Conclusion

Author(s):  
Gary Goertz ◽  
James Mahoney

This book concludes by reemphasizing important differences in the nature of qualitative and quantitative research—differences that extend across research design, data analysis, and causal inference. While their differences are considerable, the book argues that both research cultures can complement one another in terms of explaining the social and political world. However, a fruitful collaboration between quantitative and qualitative research—one built around mutual respect and appreciation—is possible only if scholars of both traditions understand and acknowledge their differences. These differences, summarized in tables, come in the areas of individual cases, causality and causal models, populations and data, concepts and measurement, and asymmetry. The book also contends that mixing the qualitative and quantitative cultures will contribute to methodological pluralism in the social sciences.

Author(s):  
Glyn Winter

The issues surrounding the use and nature of the term 'validity' in qualitative research are controversial and many. In this paper, the author attempts to establish that 'validity' is not a single, fixed or universal concept, but rather a contingent construct, inescapably grounded in the processes and intentions of particular research methodologies and projects. The first section of this work deals with the problems faced in defining 'validity' in both quantitative and qualitative research methods and will briefly review other authors' attempts to categorise it. The work will then proceed to distinguish and compare the claims to 'validity' made by quantitative and qualitative researchers, highlighting similarities and differences as they emerge. Finally, an attempt will be made to establish that an understanding of nature of 'truth' is central to any theorisation of 'validity.' It will become clear that it is the affiliations of methodologies, concerning truth, that generate varying notions of 'validity.'


Author(s):  
Gary Goertz ◽  
James Mahoney

This chapter considers some key ideas from logic and set theory as they relate to qualitative research in the social sciences, including ideas concerning necessary and sufficient conditions. It also highlights a major contrast between qualitative and quantitative research: whereas quantitative research draws on mathematical tools associated with statistics and probability theory, qualitative research is often based on set theory and logic. The chapter first compares the natural language of logic in the qualitative culture with the language of probability and statistics in the quantitative culture. It then considers the necessary conditions and sufficient conditions as basis for qualitative methods, focusing on set theory and Venn diagrams, two-by-two tables, and truth tables. It also discusses the use of qualitative and quantitative aggregation techniques and concludes by explaining the criteria for assessing the “fit” of the model or the “importance” of a given causal factor.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-183
Author(s):  
Alfin Zalicha Hilmi ◽  
Toyyibah Toyyibah ◽  
Nur Afifi

This study aimed at: 1) investigating the move and steps found in quantitative and qualitative research articles discussion; 2) investigating the rhetoric structure patterns of quantitative and qualitative research article discussion. This study is a qualitative-research focusing on genre analysis on qualitative and quantitative RA discussions. There were 20 qualitative and 20 quantitative research article discussions of EFL and applied linguistics journals were investigated in this research. Using Yang & Allison’s (2003) framework to analyze the data, it is found that all moves in the framework were employed in RA discussion of both qualitative and quantitative research. However, the number of occurrences of each move were different between discussion section of these two different approaches. Furthermore, the patterns of both qualitative and quantitative RA discussion was not significantly different. There were two types of patterns in RA discussion both in qualitative and quantitative, repetitive pattern and organized pattern. although there were some variations in each of those patterns. The present study provides more evidence of generic structure of RA discussion section as well as proposes some useful insights related to move analysis on research article discussion in ELT and Linguistics area. Limitations and recommendations are discussed in this study.


Author(s):  
Gary Goertz ◽  
James Mahoney

This book investigates the relationship between the quantitative and qualitative research traditions in the social sciences, with a particular focus on political science and sociology. It argues that the two traditions are alternative cultures with distinctive research procedures and practices, each having its own values, beliefs, and norms. The book considers the ways in which the traditions differ in terms of methodology, such as type of research question, mode of data analysis, and method of inference. It suggests that the two traditions draw on alternative mathematical foundations: quantitative research is grounded in inferential statistics (that is, probability and statistical theory), whereas qualitative research is (often implicitly) rooted in logic and set theory. This chapter discusses the book's approach to characterizing and comparing the two cultures of social science research and explains what is distinctive about qualitative research.


