scholarly journals PENGARUH DESAIN METODOLOGI PSIKOLOGI PEMBELAJARAN PAI BERBASIS GAYA BELAJAR VISUAL TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MAHASISWA

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
Ainal Mardhiah
Keyword(s):  
Student Achievement ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Learning Design ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Student Learning Style

The more appropriate learning design with student learning style, the more student achievement. This study aims to describe the influence of learning design based on visual learning style on student achievement that has visual, auditorial and kinesthetic learning style. Qualitative descriptive research method with experimental form. Result of data analysis show that: 1. That student of PAI learning psychology have 3 learning style, that is visual learning style, auditorial learning style and kinesthetic learning style. 2. Student achievement that has a visual learning style that is from the average value of 58.4 to 90.7. Children who have an auditorial learning style from the average score of 52.6 to 56.6. And the kinesthetic child from an average score of 56.5 to 60. This suggests that learning design based on visual learning style can only improve student's learning achievement that has visual learning style.

Identifikasi Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa Pendidikan Jasmani Kesehatan dan Rekreasi (PJKR) IKIP Budi Utomo Malang

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 6-11
Author(s):  
Ahmad Ilham Habibi ◽  
Tri Asih Wahyu Hartati ◽  
Purwaning Budi Lestari
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Study Programs ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Student Learning Style ◽  
Student Learning Styles

Lecturers must know and understand the characteristics and learning styles of their students so that their interactions can take place well in the learning and teaching process. However, in reality in the field most of the Lecturers are Educational Study Programs Physical Health and Recreation (PJKR) does not yet know and understand student learning styles optimally. Therefore this study aims to determine the tendency of PJKR student learning styles at IKIP Budi Utomo Malang. This research is a qualitative descriptive study.The instruments of this study were student learning style questionnaires, interview guidelines for lecturers and interview guidelines for students. The results showed that the most dominant PJKR student learning style was the visual learning style with a total of 98 students (63.23%). The next dominant student learning style is the kinesthetic learning style with a total of 23 students (14.84%).The conclusion of this study is that most PJKR students have a visual learning style and some others have kinesthetic learning styles.

scholarly journals THE STYLE USED BY STUDENTS IN LEARNING VOCABULARY

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Fithria Ulfani Yuliatin
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
The Other ◽  
Applied Learning ◽  
Descriptive Data ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Student Learning Style ◽  
Mastery Criteria

The purpose of this study is to describe the application of Learning Styles in the vocabulary used by students of SMAN 1 Sakra Timur. To know the percentage of student learning style in vocabulary. Students of grade 2 IPA 1 are less in applied learning styles, students are more sitting and silent, whether they understand what is described or not. In keeping the results of research, conducted data collection using qualitative descriptive. Data obtained from the results of vocabulary and questionnaire tests. On the other hand, the qualitative data comes from student observations as well. Then the data can be seen that students have problems with the vocabulary, from 37 students who are able to achieve it consists of 15 students (40%) able to achieve the Minimum Mastery Criteria with qualifications consisting of 5 students (14%) to Prima, 9 students (24% to Very good, and 10 students (27%) became good, while there were 13 students (35%) who were unable to achieve minimum mastery with poor or failing qualifications. For percentage of learning style preferred by students to learn to use visual learning style, (89%) SS, 3 (8%) S, 1 (2%) TT and nobody chose disagree and strongly disagree. In addition, from the observation, Students are less active to respond to lessons taught due to lack of force learning applied by the teacher.

scholarly journals Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa Kelas VII

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-211
Author(s):  
Eva Nurdiana ◽  
Ketut Sarjana ◽  
Muhammad Turmuzi ◽  
Sri Subarinah
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Story Problems ◽  
Test Question ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
The Subject

This study aims to find out the ability to solve math story problems reviewed from the learning style of grade VII students. The type of research used is descriptive research with qualitative approach. The sample class was selected using cluster random sampling techniques and obtained 32 students who were taken 25% of the population, the sample was randomly taken 8 students from each class. The samples obtained were given a study style questionnaire in order to classify the sample into visual, auditorial and kinesthetic learning style categories. The sample that was the subject of the interview and the subject given the test question was selected based on the three categories of study style, which was taken randomly 20% of the sample of each learning style. Students' ability to solve math story problems is reviewed from known learning styles through analysis of students' answers in solving number material story questions and based on interview results. The analysis technique used is descriptive statistical analysis. From the results of the study obtained: The ability to solve math story problems of students with visual learning style, auditory learning and kinesthetic learning is  good criteria, less criteria,and less criteria.

