scholarly journals Study of microleakage in dental enamel using nanofillers composite resin restoration with total-etch and self-etch adhesive

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-18
Author(s):  
Iin Sundari ◽  
Viona Diansari ◽  
Niska Darlianti
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Average Distance ◽  
Dental Enamel ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Fifth Generation ◽  
Nail Polish ◽  
Group A ◽  
Composite Resin Restoration ◽  
Group B ◽  
Self Etch

Microleakage is a poor marginal adaptation of the restoration, often found between cavity and restoration material. One of the reasons is the shrinkage during the composite resin during polymerization, causing the restoration’s adaption disturbed. Application of adhesive material on the cavity affects microleakage at the margin restoration and increases the adaptation between cavity and restoration material. This research aims to determine microleakage in dental enamel using nanofiller composite resin restoration with fifth-generation total-etch adhesive and eight-generation self-etch adhesive. This research used 16 specimens premolars, which were prepared cavity Class I G.V. Black and divided into two groups (group A and B). Group A used nanofiller composite resin FiltekTM Z350 + fifth-generation total-etch Adper Single Bond 2 (n=8), group B used nanofiller composite resin Filtek TM  Z350 + eight-generation self-etch Universal Single Bond Adper (n=8). The specimen isolated  using nail polish except in the work area.,then immersed in methylene blue 1% at 25°C (for 24 hours). After that, all specimens were washed and cut longitudinally. The results were observed using a Stereomicroscope and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The observation’s results showed that the amount number of microleakage in group A (75%) less than in group B (100%), while the non-parametric statistic test using the Mann Whitney showed no significant differences (p0.143). Based on SEM images, the average distance between enamel and composite resin with total-etch adhesive was 1.40 ± 0.007µm, and 1.84 ± 0.509 µm for resin composite with self-etch adhesive. This research concluded that microleakage using nanofiller composite with the fifth-generation total-etch adhesive was smaller than nanofiller composite resin with the eighth -generation self-etch adhesive.KEYWORDS: Adhesive system, nanofillers composite resin, microleakage, enamel

scholarly journals The difference of tensile bond strength between total and self etch adhesive systems in dentin

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Selly Yusalina ◽  
Moch. Richata Fadil ◽  
Milly Armilia
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Conservation Area ◽  
Composite Resin Restoration ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Self Etch

Total etch adhesive system has been widely used in teeth conservation area as an adhesive agent before implicating composite resin restoration agent. The aim of this research is to prove the difference of tensile bond strength between total etch (Single Bond) and self etch adhesive system (Adper prompt L-Pop) on dentin surface in vitro. The extracted and non carries maxillary premolar teeth were used in this research and were divided into 2 groups. The first group comprised 15 specimen teeth etched in phosphoric acid and was applicated with the Single Bond adhesive agent. The second group comprised 15 specimen teeth, applicated with the Adper Prompt-L-Pop. The composite resin (Z 350, 3M) was applied incrementally and each of the layers was rayed for 20 seconds. The specimens were stored in physiologic solution before they were tested. Tensile bond strength was measured by LRX Plus Lloyd Instrument, with 1 N load and 1 mm/minute speed, and the measurement result was in Mpa unit. The result was evaluated statistically by the Student t-test with α = 0.05. Single Bond (the 5th generation) showed a better bond strength compared to the Adper Prompt-L-Pop (the 6th generation).

scholarly journals Scanning Electron Microscope Image Analysis of Bonding Surfaces following Removal of Composite Resin Restoration Using Er: YAG Laser: In Vitro Study

Scanning ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Dlsoz Omer Babarasul ◽  
Bestoon Mohammed Faraj ◽  
Fadil Abdullah Kareem
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
Pulse Repetition Rate ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Yag Laser ◽  
Group A ◽  
Composite Resin Restoration ◽  
Group B ◽  
Scanning Electron

