scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF KOOPERATIF LEARNING MODEL TYPE GROUP INVESTIGATION AND FIRST CONCEPT UNDERSTANDING TO SCIENCE PROCESS SKILL OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Hiba Dertyana Siregar ◽  
Motlan .

This study aims to: know the difference science process skills of students using cooperative learning model group investigation with direct instruction teaching model. This study is quasi exsperiment. The sample in this research was done by using cluster random sampling two classes. Instruments used in this research is understanding the concept of the initial test in the form of multiple-choice comprised of 10 questions and test science process skills in the form of 15 questions of multiple choice. From the results of this study concluded that: 1) there are differences in students' science process skills are taught using cooperative learning model group investigation, 2) there is a difference science process skills of students who have an understanding of the concept of high and low initial, 3) there is an interaction between the model of cooperative learning group investigation and understanding of the initial concept of the science process skills that students have a better learning model applied to students who have an understanding of the high initial concept.

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Purnama Silitonga ◽  
Mara Bangun Harahap ◽  
Derlina .

This study aims: 1) to determine differences in science process skills of students with learning model inquiry training and conventional learning models, 2) to determine the difference science process skills of students who have high creativity and creativity is low, 3) to determine the interaction model of learning inquiry trainingwith creativity of the science process skills. The sampling technique conducted cluster random sampling two classes, where first class as a class experiment with the number of students 32 people applied learning model inquiry training (X-1) and the second class as a class control the number of students 32 people who applied conventional learning model ( X-2). Instruments in this study is the science process skills test and a test of creativity in the form of a description. From these results it can be concluded that: 1) science process skills of students that learned with a learning model inquiry training is better than the students that learned with conventional learning models, 2)science process skills of students with high creativity better than students with creativity is low, 3) there is interaction between inquirylearning model training and creativity in influencing the science process skills of students.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Mulia Sri Rahmawati

The purpose of this research is to describe  the implementation of syntax of the numbered heads together (NHT) type of cooperative learning model and the students science process skills when applying the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) type of cooperative learning model to the acid base material. This research uses One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design. The results of the research are shown as follows: (1) The implementation of the syntax of the NHT types of cooperative learning model obtained a percentage at three meetings in the first phase of 62.5%, 75.0%, 87.0%; the second phase of 75.0%, 87.0%, and 100%; the third phase of 75.0%, 75.0%, and 100%; the fourth phase of 62.5%, 87.0%, and 100%; the fifth phase of 75.0%, 87%, 100%; the sixth phase 50%, 100%, and 100%. (2) Science process skills of students to formulate problems get n-gain values of 0.31 in the medium category, compile hypotheses to get n-gains value off 0.49 in the medium category, collecting data get n-gain values of 1,00 with a high category, analyzing the data get a n-gain value of 0.99 with a high category, and make conclusions to get a n-gain value of 0.92 with a high category.Keywords: numbered head together (NHT), science process skills, acid base.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 94
Author(s):  
Nanda Avisya ◽  
Sarah Miriam ◽  
Suyidno Suyidno

Keterampilan proses sains peserta didik khususnya dalam hal memprediksi, menyimpulkan dan mengomunikasikan data hasil percobaan masih rendah. Oleh karena itu, diterapkan model pembelajaran kooperatif berbasis hands on activity untuk meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains peserta didik. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan peningkatan keterampilan proses sains peserta didik setelah diterapkan model pembelajaran kooperatif berbasis hands on activity. Adapun tujuan secara khusus, yaitu untuk mendeskripsikan: 1) keterlaksanaan rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran, 2) keterampilan proses sains dan, 3) hasil belajar siswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian tindakan kelas model Hopkins yang terdiri atas 3 siklus. Teknik pengumpulan data diperoleh melalui observasi dan tes. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: 1) keterlaksanaan RPP pada siklus I, II, dan III terlaksana dengan baik, 2) keterampilan proses sains pada siklus I dengan kriteria baik (mengobservasi), kriteria cukup (menyimpulkan dan mengomunikasikan) dan kriteria kurang baik (memprediksi) mengalami peningkatan pada siklus II dan III menjadi kriteria baik dan sangat baik, 3) hasil belajar siswa meningkat dari siklus I (18,75%) dan siklus II (56,25%) dengan kategori tidak tuntas menjadi (87,50%) dengan kategori tuntas pada siklus III. Diperoleh simpulan bahwa keterampilan proses sains siswa di kelas VIII-E SMPN 25 Banjarmasin meningkat setelah penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif berbasis hands on activity Science process skills of students, especially in terms of predicting, concluding and communicating experimental results data is still low. Therefore, a hands-on-based cooperative learning model is applied to improve students' science process skills. The purpose of this study is to describe the improvement of science process skills of students after applying a cooperative learning model based on hands on activity. The specific objectives, namely to describe: 1) the implementation of the learning implementation plan, 2) science process skills and, 3) student learning outcomes. This type of research is a Hopkins model action research consisting of 3 cycles. Data collection techniques obtained through observation and tests. The results showed: 1) the implementation of lesson plans in cycles I, II, and III were carried out well, 2) science process skills in cycle I with good criteria (observing), sufficient criteria (inferring and communicating) and unfavorable criteria (predicting ) experienced an increase in the second and third cycles into good and very good criteria, 3) student learning outcomes improved from cycle I (18.75%) and cycle II (56.25%) with the incomplete category being (87.50%) with complete category in cycle III. It was concluded that the science process skills of students in class VIII-E SMPN 25 Banjarmasin increased after the application of hands-on-based cooperative learning models.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Agi Hagiaman

