scholarly journals PENGARUH PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR

Author(s):  
Elvi Syukri ◽  
Ilmiyati Rahmy Jasril

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the application of the Cooperative Learning model of the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) type to the learning outcomes of Basic Electricity and Electronics in class X TAV students at SMKN 1 Kinali. This type of research is a quasi experiment with a randomized control group only design. The sampling technique uses Simple Random Sampling. The research sample XTAV1 (control class) is applied to the conventional learning model and XTAV2 (experimental class) is applied to the TAI learning model. The research data are the posttest value of the experimental and control class. Then the normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis test were analyzed. Based on the research data, the mean value of the control class was 76,30 and the experiment was 84,10. Hypothesis test results at a significant level α = 0,05 obtained tcount 3,14 and ttable 1,69 (tcount>ttable) can be identified Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. The test results provide an interpretation of the significant influence of learning outcomes by applying the TAI learning model in the subjects of Basic Electricity and Electronics class X TAV in SMK N 1 Kinali. Keywords:TAI Learning Model, quasi experiment, Learning Outcomes

Author(s):  
Firmansyah Nur Utomo ◽  
Agus Efendi ◽  
Endar Supri Wihidayat

<p>This study aims to find out (1) whether there are differences in learning outcomes in the application of learning models Problem Based Learning in Group Investigation with conventional learning models; (2) Are there differences in student learning activeness in the application of learning models Problem Based Learning in Group Investigation with conventional learning models (3) Is the application of learning models Problem Based Learning in Integrated Group Investigation more effective than conventional learning. This study used the quasi-experimental design method with a pretest-posttest control group design model. The population in this study were students of X Axioo class and X RPL B of SMK Negeri 5 Surakarta. The sample used was 70 people. The sampling technique used is total sampling. Data collection techniques using pretest-posttest and observation sheet. The data analysis technique used is balanced test, normality test, homogeneity test, and hypothesis test. The results of the study are as follows. First, there are differences in learning outcomes between learning models of Problem Based Learning in conventional Group Investigation and Learning. Second, there are differences in learning activeness between learning models of Problem Based Learning in conventional Group Investigation and Learning. Third, the effectiveness of the learning model of Problem Based Learning in Group Investigation is higher than conventional Learning in improving learning outcomes.</p><strong>Keywords: </strong>Problem Based Learning, Group Investigation, Conventional Learning, Learning Outcomes, Activity


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 780
Author(s):  
Ayu Ari Rahmayanti ◽  
I Gusti Ayu Tri Agustiana ◽  
Alexander Hamonangan Simamora

The research was conducted with the aim: (1) identify the effect of creativity learning model toward natural science subject’s learning outcomes and self-efficacy, (2) identify the effect of creativity learning model toward natural science subject’s learning outcomes, and (3) identify the effect of creativity learning model toward self-efficacy. This research was quasi-experimental research designed of Non-Equivalent Posttest Only Control Group. All fifth-grade classes of cluster I Buleleng district were the research population in total of 209 fifth-grade students from 8 schools. The research sample was determined through simple random sampling technique, obtained 2 schools in total of 59 students that was contained 29 students of SDN 1 Banyuning as the experiment class and 30 students of SDN 8 Banyuning as the control class. Essay test was used the research instrument to gather learning outcomes data, while questionnaire was used to measure self-efficacy. The data analysis was done descriptively to identify mean and standard deviation further tested through MANOVA test. The research findings portrayed: (1) simultaneously, creativity learning model effects in enhancing natural science subject’s learning outcomes and self-efficacy; (2) creativity learning model is able to improve natural science subject’s learning outcomes; and (3) creativity learning model is able to improve self-efficacy. Conclusively, creativity learning model presents has an influence on the aspects studies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-342
Author(s):  
Yunti fahrulia Subekti

The purpose of the study was to determine the differences in mathematics learning outcomes and the effectiveness of google classroom-assisted learning in terms of learning styles on students' mathematics learning outcomes. This research used an experimental research method with a randomized pretest-posttest control group design. Sampling using a simple random sampling technique. The population of this research is the seventhgrade students of one of the public junior high schools in Sleman. The sample of this study amounted to 54 students consisting of class VII C and VII D. The data collection techniques used in this study were tests and questionnaires. The data analysis techniques used in this study were normality test, homogeneity test, similarity test, and hypothesis testing. The results of the study show that: (1) there are differences in learning outcomes in bold learning assisted by google classroom; (2) bold learning assisted by google classroom is more effective in terms of visual learning styles; (3) bold learning assisted by google classroom is not more effective in terms of auditory and kinesthetic learning styles.


