scholarly journals Problematical Aspects of Current Legal Regulation of Appellate Review and their Solution in Suggested Amendment of Czech Civil Procedure Code

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-43
Author(s):  
Klára Hamuľáková ◽  
Jana Křiváčková
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Conceptual Problems ◽  
Civil Cases

Abstract Th e aim of this article is to point to insufficiencies of the current legal regulation of the appellate review proceeding in civil cases, when the court competent to deal with the appellate reviews is not able to fulfill its function of a unifier of case law and the defender of lawfullness of decision-making any more. Th e proposed amendment of the Civil procedure code which is being prepared by the Ministry of Justice reacts to many of these insufficiencies. In the article we have only focused on crucial conceptual problems of the proposed legal regulation and we have avoided other deficiencies requiring deeper analysis and the knowledge of Czech legal regulation.

scholarly journals An approach between the institutional capacity of the Courts of Audit and the regimen of precedents and summulas from the Civil Procedure Code

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (88) ◽  
pp. 1-32
Author(s):  
Caroline Müller Bitencourt ◽  
Carlos Ignacio Aymerich Cano ◽  
Jonas Faveiro Trindade
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Theoretical Work ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Institutional Capacity ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Deductive Method ◽  
Interpretive Theory ◽  
The Relationship

The institutional capacity of the courts of audit as makers and applicants of precedents and summulas (restatement of case law) is investigated to answer the following: is it possible a mutually beneficial approach to the decision standards regimen from the Civil Procedure Code-CPC, as well as a productive dialogue with the Law of Introduction to the Brazilian Legal Statutes (Lei de Introdução às normas do Direito Brasileiro-LINDB)?. The objective of the work is to analyze, from the abstract and concrete institutional capacities of the audit courts, the aptitude for the formation and application of decision-making standards. To do so, Ronald Dworkin's interpretive theory was chosen, especially because it is believed that precedents are intertwined in a discursive plot, when every single interpreter commits to analyzing past decisions, in a reflexive way, to decide in the present and, at the same time, anticipating the directions for the future of the decision, which is made in the here and now. The hypothesis is that the audit courts have the potential ability to form and apply precedents and summulas, arising from the exercise of their constitutional powers, but that it is also necessary to develop a concrete capacity to form and apply controlling decision patterns. In this way, it allows for a better understanding of the relationship between the decisions of the audit courts and the judicial ones. It is a theoretical work, of legal analysis of the subject, using the deductive method, starting from a general analysis to reach the institutional capacity of audit courts for the formation and application of decision-making standards.

scholarly journals Criminogenic role of “private patronage” as a corruption-causing factor in the judicial act in light of the activity of modern “mafia” groups

2021 ◽  
pp. 190-217
Author(s):  
Nadezhda Pavlovna Novitskaya
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Definition Of

This article explores the causes for the emergence of “corruption-causing factors” in judicial acts, indicates correlation between “corruption-causing factors” and “private patronage” on the part of mafia institution (modern mafia groups), which is the highest “specific economic enterprise or industry that produces, encourages, and sells private patronage”, including interference in justice through corruption and bribery. The case law on the topic is analyzed. The object of this research is the activity of judges in assessing legally valid circumstances in relation to the responsibility of judges. The subject of this research is the norms of Russian legislation that regulate the activity of judges in assessing legally valid circumstances, as well as the texts of judicial acts on claims under the Article 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, civil and administrative cases of the courts of St. Petersburg, and the responsibility of judges. The author notes the absence of definition of “corruption-causing factor” in the judicial act, its characteristics, responsibility of the judges for decision-making that contain “corruption-causing factor”, effective judicial bodies that “investigate” the disciplinary misconduct of judges. It is underlined that the implementation of the institution of investigative judge was anticipatory. The scientific novelty is substantiated by the fact that this article is first to outline the concept of “corruption-causing factor” in the judicial act as the grounds for bringing the judge to disciplinary responsibility. The conclusion is made that this is a comprehensive issue; thus, the longer it would take to solve the questions of effective legal regulation of the mechanism of judicial responsibility, the more it would augment the risks of proliferation of the “corruption-causing factor” in the judicial system, which destroys confidence in the government authorities and deteriorates the state from within.

