scholarly journals Some features of criminal law relations in the field of border security of Ukraine

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 183-188
Author(s):  
O. B. Ganba

The article identifies separate features of criminal law relations in the field of border security of Ukraine. It is emphasized that the strengthening of existing and emergence of new threats in the field of national security of Ukraine, in particular, the exacerbation of certain problems of integrated border management, necessitates further rethinking and improving criminal relations in the field of border security of the state. Features of these legal relations are considered by us through the prism of specific species and scientific ap-proaches to their characteristics.It is substantiated that, taking into account the specifics of the sphere of legal regulation, the protective criminal relations, which are specific social relations that arise on the basis of the norms of criminal law between the state and a person who commits a concrete crime, enforcing the border security of Ukraine and which is realized in the form criminal liability or exemption from criminal liability.It is emphasized that an exceptional feature of the investigated legal relationship is their subject composition, due to which their specific characteristics are distinguished. Accordingly, a list of subjects of both regulatory and security criminal relations in the field of border security of Ukraine is determined.Depending on the entity, it is proposed to divide crimes to such that servicemen and employees of the State Bor-der Guard Service of Ukraine, as well as other security sector and defense bodies; crimes that are committed by third parties, which are unlawful of which is related to the field of the border security of the state. Comparison of these groups of crimes reflected in statistical data on the results of operative-service activities of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine for 2018, 2019 and 2020, clearly forms the idea of law and order and legality, the level of quality of criminal-legal regulation of relations in the investigational area, as well as about the state of protecting the state and public interests of Ukraine as a whole.

2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 68-75
Author(s):  
R. V. Igonin ◽  
M. V. Viktorchuk

The essence and features of administrative and legal regulation, its purpose and correlation with other concepts within administrative law of Ukraine have been clarified. It has been emphasized that legal regulation provides mainly authoritative and management function; its result is the establishment of law and order in society, it focuses on constitutional law and carries out the legalization of the principles of law. It has been determined that administrative and legal regulation is the state’s activity in order to regulate social relations with the help of the norms of law. It has been revealed that administrative and legal regulation has the relevant features that distinguish it among other types of regulation, in particular: 1) it is a mean of influence of the state on social relations; 2) it is carried out with the help of legal means, which constitute the mechanism of administrative and legal regulation; 3) its purpose is to streamline the state and authoritative relations; 4) it establishes the rights and obligations of the participants in administrative and legal relations. The authors have carried out the differentiation of the concepts of administrative and legal regulation and administrative and legal provision. It has been established that administrative and legal provision is a guarantee for the realization, security and protection of human and citizen’s rights and freedoms within administrative and legal relations and represents a set of mechanisms, tools and methods provided by the current legislation, through which administrative and legal regulation is carried out. The objective of administrative and legal regulation has been determined – it is compliance with the state policy regarding the development of administrative legal relations, creation of effective administrative, legal, economic, organizational and procedural rules; ensuring the observance and protection of human rights and freedoms, as well as their effective protection in case of violation; prevention of offenses by the subjects of administrative relations. It has been concluded that during administrative and legal regulation there are relations concerning: 1) the realization of public interests of individuals and legal entities, as well as general and public interest of the state; 2) the implementation of imperative and authoritative competence of public administration agencies; 3) the observance of certain rules established by the state within administrative and legal norms.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4(106)) ◽  
pp. 67-73
Author(s):  
В. О. Галушко