The purpose of this research is to know the difference of learning result of history between students studying with cooperative learning model of group investigation type with conventional learning model, the influence of interaction between learning model with social intelligence to historical learning result, difference of historical learning result between students who have social intelligence High learning group model investigation with students who have high social intelligence learning with conventional learning model, differences in historical learning outcomes between students who have low social intelligence who learn with group investigation model with students who have low social intelligence learning by model of learning Conventional. The research method used experimental method with factorial design 2x2 by level. The population of this research is students of SMA Negeri 1 Jatisari class XI (eleven) IPS. The sample of research is two classes taken randomly by technique (cluster random sampling). The research instrument uses questionnaires and test results of learning. The result of the research shows that there is influence and difference of the result of history learning between the students who have high social intelligence and low social intelligence that study with cooperative learning model of group investigation type and conventional learning model.


Vidya Karya ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Binar Kurnia Prahani ◽  
Mohammad Nur ◽  
Leny Yuanita ◽  
Iqbal Limatahu

Abstract: Result of a preliminary study showed that in general the collaborative problem solving skills, science process skills, and confidence of students of SMA Negeri 19 Surabaya, SMAN 1 Tegaldlimo, MA Roudlotun Nasyin Mojokerto are still low. Therefore, researchers developed a model instructional group science learning to enhance collaborative problem solving skills, science process skills, and confidence. The purpose of this research is to get validity of Group Science Learning (GSL) developed to improve collaborative problem solving skills, science process skills, and confidence. Methods of data collection validation using Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Group science learning model developed needs to be validated by experts through Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Group science learning model assessed the validity of the learning model based on content validity and construct validity. Results of the validation by experts through focus group discussions indicate that group science learning model to improve the collaborative problem solving skills, science process skills, and confidence in this study are included in the category of very valid. This group science learning model can be implemented in learning to improve the collaborative problem solving skills, science process skills, and confidence. Keywords:  content validity, construct validity,  and group science learning model  Abstrak: Hasil studi awal menunjukkan bahwa secara umum keterampilan pemecahan masalah kolaboratif, keterampilan proses sains, dan kepercayaan diri siswa SMA Negeri 19 Surabaya, SMA Negeri 1 Tegaldlimo, MA Roudlotun Nasyin Mojokerto masih rendah. Oleh karena itu peneliti bermaksud mengembangkan model group science learning. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendapatkan validitas model Group Science Learning  yang dikembangkan untuk meningkatkan keterampilan pemecahan masalah kolaboratif, keterampilan proses sains, dan kepercayaan diri. Metode pengumpulan data validasi menggunakan Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Validitas model pembelajaran Group Science Learning dinilai berdasarkan validitas isi dan validitas konstruk. Hasil validasi oleh pakar melalui FGD menunjukkan bahwa model Group Science Learning untuk meningkatkan keterampilan pemecahan masalah kolaboratif, keterampilan proses sains, dan kepercayaan diri dalam penelitian ini termasuk dalam kategori sangat valid. Model Group Science Learning dapat diimplementasikan dalam pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan keterampilan pemecahan masalah kolaboratif, keterampilan proses sains, dan kepercayaan diri.Kata Kunci: Validitas isi, validitas konstruk,  dan group science learning model


Author(s):  
Irmawati Irmawati ◽  
Erman Har

The purpose of this study to describe the activities and learning outcomes of students using cooperative learning model group investigation in the learning of science in  public elementary school 011 Batusangkar. This classroom action research using observation sheet student activity and achievement test as an instrument. The results showed that the average student activity cycle I discuss activities 49.2 percent, 49.2 percent presented the task and do the test 55.3 percent. and the second cycle of activities discussed 81.1 percent , 82.4 percent and discuss test-taking 85.1 percent. Thoroughness of learning outcomes in the first cycle an average of 37.9 percent and an average second cycle 82.4 percent. Investigation group cooperative learning model can improve the activity and learning outcomes in science learning. The implications of this research can teachers use cooperative learning group investigation in science learning.Keywords: Cooperative, Model Group Investigation, Learning Science


GANEC SWARA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 270
Author(s):  
KUSMIANTI KUSMIANTI

