scholarly journals A Oralidade (e a Escrita) no Novo Código de Processo Civil Brasileiro

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Valente Cardoso
Keyword(s):  
Middle Age ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Roman Law ◽  
Historical Evolution ◽  
Current Regulation ◽  
Historical Perspectives ◽  
Ius Commune ◽  
Modern Age ◽  
Procedure Code

Resumo: O artigo trata da oralidade no processo civil brasileiro, sob as perspectivas histórica e normativa, com o objetivo de examinar a regulamentação atual pelo Código de Processo Civil e o tratamento conferido pelo Anteprojeto do novo Código. Aborda aspectos conceituais e classificações da oralidade e sua evolução histórica, no Direito Romano, no Ius Commune da Idade Média e na Idade Moderna, especialmente em Portugal e no Brasil. No Brasil, examina-se a regulamentação da oralidade no Regulamento 737 e nos Códigos de Processo Civil de 1939 e 1973, para, ao fim, verificar a existência (ou não) de mudanças no projeto da nova codificação processual. Palavras-Chave: Oralidade; Direito Romano; Idade Média; Ius Commune; Código de Processo Civil. Abstract: This article deals with orality in Brazilian civil procedure, under normative and historical perspectives, in order to examine the current regulation by the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code and the treatment given by the new Code draft. It addresses conceptual aspects, and orality classifications and its historical evolution, in Roman Law, Middle Age Ius Commune and Modern Age, especially in Portugal and Brazil. In Brazil, it examines orality legal regulation, in Regulation 737, and in 1939 and 1973 Civil Procedure Code, in order to, finally, determine the existence (or not) of changes in the new Code draft. Keywords: Orality; Roman Law; Middle Age; Ius Commune; Civil Procedure Code.

scholarly journals LEGAL REGULATION OF THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN NOTARY AND CIVIL PROCESSES AS AN ELEMENT PROTECTION AND PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF RESIDENTS (RESIDENTS) OF THE TEMPORARILY OCCUPIED TERRITORIES OF UKRAINE

2020 ◽  
pp. 447-456
Author(s):  
Г. В. Луцька
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Computer Programs ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Occupied Territories ◽  
Intelligent Computer ◽  
Autonomous Republic

The article considers the problem of application of artificial intelligence in the law of Ukraine in general and in the notarial and civil process in particular. The legal consequences of the legal regime of temporary occupation of some territories of Ukraine are indicated and the ways to eliminate obstacles in the protection and defense of the rights of citizens of Ukraine in these territories are determined. The legal construction of «artificial intelligence» is studied and its types are offered. The conclusion about the expediency of using intelligent computer programs, intelligent information technologies as types of artificial intelligence in notarial and executive processes is substantiated. It is proposed to consider the use of artificial intelligence in notarial and civil proceedings for citizens of Ukraine living in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or in the occupied territories of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, within the limits, in the manner and in the manner prescribed by law of Ukraine. It is proved that the introduction of artificial intelligence through the mechanism of protection and defense of human and civil rights and freedoms in the civil process must be adapted to social relations that arise and exist, not violate the constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen in Ukraine and have a legal basis. Based on the scientific and practical analysis of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, it is proposed for citizens of Ukraine living in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or in the occupied territories of Donetsk and Luhansk regions to establish that lawsuits, separate and injunctive proceedings are entirely online. The procedure (procedure) and features of such proceedings with the use of various types of artificial intelligence (such as chatbots and other information intelligence technologies) should be defined in the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine. It is noted that the introduction of the above mechanism to protect and defend the rights of citizens living in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or in the occupied territories of Donetsk and Luhansk regions through intelligent computer programs will require proper maintenance and support of such programs to prevent leakage of information, leakage of personal data, etc. The conclusion is substantiated that e-litigation and remote notarial proceedings will increase the effectiveness of notarial and judicial forms of protection and protection of rights and make these state forms of protection more flexible, able to anticipate the peculiarities of procedural actions involving residents of the temporarily occupied territories.