The relevance of the topic of the article is that the implementation of legal procedures within a particular branch of law requires a clear establishment and definition of key stages, procedures, patterns and subjective composition of the latter. That is, we are talking about the legal regulation of legal processes, the high level of quality of which directly affects the effectiveness and efficiency of the relevant sequences of legally significant actions. Official investigations in the prosecutor's office in this aspect are no exception, so it is appropriate to analyze the current state of their legal regulation. Determining the state of legal regulation of official investigations in the prosecutor's office requires a full understanding of the features and internal nature of this category. Note that legal regulation has a deep theoretical basis. It can be pointed out that legal regulation in a separate part is an expression of the content of the principle of the rule of law, that is, it is an indicator of the action of law as the main regulator of social relations. However, there are other features of this category that are important to outline within this article. The article, based on the analysis of scientific views of scientists, offers the author's vision on the interpretation of the concept of legal regulation of official investigations in the prosecutor's office of Ukraine. Emphasis is placed on the specifics of the mechanism of legal regulation of official investigations in the prosecutor's office and identified features of its structure. The general assessment of the state of legal regulation of official investigations in the prosecutor's office is given. It is concluded that at the present stage the legal regulation of official investigations in the prosecutor's office is disordered in its internal structure. Yes, there is a corresponding dissonance between the status and the practice of applying official investigations. The procedure for this procedure, the subject composition, the local legal framework, as well as other mechanical features of official investigations are developed and have the appropriate forms of operation. At the same time, the status and purpose of official investigations in the prosecutor's office, their connection with disciplinary proceedings, principles, as well as the general place in the field of official discipline of prosecutors in modern realities are not properly regulated.


Author(s):  
О. Б. Ганьба

The article analyzes the approaches of various scholars to determine the effectiveness of legal regulation and its mechanism as general theoretical categories and manifestations of their effectiveness in the field of border security of Ukraine.The author points out that most scientists limit their coverage to the effectiveness of legal regulation as a whole, bypassing the problem of the effectiveness of its mechanism. Attention is also drawn to the fact that some researchers in their scientific works generally ignore the coverage of both the effectiveness of legal regulation and the effectiveness of its mechanism.The paper proposes factors to determine the effectiveness of legal regulation and its mechanism by various scholars. At the same time, the factors that reduce such efficiency are listed. Among them, the author calls, first of all, the following: backlog of rulemaking from new challenges and threats that take place in the field of Ukrainian border security; the complexity and multifaceted application of the rules of law in the field; the state of legal consciousness and legal culture of the subjects of right-wing activity, as well as the current state of economic, political and law-enforcement development of society and the state as a whole; quality of staffing of the legal and regulatory activity of public authorities, etc.It is argued that the categories of “regulatory effectiveness” and “regulatory mechanism effectiveness” are not identical, and the author proposes five positions to delineate the investigated efficiencies.Finally, the paper emphasizes that proving the lack of an identity between the effectiveness of legal regulation and the effectiveness of the regulatory mechanism will allow the further use of these valuation concepts as different, though closely related.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 17-25
Author(s):  
Vadim A. Avdeev ◽  
Olga A. Avdeeva

The subject of the study is careless crime, taking into account the implemented national criminal law policy. The aim of the study is to investigate the scientific understanding, content and types of careless crime. Attention is focused on the state, dynamics of careless crime, measures of General and special counteraction to the specified social and legal phenomenon. The methodological basis of counteraction measures is formed by a set of General scientific and private scientific methods, which allowed to investigate the process of novelization of criminal legislation and its implementation at the law enforcement level. The main results of the study reflect the problems of prevention, prevention, General and special counteraction to careless crime, affecting the effectiveness of the implementation of the mechanism of criminal law regulation of social relations associated with crimes committed by carelessness or negligence. Conclusions concerning types of careless crime, its specific weight, the personality of the careless criminal, including scientific substantiation of the General and special counteraction measures are formulated. The scientific and practical validity of legislative processes is noted as the defining problem. The problems of implementation of the criminal law in the context of increasing rates of careless crime, actualizing the practice-oriented measures of counteraction, based on the state, structure, dynamics of the development of this social and legal phenomenon. Attention is focused on strengthening the sanctions of criminal law norms regulating increased responsibility for certain types of careless crimes, which in fact do not affect the reduction of criminal tension in the sphere of careless crime. The problematic issues of improving the quality of the criminal law and other normative legal acts providing prevention, prevention and counteraction to careless crimes are revealed. The focus is on improving the quality of activities of state authorities, self-government bodies and civil society institutions, increasing the level of control.


