scholarly journals EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF DAN MINAT BELAJAR TERHADAP KEWIRAUSAHAAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 159
Author(s):  
Juniati . ◽  
Sahat Siagian ◽  
R Mursid
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Calculation Result ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Student Interest ◽  
Factorial Anova ◽  
Learning Group ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Learning Interest

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk  mengetahui (1) hasil belajar kewirausahaan yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih tinggi dibandingkan hasil belajar kewirausahaan yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD, (2) secara keseluruhan, siswa yang memilki minat belajar tinggi lebih tinggi hasil belajar kewirausahaan, dibandingkan dengan siswa yang memiliki minat belajar, (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan minat belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar kewirausahaan. Metode penelitian  yang digunakan adalah quasi eksperimen dengan faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis varian dua jalur dengan taraf signifikansi α = 0,05 dengan Uji F, pengujian lanjut menggunakan Uji Scheffe. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan (1) Hasil belajar kewirausahaan siswa SMK Negeri 8 Medan yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD,pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05 dengan Fh sebesar 6,49 dan Ftabel = 4,00, jadi Fhitung >  Ftabel   =  6,49 >4,00. Hipotesis telah teruji kebenarannya  Ha diterima dan Ho ditolak, (2) hasil perhitungan tentang perbedaan hasil belajar kewirausahaan antara kelompok  siswa yang  memiliki minat belaja rtinggi dan rendah pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05 dengan Fh sebesar 28,15 dan Ftabel = 4,00jadi Fhitung>  Ftabel   =  28,15 >4,00, maka hipotesis telah teruji kebenarannya  Ha diterima dan Ho ditolak, (3) besarnya rata-rata hasil belajar kewirausahaan siswa untuk setiap kelompok pembelajaran A1B1 = 91,94dan A1B2 = 78,59 sedangkan A2B1 = 83,06 dan A2B2  = 79,65. Hasil perhitungan Anava factorial 2x2 diperoleh hasil perhitungan Fh = 8,52 dan harga tabel Ft = 4,00 adalah Ft(0,05)(1,64) = 4,00, sehingga dapat dinyatakan Fh (8,52) > Ft (4,00), Kata Kunci: Pengaruh Model, Minat Belajar, Hasil Belajar Kewirausahaan                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Abstract: This research means to know: (1) The learning result of enterprise of student that thought by JIGSAW type cooperative learning model higher than the result of the enterprise which thought by cooperative learning model STAD type.(2) By all the students who have to learn high interest higher than the result of enterprise study compare with the student who has low-interest learning.(3) There is the interaction between the learning model and the learning interest of students to study enterprise from the student. The technic of taking a sample is used sample Cluster Random Sampling based on student interest so that this research sample in learning group and each group consist of 33 students for the experiment, and 35 students for the control group. The research method which used is experiment quasi with factorial 2x2 analysis technic which used is variant analysis two ways significant level a =0.05 by testing F, the test continues to use scheffe test. The research result mention = (1) learning result of students enterprise that thought with cooperative learning model JIGSAW type higher than cooperative learning model STAD type, at significant level a= 0.05 with Fh as big as 6.49 and = 4 Ftable  00 so Fcount >Ftable=6.49 > 4.00 Hypothesis has tasted its correctness Ha is given and he is refused (2) the calculation result about the difference of learning result enterprise between the group of students who have high study interest and low at a significant level a =0.05 with Fa as big as 28.15 and F table= 4.00  so F count > Ftable =28.15 >4.00 so hypothesis has tested its correctness. Ha is given and Ho is refused,(3) its big average the result of students enterprise learning for each learning group XA1.B1 = 91.94 and  XA1 B2   =78.59 whereas XA2B1 =83.06 and XA2B2 =79.65 the calculation result factorial ANOVA 2x2 is received the result of calculation Fh=8.52 and table prise F1=4.00 is Ft (0.05) (1.64)=4.00 Keywords: Effect of Model, Interest Of Student, Result of Enterprise

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF GROUP INVESTIGATION TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS DITINJAU DARI BAKAT NUMERIK BAGI SISWA KELAS XI SMA

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
NI NYOMAN SRI ARTINI . ◽  
PROF.DR. I MADE CANDIASA, MI.Komp. . ◽  
DR. I MADE KIRNA, M.Si. .
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Direct Learning ◽  
The Difference

