Differences of methacrylate and silorane based composite resins surface hardness after 40% hydrogen peroxide application

Composite restoration is frequently found on teeth before doing any bleaching treatment. Hydrogen peroxide is a bleaching agent which enable transition to one of the composite physical properties. The aim of this research was to observe the difference of surface hardness between methacrylate and silorane based composite resin after application of 40% hydrogen peroxide. This true experiment involved 36 specimens from two different disc-shaped methacrylate and silorane based composite resins, with 18 specimens methacrylate and 18 silorane. Every specimen groups were immersed in artificial saliva solution and divided into two groups; the first group consisted of 9 specimens of control which were tested directly using microvickers hardness tester and another group consisted of 9 specimens which had been added by 40% hydrogen peroxide for hardness test. The result showed the different surface hardness average value of metachrylate and silorane based composite resin after application of 40% hydrogen peroxide. The surface hardness of methacrylate and silorane based composite resins was 41.8 VHN and 33.7 VHN (p>0.05) with t-test, respectively. From this study concluded that there was no significant difference between methacrylate and silorane based composite resins after 40% hydrogen peroxide application.

Download Full-text

Comparison of time-dependent changes in the surface hardness of different composite resins

European Journal of Dentistry ◽

10.4103/1305-7456.119059 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 07 (S 01) ◽

pp. S020-S025 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Suat Ozcan ◽

Ihsan Yikilgan ◽

Mine Betul Uctasli ◽

Oya Bala ◽

Zeliha Gonca Bek Kurklu

Keyword(s):

Composite Resin ◽

Surface Hardness ◽

Multiple Comparisons ◽

Composite Resins ◽

Time Dependent ◽

Bottom Surface ◽

Significance Level ◽

Hardness Tester ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Hardness Values

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in surface hardness of silorane-based composite resin (Filtek Silorane) in time and compare the results with the surface hardness of two methacrylate-based resins (Filtek Supreme and Majesty Posterior). Materials and Methods: From each composite material, 18 wheel-shaped samples (5-mm diameter and 2-mm depth) were prepared. Top and bottom surface hardness of these samples was measured using a Vicker′s hardness tester. The samples were then stored at 37°C and 100% humidity. After 24 h and 7, 30 and 90 days, the top and bottom surface hardness of the samples was measured. In each measurement, the rate between the hardness of the top and bottom surfaces were recorded as the hardness rate. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance, multiple comparisons by Tukey′s test and binary comparisons by t-test with a significance level of P = 0.05. Results: The highest hardness values were obtained from each two surfaces of Majesty Posterior and the lowest from Filtek Silorane. Both the top and bottom surface hardness of the methacrylate based composite resins was high and there was a statistically significant difference between the top and bottom hardness values of only the silorane-based composite, Filtek Silorane (p < 0.05). The lowest was obtained with Filtek Silorane. The hardness values of all test groups increased after 24 h (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although silorane-based composite resin Filtek Silorane showed adequate hardness ratio, the use of incremental technic during application is more important than methacrylate based composites.

Download Full-text

Surface roughness comparison of methacrylate and silorane-based composite resins after 40% hydrogen peroxide application

Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry ◽

10.24198/pjd.vol24no1.15384 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 24 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Rori Sasmita ◽

Rahmi Alma Farah Adang ◽

Opik Taofik Hidayat

Keyword(s):