scholarly journals A Oralidade (e a Escrita) no Novo Código de Processo Civil Brasileiro

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Valente Cardoso
Keyword(s):  
Middle Age ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Roman Law ◽  
Historical Evolution ◽  
Current Regulation ◽  
Historical Perspectives ◽  
Ius Commune ◽  
Modern Age ◽  
Procedure Code

Resumo: O artigo trata da oralidade no processo civil brasileiro, sob as perspectivas histórica e normativa, com o objetivo de examinar a regulamentação atual pelo Código de Processo Civil e o tratamento conferido pelo Anteprojeto do novo Código. Aborda aspectos conceituais e classificações da oralidade e sua evolução histórica, no Direito Romano, no Ius Commune da Idade Média e na Idade Moderna, especialmente em Portugal e no Brasil. No Brasil, examina-se a regulamentação da oralidade no Regulamento 737 e nos Códigos de Processo Civil de 1939 e 1973, para, ao fim, verificar a existência (ou não) de mudanças no projeto da nova codificação processual. Palavras-Chave: Oralidade; Direito Romano; Idade Média; Ius Commune; Código de Processo Civil. Abstract: This article deals with orality in Brazilian civil procedure, under normative and historical perspectives, in order to examine the current regulation by the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code and the treatment given by the new Code draft. It addresses conceptual aspects, and orality classifications and its historical evolution, in Roman Law, Middle Age Ius Commune and Modern Age, especially in Portugal and Brazil. In Brazil, it examines orality legal regulation, in Regulation 737, and in 1939 and 1973 Civil Procedure Code, in order to, finally, determine the existence (or not) of changes in the new Code draft. Keywords: Orality; Roman Law; Middle Age; Ius Commune; Civil Procedure Code.

scholarly journals LEGAL REGULATION OF THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN NOTARY AND CIVIL PROCESSES AS AN ELEMENT PROTECTION AND PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF RESIDENTS (RESIDENTS) OF THE TEMPORARILY OCCUPIED TERRITORIES OF UKRAINE

2020 ◽  
pp. 447-456
Author(s):  
Г. В. Луцька
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Computer Programs ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Occupied Territories ◽  
Intelligent Computer ◽  
Autonomous Republic

The article considers the problem of application of artificial intelligence in the law of Ukraine in general and in the notarial and civil process in particular. The legal consequences of the legal regime of temporary occupation of some territories of Ukraine are indicated and the ways to eliminate obstacles in the protection and defense of the rights of citizens of Ukraine in these territories are determined. The legal construction of «artificial intelligence» is studied and its types are offered. The conclusion about the expediency of using intelligent computer programs, intelligent information technologies as types of artificial intelligence in notarial and executive processes is substantiated. It is proposed to consider the use of artificial intelligence in notarial and civil proceedings for citizens of Ukraine living in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or in the occupied territories of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, within the limits, in the manner and in the manner prescribed by law of Ukraine. It is proved that the introduction of artificial intelligence through the mechanism of protection and defense of human and civil rights and freedoms in the civil process must be adapted to social relations that arise and exist, not violate the constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen in Ukraine and have a legal basis. Based on the scientific and practical analysis of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, it is proposed for citizens of Ukraine living in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or in the occupied territories of Donetsk and Luhansk regions to establish that lawsuits, separate and injunctive proceedings are entirely online. The procedure (procedure) and features of such proceedings with the use of various types of artificial intelligence (such as chatbots and other information intelligence technologies) should be defined in the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine. It is noted that the introduction of the above mechanism to protect and defend the rights of citizens living in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or in the occupied territories of Donetsk and Luhansk regions through intelligent computer programs will require proper maintenance and support of such programs to prevent leakage of information, leakage of personal data, etc. The conclusion is substantiated that e-litigation and remote notarial proceedings will increase the effectiveness of notarial and judicial forms of protection and protection of rights and make these state forms of protection more flexible, able to anticipate the peculiarities of procedural actions involving residents of the temporarily occupied territories.