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis (1) perbedaan keterampilan berpikir kritis antara siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran kooperatif Group Investigation dengan siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran langsung, (2) pengaruh interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan bakat numerik siswa terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa, (3) perbedaan keterampilan berpikir kritis antara siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran kooperatif Group Investigation dengan siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran langsung, pada siswa yang memiliki bakat numerik tinggi, (4) perbedaan keterampilan berpikir kritis antara siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran kooperatif Group Investigation dengan siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran langsung, pada siswa yang memiliki bakat numerik rendah. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu dengan rancangan yang digunakan adalah two way pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. Populasi penelitian adalah siswa kelas XI IA SMAN 2 Semarapura tahun pelajaran 2013/2014 sebanyak 171 orang. Sampel 76 orang siswa yang dipilih dengan teknik simple random sampling dengan uji kesetaraan kelas. Data dalam penelitian ini berupa keterampilan berpikir kritis dan bakat numerik siswa yang dikumpulkan dengan tes keterampilan berpikir kritis dan bakat numerik. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan uji ANAVA dua jalur dan dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe untuk menguji komparasi pasangan nilai rata-rata tiap kelompok perlakuan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan (1) terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara keterampilan berpikir kritis kelompok siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif Group Investigation dan model pembelajaran langsung (Fh=14,153;pF’(0,05)=4,41).Kata Kunci : Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Group Investigation, Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis, Bakat Numerik. This research aimed to analyze (1) the difference of critical thinking ability among the students who joined Group Investigation cooperative learning model with the students who take the direct learning model, (2) interaction effect between learning model and students’ numerical talent towards students’ critical thinking ability, (3) the difference of critical thinking ability among the students who joined Group Investigation cooperative learning model with the students who take the direct learning model, on high numerical talent students, (4) the difference of critical thinking ability among the students who joined Group Investigation cooperative learning model with the students who take the direct learning model, on low numerical talent students. The research type was a quasi experimental research with two ways pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The research population was grade XI A1 students of SMAN 2 Semarapura Academic Year 2013/2014, with the amount 171 students. The sample was 76 students chosen by simple random sampling technique and class equality test. The data research was critical thinking ability and students’ numerical talent collected by critical thinking ability test and numerical talent. The hypothesis testing used ANOVA two paths followed by Scheffe test to test the comparative value pairs on average each treatment group. The research result showed (1) there was a significant difference between critical thinking ability of the students using Group Investigation cooperative learning model and direct learning model (Fh=14,153;p˂0,05). The students learnt using Group Investigation cooperative learning model showed better critical thinking ability and numerical talent. (2) There was an interaction effect between learning model and numerical talent towards critical thinking ability (Fh=4,502;p˂0,05). (3) There was a significant difference between critical thinking ability students’ levels that using Group Investigation cooperative learning model and direct learning model on high numerical talent students (Fh=16,68˃F’(0,05)=4,41). (4) There was a significant difference between critical thinking ability of the students using Group Investigation cooperative learning model and direct learning model for low numerical talent students (Fh=1,29˃F’(0,05)=4,41). keyword : Group Investigation Cooperative Learning Model, Critical Thinking Ability, Numerical Talent.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Kecerdasan Sosial Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sejarah

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Agi Hagiaman
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Social Intelligence ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Group Model ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Learning Group ◽  
History Learning ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

The purpose of this research is to know the difference of learning result of history between students studying with cooperative learning model of group investigation type with conventional learning model, the influence of interaction between learning model with social intelligence to historical learning result, difference of historical learning result between students who have social intelligence High learning group model investigation with students who have high social intelligence learning with conventional learning model, differences in historical learning outcomes between students who have low social intelligence who learn with group investigation model with students who have low social intelligence learning by model of learning Conventional. The research method used experimental method with factorial design 2x2 by level. The population of this research is students of SMA Negeri 1 Jatisari class XI (eleven) IPS. The sample of research is two classes taken randomly by technique (cluster random sampling). The research instrument uses questionnaires and test results of learning. The result of the research shows that there is influence and difference of the result of history learning between the students who have high social intelligence and low social intelligence that study with cooperative learning model of group investigation type and conventional learning model.

scholarly journals Application of Discovery Learning Model in Increasing Student Interest and Learning Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 542-548
Author(s):  
Rosnidar Rosnidar ◽  
Yusrizal Yusrizal ◽  
Mustafa Mustafa ◽  
Susanna Susanna
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Student Interest ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Learning Interest ◽  
And Control