Hydrogen Peroxide ◽

Surface Roughness ◽

Composite Resin ◽

Artificial Saliva ◽

Composite Resins ◽

Tooth Bleaching ◽

Control Group ◽

Average Value ◽

Quasi Experimental ◽

Tooth Colour

The change of the tooth colour could be restored with bleaching. The tooth bleaching will affects the surface roughness of the composite resins. Recently, the material basis for composite resins has developed, among others are methacrylate-based and silorane based composite resins. The objective of this study was to distinguish the surface roughness value of methacrylate-based composite resin and silorane based composite resins. This research was quasi-experimental. The sample used in this study were methacrylate and silorane based composite resins in discs form, with the size of 6 mm and the thickness of 3 mm, manufactured into 20 specimens and divided into 2 groups. The control group was immersed in the artificial saliva, and the treatment group was applied with 40% hydrogen peroxide. The result of the experiment analyzed using unpaired sample t-test showed significant differences in the average value of the surface roughness after the application of 40% hydrogen peroxide. The average value of methacrylate and silorane based composite resins were 2.744 μm and 3.417 μm, respectively. There was a difference in the surface roughness of methacrylate and silorane based composite resin compounds after the application of 40% hydrogen peroxide. The surface roughness value of the silorane-based composite resin was higher than the methacrylate-based.

Download Full-text

PERENDAMAN DENGAN PERASAN BUAH JERUK LEMON (Citrus lemon) DAPAT MENURUNKAN KEKERASAN RESIN KOMPOSIT NANOHYBRID

Interdental Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi (IJKG) ◽

10.46862/interdental.v16i2.1131 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 16 (2) ◽

pp. 49-53

Author(s):

IGN Bagus Tista ◽

◽

IGAA Hartini Hartini ◽

IA. Gitasanthi KDA ◽

Keyword(s):

Composite Resin ◽

Applied Pressure ◽

Surface Hardness ◽

Composite Resins ◽

Control Group ◽

Control Group Design ◽

Mechanical Condition ◽

Hardness Tester ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Nanohybrid Composite

Composite resin is a restoration material that is often used because the composite resin has good aesthetic value like mimetic the teeth color. Composite resins have a physical and mechanical condition. One of the mechanical condition is hardness. The surface hardness of composite resins is the surface resistance of the composite resin material to the applied pressure. One of the factors influencing composite hardness is the food and beverages consumed. Consuming acidic drinks continuously for a long time period can erode composite resin filling. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of soaking into a citrus lemon on the hardness of nanohybrid composite resin. This type of research was true experimental with pre-test post-test with control group design using 24 composite resin samples which are divided into 4 groups with 6 samples each. The groups in this study were nanohybrid composite resins soaked with citrus lemon and aqua dest for 60 minutes and 120 minutes. The hardness tested using a Vicker hardness tester. The results of the study using the LSD (Least Significant Difference) test showed that the significance value of p= 0.014 (p<0.05), which means that the use of citrus lemon for 120 minutes affected the hardness of nanohybrid composite resin. In conclusion, soaking with citrus lemon for 120 minutes reduces more the hardness of nanohybrid composite resin compared with soaking for 60 minutes.

Download Full-text

Properties of New Glass-Ionomer Restorative Systems Marketed for Stress-Bearing Areas

Operative Dentistry ◽

10.2341/18-176-l ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 45 (1) ◽

pp. 104-110 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

D Fuhrmann ◽

D Murchison ◽

S Whipple ◽

K Vandewalle

Keyword(s):

Fracture Toughness ◽

Composite Resin ◽

Testing Machine ◽

Surface Hardness ◽

Glass Ionomer ◽

Hardness Tester ◽

Resin Coating ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Restorative Materials ◽

Post Hoc

SUMMARY Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the properties (fracture toughness, surface hardness) of newer conventional glass-ionomer restorative materials that are marketed for posterior stress-bearing areas compared with more traditional glass-ionomer restorative materials marketed for non–load-bearing areas and composite-resin restorative materials. Methods and Materials: Notched-beam fracture toughness specimens were created in a mold with each tested material (Equia Forte, GC America, with and without a surface coating of Equia Forte Coat; Ketac Universal, 3M/ESPE; ChemFil Rock, Dentsply; Fuji IX GP Extra, GC; Ionostar Molar, VOCO; Filtek Z250, 3M/ESPE; Filtek Supreme Ultra, 3M/ESPE) and fractured using a universal testing machine after 24 hours of storage. Hardness values were determined on the surface of the fracture toughness specimens using a hardness tester. Data were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test per property (alpha=0.05). Results: The composite-resin restorative materials had significantly greater fracture toughness than the glass-ionomer materials. There was no significant difference in fracture toughness between the glass-ionomer materials. The use of a resin coating significantly increased the surface hardness of the newer glass ionomer marketed for stress-bearing areas. Conclusions: Fracture toughness was not improved with the newer glass-ionomer restorative materials marketed for stress-bearing areas compared to the conventional glass-ionomer materials, however a resin coating provided greater surface hardness.