SECURING EVIDENCE IN CIVIL PROCEDURE: DEVELOPMENT OF THEORY, LEGISLATIVE AND PRACTICE

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 159-190
Author(s):  
E.I. NOSYREVA ◽  
D.G. FILCHENKO
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Theoretical Concepts ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Arbitration Procedure ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Assessment Of Evidence

The article presents an analysis of the institution of securing evidence in the civil process from the point of view of the development of its legal regulation, doctrine and practice. The teaching of professor M.K. Treushnikov on the evidence is taken as a basis. Through the prism of his ideas, theoretical concepts of securing evidence are revealed, from prerevolutionary works to modern research; the sequence of the formation of norms on the securing evidence on the example of procedural codes of various periods; trends in the law practice of securing evidence. The correlation of the securing evidence with the elements of the judicial proof is revealed. It is substantiated that the securing evidence includes such elements of the structure of judicial proof as: indication of facts, indication of evidence and preliminary assessment. The end result of the procedural action to secure evidence is the possibility of implementing all subsequent elements – presentation, disclosure, investigation and final assessment of evidence. Conclusions are formulated on the results of the development of the institution of securing evidence, which from rather brief and obvious provisions of procedural legislation, a few practice has turned into an actual procedural activity. Its demand is predicted to grow in the context of digitalization of information, as well as due to the possibility of using it in the framework of arbitration. At the same time, an increase in the number of cases of unfounded appeal of interested parties to actions to secure evidence is noted. The authors support a critical assessment of the rule of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation that the securing evidence is carried out by the arbitration court according to the rules for securing a claim, and a proposal for a unified regulation of this institution in accordance with the rules of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.

JUDICIAL REFORM OF THE LATE 20TH – EARLY 21ST CENTURIES IN RUSSIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 191-221
Author(s):  
V.M. ZHUIKOV
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Major Change ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
Judicial Reform ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Current Trends ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Cases

The author analyzes the reform of the Russian legislation regulating the activity of courts for consideration of civil cases, the reform, which began in the 1990s and continues to this day. Highlights the main stages of the reform related to the adoption of the Constitution of the Russian Federation 1993, changes in the judicial system, with the adoption of the Commercial Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in 1992, 1995, 2002, with a major change of Civil Procedure Code of the RSFSR 1964 and the entry into force of the current Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, 2002. In addition, the author calls the current trends in the development of procedural legislation, including reforms made by Federal Law of 28 November 2018 No. 451-FZ.

Besondere Typen der Widerklage

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annalena Hanke
Keyword(s):  
Case Law ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Law

This highly significant work in terms of litigation practice critically examines the case law of Germany’s highest courts with regard to third-party counterclaims. In particular, it discusses the recognition of third-party counterclaims as an independent institution of procedural law. This work solves the problems that arise in this respect, above all the question of local jurisdiction, using the existing legally regulated instruments of procedural law. Due to the actual lack of the presupposed loophole in the regulations, it therefore calls into question both the analogous application of § 33 of Germany’s civil procedure code (Zivilprozessordnung) and the judicial development of the law in this area.

scholarly journals To the admissibility of the civil law exemption of property from arrest, imposed in the criminal proceedings: domestic and foreign experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-200
Author(s):  
Natalia Kashtanova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Judicial Protection