Author(s):  
Putri Irma Delianti ◽  
Elfi Tasrif ◽  
Ika Parma Dewi

This research aimed to analyze the difference of learning outcomes by using Student Facilitator and Explaining model and direct learning model on Digital Simulation subject at class X TKJ SMKN 1 Tilatang Kamang. The problem in this study was the student learning result which were still under KKM on Digital Simulation subjects at SMKN 1 Tilatang Kamang. Type of this research was Quasi Experiment. The sample was taken through Probability Sampling technique. The research samples were class X TKJ A  and class X TKJ B. Class X TKJ A as sample for experiment class using Student Facilitator and Explaining  model and class X TKJ B as sample for control class using direct learning model. Data analyzed based on post-test experiment class and control class, then analyzed for normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class, the research results obtained an average of 82.47, while the control class was averaged of 76.94. Result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 found tcount> ttable that is 1,78> 1,699, because tcount was bigger than ttable, so null hypothesis (H0) was rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. It can be concluded at the real level that this study showed that Student Facilitator and Explainingmodel gave significant effect on students learning results of Digital Simulation at class X TKJ in SMKN 1 Tilatang Kamang. Therefore, the Student Facilitator and Explaining model is better than the direct learning model.Keywords: Student Facilitator and Explaining Model,Direct Learning Model, Learning outcomes, Experiment Class, Control Class.


Author(s):  
Hayatun Nufus ◽  
Rezi Ariawan ◽  
Erdawati Nurdin ◽  
Hasanuddin Hasanuddin

This study examines the problem of improving mathematics learning outcomes among students with cooperative learning model NHT type and conventional learning approaches is reviewed as a whole and for each level of mathematical ability (high, medium, and low). This research is a quasi-experimental research design Nonequivalent Control Group Design uses Simple Random Sampling technique. The population in this study were students of class VII in a private junior high school in the city of Pekanbaru in Riau in the academic year 2014/2015. While the sample is graders VII2 as control class and class VII2 as an experimental class. The instrument used in this study is the mathematics achievement test. Quantitative analysis was performed using two mean difference test. The results showed that: (1) there is significant implementation of cooperative learning model NHT on the results of students' mathematics learning is reviewed as a whole and the level of ability was; (2) there is no effect of the application of cooperative learning model NHT towards mathematics learning outcomes of students based on high and low-level capabilities.


Author(s):  
Hayatun Nufus ◽  
Rezi Ariawan ◽  
Erdawati Nurdin ◽  
Hasanuddin Hasanuddin

This study examines the problem of improving mathematics learning outcomes among students with cooperative learning model NHT type and conventional learning approaches is reviewed as a whole and for each level of mathematical ability (high, medium, and low). This research is a quasi-experimental research design Nonequivalent Control Group Design uses Simple Random Sampling technique. The population in this study were students of class VII in a private junior high school in the city of Pekanbaru in Riau in the academic year 2014/2015. While the sample is graders VII2 as control class and class VII2 as an experimental class. The instrument used in this study is the mathematics achievement test. Quantitative analysis was performed using two mean difference test. The results showed that: (1) there is significant implementation of cooperative learning model NHT on the results of students' mathematics learning is reviewed as a whole and the level of ability was; (2) there is no effect of the application of cooperative learning model NHT towards mathematics learning outcomes of students based on high and low-level capabilities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-38
Author(s):  
Sarjon Lakoro ◽  
Sunarty Eraku ◽  
Daud Yusuf