Download Full-text

Perbedaan Penggunaan Bahan Desensitizing dan Tanpa Desensitizing Pasca Bleaching Ekstra-Koronal terhadap Kekerasan Email

Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia ◽

10.22146/majkedgiind.12703 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 19 (2) ◽

pp. 119

Author(s):

Wignyo Hadriyanto

Keyword(s):

Vickers Hardness ◽

Artificial Saliva ◽

Hardness Test ◽

Acrylic Resin ◽

Micro Hardness ◽

Vickers Hardness Number ◽

Hardness Tester ◽

Group I ◽

Significant Difference ◽

The Subject

Latar Belakang. Pada bleaching ekstrakoronal diketahui terjadi proses demineralisasi sehingga terjadi hiersensitivitas dentin. UltraEZ salah satu bahan desensitizing yang dapat mengurangi hipersensitivitas akibat demineralisasi email pasca bleaching ekstrakoronal terkini. Tujuan penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan kekerasan email pasca pemutihan gigi ekstra-koronal dengan aplikasi bahan desensitizing dan tanpa aplikasi bahan desensitizing. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan 20 gigi premolar permanen pasca pencabutanyang masih utuh dan direndam dalam saliva buatan, kemudian dilakukan pemolesan pada bagian bukal dengan menggunakan pasta profilaksis kemudian gigi dicuci dan dikeringkan. Bahan pemutih Opalescence Xtra Boost diaplikasikan pada semua permukaan bukal gigi premolar kemudian dibagi menjadi 2 kelompok yaitu kelompok I, II, masing-masing kelompok sebanyak 10 gigi. Kelompok I sebagai kelompok control setelah dilakukan pemutihan, tidak dilakukan aplikasi Ultra-EZ, dimasukkan dalam wadah botol dan direndam dalam saliva buatan kemudian disimpan dalam incubator. Mahkota dan akar gigi,kemudian ditanam dalam resin akrilik sesuai kelompok sebelumnya dengan permukaan bukal menghadap ke atas. Semua sampel diuji kekerasannya dengan uji kekerasan Vickers menggunakan beban 100 g selama 15 detik. Permukaan bukal menghadap ke atas, kemudian dijepit dengan alat penjepit pada meja alat Micro Vickers Hardness Tester. Sampel diatur sedemikian rupa sehingga akan terlihat gambar yang dapat diukur panjang diagonalnya langsung dengan micrometer yang ada pada lensa okuler. Nilai kekerasan email dalam Vickers hardness number (VHN) juga dapat diperoleh dari table setelah mengetahui rata-rata panjang diagonal, berat badan yang digunakan dan waktu yang digunakan untuk uji kekerasan. Pengujian ini dilakukan pada setiap kelompok. Selanjutnya diuji dengan uji-t. hasil penelitian menunjukkan ada perbedaan yang bermakna antara aplikasi ultraEZ lima menit dibandingkan tanpa aplikasi ultraEZ terhadap kekerasan email pada p>0,05. Background. One of the side effect of bleaching agent is a dentine hypersensitive and ultraEZ is an agent can diminish this process. The purpose of this study was to evaluate difference of enamel microhardness post external bleaching with or without ultra-eze application. Method. Twenty extracted permanent bicuspid used in this study were divided into two group, each group contains 10 bicupids. Group I was treated external bleaching without ultra-eze application and group II was treated external bleaching with application ultraEZ for five minutes. After that all of the subject were seaked the artificial saliva and kept in the incubator 24 hours. Teeth were embedded into acrylic resin with the buccal sirface facing up. Further all of the subject was evaluated by Vickers using 100 g load for 15 seconds. Teeth were stapled on the Micro Hardness Tester table diagonal of emage was measure using micrometer attach on ocular lesnse. Email hardness can be known after calculating, the everage diagonal length, the load used and the duration of hardness test. Further the data was analize using t-test. The result shows there is significant difference between bleaching with and without the application of ultra-eze.