Author(s):  
Bilokon O. H.

The article explores and analyzes the general meaning of the term "bribery" in the Criminal Law of Ukraine. It was defined that the main social dangers of bribery are the following: committing this crime prevents citizens from free exercising their right to participate in all-Ukrainian and local referendum, violates their procedure, may affect the elections results and the decision on the referendum issue; goes beyond the granted official or official authority, characterized by the committing of substantial harm to the rights or interests of individuals, protected by law, or to the state or public interests or interests of legal entities; it is a socially dangerous act, the commission of which is to use the authority given to persons for the purpose of obtaining from other persons undue benefits; it is a socially dangerous act, the commission of which is performed via use of power against the interests of the service; it is a socially dangerous act, the commission of which is performed via use the position powers contrary to the interests of a legal entity of private law, regardless of the legal form. At the same time, the prerequisites of becoming responsible for bribery in the Ukrainian legislation were clarified and the types of bribery were analyzed, depending on the specifics of the rights and powers of subjects, depending on the degree of obviousness for persons, who are not parties or interested parties to bribery, as a corruption offense and depending on the role of the state in setting of social relations, the order of which is disrupted by bribery. From the analysis of articles of the Criminal Code of Ukraine bribery is characterized as: acceptance of an offer, promise or receipt for oneself or for the third party of unlawful benefit; an offer or promise to provide an illegal benefit; The definition of the concept of "bribery" in the criminal law of Ukraine is proposed to be considered as a socially dangerous, punishable act, characterized by the agreement of two interested persons, or the inclination of one person for the benefit of the other, to gain (give) illegal advantage by abuse of the authorized person by their authority or their official power another person.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-50
Author(s):  
Maksim Bavsun

Biopolitics begins to occupy more and more place in the modern understanding of the state about its possibilities in choosing the means necessary to exert the required influence on each individual and society as a whole. The limits of such possibilities, taking into account the knowledge accumulated by mankind in the past few decades, turned out to be truly unlimited, inevitably formulating the question of setting specific goals and objectives implied by the authorities. The function of control has always been inherent in the official power formation, and the problem of determining the limits of its implementation has also always been in the sphere of disagreements, forming various types of societies and states. Biopolitics is a phenomenon of a fundamentally new order, capable of bringing the discussion of this problem to a previously inaccessible level. The criminallegal component of the presented issue is still on the sidelines, continuing to persistently ignore the ongoing processes, and especially the transformation of social relations, the analogs of which in terms of its scale in history are not so many. However, it is criminal policy, through the introduction of biopolitical tools into circulation, that can have the greatest impact on the formation and implementation of the function of controlling individual human behavior and social relations in general. The function, which today is not typical for the criminal law sphere, is ultimately capable of acting as one of the main ones in the course of implementing this area of legal regulation.