STUDENT’S LEARNING STYLES IN LEARNING READING COMPREHENSION

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinta sasmita And Siti Aisah Ginting
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Tenth Grade ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Auditory Learners

This study is about student’s learning styles in learning reading comprehension. The design of this research was descriptive research. The data were collected by using questionnaires and observation sheet. The subject of the study are the XI AP 2 of SMK Swasta Harapan Stabat and the object of the study are the students learning styles in learning reading comprehension. The data were analyzed by using Fleming theory. The purpose of conducting this research was find out whether the most dominant learning style in reading comprehension and to find out what are the types of student’s learning styles which has higher achievement in reading comprehension of XI grade in SMK Swasta Harapan Stabat in academic 2016/2017. There were 32 students as the subject of this research. In this case, the researcher collected the data by using learning style questionnaire and observation. The result showed that auditory learning style is the most dominant learning style at the tenth grade students at SMK Swasta Harapan Stabat, the percentage was 71,87%, it means 23 from 32 students prefer to hear than read and move. The second was kinesthetic learning style, the score, 21,88%, means that only 7 students prefer to move. Then, visual learning style, score 6,25%, means that 2 from 32 students prefer to read. For the fastest student’s in reading comprehension came from auditory students or auditory learners. They get score 69,56% followed kinesthetic 21,74%, and visual 8,70%.

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SNOWBALL THROWING DAN NHT DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN KELAS VII SMP AVICENNA CILEUNGSI

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati ◽  
Setiani Setiani
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Student Learning Style ◽  
Experimental Group

AbstractThe aim of the research was to find out the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student learning style. The learning model compared were snowball throwing and NHT (Numbered Head Together). The type of the research was a quasi-experimental by 2×3 factorial design. The population was the seven grade student of junior high school in Cileungsi district on academic year 2017/2018. The sampling tecnique was cluster random sampling. The size of the sampel was 60 students consisted of 30 students in the first experimental group and 30 students in second experimental group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and learning style questionnaire. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) Snowball Throwing learning model gives better mathematics achievement than NHT learning model, and (2) The students with visual and auditory learning style have the same mathematics achievement and give better mathematics achievement than the students with kinesthetic learning style, (3) In all the students with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning style, snowball throwing learning model give the better mathematics achievement than NHT learning model. (4) In the snowball throwing and NHT learning models, students with auditory and visual learning style have the same mathematics achievement and have the better mathematics achievement than students with kinesthetic learning style.Keywords: Snowball throwing, NHT, learning style, mathematics achievement

scholarly journals ANALISIS AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA BERDASARKAN GAYA BELAJAR VISUAL AUDITORIAL KINESTETIK SISWA PADA PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI KELAS XI IPA MAN 1 MEDAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Riska Amina ◽  
Zulkifli Simatupang
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Activities ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Motor Activities ◽  
Survey Results

This research aims to determine students's learning activities based on visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles of students XI IPA class at MAN 1 Medan Academic Year 2015/2016. The Population of this research is 60 students in two of XI IPA classes and samples were determined by using purposive sampling technique in which the sample was 18 students. The type of this research is a descriptive research. As the research instrument with 36 item of learning style’s questionnaire and the observations are done two times by using learning activities observation sheets. The survey results revealed that students with  visual learning style have the highest writing activities with a percentage of 51.1%, visual activities by 50% and motor activities with a percentage of 39.1%. Students with auditory learning style have a high listening activities with a percentage of 37.9% and oral activities with a percentage of 32.7%. Students with kinesthetic learning style have the highest oral activities with a percentage of 41.4%, and listening activities with a percentage of 39.9%.Keywords: biology learning activities, learning styles

PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF STAD DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR NEGERI 054938 ALUR DUA KECAMATAN SEI LEPAN PANGKALAN BRANDAN KABUPATEN LANGKAT

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Uthman Uthman
Keyword(s):  
Primary School ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Instructional Strategy ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Education Of Students

The objectives of this research were to discover: (1) the difference in learning<br />achievement of Islam Religion Education of students taught by cooperative<br />instructional strategy STAD type and student taught by expository instructional<br />strategy, (2) the a difference of learning style Islam Religion education with visual,<br />auditory and kinesthetic, learning style, and (3) the interaction between instructional<br />strategy and learning style in affecting learning achievement of learning style Islam<br />religion education. The population was Grade V students of Primary School Inti<br />Number SD Negeri 054938 Alur Dua Sei Lepan Pangkalan Brandan Langkat regency<br />consisting of three classes. The sample chosen for instructional class using STAD was<br />class Vc with 40 students, while those taught by expository was class Vb with 40<br />students. The results of the findings were: (1) the average of Islam Religion Education<br />of students taught by STAD instructional strategy ( X = 29,95) was higher than the<br />average of students taught by expositoyi instructional strategy ( X = 28,62) with Fcount<br />= 12,46 &gt; Ftable = 3, 972), the avarage learning achievement of Islam religion education<br />with kinesthetic learning style ( X = 29,77) and visual learning style ( X = 25.35) with<br />Fcount = 5,92 &gt; Ftable = 3,972, and (3) there was an interaction between instructional<br />strategy and learning style toward students learning achievement Islam Religion<br />education with Fcount = 23.84 &gt; Ftable = 3,972.

scholarly journals A Study of Educational Achievement of Standard XI Students in Context of their Learning Style in Reference to Area

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay B. Raval
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Individual Difference ◽  
Educational Achievement ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Learning Style Inventory ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Selection Of

In the Era of Change, teacher should consider the individual differences while teaching in the classroom. In fact teacher must keep in mind the individual differences for teaching. Students have so many talent, we as a teacher must have that angel of view of identifying it. This individual difference can be divided in dimension of Learning Style, too. Researcher was giving service in High School as a teacher, he observe such an Individual difference in context to learning style in class room. Is there any relationship between Educational Achievement and Learning Style? Is there any effect of Learning Style on Educational Achievement in reference to Area? To find the answer of this question present study was conducted. Population & Sample: Population for present study was students studying in Standard-XI of Gujarati Medium School of Gandhinagar District. The selection of schools was by Stratified Randomization Technique and selection of students was selected by Cluster Method. In last, the Sample size was 607. Method: Survey Method was used for Data Collection. Tool: Self constructed Learning Style Inventory (L.S.I.) was used for Data Collection. Learning Style Inventory (L.S.I.) was three Point Likert type Scale. Findings: 1) There was no significance different in educational achievement among students having Visual Learning Style, Auditorial Learning Style and Kinesthetic Learning Style. 2) In matter of educational achievement, students of Rural are superior to students of Urban among students having Visual Learning Style. 3) In matter of educational achievement, students of Rural are superior to students of Urban among students having Auditorial Learning Style. 4) In matter of educational achievement, students of Urban are superior to students of Rural among students having Kinesthetic Learning Style.

scholarly journals Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa Thailand di Universitas Islam Riau

GERAM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Muhammad Mukhlis
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Foreign Students ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Lecture Material ◽  
Lecture Method ◽  
Good Learning

