision and implementation of the rules systematically against foreigners who abuse BVK are specified in Law Number 6 Year 2011, Regulation of the Ministry of Law and Human Affairs (Permenkumham) Number 17 Year 2016, and Regulation of the Ministry of Domestic Affairs (Permendagri) Number 49 Year 2010. In addition, for foreigners who are caught having committed violations, the government can provide administrative sanctions up to criminal sanctions and deportation. From the perspective of the ius constituendum, the provisions regarding BVK need to carry out legal reconstruction to determine specific sanctions against foreigners who commit violations. Besides, there is a need for provisions regarding the system for providing BVK to foreigners in detail so that it is right on target. Visa merupakan sesuatu surat tertulis yang memilki unsur legalitas yang digunakan dalam kegiatan kunjungan menuju negara lain. Pada tahun 2016 Presiden Republik Indonesia mengeluarkan Peraturan Presiden mengenai bebas visa kunjungan. Perpres Nomor 21 Tahun 2016 tentang Bebas Visa Kunjungan (BVK) memberikan kesempatan bagi 169 negara untuk bebas berkunjung ke wilayah Republik Indonesia tanpa visa. Ketentuan tersebut menimbulkan dualisme dalam suatu lingkungan sosial. Di satu sisi, ketentuan ini menguntungkan dalam peningkatan ekonomi pariwisata, dan di sisi lain pertumbuhan resiko kriminalisasi oleh orang asing kian bertambah. Kajian ini bertujuan memberikan suatu jawaban dari permasalahan dalam ketentuan hukum untuk mencegah dan mengendalikan lalu lintas orang asing ke Indonesia pasca berlakunya BVK dan bagaimana sanksi kepada warga yang menyalahgunakan izin bebas visa kunjungan. Kajian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif (normative legal research). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa aturan-aturan yang menentukan mengenai pengawasan dan berjalannya aturan secara sistematis terhadap orang asing yang menyalahgunakan BVK ditentukan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2011, Permenkumham Nomor 17 Tahun 2016, dan Permendagri Nomor 49 Tahun 2010. Selain itu bagi orang asing yang tertangkap telah melakukan pelanggaran, pemerintah dapat memberikan sanksi administratif sampai sanksi pidana dan deportasi. Dari prespektif ius constituendum ketentuan mengenai BVK perlu dilakukan rekonstruksi hukum guna menentukan sanksi secara khusus terhadap warga asing yang melakukan pelanggaran. Selain itu, perlu adanya ketentuan mengenai sistem pemberian BVK kepada orang asing secara mendetail agar tepat sasaran.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-111
Author(s):  
Made Dwi Kurnia Dananjaya ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani

Indonesia in this era of globalization was made as a country that can include foreigners in carrying out activities in the form of industry, tourism and commerce in Indonesia. The development of technological science, allows people to be more consumptive in using it. Viewed from a psychological perspective, it is often found that foreign tourists have deviant behavior from legal norms that exist in Indonesia. One of the deviant acts is the criminal treatment of persecution of a foreign citizen to Indonesian citizens who are in the Republic of Indonesia. There is also a problem statement. The purpose of this study is to determine criminal liability and criminal sanctions given to foreign citizens who commit criminal acts of persecution. This study uses a normative method because there are still vague norms, based on the opinions of legal scholars and the Law. One person can have a personality in criminal liability if some things or actions made by someone in violating positive law, if one can eliminate the sense of responsibility in someone who found an element of a person's ability to lose responsibility.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document