The subject of paper deals with the legal nature of measures of criminal procedural compulsionin the form of seizure of property.Methodological basis of the article is based on general scientific dialectical methods of cognitionof objective reality of the legal processes and phenomena that allowed us to conduct anobjective assessment of the state of legislation and law enforcement practice in the proceduralaspects of the cancellation of the seizure of property in criminal proceedings of Russia.The results and scope of it’s application. It is submitted that the cancellation of the seizureof the property (or the individual limit) is allowed only on the grounds and in the mannerprescribed by the criminal procedure law of the Russian Federation. However, the studyfound serious contradictions in the application of the relevant law. In particular, cases inwhich the question of exemption of property from arrest (exclusion from the inventory),imposed in the criminal case was resolved in a civil procedure that, in the opinion of theauthor of the publication, is extremely unacceptable.On the stated issues topics analyzes opinions of scientists who say that the dispute aboutthe release of impounded property may be allowed in civil proceedings, including pendingresolution of the criminal case on the merits. The author strongly disagrees with this positionand supports those experts who argue that the filing of a claim for exemption of propertyfrom arrest (exclusion from the inventory) the reviewed judicial act of imposing of arrestwithout recognition per se invalid. In this regard, the author cites the legal position ofthe constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, from which clearly follows that of theright of everyone to judicial protection does not imply the possibility of choice of the citizenat its discretion, techniques and procedures of judicial protection, since the features of suchjudicial protection is defined in specific Federal laws.The author analyzes and appreciates Kazakhstan's experience of legal regulation of the permissibilityof filing a civil claim for exemption of property from seizure imposed in criminalproceedings. The author notes that the new civil procedural legislation of the Republic ofKazakhstan, which came into force from 01 January 2016, clearly captures that considerationin the civil proceedings are not subject to claims for exemption of property from seizureby the criminal prosecution body.Conclusions. Necessity of amendment to article 422 of the Civil Procedure Code of Russia:this article should not apply to cases of application of measures of criminal procedural compulsionin the form of seizure of property. Among other things, the author proposed additionsto part 9 of article 115 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Russia.

scholarly journals Os alimentos provisionais como efetivação do direito aos alimentos e o sistema de tutelas cognitivas de urgência do Novo Código de Processo Civil (Lei nº 13.105/2015) / The brazilian provisional alimonies as realization of the right to alimony and the summary judgment system of the New Civil Procedure Code (Law 13.105/ 2015)

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Cristina Alves de Paula ◽  
Edilberto Marassi Basílio Silveira Junior ◽  
Gabrielle Ota Longo ◽  
Yvete Flávio Da Costa
Keyword(s):  
Child Support ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Judgment Type ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Right ◽  
Summary Judgment ◽  
Legal Mechanism ◽  
Present Text

Resumo: Este artigo contém uma análise dos alimentos provisionais como mecanismo jurídico-processual eficaz de tutela do direito aos alimentos, no bojo da sistemática processual civil hodierna, não se olvidando de enfrentar as questões advindas da nova disciplina jurídica das medidas de urgência, inaugurada pela Lei nº 13.105/2015 (Novo Código de Processo Civil). Para tanto, o presente texto, em estudo crítico-doutrinário, perscruta, pormenorizadamente a disciplina jurídica atinente aos alimentos provisionais enquanto modalidade de tutela antecipatória, diferenciando-os dos alimentos provisórios. Disserta acerca das desconcertantes indagações oriundas da desregulamentação das tutelas cognitivas de urgência nominadas promovida pela nova codificação, problematizando suas repercussões sobre o instituto dos alimentos provisionais. Propõe, para cada uma delas, sem desprezar a relevância futura dos contributos doutrinários e jurisprudenciais, possíveis soluções, que prezem pela minimização das dificuldades a serem criadas.Abstract: This article analyses the Brazilian provisional alimony/alimony pendente lite as a procedural realization and a legal mechanism of protection for the rights of alimony, palimony, parental and child support in the wake of contemporary Brazilian civil procedural system, not forgetting to address the issues arising from the new summary judgment legal regulation, inaugurated by Law 13,105/2015 (New Civil Procedure Code). For this purpose, the present text, a critically-doctrinal study, scrutinize in detail the legal regulation pertaining to provisional alimonies while Brazilian anticipatory summary judgment type, distinguishing them from Brazilian provisory alimony. It discusses about the perplexing questions arising from the deregulation of nominated summary judgment system, promoted by the new coding, questioning its impact on the institute of provisional alimonies. It proposes, for each of these questions, without neglecting the future relevance of the doctrinal and jurisprudential contributions, possible solutions, which seek minimizing the difficulties to be created. 

DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARDS FOR THE PREPARATION OF CIVIL CASES FOR TRIAL IN THE CIVIL LAW PROCEDURE CODES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-190
Author(s):  
A.V. CHEKMAREVA
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
18Th Century ◽  
Central Place ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Arbitration Procedure ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
To Come ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The article highlights the stages of development of legislation regulating preparatory procedural actions in civil cases in courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts. The author notes that the Decrees of Peter the Great had an important impact on setting the time limits for the performance of some procedural preparatory actions in the 18th century. The adoption of the Charter of Civil Procedure of 1864 consolidated preliminary written preparation as an important stage in the proceedings that carried out based on adversarial and equality of rights of the parties. The author comes to a conclusion that the stage of preparing the case for trial practically did not exist until 1929, since the 1923 Civil Procedure Code of the RSFSR reduced the essence of the preparation only to the judge’s right to collect necessary evidence for the resolve of the case at the request of the plaintiff and beyond the objections of the defendant. It is noted that the RSFSR Civil Procedure Code, adopted in 1964, also did not call the preparation of the case for trial a mandatory stage of the process; and only in the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the RSFSR of 19 March 1969 “On the Preparation of Civil Cases for Trial” preparation was indicated as independent stage and is obligatory in every civil case. The author emphasizes that the adoption in 2002 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation significantly changed the preparation of the case for trial, imparting an adversarial character to the preparatory actions. The legislative fundamentalization of this stage allowed the author to present the preparation of the case for trial as a system consisting of two interconnected subsystems (guided and regulatory). The author notes that a systemic approach to studying the preparation of cases for consideration makes it possible to identify the role of preparatory procedures in civil procedure, to regulate the interaction between the court and the parties, to predict possible results from preparatory procedures, and find out the balance between the purposes and aims of preparation at each stage of the proceedings. A comparative analysis of the norms of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, which regulate the rules on the disclosure of evidence, made it possible to come to the conclusion that it is inexpedient to stipulate in the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation the obligation to disclose evidence without establishing measures of responsibility for its failure to comply. Attention is drawn to the inconsistency of the legislator, who defines Article 132 of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation as “Aims of Preparing an Administrative Case for Trial”, but does not indicate any of them. The author offers a list of such aims. Noting the specifics of administrative proceedings, the author states that such a problem of preparing an administrative case for trial as reconciliation of the parties can be singled out with a certain degree of conditionality, since the court promotes the reconciliation of the parties if reconciliation is possible in this category of administrative cases. On the contrary, in civil and arbitration proceedings the central place in the modern model of preparatory procedures in the court of first instance should be occupied by two interrelated goals: the first is aimed at maximizing the possibilities of reconciliation of the parties, the second is aimed at the qualitative preparation of the case for consideration in court, in connection with which the importance of the stage of preparing the case for trial is growing, since in the event of conciliation or refusal of the claim, the goal of the proceedings can be achieved without trial. In her study of the problems of scientific understanding of the purposes and aims of both preparatory procedures and entire civil proceedings, the author comes to the conclusion that the effectiveness of judicial protection is directly dependent on the implementation of the targets based on constitutional provisions of civil, arbitration and administrative proceedings. Exploring foreign experience, the author points out that along with effective dispute resolution, a social function becomes an important component of the purpose of civil legal proceedings, without which domestic justice cannot do. In many ways, this should contribute to legislative consolidation of conciliation among the aims of civil, arbitration and administrative proceedings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document