Effect of Cognitive Style on Test Type (Visual or Verbal) and Color Coding

1994 ◽  
Vol 79 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1532-1534 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Moore ◽  
Francis M. Dwyer
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Visual Test ◽  
Test Format ◽  
Color Coding ◽  
Test Type ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Better Than ◽  
Instructional Variable

66 field-independent undergraduates achieved significantly higher scores than 43 field-dependent students on drawing, terminology, and comprehension. Color coding was an inconclusive instructional variable, but unexpectedly, subjects who received the verbal tests scored significantly better than those who received the visual test format.

Effect of Cognitive Style on Strategies for Comprehension of Prose

1983 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 859-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dayo Adejumo
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Embedded Figures Test ◽  
Introductory Course ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Embedded Figures ◽  
Group Embedded Figures Test ◽  
Better Than

The effect of cognitive style on the performance of four groups who used different strategies of study to comprehend prose was investigated. Performance on Group Embedded Figures Test was used to classify subjects into groups by cognitive style. 201 field-dependent and 125 field-independent subjects enrolled in an introductory course in psychology were subjects. Field-independent subjects performed significantly better overall. In particular, field-independent subjects in the control group and the groups given factual and inferential questions as study aids performed better than the field-dependent subjects on the inferential items at posttest. On the factual items at posttest, field-independent subjects performed significantly better only in the group who were given inferential questions as an adjunct. The cognitive styles of the subjects interacted with the strategies of study and seem to affect performance on comprehension of prose at posttest.

scholarly journals GAYA KOGNITIF FIELD-DEPENDENT DAN FIELD-INDEPENDENT SEBAGAI JENDELA PROFIL PEMECAHAN MASALAH POLYA DARI SISWA SMP

Factor M ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eka Resti Wulan
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Research Subject ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Pythagoras Theorem ◽  
Looking Back ◽  
Better Than

The aim of this research is to describe junior high school students’ problem solving profile in the Pythagoras Theorem problem based on the cognitive styles of FI and FD. The subjects of this research consisting of two subjects FI and two subjects FD in VIII H SMP Negeri 2 Lumajang. Instruments used: cognitive style tests (GEFT), Pythagoras Theorem problem solving tests, and interview guideline. Problem-solving indicators that be used is Polya's problem solving steps: understanding the problem, devise a plan, carry out the plan, and looking back. The results of this study is the FI subject is better than the FD subject. The FI subject understand the problem very well, arranging a solution plan well, implementing a plan properly, and looking back well. Different from previous research, subject FI make error even though not any Polya’s step. Nevertheless, The FD subjects are categorized as lacking in the step of understanding the problem, devising a plan with deficient category, implementing the plan without looking back on the solution, so it is categorized as lacking and errors emerged at almost every step. Some errors in problem solving showed by FI and FD subjects, so for further research need to analyses errors and the other cognitive style.

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINKING ALOUD PAIRS PROBLEM SOLVING (TAPPS) DAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA

JURNAL IQRA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Tyas Kusumaningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Thinking Aloud ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Better Than

This study aims to determine: (1) Which has the mathematics learning achievement better, a model of cooperative Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps), cooperative Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) or direct instruction, (2) Which has the achievement better mathematics learning, students who have the cognitive style field independent (FI) or students who have the cognitive style field dependent (FD), (3) in each cognitive style, which one has the mathematics learning achievement better, a model of cooperative Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps), cooperative Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) or direct learning, (4) on each of the learning model, which one has the achievement of better mathematics learning, students who have the cognitive style field independent (FI) or students who have the cognitive style of field dependent (FD. This study is a quasi-experimental research. The populations in this study were all students of class VII SMP N 5 Metro 2015/2016 school year. The sampling technique was conducted by stratified cluster random sampling. The balance test performed using one way analysis of variance with different cells before carrying out a study of three groups of population. The data analysis technique used to test the hypothesis is two-way ANOVA with different cell with a 3x2 factorial design. Lilliefors prerequisite test method to test for normality and Bartlett methods for homogeneity. From the analysis concluded: (1) cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps) generates mathematics learning achievement better than cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps ) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning direct, cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning Direct, (2) students with cognitive style Field Independent (FI) had mathematics learning achievement better than students with cognitive style Field Dependent (FD), (3) the individual cognitive style, cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps) generates mathematics learning achievement better than cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS ), cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning direct, cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning Direct (4) on each model of learning, mathematics achievement of students with cognitive style Field Independent (FI) have better mathematics learning achievement than students with cognitive style Field Dependent (FD). Keywords: Tapps, TSTS, Direct learning, Learning Achievement, Cognitive Style.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Pendekatan Problem Posing Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
Muhammad Muzaini
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Conventional Approach ◽  
Problem Posing ◽  
Learning Approach ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Better Than

