scholarly journals Sidik Jari sebagai Pendukung Alat Bukti dalam Proses Penyidikan Perkara Pidana

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-156
Author(s):  
Uswatun Hasanah ◽  
Yulia Monita

The purpose of this study was to determine the use of fingerprints to support the process of proving evidence in the investigation of criminal cases in the Jambi Regional Police and to determine the effectiveness of fingerprints as supporting evidence in the investigation of criminal cases. The number of criminal cases that occurred in Jambi made the police improve their performance, one of which was in the investigation process by looking for evidence of evidence, one of which was a fingerprint. The results of this study are the use of fingerprints can support the process of proving evidence in the investigation of criminal cases, because the discovery of fingerprints of someone suspected of committing a crime will make it easier for the police to find other evidence, for in Jambi itself the use of fingerprints as preliminary evidence rarely seen from 2016-2019, there were only 5 cases that used fingerprints as an initial guide, because in Jambi itself still had many shortcomings such as at the time of the crime scene many fingerprints were found but many were already damaged, and many criminal acts were indirectly reported, for its own effectiveness the Jambi Regional Police have very complete and sophisticated equipment such as those at the National Police Headquarters and are very effective in terms of cases and tools that all 5 cases that occurred were effective using fingerprints as evidence for initial instructions. Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui penggunaan sidik jari bisa mendukung proses pembuktian alat bukti dalam proses penyidikan perkara pidana di Polda Jambi serta untuk mengetahui efektivitas sidik jari sebagai pendukung alat bukti dalam proses penyidikan perkara pidana. Banyaknya kasus kejahatan yang terjadi di Jambi membuat pihak kepolisian semakin meningkatkan kinerjanya yang salah satunya ialah dalam proses penyidikan dengan mencari bukti petunjuk yang salah satunya sidik jari. Hasil penelitian ini adalah penggunaan sidik jari bisa mendukung proses pembuktian alat bukti dalam proses penyidikan perkara pidana, karena dengan ditemukannya sidik jari seseorang yang diduga melakukan tindak pidana maka akan memudahkan pihak kepolisian dalam mencari bukti lain, untuk di Jambi sendiri penggunaan sidik jari sebagai bukti awal jarang dilakukan terlihat dari tahun 2016-2019 hanya terdapat 5 kasus yang menggunakan sidik jari sebagai petunjuk awal, karena di Jambi sendiri masih memiliki banyak kekurangan seperti pada saat olah TKP banyak ditemukan sidik jari akan tetapi banyak yang sudah rusak, dan banyak kejadian tindak pidana yang tidak langsung dilaporkan, untuk efektivitasnya sendiri Polda Jambi memiliki peralatan yang sangat lengkap dan canggih sudah seperti di Mabes Polri dan sangat efektif dari segi kasus dan alatnya bahwa dari 5 kasus yang terjadi semuanya efektif dengan menggunakan sidik jari sebagai alat bukti petunjuk awal.

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 01240
Author(s):  
Aleksei Parfenov

This paper addresses the topical issues that arise in the process of preliminary investigation and initial operations and investigations related to collecting and obtaining evidence. In particular, the study raises the problematic questions about the nature and goals of technical and criminalistic support of the forensic experts’ research activities during crime scene investigation while specifying relevant statistical data. The author provides an analysis of the state of usage of the forensic equipment employed in obtaining and collecting evidence during crime scene investigation during preliminary investigation in the Republic of Tajikistan and other countries. The paper also covers the issues of knowledge, skills, and abilities of the subjects collecting and obtaining evidence for criminal cases and determines the requirements to to the knowledge, skills, and abilities of the forensic experts who participate in crime scene investigation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E. Argoff, MD ◽  
Meldon Kahan, MD ◽  
Edward M. Sellers, MD

Several strategies for preventing, identifying, and responding to aberrant opioid-related behaviors are recommended in pain management guidelines. This systematic review evaluated data supporting basic strategies for addressing aberrant opioid- related behaviors. Risk reduction strategies were identified via a review of available guidelines. Systematic literature searches of PubMed (May 1, 2007- January 18, 2013) identified articles with evidence relevant to nine basic strategies. Reference lists from relevant articles were reviewed for additional references of interest. Levels of evidence for articles identified were graded on a four-point scale (strongest evidence = level 1; weakest evidence = level 4) using Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence criteria. Weak to moderate evidence supports the value of thorough patient assessment, risk-screening tools, controlled substance agreements, careful dose titration, opioid dose ceilings, compliance monitoring, and adherence to practice guidelines. Moderate to strong evidence suggests that prescribing tamper-resistant opioids may help prevent misuse but may also have the unintended consequence of prompting a migration of users to other marketed opioids, heroin, or other substances. Similarly, preliminary evidence suggests that although recent regulatory and legal efforts may reduce misuse, they also impose barriers to the legitimate treatment of pain. Despite an absence of consistent, strong supporting evidence, clinicians are advised to use each of the available risk-mitigation strategies in combination in an attempt to minimize the risk of abuse in opioid treatment patients. Physicians must critically evaluate their opioid prescribing and not only increase their efforts to prevent substance