   The purpose of this research is to analyze: (1) the difference of critical thinking skills (CTS) and science process skills(SPS) between student’s group who are managed with hypothetical inquiry model and conventional learning model, (2) the difference of critical thinking skills (CTS) between student’s group who are managed with hypothetical inquiry model and conventional learning model, (3) the difference of science process skills (SPS) between student’s group who are managed with hypothetical inquiry model and conventional learning model.    This research is quasi experiments with post-test only control group design factorial 2x1. Data of critical think skill are collected by using test and data of science process skillscollected by using test and observation. Data analyzed by using descriptive analyze and one way MANOVA.It is found: (1) there is significant difference of critical thinking skills (CTS) and science process skills(SPS) between student’s group who are managed with hypothetical inquiry model and conventional learning model (F=59,161; p<0,05), (2) there is significant difference of critical thinking skills (CTS) between student’s group who are managed with hypothetical inquiry model and conventional learning model(F=22,219; p<0,05), (3) there is significant difference of science process skills (SPS) between student’s group who are managed with hypothetical inquiry model and conventional learning model (F=113.559; p<0,05).


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 159
Author(s):  
Juniati . ◽  
Sahat Siagian ◽  
R Mursid

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk  mengetahui (1) hasil belajar kewirausahaan yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih tinggi dibandingkan hasil belajar kewirausahaan yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD, (2) secara keseluruhan, siswa yang memilki minat belajar tinggi lebih tinggi hasil belajar kewirausahaan, dibandingkan dengan siswa yang memiliki minat belajar, (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan minat belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar kewirausahaan. Metode penelitian  yang digunakan adalah quasi eksperimen dengan faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis varian dua jalur dengan taraf signifikansi α = 0,05 dengan Uji F, pengujian lanjut menggunakan Uji Scheffe. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan (1) Hasil belajar kewirausahaan siswa SMK Negeri 8 Medan yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD,pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05 dengan Fh sebesar 6,49 dan Ftabel = 4,00, jadi Fhitung >  Ftabel   =  6,49 >4,00. Hipotesis telah teruji kebenarannya  Ha diterima dan Ho ditolak, (2) hasil perhitungan tentang perbedaan hasil belajar kewirausahaan antara kelompok  siswa yang  memiliki minat belaja rtinggi dan rendah pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05 dengan Fh sebesar 28,15 dan Ftabel = 4,00jadi Fhitung>  Ftabel   =  28,15 >4,00, maka hipotesis telah teruji kebenarannya  Ha diterima dan Ho ditolak, (3) besarnya rata-rata hasil belajar kewirausahaan siswa untuk setiap kelompok pembelajaran A1B1 = 91,94dan A1B2 = 78,59 sedangkan A2B1 = 83,06 dan A2B2  = 79,65. Hasil perhitungan Anava factorial 2x2 diperoleh hasil perhitungan Fh = 8,52 dan harga tabel Ft = 4,00 adalah Ft(0,05)(1,64) = 4,00, sehingga dapat dinyatakan Fh (8,52) > Ft (4,00), Kata Kunci: Pengaruh Model, Minat Belajar, Hasil Belajar Kewirausahaan                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Abstract: This research means to know: (1) The learning result of enterprise of student that thought by JIGSAW type cooperative learning model higher than the result of the enterprise which thought by cooperative learning model STAD type.(2) By all the students who have to learn high interest higher than the result of enterprise study compare with the student who has low-interest learning.(3) There is the interaction between the learning model and the learning interest of students to study enterprise from the student. The technic of taking a sample is used sample Cluster Random Sampling based on student interest so that this research sample in learning group and each group consist of 33 students for the experiment, and 35 students for the control group. The research method which used is experiment quasi with factorial 2x2 analysis technic which used is variant analysis two ways significant level a =0.05 by testing F, the test continues to use scheffe test. The research result mention = (1) learning result of students enterprise that thought with cooperative learning model JIGSAW type higher than cooperative learning model STAD type, at significant level a= 0.05 with Fh as big as 6.49 and = 4 Ftable  00 so Fcount >Ftable=6.49 > 4.00 Hypothesis has tasted its correctness Ha is given and he is refused (2) the calculation result about the difference of learning result enterprise between the group of students who have high study interest and low at a significant level a =0.05 with Fa as big as 28.15 and F table= 4.00  so F count > Ftable =28.15 >4.00 so hypothesis has tested its correctness. Ha is given and Ho is refused,(3) its big average the result of students enterprise learning for each learning group XA1.B1 = 91.94 and  XA1 B2   =78.59 whereas XA2B1 =83.06 and XA2B2 =79.65 the calculation result factorial ANOVA 2x2 is received the result of calculation Fh=8.52 and table prise F1=4.00 is Ft (0.05) (1.64)=4.00 Keywords: Effect of Model, Interest Of Student, Result of Enterprise


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document