scholarly journals Comparison of Superparamagnetic and Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Cell Labeling for Tracking Green Fluorescent Protein Gene Marker with Negative and Positive Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 7290.2009.00008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhuoli Zhang ◽  
Rohan Dharmakumar ◽  
Nicole Mascheri ◽  
Zhaoyang Fan ◽  
Shengyong Wu ◽  
...  

The objectives of this study were to investigate the feasibility of imaging green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing cells labeled with iron oxide nanoparticles with the fast low-angle positive contrast steady-state free precession (FLAPS) method and to compare them with the traditional negative contrast technique. The GFP-R3230Ac cell line (GFP cell) was incubated for 24 hours using 20 μg Fe/mL concentration of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) and ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) nanoparticles. Cell samples were prepared for iron content analysis and cell function evaluation. The labeled cells were imaged using positive contrast with FLAPS imaging, and FLAPS images were compared with negative contrast T2*-weighted images. The results demonstrated that SPIO and USPIO labeling of GFP cells had no effect on cell function or GFP expression. Labeled cells were successfully imaged with both positive and negative contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The labeled cells were observed as a narrow band of signal enhancement surrounding signal voids in FLAPS images and were visible as signal voids in T2*-weighted images. Positive contrast and negative contrast imaging were both valuable for visualizing labeled GFP cells. MRI of labeled cells with GFP expression holds potential promise for monitoring the temporal and spatial migration of gene markers and cells, thereby enhancing the understanding of cell- and gene-based therapeutic strategies.

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenghong Lin ◽  
Shuhui Cai ◽  
Jianghua Feng

It is advantageous to achieve positive contrast images instead of negative contrast images in superparamagnetic iron-oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles-based MR imaging in order to distinguish the signal surrounding SPIO nanoparticles from the dark signal due to local field inhomogeneity and the artifacts due to tissue interface and background noise, eliminate the inherent defects in the traditional MRI such as partial-volume effects and large void volume for reliable visualization, and increase contrast-to-noise ratio. Many methods generating positive signal with SPIO nanoparticles have been developed in the last decade. This paper provides an overview of current visualization methods and states their advantages and disadvantages. In practice, these techniques have been widely applied to cell labeling and disease diagnosis and monitoring. However, there is still a need for an ideal method to achieve both accuracy and sensitivity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Weber-Adrian ◽  
Rikke Hahn Kofoed ◽  
Joseph Silburt ◽  
Zeinab Noroozian ◽  
Kairavi Shah ◽  
...  

AbstractNon-surgical gene delivery to the brain can be achieved following intravenous injection of viral vectors coupled with transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRIgFUS) to temporarily and locally permeabilize the blood–brain barrier. Vector and promoter selection can provide neuronal expression in the brain, while limiting biodistribution and expression in peripheral organs. To date, the biodistribution of adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) within peripheral organs had not been quantified following intravenous injection and MRIgFUS delivery to the brain. We evaluated the quantity of viral DNA from the serotypes AAV9, AAV6, and a mosaic AAV1&2, expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the neuron-specific synapsin promoter (syn). AAVs were administered intravenously during MRIgFUS targeting to the striatum and hippocampus in mice. The syn promoter led to undetectable levels of GFP expression in peripheral organs. In the liver, the biodistribution of AAV9 and AAV1&2 was 12.9- and 4.4-fold higher, respectively, compared to AAV6. The percentage of GFP-positive neurons in the FUS-targeted areas of the brain was comparable for AAV6-syn-GFP and AAV1&2-syn-GFP. In summary, MRIgFUS-mediated gene delivery with AAV6-syn-GFP had lower off-target biodistribution in the liver compared to AAV9 and AAV1&2, while providing neuronal GFP expression in the striatum and hippocampus.


2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-329
Author(s):  
Atsushi Hirao ◽  
Tatsuo Kawarasaki ◽  
Kenjiro Konno ◽  
Satoko Enya ◽  
Masatoshi Shibata ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Tomita ◽  
Shoshiro Hirayama ◽  
Yasuyuki Sakurai ◽  
Yuki Ohte ◽  
Hidehito Yoshihara ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The proteasome is the proteolytic machinery at the center of regulated intracellular protein degradation and participates in various cellular processes. Maintaining the quality of the proteasome is therefore important for proper cell function. It is unclear, however, how proteasomes change over time and how aged proteasomes are disposed. Here, we show that the proteasome undergoes specific biochemical alterations as it ages. We generated Rpn11-Flag/enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) tag-exchangeable knock-in mice and established a method for selective purification of old proteasomes in terms of their molecular age at the time after synthesis. The half-life of proteasomes in mouse embryonic fibroblasts isolated from these knock-in mice was about 16 h. Using this tool, we found increased association of Txnl1, Usp14, and actin with the proteasome and specific phosphorylation of Rpn3 at Ser 6 in 3-day-old proteasomes. We also identified CSNK2A2 encoding the catalytic α′ subunit of casein kinase II (CK2α′) as a responsible gene that regulates the phosphorylation and turnover of old proteasomes. These findings will provide a basis for understanding the mechanism of molecular aging of the proteasome.


2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1209-1216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard J Dardzinski ◽  
Vincent J Schmithorst ◽  
Scott K Holland ◽  
Gregory P Boivin ◽  
Tomoyuki Imagawa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document