[Bahasa]: Penelitian eksperimen ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: 1) perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika siswa antara siswa yang bergaya kognitif field independent diajar dengan pendekatan problem posing dan siswa diajar yang dengan pendekatan konvensional; 2) perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika siswa antara siswa  bergaya kognitif field dependent yang diajar dengan pendekatan problem posing dan siswa  yang diajar dengan pendekatan konvensional; dan 3) interaksi antara pendekatan pembelajaran dengan gaya kognitif terhadap prestasi belajar siswa. Instrumen penelitian yaitu lembar observasi aktivitas guru, lembar observasi aktivitas siswa, instrumen GEFT, dan angket respon siswa. Analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan inferensial dengan bantuan SPSS versi 16,0. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang bergaya kognitif field independent yang diajar dengan pendekatan problem posing lebih baik dari prestasi belajar siswa yang diajar dengan pendekatan konvensional, ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang mempunyai gaya kognitif field dependent yang diajar dengan pendekatan problem posing dan prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang diajar dengan pendekatan konvensional, dan tidak ada interaksi antara pendekatan problem posing dan gaya kognitif terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa. [English]: This experimental research aims to find out: 1) the difference of mathematics achievement of students who have field-independent cognitive style taught with problem posing and conventional approach; 2) the difference of mathematics achievement of students who have field-dependent cognitive style taught with problem posing and conventional approach; and 3) interaction between learning approach and cognitive style towards students’ mathematics achievement. The instruments of this research are teacher’s observation sheet, students’ activity observation sheet, GEFT instrument, and the questionnaire of students’ response. Research data is analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS version 16,0. The research found that mathematics achievement of students who have field-independent taught with problem posing is better than those who taught with conventional approach, field-dependent students have different mathematics achievement that taught with problem posing and conventional approach, and there is no interaction between problem posing approach and cognitive style towards mathematics achievement of students.

Field Dependence and the Differentiation of Affective States

1981 ◽  
Vol 139 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharine R. Parkes
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Social Class ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Field Dependence ◽  
Normal Female ◽  
Cognitive Symptoms ◽  
Affective States ◽  
Clear Cut ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent

SummaryThe extent to which anxiety, irritability and depression were differentiated as separate entities associated with characteristic patterns of somatic and cognitive symptoms by field dependent (FD) and field independent (Fl) normal female subjects was studied with the Hidden Figures Test and Unpleasant Emotions Questionnaire. In the Fl group the correlations between the three emotions were low and non-significant, reflecting a clear-cut differentiation in symptom configuration, as shown by psychiatrists. In the FD group the inter-correlations were significant and positive, corresponding to relatively poor symptom differentiation, comparable to that of a psychiatric patient group. This suggests that the cognitive style variable of field dependence may underly differences in symptom differentiation associated with psychiatrist/patient differences and, more generally, with social class and sex differences.

scholarly journals The Implementation of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Model to Improve Creativity and Self-Efficacy of Field Dependent and Field Independent Students

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farrah Maulidia ◽  
Saminan Saminan ◽  
Zainal Abidin
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Paper Test ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Conventional Methods ◽  
Pbl Model ◽  
Better Than