Author(s):  
Vladimir Myslivyy ◽  
Angelina Mykyta

Problem setting. According to Art. 27 of the Constitution of Ukraine, everyone has an inalienable right to life, no one can be arbitrarily deprived of life, and the state, in turn, is obliged to protect human life. Protection of a person’s life, as a duty of the state, is manifested in the establishment of criminal liability, enshrined in Section II “Criminal offenses against life and health of a person” of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, who commit socially dangerous acts. whether there are criminal offenses and what punishments they should be committed. The distinction between crimes such as premeditated murder and negligent deprivation of another’s life is important, as criminal law theory still does not have sufficient information on this issue and does not have a complete list of features of the above crimes, but we tried to identify them in our article. Target of research. Deepening their knowledge on the caution of a person’s life due to inconsistency and drawing the line between possible offenses and conditional authority, clarifying the special characteristics of the perpetrator and the victim, outlining the essential features of the perpetrator and the victim, and researching the regulation of negligent proposal of a new version of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Analysis of resent researches and publications. The theoretical basis for the study of the problem of murder through negligence are the works of legal scholars, in particular, M. Bazhanov, V. Borisov, S. Borodin, V. Glushkov, O. Gorokhovskaya, I. Zinchenko , V. Tyutyugin, O. Us, E. Kisilyuk, V. Kuts, M. Yefimov, S. Likhova, V. Stashis, V. Shablisty and others. Article’s main body. According to Art. 3 of the Constitution of Ukraine, man, his life and health, honor and dignity, inviolability and security are recognized in Ukraine as the highest social value. Given this constitutional provision, the legislator should pay special attention to the criminal law protection of human life and health as the most important public relations. So it is no coincidence that considering such encroachments as one of the most dangerous in the criminal law dimension, the legislator established criminal liability for their commission in Section II “Criminal offenses against life and health” of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Due to the high public danger and the high prevalence of criminal offenses against human life and health, criminal law theory and law enforcement practice are under increasing scrutiny. Thus, the analysis of judicial practice in recent years shows that, for example, among all murders (Articles 117-119 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) the number of persons convicted of deprivation of life due to negligence is about 15 percent annually. In our opinion, it is also advisable to analyze the concept of “murder” by comparing the common and distinctive features of the offenses referred to in Art. Art. 115 and 119 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. According to scientific results, we can conclude that these offenses have many common features. It is possible to understand the common features and preconditions for the spread of these types of offenses. Conclusions and prospects for the development. A study of issues related to the criminal law analysis of murder through negligence and its difference from other types of murder, shows that these acts encroach on the identical object, which is “human life as a set of social relations.” Unfortunately, nowadays the dynamics of offenses committed in Art. Art. 115 and 119 is intensifying, so consideration of their delimitation and characterization of their features is very important. The study examines the main features of these types of crimes, as well as analyzes some provisions of national law and proposes some adjustments to them.


Author(s):  
Viktoriia V. Haltsova ◽  
Sergiy O. Kharytonov ◽  
Oleksandr M. Khramtsov ◽  
Oleksandr O. Zhytnyi ◽  
Andrii A. Vasyliev

This paper is a comprehensive study of the problems of criminal law as a remedy for human rights and freedoms in the modern world. The relevance of this subject lies in the systematic violations of constitutional human rights and freedoms and the inaction of the criminal law in such cases. Nowadays, the criminal law as a remedy for human rights and freedoms in national and international law is described by imperfection in its adaptation to rapidly changing social relations, which, accordingly, leads to problems in their legal protection. There are various reasons for this in the legal sphere, such as gaps in the legal provisions, conflicts of legal regulation and inconsistency of the rules of legislation with existing public relations in the state. All of the above determines the relevance of the subject matter of this study. Thus, the purpose of this study was a comprehensive analysis of theoretical and applied issues relating to the remedies for human rights and legitimate interests against socially dangerous encroachments, and the formulation of scientifically sound proposals for improving the current legislation of Ukraine and the practice of its application in this area. Ultimately, this study identified the legal characteristics of human rights and freedoms at both the national and international levels. The remedies for rights were demonstrated through the lens of criminal law. In addition, the study analysed the forms of implementation of international practice in the national legislation of Ukraine as a remedy for human rights and freedoms in the modern world. The significance of the results of this study was expressed in the further research of related subjects concerning this issue, namely the history of the development of EU criminal law standards and the historical establishment of the concept of human and citizen rights and legitimate interests. Furthermore, the materials of this study can be used in the preparation of educational materials, methodological recommendations, as well as training in various fields of legal science. This, in turn, will allow properly using the criminal law protection of human rights and freedoms without violations on the part of criminal justice bodies