SECURING EVIDENCE IN CIVIL PROCEDURE: DEVELOPMENT OF THEORY, LEGISLATIVE AND PRACTICE

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 159-190
Author(s):  
E.I. NOSYREVA ◽  
D.G. FILCHENKO
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Theoretical Concepts ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Arbitration Procedure ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Assessment Of Evidence

The article presents an analysis of the institution of securing evidence in the civil process from the point of view of the development of its legal regulation, doctrine and practice. The teaching of professor M.K. Treushnikov on the evidence is taken as a basis. Through the prism of his ideas, theoretical concepts of securing evidence are revealed, from prerevolutionary works to modern research; the sequence of the formation of norms on the securing evidence on the example of procedural codes of various periods; trends in the law practice of securing evidence. The correlation of the securing evidence with the elements of the judicial proof is revealed. It is substantiated that the securing evidence includes such elements of the structure of judicial proof as: indication of facts, indication of evidence and preliminary assessment. The end result of the procedural action to secure evidence is the possibility of implementing all subsequent elements – presentation, disclosure, investigation and final assessment of evidence. Conclusions are formulated on the results of the development of the institution of securing evidence, which from rather brief and obvious provisions of procedural legislation, a few practice has turned into an actual procedural activity. Its demand is predicted to grow in the context of digitalization of information, as well as due to the possibility of using it in the framework of arbitration. At the same time, an increase in the number of cases of unfounded appeal of interested parties to actions to secure evidence is noted. The authors support a critical assessment of the rule of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation that the securing evidence is carried out by the arbitration court according to the rules for securing a claim, and a proposal for a unified regulation of this institution in accordance with the rules of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals To the admissibility of the civil law exemption of property from arrest, imposed in the criminal proceedings: domestic and foreign experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-200
Author(s):  
Natalia Kashtanova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Judicial Protection

The subject of paper deals with the legal nature of measures of criminal procedural compulsionin the form of seizure of property.Methodological basis of the article is based on general scientific dialectical methods of cognitionof objective reality of the legal processes and phenomena that allowed us to conduct anobjective assessment of the state of legislation and law enforcement practice in the proceduralaspects of the cancellation of the seizure of property in criminal proceedings of Russia.The results and scope of it’s application. It is submitted that the cancellation of the seizureof the property (or the individual limit) is allowed only on the grounds and in the mannerprescribed by the criminal procedure law of the Russian Federation. However, the studyfound serious contradictions in the application of the relevant law. In particular, cases inwhich the question of exemption of property from arrest (exclusion from the inventory),imposed in the criminal case was resolved in a civil procedure that, in the opinion of theauthor of the publication, is extremely unacceptable.On the stated issues topics analyzes opinions of scientists who say that the dispute aboutthe release of impounded property may be allowed in civil proceedings, including pendingresolution of the criminal case on the merits. The author strongly disagrees with this positionand supports those experts who argue that the filing of a claim for exemption of propertyfrom arrest (exclusion from the inventory) the reviewed judicial act of imposing of arrestwithout recognition per se invalid. In this regard, the author cites the legal position ofthe constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, from which clearly follows that of theright of everyone to judicial protection does not imply the possibility of choice of the citizenat its discretion, techniques and procedures of judicial protection, since the features of suchjudicial protection is defined in specific Federal laws.The author analyzes and appreciates Kazakhstan's experience of legal regulation of the permissibilityof filing a civil claim for exemption of property from seizure imposed in criminalproceedings. The author notes that the new civil procedural legislation of the Republic ofKazakhstan, which came into force from 01 January 2016, clearly captures that considerationin the civil proceedings are not subject to claims for exemption of property from seizureby the criminal prosecution body.Conclusions. Necessity of amendment to article 422 of the Civil Procedure Code of Russia:this article should not apply to cases of application of measures of criminal procedural compulsionin the form of seizure of property. Among other things, the author proposed additionsto part 9 of article 115 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Russia.

scholarly journals Os alimentos provisionais como efetivação do direito aos alimentos e o sistema de tutelas cognitivas de urgência do Novo Código de Processo Civil (Lei nº 13.105/2015) / The brazilian provisional alimonies as realization of the right to alimony and the summary judgment system of the New Civil Procedure Code (Law 13.105/ 2015)

