scholarly journals Language- And Legal Culture Peculiarities in Selected Swiss Constitutional Acts Including a Translational Perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-109
Author(s):  
Łukasz Iluk
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Cultural Differences ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Good Knowledge ◽  
Cultural Dimension ◽  
Law System ◽  
Political Motivation ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law Texts

Abstract The subject of the analysis is linguaculture expressing linguistic and cultural differences occurring in every language of law. They relate to vocabulary and editing principles of law acts. It seems that preserving such differences in the target translation makes it possible to reveal specific legislation trends of a given country, which express political motivation. Their preservation in the translated text requires good knowledge of law and in-depth comparative analysis. The focus of the analysis in this text is on the expression of gender in the law texts and specifically, on the translation of feminatives and legal names relevant for cultural dimension of a given law system.

scholarly journals LAW AS A VALUE, VALUES IN LAW (PART TWO)

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (91) ◽  
pp. 69-79
Author(s):  
Aleksandrs Baikovs
Keyword(s):  
Legal Culture ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Legal Consciousness ◽  
Apparent Lack ◽  
A Value ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
The One ◽  
Fundamental Values

The paper deals with the category of "values", the Rights as a value, and fundamental values of law; including freedom, justice, and equality have been analyzed.The relevance of the research is determined not only by the apparent lack of exploration of the problem but also by the fact that the value of rights and legal values determine direction and meaning, as well as the content of the rules of law, which is their normative expression, and, ultimately, appearing as a kind of basis for the legal culture, the source of the formation of the legal consciousness and establishing legal order, ensuring the efficiency of legal regulation due to the using the embodiment in reality of freedom, justice, equality.Legal norms themselves acquire the importance of values and become the subject of evaluation. Among values themselves, which act as an ideal justification of law rules, the law rules themselves and assessments, on the one hand, there are not only close ties but also mutual transitions. Therefore, both their interrelated explanations and differentiation are necessary.

scholarly journals The Dispute Settlement Model of Regional Head Election Perspective Theory of Legal System in Indonesia

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dedi Mulyadi ◽  
Tanti Kirana Utami
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Law System ◽  
Perspective Theory ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Electoral Law

The effectiveness of law enforcement depends on three law aspects; those are the structure of law, the substance of the law, and legal culture. Law structure is about the law enforcers, law substance is about the legislative means, and law culture is about a living law adopted by society. This study defines the background of simultaneous regional head elections in Indonesia, the problems of the simultaneous regional head elections in Indonesia, and the implementation of legal system theory to solve the simultaneous regional head election problems in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical with the specification of descriptive analysis research. The result of the research is needed permanent law structures that cover (Election Police, Election Prosecutor, Election lawyer, and Election Jury), the law substance through the issuing of general regulations (lex general) which can integrate the Laws of Legislative, Presidential, and Regional Head Elections (lex specialist) and the legal culture of society as human behavior (including the legal culture of law enforcement officers) on the electoral law and law system that are in force at the moment.

scholarly journals Forms of testaments in European legislatures

2021 ◽  
pp. 433-444
Author(s):  
Jovana Vasiljković ◽  
Dalibor Krstinić
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Historical Method ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Made In

A testament is a unilateral legal act as it is made by a declaration of will of one person and is distinguished from other legal acts by its characteristics. By means of testament the testators may dispose of their rights and create an obligation for themselves and the obligations of the testament do not come into effect until after the death of the testator. A testament can be made in one of the forms prescribed by the law. The primary goal of this paper is to demonstrate and analyse different forms of testaments in the legislature of the Republic of Serbia and the chosen European legislatures of France, Germany, Italy and England. The following methods will be used in the paper: comparative analysis of the forms of testaments in the said legislatures, to be completed by the normative method, while by analysing the content in a systematic way we shall approach the subject matter, and the historical method, which will help us review the origin of certain forms of testaments.

scholarly journals The End of the Classical Paradigms of Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 79-92
Author(s):  
Sylwia Leszczuk ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Cultural Transformations ◽  
Current State ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
Score Result ◽  
State Of Affairs ◽  
Present World

Goal – the aim of this text is to show the functioning, transformation, convergence and ultimately decline of classical paradigms operating in the legal sphere. Particular attention is focused on the contemporary state of affairs, referring to today’s trends in thought, philosophy and the contemporary way of explaining reality by societies that are carriers of the law. The purpose is to showcase that the today’s changing world is faced with many problems that are completely new to humanity as a whole, and that those problems have the power to affect the legal sphere as well. It proves that despite the belief in the stabilizing function of the law, it itself begins to be questioned, and its iron foundations begin to waver in principle, resulting in spectacular changes in the way we view such non‑negotiable issues as justice, power, order, and the meaning of being. Research methodology – through an analysis of the literature on the subject and by compiling the most important paradigmatic frameworks, a cross‑section of attitudes relevant to understanding the presented issue is made. Score/result – as a result, an observation is made regarding the current state of paradigms operating in the legal sphere. In line with the conclusion, it is stated that in the present world paradigms have mostly lost or are losing their power. They will lose it completely or undergo a transformation. There is also an exhaustion of the power of all grand narratives that must necessarily be taken into account when making any considerations about the embeddedness of law and its validity. Originality/value – the content of the text refers to well‑known paradigms of law that seem to be unshakable elements of Western legal culture. Nevertheless, the analysis of the problems presented in the text shows that the unshakable foundations of law are beginning to degrade, or at least to change, in collision with, above all, contemporary socio‑cultural transformations.