Download Full-text

Pengaruh Perendaman Kopi Robusta dan Arabika terhadap Kekerasan Resin Komposit Nanofiller

e-GIGI ◽

10.35790/eg.9.1.2021.32668 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Fransiska M. Pardosi ◽

Darmawati A. Indraswari ◽

Lusiana Batubara ◽

Nadia Hardini

Keyword(s):

Composite Resin ◽

Artificial Saliva ◽

Control Group ◽

Arabica Coffee ◽

Treatment Groups ◽

Hardness Tester ◽

Robusta Coffee ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Post Hoc ◽

One Way Anova

Abstract: Nanofiller composite resin has small filler size which enhances its properties. However, these properties could decrease due to several factors. Acidic liquid such as coffee could reduce the hardness of composite resin. This study was aimed to analyze the effect of robusta and arabica coffee immersion on the hardness of nanofiller composite resin. A total of 27 composite resin samples were used and then were polished by using a soflex disc for 30 seconds on each roughness level. Samples were then divided into three groups, as follows: the control group with artificial saliva and the treatment groups with robusta coffee and arabica coffee. The composite resin molds were immersed in the three groups for 5 days. After five days of immersion, the hardness of the sample was tested by using a Vickers hardness tester. Artificial saliva as the control group had the highest mean hardness value of 112.98±8.67 VHN, followed by robusta coffee, and then by arabica coffee. The One Way Anova and post hoc LSD test showed that there were significant differences in all groups (p<0.05) except for the two treatment groups, namely robusta and arabica coffee groups which did not show any significant difference in the resin hardness (p>0.05). In conclusion, robusta and arabica coffee affect the hardness of the nanofiller composite resin, but there is no significant difference in the hardness between the robusta and arabica coffee groups.Keywords: composite resin hardness, nanofiller, robusta coffee, arabica coffee Abstrak: Resin komposit nanofiller memiliki ukuran filler kecil yang dapat meningkatkan fungsinya namun fungsi tersebut dapat menurun oleh beberapa hal. Cairan asam yang dikonsumsi seperti kopi dapat menurunkan kekerasan resin komposit. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh perendaman kopi robusta dan arabika terhadap kekerasan resin komposit nanofiller. Sampel resin komposit yang digunakan sebanyak 27 buah dan dilanjutkan dengan pemolesan menggunakan soflex disc selama 30 detik setiap tingkat kekasarannya. Sampel kemudian dibagi dalam tiga kelompok, yaitu kelompok kontrol dengan saliva buatan dan dua kelompok perlakuan dengan kopi robusta dan arabika. Sebanyak 27 buah resin komposit direndam ke dalam tiga kelompok tersebut selama lima hari kemudian diuji kekerasannya dengan vickers hardness tester. Saliva buatan sebagai kelompok kontrol memiliki nilai rerata kekerasan tertinggi sebesar 112,98±8,67 VHN, diikuti kopi robusta, dan nilai terendah yaitu kopi arabika. Hasil uji One Way Anova dan post hoc LSD menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan bermakna pada semua kelompok (p<0,05) kecuali pada kedua kelompok perlakuan yaitu antara kopi robusta dan arabika tidak menunjukkan adanya perbedaan kekerasan yang bermakna (p>0,05). Simpulan penelitian ini ialah kopi robusta dan arabika memengaruhi kekerasan resin komposit nanofiller namun tidak terdapat perbedaan kekerasan antara keduanya.Kata kunci: kekerasan resin komposit, nanofiller, kopi robusta, kopi arabika