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Cristina Alves de Paula ◽  
Edilberto Marassi Basílio Silveira Junior ◽  
Gabrielle Ota Longo ◽  
Yvete Flávio Da Costa
Keyword(s):  
Child Support ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Judgment Type ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Right ◽  
Summary Judgment ◽  
Legal Mechanism ◽  
Present Text

Resumo: Este artigo contém uma análise dos alimentos provisionais como mecanismo jurídico-processual eficaz de tutela do direito aos alimentos, no bojo da sistemática processual civil hodierna, não se olvidando de enfrentar as questões advindas da nova disciplina jurídica das medidas de urgência, inaugurada pela Lei nº 13.105/2015 (Novo Código de Processo Civil). Para tanto, o presente texto, em estudo crítico-doutrinário, perscruta, pormenorizadamente a disciplina jurídica atinente aos alimentos provisionais enquanto modalidade de tutela antecipatória, diferenciando-os dos alimentos provisórios. Disserta acerca das desconcertantes indagações oriundas da desregulamentação das tutelas cognitivas de urgência nominadas promovida pela nova codificação, problematizando suas repercussões sobre o instituto dos alimentos provisionais. Propõe, para cada uma delas, sem desprezar a relevância futura dos contributos doutrinários e jurisprudenciais, possíveis soluções, que prezem pela minimização das dificuldades a serem criadas.Abstract: This article analyses the Brazilian provisional alimony/alimony pendente lite as a procedural realization and a legal mechanism of protection for the rights of alimony, palimony, parental and child support in the wake of contemporary Brazilian civil procedural system, not forgetting to address the issues arising from the new summary judgment legal regulation, inaugurated by Law 13,105/2015 (New Civil Procedure Code). For this purpose, the present text, a critically-doctrinal study, scrutinize in detail the legal regulation pertaining to provisional alimonies while Brazilian anticipatory summary judgment type, distinguishing them from Brazilian provisory alimony. It discusses about the perplexing questions arising from the deregulation of nominated summary judgment system, promoted by the new coding, questioning its impact on the institute of provisional alimonies. It proposes, for each of these questions, without neglecting the future relevance of the doctrinal and jurisprudential contributions, possible solutions, which seek minimizing the difficulties to be created. 

scholarly journals O processo cautelar sobrevive no Código de Processo Civil de 2015?

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (38) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Resende Leal ◽  
Flávio Luis De Oliveira
Keyword(s):  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Historical Evolution ◽  
Porto Alegre ◽  
The Third ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Preliminary Injunction ◽  
The Law ◽  
Procedure Codes