Learning styles are the ways, attitudes, and habits undertaken by students to gain comfort in learning. In this case, the researcher analyzed the foreign students’ learning style from Thailand who are studying at the Islamic University of Riau. The result of study showed that foreign students’ learning style from Thailand tended to use Kinesthetic learning style. This was based on research findings, learning style that has the highest value of kinestetik with an average of 84.6%, followed by an auditory learning style with an average of 76.9% and then visual learning style with an average of 61.5 %. As the findings in research are: First, for visual learning style students prefered to use the media in the lecture process. They were more able to concentrate when the lecturer explains the lecture material when looking at the face. Students could not memorize the material while listening to music. Students understood the material written on the board rather than read more quickly. Second, for auditory learning style, students prefered their lecturers by using lecture method. Students more easily remembered well the lecture material during the discussion. Students will lose concentration, when they heard a noise. Students prefered to discuss with friends if they find problems learning. Third, for students' kinesthetic learning styles along with. Students were more interested in lectures that are in practice. Students memorized the material while walking more dominant. when studying students could not read quickly. The findings could certainly be an input for educators in order to absorb, organize, and suit the learning strategies with learning styles, so as to show good learning outcomes and will be in accordance with lecture objectives

scholarly journals Kemampuan literasi matematika siswa SMP ditinjau dari gaya belajar

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-240
Author(s):  
Muhammad Syawahid ◽  
Susilahudin Putrawangsa
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Mathematical Literacy ◽  
Wrong Answer ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematics Literacy ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Math Literacy

[Bahasa]: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis kemampuan literasi matematika siswa ditinjau dari gaya belajar. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SMPN 1 Mataram kelas VII. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah 3 siswa dari 82 siswa kelas VIIIA dan VIIIB yang masing-masing memiliki gaya belajar auditori, visual dan kinestetis. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Instrumen yang digunakan yaitu angket gaya belajar dan tes kemampuan literasi matematika. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif untuk menggambarkan hasil tes literasi matematika siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) Siswa dengan gaya belajar auditori memiliki kemampuan literasi matematika level 4, yang ditunjukkan dengan kemampuan mereka dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 4 (soal nomor 1 dan 2) meskipun mereka kesulitan dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika dengan level 3 (soal nomor 3 dan 4). 2) Siswa dengan gaya belajar visual memiliki kemampuan literasi matematika level 3 yang ditunjukkan dengan kemampuan mereka dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 3 (soal nomor 3 dan 4) dan tidak mampu menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 4 (soal nomor 1 dan 2). 3) Siswa dengan gaya belajar kinestetis memiliki kemampuan literasi matematika level 4 yang ditunjukkan dengan kemampuan mereka dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 4 (soal nomor 1) dan level 3 (soal nomor 3 dan 4). Pada soal nomor 2 (level 4) siswa dengan gaya belajar kinestetis kurang teliti sehingga jawaban yang dihasilkan salah.  Kata kunci: Literasi Matematika; Gaya Belajar; Auditori; Visual; Kinestetis [English]: This research aims to describe and analyze student’s mathematic literacy referring to learning style. This research was conducted at SMPN 1 Mataram for VIII class. The subjects are 3 students from 82 students of class VIIIA dan VIIIB who respectively have auditory, visual and kinesthetic learning style. The method used in this research is qualitative. Instruments used in this research are a questionnaire of learning style and tests of mathematical literacy. Data analysis was conducted descriptively to portray students’ mathematics literacy referring to learning styles. This research shows that: 1) The students with auditory learning style are in the 4th level of mathematical literacy, it is indicated by their ability in solving 4th level math literacy problem (question 1 and 2) although they have difficulties in solving 3th level math literacy problem (questions 3 and 4). 2) The students with visual learning styles are in 3rd level of mathematical literacy indicated by their ability to solve 3rd level math literacy problems (questions 3 and 4) and can’t solve the 4th level math literacy problem (questions 1 and 2). 3) The students with kinesthetic learning styles have 4th level of mathematical literacy shown by their ability to solve 4th level of math literacy problems (question 1) and 3rd  level (question 3 and 4). They are less accurate in solving question 2 (4th level) so as they have wrong answer.  Keywords: Mathematics Literacy; Learning Style; Auditory; Visual; Kinesthetic

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document