Download Full-text

Long-Term Surface Hardness and Monomer Conversion of a Nanofilled and a Microhybrid Composite Resin

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice ◽

10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1419 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 14 (5) ◽

pp. 876-882 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto ◽

Matheus Coelho Bandéca ◽

José Roberto Cury Saad ◽

Edson Alves de Campos ◽

Fernanda Ferreira Jassé ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Composite Resin ◽

Artificial Saliva ◽

Hydrolytic Degradation ◽

Metallic Matrix ◽

Surface Hardness ◽

Storage Period ◽

Hardness Test ◽

Monomer Conversion ◽

Bottom Surface

ABSTRACT Objective This study aims to evaluate the degree of conversion (DC) and hydrolytic degradation through the Vickers hardness test (HV) of a nanofilled (FiltekTM Z-250, 3M) and a microhybrid (FiltekTMSupreme-XT, 3M) composite resin. Materials and methods Eight disk-shaped specimens (4 mm diameter × 2 mm thick, ISO 4049) of each material were prepared for each test. Composites were inserted into single increment in a metallic matrix and light-cured for 40 seconds. VH readings were performed for each specimen at predetermined intervals: immediately after polymerization (control), 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, 30 and 180 days. After curing, initial hardness measurements were performed and the specimens were immersed in artificial saliva at 37°C. For DC (%), specimens were ground, pressed with KBr and analyzed by FT-IR spectrophotometer. Results Student t-test showed that there was no difference between the resins for DC (p = 0.252). ANOVA analysis revealed that Z-250 VH means were all greater than S-XT, for both top and bottom surfaces, whatever the storage-period in artificial saliva (p < 0.001). After 180 days of storage, the hardness obtained for S-XT was similar with that at the baseline, for both top and bottom surfaces. While for Z-250 hardness was not significantly different from baseline only for top surface, but there was a significant decrease observed in hardness for bottom surface. Conclusion The materials tested showed no evidence of hydrolytic degradation in a significant way, in a 6-month storagetime in artificial saliva. Nanofilled resin presents a monomer conversion comparable to the conventional microhybrid. How to cite this article Jassé FF, Borges CHB, Tonetto MR, de Souza Rastelli AN, Bagnato VS, de Campos EA, Bandeca MC, Saad JRC. Long-Term Surface Hardness and Monomer Conversion of a Nanofilled and a Microhybrid Composite Resin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(5):876-882.

Download Full-text

Effect of different post-cure polymerization treatment on composite resin hardness

RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia ◽

10.1590/1981-863720150003000082908 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 63 (4) ◽

pp. 426-431

Author(s):

Ariani Rodrigues DIMER ◽

Guilherme Anziliero AROSSI ◽

Leonardo Haerter dos SANTOS ◽

Diego Rafael KAPPAUN

Keyword(s):

Composite Resin ◽

Hardness Test ◽

Composite Resins ◽

Control Group ◽

Group 4 ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group 3 ◽

Group 2 ◽

Vickers Hardness Test ◽

Group 1

Objective: To evaluate the influence of different additional polymerization methods on the microhardness of two direct composite resins. Methods: Direct Composite resins samples (Fill Magic and Opallis) and a Laboratory Composite Resin (Ceramage) were lightcured according to manufacturer instructions. Then, the direct resins were submitted to additional polymerization. Experimental groups were divided into (n = 5): group 1: Conventional Polymerization; group 2: Extra Light (80s); group 3: Autoclave; group 4: Laboratory Resin Ceramage. Vickers hardness test was carried out after a week of light-free storage in water, and results were subjected to ANOVA / Tukey statistical analysis. Results: Resin Lab Ceramage showed higher astatistically significant microhardness within all other resins in this study (p £ 0.05); Fill Magic showed no statistically significant difference between the groups tested compared to its control (p> 0.05); Opallis resin submitted to autoclave was the only method that showed a higher statistically significant difference compared to the control group (p £ 0.05). Conclusion: It concludes that hardness of a direct composite resin tested - Opallis - was increased by Autoclave post-cure polymerization, however, not enough to achieve the hardness of a laboratory composite. Furthermore, increasing lightcuring time does not produce a harder surface.