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
AISDL

According to the regulations of Vietnamese law, the accused is the person prosecuted with a criminal charges. Currently, Vietnam has made many judicial reforms to improve human rights, including reforms in criminal proceedings to protect the human rights of accuseds. However, in reality, due to many objective and subjective reasons, the accused's rights are not guaranteed. Especially in the process of investigation, creating adverse effects on the political, economic and social rights of the accuseds. During special investigation and proceedings, the accused's rights are the most seriously affected. In the framework of the article, the author assesses the impact of these activities in the investigation on the accused. Beside, proposing solutions to protect accuseds, including the need for authorities to compensate for political, economic and social damage caused by the violation of law provisions during the investigation in Vietnam.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-28
Author(s):  
Cang Elin ◽  

Witness is a person who sees, hears, and directly experiences the occurrence of a criminal act. The information conveyed by the witness can assist the investigation process to the court to reveal the actual criminal suspect. Meanwhile, victim is a person experiencing the occurrence of a criminal act that causes harm materially or physically. This study uses empirical research methods which in this study the writer used research from primary data.The results of this study are witnesses and victims have priority in their statements during the investigation process of criminal cases both at the investigation stage and the court investigation stage. The implementation of protection as in the Act on Witness and Victim Protection in Batam City has not been fully effective because there are several rights of witnesses and/or victims that cannot be fulfilled by the Police since there are no special authority and special budget to provide protection for witnesses and/or victims in criminal cases in Batam city.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Reyner . ◽  
Dian Andriawan Daeng Tawang

In general, penal mediation can be said as a concept that brings together the victims and criminals to discuss their interests and willingness in order to resolve criminal cases that have occurred between them, and are assisted by a mediator who is neutral and help to resolve criminal cases by giving advice and mediating as mediators. The results of the research conducted by normative research and through several literature such as legal books, regulations, and guidelines, show that in fact, reason mediation has been carried out in the community and carried out by several law enforcement officials in the framework of the settlement process criminal. What is done in the midst of Indonesian society is only a peace process that shows customary law as its branch and many are applied within the police in the investigation process to carry out procedures for resolving criminal acts. The importance and need for penal mediation to be applied in formal law that is developing and prevailing in society can be a special rule that is regulated and is part of criminal procedural law for the sake of legal certainty. Penal mediation can be applied at the level of investigation by the police in the process of resolving criminal cases and creating equal welfare and justice in the wide society for sure


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2021) ◽  
pp. 3-10
Author(s):  
Khairul Osman ◽  
Gina Francesca Gabriel ◽  
Noor Hazfalinda Hamzah

Crime Scene Investigation is the backbone of any criminal investigation. Expert report generated by Crime Scene Investigators are based on scientific evidence and are reported in a standard form. The content, when published should be reviewed rigorously by its peers. The expert report is a document detailing out how the investigation process of a crime scene was performed. The process of collecting and evidence processing do not only entail identifying, collecting and storing evidences for later analysis but it is a step by step process that is well structured in a document called Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Crime Scene Investigator. SOP is a complex document and sometimes overwhelmingly technical for the uninitiated. But if understood, it can be a good guide for law practitioners to determine if a piece of evidence should be included in a case. This article details out the SOP which entails groundwork before entering a crime scene, processing of a crime scene and wrapping up of the crime scene investigation. At each step, this paper will look at how it is adopted in current practices, its weakness and suggested improvement that should be adopted to ensure a final quality expert report.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 398-410
Author(s):  
Jaya Syah Putra ◽  
Rizkan Zulyadi ◽  
M.Citra Ramadhan