The Effect of Crossword Puzzle Game Media on Students’ Learning Outcomes in Geography Learning (A Case Study at Grade X IPS at Senior High School of  SMAN 1 Marisa). This experimental study is about learning outcomes which aimed to determine significant differences in students' learning outcomes using crossword media and Powerpoint media. This employed a quantitative approach where the design forms use a posttest-only control group design. In this method, we will see how the cause and effect relationships of using treatments use crosswords and PowerPoint media. In collecting data, learning test results are used in the study sample. The sample is two classes of X IPS as an experimental class with a control class, namely class X IPS 1 consisting of 32 students as an experimental class and class X IPS 3 consisting of 31 students as a control class. To take samples, the researcher used a Clauster random sampling technique or random sampling group. Based on the results of data analysis, it was found that there was a significant difference on the learning outcomes of students who were taught using media crosswords with learning outcomes of students who were taught using powerpoint media. This is indicated by the results of the t-test. Furthermore, the value of t is t count = 4,57 and t table = 1,99. The sample is stated to be significantly different if t count t table. Hypothesis test results show that t count t table is 4,57 1,99. Therefore, it can be concluded that from the t-test results H0 is rejected and HI is accepted. In other words, it has a significant difference


2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Kusumadyahdewi Kusumadyahdewi

<p>Purpose of this research is to understand the differences of learning outcomes using Cooperative learning model type TAl (Team Assisted Individualization) and STAD (Student Team Achievement Division) on the subject Accounting, Social Sciences Education Department of Tarbiyah and Teaching Sciences of Maulana Malik lbrahim State Islamic University of Malang. This research using Experimental research design Quasi Experiment, and the model using Pre-Test and Post-Test Control Group Design. Population of this research is all students of first semester Year 2013/2014, and the sample are class A as the experiment group who using TAI model and class B as the control group who study using STAD model. There are two instruments in this research, such as treatment instrument and measurement instrument. Researcher used hypothesis test to know the differences of learning outcomes, t-test in which previously conducted the prerequisite test analysis which consist of normality test, homogeneity test, and the equality test of average initial ability of student. Result of this research shows the difference of average mark in cognitive aspects in these classes is not significant but the average mark TAI class higher than STAD class, but there is a significant difference in psychomotor aspects in these classes. It can be showing the average mark of TAI also higher than STAD.</p><p>Keywords: Learning Outcomes, Cooperative Learning Model type TAI, STAD</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 00122
Author(s):  
Kade kAyu Astiti

This study aims to determine the effect of group investigation (GI) learning model with brainstorming technique on student physics learning outcomes (PLO) compared to jigsaw learning model with brainstroming technique. The learning outcome in this research are the results of learning in the cognitive domain. The method used in this research is experiment with Randomised Postest Only Control Group Design. Population in this research is all students of class XI IPA SMA Negeri 9 Kupang year lesson 2015/2016. The selected sample are 40 students of class XI IPA 1 as the experimental class and 38 students of class XI IPA 2 as the control class using simple random sampling technique. The instrument used is 13 items description test. The first hypothesis was tested by using two tailed t-test. From that, it is obtained that H0 rejected which means there are differences of students physics learning outcome. The second hypothesis was tested using one tailed t-test. It is obtained that H0 rejected which means the students PLO in experiment class were higher than control class. Based on the results of this study, researchers recommend the use of GI learning models with brainstorming techniques to improve PLO, especially in the cognitive domain.


Biosfer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-29
Author(s):  
Eva Novika Sari ◽  
Reduk Nilawarni ◽  
Erna Heryanti

Learning activities determines the achievement of learning aims and objectives. One of the objectives can be reflected in higher students’ learning result. The improvement may occur using Two Stay Two Stray Technique of Cooperative Learning Model since students are encouraged to learn together and help each other in groups. The research aimed to determine the effect of Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) technique of Cooperative Learning Model on Students’ Biology Learning Outcomes on the ecosystem topic. This research was carried out at SMAN 2 Tangerang on May to June 2012 using a quasi-experimental method. Two science classes at grade 10 were selected by purposive sampling technique, class X-7 as the experimental group and class X-8 as the control group. An overall of 36 students of each class was selected by simple random sampling. Data obtained by using instruments of multiple choice question test and affective Attitude Scale. The result of Normality testing of Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and homogeneity testing of F-test showed a normal distribution and homogenous data. The average Biology study result of experimental group was 79.1 while of control group was 74.3. Based on the result, it can be concluded that Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) technique of Cooperative Learning Model affected Students’ Biology Learning Outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document