Download Full-text

Effects of Bleaching Agents on the Microhardness and Surface Roughness of Bulk Fill Composites

World Journal of Dentistry ◽

10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1437 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 8 (3) ◽

pp. 196-201 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

K Pradeep

Keyword(s):

Surface Roughness ◽

Physical Properties ◽

Composite Resin ◽

Artificial Saliva ◽

Composite Resins ◽

Control Group ◽

Hardness Tester ◽

Crucial Effect ◽

Restorative Materials ◽

The Mean

ABSTRACT Aim The aim was to compare the effect of 10 and 20% carbamide peroxide (CP) on microhardness (MHN) and surface roughness of two commercially available bulk fill composites (X-tra fill Bulk Fill and Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill). Materials and methods A total of 50 specimens with both type composites were prepared using brass molds of inner diameter 10 mm and a height of 4 mm. Each type of composite was further divided into three groups, control group stored in artificial saliva for 14 days, other groups bleached with 10 and 20% CP respectively, for 14 days. Microhardness of the composite resin was tested with a Vickers hardness tester, whereas surface roughness was tested with profilometer. Results All the analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 18. The value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Both 10 and 20% CP significantly reduced MHN of experimental composite resins. However, the mean surface roughness was significantly higher in X-tra fill Bulk Fill than Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill at 20% CP concentration. The mean MHN of Tetric EvoCeram was reduced when compared with X-tra fill at 20% CP. Conclusion There was a significant reduction in the MHN of restorative materials observed after exposure to CP under a clinically simulated bleaching regimen. However, increase in surface roughness was seen only at 20% CP. Clinical significance The physical properties, such as MHN and surface roughness have a crucial effect on the longevity of restorations and, moreover, on the esthetic demands of patients, but they may be compromised by bleaching treatments. The aim of this research paper was to assess the reaction of home bleaching agents on the physical properties of two Bulk Fill composite resin restorative materials. How to cite this article Francis G, Pradeep K, Ginjupalli K, Saraswathi V. Effects of Bleaching Agents on the Microhardness and Surface Roughness of Bulk Fill Composites. World J Dent 2017;8(3):196-201.

Download Full-text

Benefit of Glycerine on Surface Hardness of Hybrid & Nanofill Resin Composite

Conservative Dentistry Journal ◽

10.20473/cdj.v11i1.2021.28-31 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

pp. 28

Author(s):

Ferriza Tri Mardianti ◽

Sukaton Sukaton ◽

Galih Sampoerno

Keyword(s):

Free Radicals ◽

Composite Resin ◽

Resin Composite ◽

Surface Hardness ◽

Composite Resins ◽

Polymerization Process ◽

Tooth Structure ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Light Curing ◽

Composite Resin Restorations

Background: Composite resins restoration is a treatment for tooth structure loss due to pathological conditions. Longevity of composite resins restoration can be affected by surface hardness restoration. Glycerin can increase surface hardness restoration with inhibit bond oxygen and free radicals on polymerization composite resins. Purpose: Analyze the increase surface hardness composite resins restoration after glycerin application before light-curing composite resins. Review(s): Of the six journals included in this literature review, five journals reported significant differences because of the obstacles in the polymerization process of the composite resin when composite contact with light-curing will activate the photoinitiator to produce highly reactive free radicals, free radicals will break the double chain carbon bonds of monomers and form single bonds of free radicals with monomers. Bonding of free radicals with monomers will produce polymeric bonds (degree of conversion) which affects the level of surface hardness of the filling. While one journal noted no significant difference in the surface hardness of composite resin after glycerin application. Conclusion: The use of glycerin before light-curing can increase the surface hardness composite resin restorations.

Download Full-text