The purpose of this study was to analyze law enforcement efforts, obstacles and prevention of criminal acts of theft by POLRI against perpetrators of the crime of motorcycle theft with weights in the jurisdiction of Medan Police. This type of research is directed to normative juridical law research. The nature of the research is descriptive analysis of the law enforcement by the Indonesian National Police against the perpetrators of the crime of theft. The results showed that law enforcement efforts were carried out, after the personnel received a complaint report from the victim regarding the occurrence of theft with weighting proceed to the stage of investigation and investigation, against the perpetrators of theft with the weight of a motorcycle subject to Article 363 of the Criminal Code with a maximum penalty of 9 years imprisonment depending on the the method used by the perpetrator to commit theft by weight. Barrier factors include the identity of the perpetrator is not clear, the perpetrator does not have an ID card, the perpetrator does not admit his actions, there are no witnesses at the crime scene. The perpetrator lost evidence, the victim did not want to report it to the police, there were no supporting witnesses. Countermeasures include carrying out preventive measures by carrying out patrols in suspected places, conducting socialization and community approaches in order to create synergistic coordination and cooperation in creating security. Repressive efforts by increasing efforts to take action against perpetrators of theft by weighting motorbikes by providing strict sanctions and having a deterrent effect on perpetrators and providing guidance to the community to comply with the law.


Wajah Hukum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 592
Author(s):  
Ahmad Zulfikar

Efforts to overcome crime through peace based on Restorative Justice, namely justice for all parties are greatly missed by everyone. In carrying out law enforcement duties, the State Police Investigator of the Republic of Indonesia has the duties, functions, and authorities in the field of investigating criminal acts in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations. Based on the Regulation of the National Police Chief Number .6 of 2019 concerning Criminal Investigation, it has a role to carry out prevention efforts without having to use the Criminal Justice System (SPP), namely by resolving cases through the peace process. This process is due to the desire of the community who wants the case to be completed immediately and no longer be complicated. The resolution can be supported by the police's discretionary authority so that the type of research is descriptive empirical juridical, using primary data by means of interviews and secondary data by means of documentation studies. Then all data were processed using qualitative data analysis. Based on the research results, the Pemayung Police Sector policy is to settle criminal cases peacefully (penal police), or through the settlement of criminal cases involving the perpetrator, victim and/or their family and related parties, with the aim of achieving justice for all parties/restorative justice can be carried out, if it does not cause public unrest or there is no community rejection, it will not have an impact on social conflict and the case is still in the process of investigation and investigation. So that it can be directed to a settlement by conducting mediation to the parties, both the victim and the suspect. From the results of the mediation, it was agreed by the parties, both from the reporting party and the reported party as a suspect, admitting all his actions. And from the results of the mediation there was an agreement with the parties (victim and suspect) and a letter of peace was made and the revocation of the Police Report by the victim but after that, the victim came and asked again for the case to be continued, the investigator explained that the agreement had become an agreement of both parties and was binding and the investigation has been discontinued.


Wajah Hukum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 562
Author(s):  
Rena Yulia ◽  
Aliyth Prakarsa

Police institutions are the first and main gate in law enforcement efforts. First, the police institution in charge of carrying out each criminal case’s enforcement, then the next stage will be determined by the police. The practice of law enforcement so far tends to be retributive justice, so that only a few cases can be resolved in the police investigation process. Restorative justice appears by offering various advantages, including a simple settlement process, involving both parties, both perpetrators and victims, and the role of a third party to mediate, so that cases can be resolved according to the agreement. The police, as the first institution in the law enforcement process, had already issued regulations regarding the application of restorative justice, as a form of law enforcement efforts to change retributive law enforcement. The purpose of this research judicially examined the regulation of restorative justice at the police investigation phase in line with the enactment of the regulation of the Chief of Police Number: SE/8/VII/2018 concerning the Application of Restorative Justice in the Settlement of Criminal Cases and the Regulation of the Chief of the Indonesian Police Number 6 of 2019 concerning Criminal Investigation. This research used a qualitative research method with the type of normative legal research through a statutory approach


1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1350-1351
Author(s):  
T. Mc Adam

Recent celebrated criminal cases have raised the public's awareness of forensic science. The advent of DNA technology, in particular, has led to a perception of instrumental techniques that lead to a mathematical probability of guilt that approaches certainty. Mostly passed over in press accounts of forensic operations is the use of the microscope in the examination of physical evidence. By the use of an example from an adjudicated criminal case it is hoped that a greater appreciation is gained of the microscope, that in its various forms, is by far the most widely used instrument in a crime laboratory today.A middle-aged woman was reported missing by her son after the Memorial Day weekend in 1997. An examination of her apartment by members of the Washington State Patrol Crime Scene Response Team revealed a small amount of blood on her bedding. This bedding, together with other items, was taken into evidence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document