O processo cautelar sobrevive no Código de Processo Civil de 2015? Does the precautionary process survive in the Civil Procedure Code of 2015? Fabio Resende Leal *Flávio Luis de Oliveira ** REFERÊNCIA LEAL, Fabio Resende; OLIVEIRA, Flávio Luis de. O processo cautelar sobrevive no Código de Processo Civil de 2015? Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFRGS, Porto Alegre, n. 38, p. 234-256, ago. 2018. RESUMOABSTRACTEste artigo procura desmentir a afirmação, feita em doutrina, de que o processo cautelar desapareceu no Código de Processo Civil de 2015, propondo uma nova forma de definir tal espécie processual. O primeiro de seus cinco itens versa sobre os conceitos de ação e processo; o segundo, sobre os Códigos de Processo Civil de 1939, 1973 e 2015; o terceiro, sobre o sincretismo processual e a tutela cautelar na lei hoje em vigor. Adentrando ao cerne da discussão, o quarto item procura, a partir de situações processuais hipotéticas, demonstrar a possível sobrevivência do processo cautelar, enquanto que o quinto e último, para sustentar tal sobrevida, formula, a título de sugestão, um novo conceito de processo cautelar, a partir da preponderância dos atos preventivos que nele serão praticados, com inspiração em Pontes de Miranda. O método adotado foi pesquisar, além da legislação e sua evolução histórica, os principais autores processuais pátrios em cada um dos três grandes momentos legislativos vividos no Brasil. This article seeks to deny the doctrinal assertion that the precautionary process disappeared in the Civil Procedure Code of 2015, proposing a new way of defining that procedural species. The first of its five chapters deals with the concepts of action and process; the second, the Civil Procedure Codes of 1939, 1973 and 2015; the third, procedural syncretism and preliminary injunction in the law today in force. At the heart of the discussion, the fourth chapter seeks, based on hypothetical procedural situations, to demonstrate the possible survival of the precautionary process, while the fifth and last, in order to sustain such survival, formulates, as a suggestion, a new concept of process precautionary, starting from the preponderance of the preventive acts that will be practiced in it, with inspiration in Pontes de Miranda. The method adopted was to investigate, in addition to the legislation and its historical evolution, the main procedural authors of the country in each of the three great legislative moments experienced in Brazil. PALAVRAS-CHAVEKEYWORDSProcesso cautelar. Sobrevivência. Código de Processo Civil de 2015.Precautionary process. Survival. Code of Civil Procedure of 2015.* Doutorando em Direito pela Instituição Toledo de Ensino de Bauru. Graduação, Especialização e Mestrado em Direito pela Instituição Toledo de Ensino de Bauru. Advogado. Professor Adjunto da Universidade Paulista - Campus de Bauru. Professor da Pós-Graduação em Direito Universidade Paulista Interativa, Professor convidado do Centro de Pós-Graduação da Instituição Toledo de Ensino de Bauru e da Escola Superior da Advocacia da OAB/SP. Coordenador da Comissão OAB vai à Faculdade da OAB/Bauru. Membro do Tribunal de Ética e Disciplina da OAB/SP. Autor do livro A celeridade processual como pressuposto da efetividade dos direitos fundamentais (Curitiba: Juruá, 2011).** Flávio Luis de Oliveira Mestre (1999) e Doutor (2001) em Direito pela Universidade Federal do Paraná. Coordenou o Curso de Graduação em Direito do Centro Universitário de Bauru/SP, mantido pela Instituição Toledo de Ensino - ITE. Coordenou o Programa de Pós-graduação Stricto Sensu em Direito do Centro Universitário de Bauru/SP, mantido pela Instituição Toledo de Ensino - ITE. Tem experiência em gestão acadêmica e docência superior na área do Direito Processual Civil. Membro do Instituto Ibero-americano de Direito Processual. Membro do Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual. Membro do Centro de Estudos Avançados de Processo. Consultor Ad Hoc da Capes - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. Advogado. 

CLASS ACTIONS IN CIVIL PROCEDURE: ENFORCEMENT ISSUES

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 86-106
Author(s):  
V.V. YARKOV
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Class Action ◽  
Class Actions ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Special Rules

The issues of legal regulation and the first experience of law enforcement of class actions on the example of chapter 22.3 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation are considered. Despite the generally unified legal regulation of class proceedings in arbitration and civil proceedings, in the practice of courts of general jurisdiction there are specific issues that need to be addressed. In article value of unity of all conditions of qualification of the declared requirements as the class action is underlined, and also consequences of non-compliance of conditions of certification are revealed. Attention has been drawn to the necessity of application of the general rules of action proceedings along with the special rules of chapter 22.3 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in consideration of class actions. Also within the framework of this study the author concludes that each new legal institute raises a number of controversial issues in the process of law enforcement. And that is why it is very important to refer to the general provisions of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, developed under the guidance of Professor M.K. Treushnikov, which allow to find the best solution for this or that problem of legal regulation and law enforcement.

scholarly journals Problems and Prospects of Legal Regulation of the Status of Persons Contributing to the Administration of Justice in Civil Proceedings

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-115
Author(s):  
O. N. Gorodnova ◽  
A. A. Makarushkova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Administration Of Justice ◽  
The Status ◽  
Procedural Code ◽  
The Russian Federation