scholarly journals Forum Non Conveniens in Australia: A Comparative Analysis

2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Gray
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
International Law ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
The Us ◽  
Forum Non Conveniens ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Uk

This paper critically examines the law of forum non conveniens, in particular the use of the ‘clearly inappropriate forum’ test in Australia, compared with the ‘more appropriate forum’ test applied in jurisdictions such as the UK and the US. It traces the development of the law in the UK in relation to forum non conveniens, including the English acceptance of the doctrine, and how it has been applied in various cases. Some criticism of the ‘more appropriate forum’ test is noted, and it is not recommended that the courts adopt the ‘laundry list’ approach evident in some US decisions, where up to 25 different factors are considered in assessing a forum non conveniens application. It considers the Australian ‘clearly inappropriate forum’ test, and concludes that the ‘clearly inappropriate forum’ test should no longer be followed in that it is unnecessarily parochial and is not consistent with other goals of the rules of private international law including comity. Links between Australia and the subject matter may well be tenuous. Confusion attends the application of the test in Australia at present, the court has rejected the English approach but claims to apply some of the factors mentioned in the English approach in the Australian test, and there is an undesirable schism between statutory rules applicable in domestic cases and the approach when the common law doctrine of forum non conveniens is used. The law regarding forum non conveniens should be harmonious with choice of law rules, and interest analysis can assist in formulating the desired approach to forum non conveniens applications.

scholarly journals References to Common Law in the Reasons for Judgments by Polish Courts

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-161
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Maroń
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Law System ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
Qualitative Nature ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Given

The article presents the results of a study of the reasons for rulings of the Polish courts in terms of the presence in them of references to common law. The analysis of the title issue is mainly of a qualitative nature with descriptive, systematic, and explanatory features. The research has focused on determining the functions played by the references to common law in judgments and on recognizing the factors that rule or causally explain the practice of the courts referring to the given law system in their decisions. Some general regularities characterizing the discussed phenomenon have also been shown. Furthermore, quantitative findings on the scale, intensity, and dynamics of the references to common law in the reasons for judgments have been presented. Common law, which until now has been the subject of comparative studies of the Polish legal science, is increasingly drawing attention of the Polish courts as the law-applying bodies.

The Issue of Compulsory Contracts between Providers and Clients of Public Services or Essential Commodities in the Law of Iran

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Sedaghati
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Major Change ◽  
Direct Reference ◽  
Law System ◽  
Challenging Issue ◽  
Iranian Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law

AbstractNowadays a major change in interactions and concepts like independence has led to a transformation in the law of contracts. A clear example can be observed in the continuing expansion of compulsion into contracts (conclusion of compulsory contracts). In the modern law, the phenomenon of compulsory contract is considered to be inevitable, and the law of Iran is no exception. On the account of the fact that this concept has not undergone in-depth analyses neither in Iranian law system nor among the jurists, the study of this system of law in regard to its capacity to accept this phenomenon would be probably a challenging issue. Direct reference to law so as to infer an obligation to enter a contract or resort to one in order to conclude the existence of a type of implied term creating such an obligation is the subject matter of this study.

ИЗМЕНЕНИЕ ПАРАДИГМЫ МЕТОДОЛОГИИ ЮРИСПРУДЕНЦИИ

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 32-40
Author(s):  
Ю. М. Оборотов
Keyword(s):  
Legal Theory ◽  
Research Strategy ◽  
The State ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Methodological Question ◽  
Modern Development ◽  
Decisive Importance ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Methodological Approaches ◽  
The Law

В современной методологии юриспруденции происходит переход от изучения состо­яний ее объекта, которыми выступают право и государство, к постижению этого объек­та в его изменениях и превращениях. Две подсистемы методологии юриспруденции, подсистема обращенная к состоянию права и государства; и подсистема обращенная к изменениям права и государства, — получают свое отображение в концептуальной форме, методологических подходах, методах, специфических понятиях. Показательны перемены в содержании методологии юриспруденции, где определяю­щее значение имеют методологические подходы, определяющие стратегию исследова­тельских поисков во взаимосвязи юриспруденции с правом и государством. Среди наи­более характерных подходов антропологический, аксиологический, цивилизационный, синергетический и герменевтический — определяют плюралистичность современной методологии и свидетельствуют о становлении новой парадигмы методологии юриспру­денции.   In modern methodology of jurisprudence there is a transition from the study the states of its object to its comprehension in changes and transformations. Hence the two subsystems of methodology of jurisprudence: subsystem facing the states of the law and the state as well as their components and aspects; and subsystem facing the changes of the law and the state in general and their constituents. These subsystems of methodology of jurisprudence receive its reflection in conceptual form, methodological approaches, methods, specific concepts. Methodology of jurisprudence should not be restricted to the methodology of legal theory. In this regard, it is an important methodological question about subject of jurisprudence. It is proposed to consider the subject of jurisprudence as complex, covering both the law and the state in their specificity, interaction and integrity. Indicative changes in the content methodology of jurisprudence are the usage of decisive importance methodological approaches that govern research strategy searches in conjunction with the law and the state. Among the most characteristic of modern development approaches: anthropological, axiological, civilization, synergistic and hermeneutic. Modern methodology of jurisprudence is pluralistic in nature alleging various approaches to the law and the state. Marked approaches allow the formation of a new paradigm methodology of jurisprudence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document