2020 ◽  
pp. 116-121
Author(s):  
Kseniia Ivanova

Problem setting. One of the subsystems of the National Innovative System is the field of technology transfer. Considering the NIS from the point of view of the interests pursued by its participants (subjects), the mechanism introduced by the legislator, providing legal regulation of certain social relations, directly depends on what interests they pursue. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The following scientists drew attention to the problems of regulation of relations in the field of technology transfer: O. M. Davydiuk, Yu. M. Kapitsa, D. S. Makhnovsky, V. S. Milash, O. P. Orlyuk, B. M. Paduchak, O. E. Simson. However, further study of these relations remains relevant especially in view of the constant updating of current legislation. Target of research is to analyze the mechanisms for satisfying the interests of participants (subjects) of technology transfer, which are introduced in the current legislation and are proposed for the future. Article’s main body. Considering the national innovative system from the point of view of the interests pursued by its participants (subjects), we can distinguish the interests of the author of the technology, recipient, technology donor and the state, whose interests determine the overall vector of the transfer process. The primary subject in technology transfer is the author of the technology – an individual who can act as a direct participant (subject) of technology transfer and be its donor, who independently decides the legal fate of the technology and / or its components. However, the author of the technology may not be a donor when it comes to the relationship between him and his employer as a performer of scientific research and development work for the budget. In this case, although the technology is created by the direct work of the author-employee, property rights to the technology are assigned to the enterprise, research institution, organization or institution of higher education as the executor of these works (organization-developer), and the author is entitled to royalties. Thus, a compromise is reached between the parties and provides the necessary balance of interests of the employer and the author. In the transfer of technology, which occurs through the conclusion of the contract, the interests of the parties to the contract are mutually conditioned. These entities, realizing their property interests, act in contractual relations on the principle of dispositiveness, ie equality of the parties, and the state does not interfere in these relations. And only when the sphere of interests of the subjects of transfer affects the interests of the state, the relationship is complicated by the establishment of additional requirements and / or procedures (in particular, the export of technologies created or purchased from the budget). The interest of the state in this case is due to the purpose of preserving national and technological security, control over the misuse of budget funds during the financing of R & D, solving other strategic tasks. The protective mechanism of legal support of the state’s interests introduced in the Law is implemented through the establishment of requirements for the use of technology and / or their components, created or purchased for budget funds, mainly on the territory of Ukraine; conducting state expertise for technologies and / or their components, which are purchased for budget funds (including through their import). Meanwhile, the world practice is aware of other means aimed at protecting the interests of the state, such as control over the re-export of technology in order to eliminate the possibility of further transfer of technology from its donor to others. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The field of technology transfer is characterized by a combination of imperative and dispositive methods of legal regulation. When concluding a technology transfer agreement, the parties agree on its terms, based on their own interests and the requirements for certain types of agreements. However, lawyers note: the wider the range of interests (individual, group), which are directly or indirectly affected by the contract, the more important should be the degree of legal regulation. Therefore, when it comes to the interests of the state, the legislator should not neglect the ability to imperatively determine the requirements to be met by the parties in technology transfer and which provide for the implementation of additional incentives for the introduction of domestic technologies into circulation, their practical application in production.


Temida ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 431-451
Author(s):  
Ana Batricevic

Misogynous and sexist violence against women, which often results in death, represents a global problem. Numerous international and national legal instruments are dedicated to the prevention and sanctioning of violence against women. However, the reality implies that existing mechanisms of penal reaction to femicide, as its most extreme and brutal form, should be re-examined. Having in mind the frequency and severe consequences of this criminal offence and the discriminatory character of the message that the state sends by tolerating it or inadequately punishing its perpetrators, the author attempts to define femicide, to present basic forms of state reaction to femicide in comparative law as well as to analyze the features of femicide as an independent criminal offence. Arguing for the incrimination of femicide as an independent criminal offence, or as a special form of aggravated murder, the author points out that such solution could contribute to more precise observation of this form of crime, to a better estimation of the quality of the state? s reaction to it and to its more efficient suppression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document