Based on a comparative analysis of the norms of the procedural legislation of the Russian Federation, the paper discusses certain problems and prospects of legal regulation of the status of persons contributing to the administration of justice: expert, specialist, witness, interpreter, assistant judge, court clerk, as applied to civil proceedings.The authors analyze modern approaches to the persons contributing to the administration of justice, considering, along with traditional subjects, such a procedural figure as judicial representative in a civil procedure, taking into account the latest changes and additions to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, entering into force on September 1, 2019.Based on a comparative analysis of the provisions of the arbitration and civil procedural laws, the authors of the paper point that the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation lacks a separate chapter on legal regulation of the status of participants in civil proceedings, including those assisting in the administration of justice. This makes it difficult to establish the circle of such entities in practice. In this regard, they propose, by analogy with the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, to fix the circle of participants in the civil procedure in a separate chapter, revealing in detail and specifying the legal status in other articles of the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation of other participants in the civil proceedings.In the paper, the authors conclude that the judicial representative must be considered as an independent subject of the civil proceedings. Finally, this problematic issue can only be resolved by making appropriate changes and additions to the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation.It is noted that, despite the absence of special instructions in the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation to other participants in the process, their list is not exhaustive and in fact, the circle of persons involved in the case is much wider. Such persons include court bailiffs and witnesses, whose legal status is currently debatable.

scholarly journals UZNANIE ZA ZMARŁEGO I STWIERDZENIE ZGONU (GENEZA, ROZWÓJ INSTYTUCJI I POSTĘPOWANIA)

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Anna Bartoszewicz
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Second World War ◽  
Roman Law ◽  
World War ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Law ◽  
Polish Law ◽  
Second World

The Origins and Development of the Law on the Presumption of Death and Declarations of DeathSummaryThe article presents the history of the presumption of death and declaration of death. It provides an insight into the relevant concepts of the Roman law as well as chosen examples of the laws of the ancient Middle East. It also focuses on the Polish and foreign laws which were in force on the historically Polish territory during the period of the country’s loss of independence (1795-1918). It identifies the origins of the presumption of death and declaration of death in the Polish law and examines their development (including the relevant civil procedurę provisions) until 1964, when the present civil code and civil procedurę code came into force.By presenting and comparing the laws governing the presumption of death and declarations of death, the author highlights the different approaches of the laws that applied at the time of the loss of independence: those of Prussia, Russia, Austria and the Polish Kingdom, as well as the law in effect in the Grand Duchy of Warsaw. The article also considers the extent to which the laws introduced after Poland regained independence in 1918 were influenced by the foreign regimes previously in force.The gradual developments in the law following the Second World War are presented against the background of the major changes in Polish civil law over the same period, which occurred mainly via the codifications of the law in the civil code and the civil procedure code.

scholarly journals Problematical Aspects of Current Legal Regulation of Appellate Review and their Solution in Suggested Amendment of Czech Civil Procedure Code

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-43
Author(s):  
Klára Hamuľáková ◽  
Jana Křiváčková
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Conceptual Problems ◽  
Civil Cases

Abstract Th e aim of this article is to point to insufficiencies of the current legal regulation of the appellate review proceeding in civil cases, when the court competent to deal with the appellate reviews is not able to fulfill its function of a unifier of case law and the defender of lawfullness of decision-making any more. Th e proposed amendment of the Civil procedure code which is being prepared by the Ministry of Justice reacts to many of these insufficiencies. In the article we have only focused on crucial conceptual problems of the proposed legal regulation and we have avoided other deficiencies requiring deeper analysis and the knowledge of Czech legal regulation.

Scots Law: Mixed from the Very Beginning? A Tale of Two Receptions

2000 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
WDH Sellar
Keyword(s):  
Middle Ages ◽  
Common Law ◽  
General Meeting ◽  
Roman Law ◽  
Mixed System ◽  
Annual General Meeting ◽  
Ius Commune ◽  
Profound Influence ◽  
Anglo Norman ◽  
Considerable Period

This article is the revised text of the lecture delivered to the Stair Society at its Annual General Meeting in November 1997. It defends the proposition that Scots law, from the time of its emergence in the Middle Ages, has been a “mixed” system, open to the influence of both the English Common Law and the Civilian tradition. It also compares and contrasts the Reception of the Anglo-Norman law with that of Roman law. The former was quite specific as regards both time and substantive legal content. The Reception of Roman law, on the other hand, took place over a considerable period of time, and its effects were complex and diffuse. Above all, the Civilian tradition and the wider ius commune provided an intellectual framework against which to measure Scots law. Both Receptions exercised a profound influence on the continuing development of Scots law.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document