Students’ creativity and self-efficacy in solving mathematical problems remain low. Students with Field Dependent (FD) and Field Independent (FI) cognitive styleshave different creativity and self-efficacy. One learning model that is believed to increase students' creativity and self-efficacyis Problem Based Learning (PBL) model. This study aimed to increase the creativity and self-efficacyof FD and FI students through the application of PBLmodel. This research is an experimental study with pre-test and post-test control group design.The population of this research was grade VIII students in State Islamic School (MTsN) 1 Banda Aceh,while the sample consisted of two classes out of 11 classes. The sampling technique usedrandom samplingwith one experimental class and one control class. Data collection was carried out by using two instruments; a paper-test to measure students’ creativity and a questionnaire to measure students’self-efficacy. The grouping of FD and FI students was based on the results of the Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT). Furthermore, a paired t-test was conducted to obtain an increase in students' creativity and self-efficacy. At the same time, a correlation test was performed to see the relationship between creativity and the self-efficacy ofstudents. The results of the study revealed that the increase of FD and FI students’ creativity who were taught by the PBL model was better than students taught by conventional methods. The results also reported that the increase of FD and FI students’ self-efficacy who were taught with the PBL model was better than the students who were taught with conventional methods. In addition, there was a significant relationship between FI and FD students' creativity and self-efficacy.

scholarly journals Peculiarities of management of cognitive barriers in educational activity of students with field-independent and field-dependent styles

2020 ◽  
pp. 54-65
Author(s):  
Ngo Thi Nga
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Cognitive Activity ◽  
Educational Activity ◽  
Professional Activities ◽  
Cognitive Difficulties ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent

The survey is dedicated to the identification of cognitive barriers in educational and professional activities among students with field-dependent and field-independent styles of cognitive activity. For these purposes, we used the principle of taxonomy proposed by B. Bloom (“the taxonomy of the levels of knowledge of Benjamin Blum”), as well as the “Gottschaldt figures” technique. The results show that the cognitive style is a factor influencing the level of cognitive difficulties.

Effect of Color Coding on Visually and Verbally Oriented Tests with Students of Different Field Dependence Levels

1992 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis M. Dwyer ◽  
David M. Moore
Keyword(s):  
Field Dependence ◽  
Information Acquisition ◽  
Color Coding ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Black And White ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Respective Treatment ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Instructional Variable

To assess the impact of instructional color coding on visually and verbally oriented tests and on field-dependent-independent subjects, undergraduate college students (119) were randomly assigned to two treatment groups (color—black and white). These subjects received their respective treatment and received four dependent measures measuring four different types of educational objectives. Results indicated that the subject's level of field dependence is an important instructional variable and that color coding is an effective variable for maximizing information acquisition levels for field dependent over oriented subjects.

scholarly journals The effect of problem based learning by cognitive style on critical thinking skills and student retention

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 271
Author(s):  
Syamsul Arifin ◽  
Punadji Setyosari ◽  
Cholis Sa’dijah ◽  
Dedi Kuswandi
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Student Retention ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent

The purpose of this research is to compare the effectiveness of learning models to develop student critical thinking skills and retention in mathematics through the application of Problem Based Learning (PBL) models and multimedia assisted Direct Instruction (DI) models for students who have different cognitive styles. This research is quasi-experimental type, using non-equivalent control group design. Subject of this research are students in three different senior high school with two class samples in each school. There are 102 students of control class with Direct Instruction learning model by multimedia and 97 students of experiment class with Problem Based Learning model. The instrument of this research are test and questionnaires. The findings of this research are that there are significant differences in student critical thinking skills and retention between groups of student with Field Dependent (FD) and Field Independent (FI) cognitive styles and also between group of student with Direct Instruction model and Problem Based Learning model. Each learning model has interaction with critical thinking skills but not student retention. This research is useful for educators to develop students critical thinking skills processes with an effective learning model approach especially for senior high school students. The educators can know the interaction of cognitive styles with student retention, the extent to which cognitive styles are able to have an impact on student retention. This research provides knowledge an effective learning model to develop critical thinking skills and retention of student both Field Dependent and Field Independent cognitive style. Based on cognitive style, Field Independent students have higher retention and critical thinking skills compared to Field Dependent students.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document