This research aims to find out the application of discovery learning models in increasing students' interest and learning outcomes in harmonic vibrational materials in MAN 4 Aceh Besar. The method in this study is quasi-experimentation with the design of a pretest-posttest control group. The instruments used are questionnaires and problems. The results showed that the average N-gain of student learning interest in the experimental class was 0.79 high category and control class 0.28 low category. The results of each experimental class indicator included a very positive category while the category control class was positive. Based on the results of the analysis of both classes, it can be concluded that the average interest in student learning in the experimental class is more increased than in the control class, especially on indicators of student engagement. The average N-gain result of student learning outcomes in the experimental class obtained a score of 0.61 moderate categories, then in the control class obtained a score of 0.35 medium category. Based on the test results, the average of the two classes obtained significance scores of 0.000 < 0.05, meaning that there was a difference in the average learning outcome of students in experimental classes and control classes. This proves that the discovery learning model's application can improve students' learning outcomes higher than the discovery learning model in the control class. This study concludes that the application of discovery learning models can increase students' interest and learning outcomes in harmonic vibrational materials in MAN 4 Aceh Besar

Effects of cooperative learning on preservice elementary teachers’ interest in and integration of music into core academic subjects

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 608-621
Author(s):  
John Okley Egger
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Methods Course ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Student Interest ◽  
Music Integration ◽  
Final Project ◽  
Learning Group ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Integration Project

The author investigated the effects of a cooperative learning environment on the implementation of integrating music into core academic subjects. Using a quasi-experimental design, participants ( N = 59) were preservice generalist elementary and special education majors from four course sections of a required music methods course, where two course sections worked in a cooperative learning environment and two course sections worked individually. For six weeks, participants worked on a final project that integrated music into academic core subject lessons. At the conclusion of six weeks, each participant individually microtaught one lesson created from the music integration project. Additionally, participants completed an interest survey after the study was concluded. Results showed that participants in the cooperative learning group scored statistically significantly higher ( p < .05) on the music integration project, microteaching evaluations, and rated statistically significantly higher interest on their projects from the student interest survey. These results suggest that participants in the cooperative learning group produced work of a higher quality than participants in the control group and that the cooperative learning group also showed a higher level of interest in their own music integration projects.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PRESTASI BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI 1 KUPANG

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Lidwina Felisima Tae ◽  
Fakhruddin Fakhruddin ◽  
Imelda Paulina Soko ◽  
Bagus Hary Prakoso
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Pattern Learning ◽  
Simple Pattern ◽  
Post Test ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group Member ◽  
Share Information

Two Stay Two Stray  is a cooperative learning model which is majoring the cooperation of each member of group to finish the task given and give chance to its member to share information each other with another group member by following a certain pattern. The purpose of this research is  to investigate the difference of learning achievement between students who have been taught using cooperative learning model of Two Stay Two Stray  type with three intersection  pattern and students who have been taught using cooperative learning model of Two Stay Two Stray  type with the simple pattern. The participants of this research are two groups of 10th grader, the A class as the experiment group and the B class as the control group respectively.  The instruments used in this research is Two Stay Two Stray with three intersection pattern and simple pattern learning which is manifested in the syllabus, Teaching Implementation Plan (RPP), and the questions for pre test and post test. The results of the data analysis were: 1) There was a difference in achievement between students who have been taught using cooperative learning of Two Stay Two Stray  type with three intersection pattern and students who have taught using a model of cooperative learning by Two Stay Two Stray  type with simple pattern, 2) the learning achievements of students who have taught using cooperative learning model of Two Stay Two Stray  type with three intersection pattern were higher than students who have taught using cooperative learning model of Two Stay Two Stray  type with simple pattern.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF KOOPERATIF LEARNING MODEL TYPE GROUP INVESTIGATION AND FIRST CONCEPT UNDERSTANDING TO SCIENCE PROCESS SKILL OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Hiba Dertyana Siregar ◽  
Motlan .
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Process Skills ◽  
Model Group ◽  
Science Process Skills ◽  
Concept Understanding ◽  
Learning Group ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Initial Concept

This study aims to: know the difference science process skills of students using cooperative learning model group investigation with direct instruction teaching model. This study is quasi exsperiment. The sample in this research was done by using cluster random sampling two classes. Instruments used in this research is understanding the concept of the initial test in the form of multiple-choice comprised of 10 questions and test science process skills in the form of 15 questions of multiple choice. From the results of this study concluded that: 1) there are differences in students' science process skills are taught using cooperative learning model group investigation, 2) there is a difference science process skills of students who have an understanding of the concept of high and low initial, 3) there is an interaction between the model of cooperative learning group investigation and understanding of the initial concept of the science process skills that students have a better learning model applied to students who have an understanding of the high initial concept.

scholarly journals Peningkatan Kompetensi Manajemen Asfiksia Bayi Baru Lahir Melalui Metode Cooperative-Learning

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 154
Author(s):  
Reni M. Kusuma ◽  
Anita D. Anwar ◽  
Dwi Prasetyo
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Method ◽  
Learning Group ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Teacher Centered