2021 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-260
Author(s):  
Barbara L. Voss

This article is the first of a two-part series to analyze current research on harassment in archaeology. Harassment has shaped the discipline of archaeology since at least the late 1800s. Since the 1970s, harassment has been recognized as a significant factor impacting gender equity in archaeology. Recent qualitative and quantitative research has verified that harassment occurs at epidemic rates in archaeology. Archaeologists are primarily harassed by other archaeologists, and harassment occurs not only in field research settings but also in classrooms, laboratories, museums, office workplaces, and conferences. Although women in archaeology experience a higher frequency of harassment, both men and women report harassment at disturbingly high rates. Archaeologists of color, LGBTQIA+ archaeologists, nonbinary archaeologists, and archaeologists with disabilities are also disproportionately harassed. As reflected in the author's own career experiences, harassment creates a cognitive burden for survivors and reduces access to professional opportunities, directly impacting diversity within archaeology. Fortunately, there are evidence-based interventions and policies that can reduce harassment and support survivors. These are discussed in the second article, “Disrupting Cultures of Harassment in Archaeology.”


Author(s):  
Anthony Onwuegbuzie ◽  
Nancy Leech

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the development of research questions in mixed methods studies. First, we discuss the ways that the goal of the study, the research objective(s), and the research purpose shape the formation of research questions. Second, we compare and contrast quantitative research questions and qualitative research questions. Third, we describe how to write mixed methods research questions, which we define as questions that embed quantitative and qualitative research questions. Finally, we provide a framework for linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis techniques. A major goal of our framework is to illustrate that the development of research questions and data analysis procedures in mixed method studies should occur logically and sequentially.


Author(s):  
Gary Goertz ◽  
James Mahoney

This chapter examines David Hume's two definitions of cause in the context of quantitative and qualitative research. The two definitions can be found in Hume's quotation from Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding, and Concerning the Principles of Morals: “We may define a cause to be an object followed by another, and where all the objects, similar to the first, are followed by objects similar to the second [definition 1]. Or, in other words, where, if the first object had not been, the second never would have existed [definition 2].” Hume's phrase “in other words” makes it appear as if definition 1 and definition 2 are equivalent, when in fact they represent quite different approaches. The chapter considers how Hume's definition 2, which it calls the “counterfactual definition,” and definition 1, the “constant conjunction definition,” are related to understandings of causation in the qualitative and quantitative research traditions.


1982 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Kielhofner

This article, the first of two in a series, presents the argument that qualitative research constitutes a legitimate method of research that has special relevance to occupational therapy. The author proposes and discusses a definition of qualitative research. The qualitative research tradition is guided by a scientific paradigm that defines its view of the social world and sets the rationale for its methods. Qualitative and quantitative research are contrasted, and the methodological issues of the former are discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-146
Author(s):  
Maryam Eskafi Noghani ◽  
◽  
Farideh Gorgidge ◽  
Ali Hojjati Shargh ◽  
◽  
...  

Background: Divorce has always been one of the five main issues in the country and one of the criteria for community health. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review quantitative and qualitative research on the factors affecting divorce. Methods: The research community included all the quantitative and qualitative articles published from 2006 to 2016, which regarded the causes of divorce. A total number of 70 quantitative and qualitative studies were selected and reviewed individually. Results: The findings showed that the highest share of the individual and personality trait factors is the variable of addiction (14.28% in quantitative research and 32.3% in qualitative research), followed by verbal and physical violence (28.84% in quantitative research and 21.42% in the qualitative section). The most frequent economic variables in both research categories were economic problems (10.71%) and unemployment (14.7%). Among the social factors, the interference of families and people around them had the highest share and contributed to 17.85% and 21.42% of the quantitative and qualitative research, respectively. Besides, among the cultural factors studied, idealism and the positive imagery of the consequences of divorce with the frequency of 14.7% in quantitative and quantitative research, and the negative effects of media with the frequency of 10.71% in qualitative research had the highest percentages, compared with other variables. Conclusion: Based on the findings, we conducted an analysis using the Boudon model to determine the final pattern of divorce, however, it was impossible to design a comprehensive model.


ACCRUALS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-31
Author(s):  
Weni Apriliyani ◽  
Novita Novita

Preparation of this study aimed to evaluate whether CSR program PT Holcim Indonesia Tbk has met the criteria of GRI-Standard and determine whether CSR program PT Holcim Indonesia Tbk is able to support perncapaian SDG's targets in 2030. This study is a qualitative and quantitative research. Research data collection techniques by interviewing the management of PT Holcim Indonesia Tbk namely Community Relations division and the local government. The second data collection techniques is by distributing questionnaires to people who get Holcim CSR program. The results of data analysis in this research produces information that only PT Holcim Indonesia CSR program Tbk economics that has influence on the target perncapaian SDG's. While the social and environmental fields have not been proven to have an effect on the achievement of the target SDG's. The results of the data analysis was due largely Holcim CSR program is only focused on the achievement of the economy and the realization of all the indicators for the achievement of SDG's may have been performed by the company as a whole, but does’t plan implemented CSR programs on community sustainability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document