Background: The competence of asphyxia management on newborn baby is essential for midwife. The quality of learning process should be improved by applying interactive learning method. The cooperative learning method is often applied to enhance the effectiveness of clinical learning process. The purpose of this research was to analyze the influence of cooperative learning on competence which consists of student’s knowledge, attitude, and skill in comparison to teacher-centered learning method.Method: This is quasi-experimental research with control group pre-test and post-test design Samples were third semester students at Stikes A. Yani Yogyakarta. The samples were 80 students in cooperative learning group and 90 students in teacher-centered learning group.Result: The result showed that  there was an improvement of knowledge in cooperative learning group compared to teacher-centered learning group (p=0.002). The improvement od student’s attitude in cooperative learning group was significantly higher than teacher-centered learning group (p=0.001). In the field of skills, cooperative group, although not significant (p=0.671). The competence was significantly higher in cooperative learning group rather than in teacher-centered learning group (p=0.027). Correlation between competence and method of learning was weak (rpbi  = 0.134, p= 0.041).Conclusion: Cooperative learning method is proven to be improve student’s knowledge, attitude and skills. The difference is not significant for skills domain. Cooperative learning method is proven to improve student’s competence in carrying out the management of newborn babies asphyxia, even though the correlation is weak.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TAI DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEP BANGUN RUANG SISWA

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 338
Author(s):  
Lia Budi Tristanti
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Mathematical Concept ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Mathematical Concepts ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Randomized Control ◽  
The Difference

The objective of the research is to describe whether there is a difference of students' understanding of mathematical concepts using cooperative learning model of TAI type and Problem Based Learning (PBL) and show the cause of the difference. This study included experimental research with randomized control group design pretest posttest design. The result of the research shows that (1) the understanding of students 'mathematical concepts with cooperative learning model of TAI type is not significantly different from the understanding of students' mathematics concept with PBL learning model; (2) the understanding of students 'mathematical concept with cooperative learning model of TAI type is not significantly different from the students' with conventional learning model, (3) understanding of student math concept with PBL learning model is significantly different with understanding of student math concept with conventional learning model. So that there is effect of cooperative learning model of TAI type and problem based learning (PBL) to the students' math concept.

scholarly journals Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Fisika Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Numbered Heads Together (NHT) Berbantuan Kartu Soal dengan Model Pembelajaran Direct Instruction Di SMAN 7 Mataram Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Febri Susanti ◽  
Syahrial Ayub ◽  
Muhammad Taufik
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Direct Instruction ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Physics Learning ◽  
Group Design ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

This research is aimed to know the difference between physics learning result through numbered heads together type cooperative learning model helped by question card and physics learning result through direct instruction learning model at SMAN 7 Mataram on academic year of 2015/2016. This research was an experimental study with pretest posttest control group design. The population in this research was all the students of XI IPA SMAN 7 Mataram. Based on sampling process using cluster random sampling tehnique, XI IPA 7 was choosen as the experiment A class and XI IPA 6 was choosen as the experiment B class. The result of the test analized using t-test polled varians showed that tcount was 5,98 and ttable was 1,99 in the significant level of 5 % with the degree of freedom (df) of 61. Since tcount > ttable, Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted. It can be concluded that there were a difference between physics learning result through numbered heads together type cooperative learning model helped by question card and physics learning result through direct instruction learning model at SMAN 7 Mataram on academic year of 2015/2016

scholarly journals TALKING STICK : A LEARNING MODEL TO IMPROVE STUDENT'S MATHEMATICS LEARNING INTEREST AND ACHIEVEMENT IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-78
Author(s):  
Rika Wulandari
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Student Interest ◽  
Classroom Action Research ◽  
Learning Interest ◽  
Improve Student Learning

The purpose of this study was to determine how the steps of the talking stick type of cooperative learning model assisted with question cards that can improve student learning outcomes and interest. The research was conducted using this type of classroom action research. The stages of classroom action research carried out include: plan, act, observe, reflect. The research was conducted at SDN Kara I, Sampang to 9 Grade III students. The results of the study indicate that the steps of the talking stick type of cooperative learning model assisted with question cards that can improve learning outcomes and student interest are: the teacher organizes students into several groups, each group consisting of four students heterogeneously. The teacher explains the rules of the game, namely the game is done by running a stick while singing, if the teacher says "stop" then the last one holding the stick gets a question by taking a question card containing the question, but if the student cannot answer it can be helped by a group of friends. Likewise so on ". After finishing the teacher asks students to conclude the material that has been studied then divides the evaluation questions. The percentage of classical completeness of learning outcomes reached 77.77% with an average learning outcome also increased from 66.1 to 77.77. Likewise with students' interest in learning, on average the results of filling out the interest questionnaire were in the category of very fond of the cooperative learning model type talking stick assisted question card that was done.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document