It is impossible to remove tooth-colored restorations by mechanical means without unnecessary damage to the adjacent sound tooth structure. This study is aimed at investigating erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er: YAG) laser (Hoya ConBio, VersaWave, CA, USA) in removing composite resin restorations and assessing the change in morphology of bonding surfaces using a scanning electron microscope (EDX, CAMSCANNER, 3200LV, UK). The investigators collected thirty extracted sound human premolar teeth for this investigation, and the conventional design class V cavity was prepared on the buccal surface of each specimen. The specimens were allocated randomly into three groups, according to the procedure used for the ablation of the composite restoration: group A (high-speed diamond fissure bur), group B, and group C (Er: YAG laser) using a different pulse repetition rate of 20 Hz (group B) and 25 Hz (group C). The AutoCAD software program (Autodesk, Inc., 2016) was used to calculate the surface area and the resulting dimensional change of the cavities after restoration removal. The cavities were filled with composite resin and randomly assigned into two groups conforming to the methods applied to eliminate the restoration; diamond turbine fissure bur and laser. In each group, two specimens were selected randomly for scanning electron microscope analysis of bonding surfaces. The least meantime for the composite resin removal was observed in the high-speed diamond bur, significantly less than both Er-YAG laser groups ( p < 0.001 ). However, at a higher pulse repetition rate, time-consuming decreased. The results showed that laser is more conservative in removing composite resin restoration as the change was most remarkable in group A (0.800 mm), then group C (0.466 mm), and the slightest change is in group B (0.372 mm) ( p = 0.014 ). The dentin surface of group A showed a smooth surface with no opened dentinal tubule and intact smear layer. In groups B and C, dentin surfaces were irregular, scaly, or flaky, and dentinal tubules were opened without a smear layer. Therefore, Er: YAG laser is effective for composite resin removal considering the parameters chosen in this study with fewer changes in cavity surface area and better microretentive features.

scholarly journals Sectional matrix system in reconstruction of proximal contact in class ii resin restoration

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 16-19
Author(s):  
Norun Nahar ◽  
AKM Bashar ◽  
Md Abdul Gafur ◽  
Didarul Haque Jeorge
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Reference Group ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Contact Points ◽  
Molar Teeth ◽  
Group A ◽  
Composite Resin Restoration ◽  
Bonferroni Test ◽  
Group B ◽  
Matrix Band

Background: Clinicians always faces some challenges to reconstruct proper proximal contact while restoring class-II cavity with composite resin due to its viscosity, elastic property and polymerization shrinkage. It has been claimed that use of sectional pre-contoured matrix band with separation ring will produce more reliable result for reconstruction of optimal proximal contact in class II composite resin restoration. Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of sectional pre-contoured matrix band with separation ring for reconstruction of optimal proximal contact in class II resin composite restoration. Methodology:  One Nissin manikin model having the facility of placing and screwing all upper and lower sets of artificial human teeth and sixty-two (62) artificial human mandibular permanent 1st molar teeth were collected. These 62 artificial human mandibular permanent 1st molars were randomly assigned in two groups (A & B) having 31 teeth in each. Standardized class II MO (mesio-occlusal) cavity were prepared on total 31 artificial 1st molar in group A. The 2nd premolar in the manikin model was replaced by metal cast duplicate and permanently fixed into the socket. All the Thirty-one (31) 1st molar teeth in group A, having Prepared class II cavity in each, were replaced one by another in the manikin distal to cast duplicated 2nd premolar and restored with composite resin by using sectional pre-contoured matrix band with separation ring and another 31 uninstrumented intact artificial 1st molars were include in group B as a reference group. After completion of restoration, newly developed proximal contact points were measured by using universal testing machine one after another. Same were also done in intact reference Group B. Measurement was done to assess the position of contact point, contact tightness and contact area of Group A and Group B on the same typodont. The results were analyzed statistically with post hoc Bonferroni test (P<0.05). Result: Teeth restored with sectional pre-contoured matrix with separation ring (group A) provided the tighter contact and broadened area of contact where all the contact points were placed  more occlusally compared to that of the intact un-instrumented reference teeth (group B).Statistically significant differences (P<0.05) were produced in all the three parameters with each other. Conclusion: Teeth restored with sectional pre-contoured matrix band with separation ring failed to reconstruct the optimal proximal contact in class-II composite resin restoration in comparison to intact uninstrumented reference tooth. Update Dent. Coll. j: 2021; 11(2): 16-19

scholarly journals Influence of irrigating agents on fiber postpush-out bond strength to radicular dentin sections with the different adhesive system

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (03) ◽  
pp. 380-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satheesh B. Haralur ◽  
Asim Nasser A. Alasabi ◽  
Sultan A. Abohathrah Al Qahtani ◽  
Saeed Musleh S. Alqahtani
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Coronal Section ◽  
Group B ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Push Out

ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of irrigating agents on push-out bond strength of resin postcemented with various adhesive systems at different radicular dentin sections. Materials and Methods:Sixty single-rooted premolar teeth were root canal treated, subsequently decorated at cementoenamel junction. The endodontic postspace was irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for Group A (n = 30) and Group B (n = 30), respectively. The sample from each group was subdivided into three groups (10) according to luting protocol of etch-wash, self-etch, and self-adhesive. Individual teeth with cemented resin postsamples were sectioned into coronal, middle, and apical segments. Subsequently, subjected for pushout bond strength test by applying a load at 0.5 mm/min speed. The data were analyzed by three-way analysis of variance and Tukey comparison test at a significant difference level of 0.05.Results: The coronal section with 5.25% NaOCl irrigation and self-etch luting protocol provided the highest push out strength at 16.282 Mpa. The etch-wash luting protocol in both irrigations showed the lesser bond strength at 8.273 and 8.493 MPa, respectively, in coronal section.Conclusions: The self-etch adhesive system showed better push out bond strength and 17% EDTA had a negative influence on self-etch bond strength. The coronal sections had highest bond strength in comparison with apical radicular dentin sections.

scholarly journals Comparison of microleakage of an alkasite restorative material, a composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. e213981
Author(s):  
Fariba Motevasselian ◽  
Hamid Kermanshah ◽  
Ebrahim Rasoulkhani ◽  
Mutlu Özcan
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Group A ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

Aim: To compare the microleakage of Cention N, a subgroup of composite resins with a resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and a composite resin. Methods: Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of 46 extracted human molars. The teeth were randomly assigned to four groups. Group A: Tetric N-Bond etch-and-rinse adhesive and Tetric N-Ceram nanohybrid composite resin, group B: Cention N without adhesive, group C: Cention N with adhesive, and group D: Fuji II LC RMGI. The teeth were thermocycled between 5°-55°C (×10,000). The teeth were coated with two layers of nail vanish except for 1 mm around the restoration margins, and immersed in 2% methylene blue (37°C, 24 h) before buccolingual sectioning to evaluate dye penetration under a stereomicroscope (×20). The data were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests (α=0.05). Results: Type of material and restoration margin had significant effects on the microleakage (p<0.05). Dentin margins showed a higher leakage score in all groups. Cention N and RMGI groups showed significant differences at the enamel margin (p=0.025, p=0.011), and for the latter group the scores were higher. No significant difference was found at the dentin margins between the materials except between Cention N with adhesive and RMGI (p=0.031). Conclusion: Microleakage was evident in all three restorative materials. Cention N groups showed similar microleakage scores to the composite resin and displayed lower microleakage scores compared with RMGI.

Comparison of successful outcome of pit and fissure sealants bonded with etch-and-rinse adhesive and self-etch adhesive system

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Jiand Malik Baloch ◽  
Muhammad Adeel Ahmed ◽  
Azeem Ul Yaqin Syed ◽  
Muhammad Zohaib Younus ◽  
Muhammad Owais Nasim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adhesive System ◽  
Successful Outcome ◽  
Fissure Sealants ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealants ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Molar Teeth ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Self Etch

BACKGROUND: Dental caries is one of the most common diseases around the world. The newly erupted permanent posterior teeth are at great risk due to the complex occlusal morphology of pits and fissures, infraocclusion and incomplete maturation of enamel. Pit and fissure sealants are the treatment of choice in such conditions. OBJECTIVES: To compare the successful outcome of pit and fissure sealants bonded with etch-and-rinse adhesive system and self-etch adhesive systems in newly erupted permanent first molars. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Fatimah Jinnah Dental Hospital from June 2017 to May 2019. Children aged between 6 to 9 years who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were recruited for this study after parents’ consent. Patients were randomly divided into two groups by the lottery method. Thirty patients with 60 first molar teeth in Group A were treated with etch-and-rinse adhesive system, while the other thirty patients with 60 first molar teeth in Group B were treated with self-etch adhesive system. After adhesive placement, all children received the same fissure sealants in newly erupted maxillary and mandibular permanent first molar. Each group was clinically evaluated at 6 and 12 months follow-up visit. Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were used for direct clinical evaluation of successful outcomes such as sealant retention and marginal discoloration. RESULTS: Successful outcome was statistically significant in Group B compared to Group A (60% vs. 30% p= 0.020) at 12 months follow-up. Stratification analysis was performed with respect to age in which a successful outcome was not significant (p= 0.43) between groups for 6 to 7 years of age, while it was significant (p= 0.012) between groups in 8 to 9 years of age children. CONCLUSION: Self-etch adhesive system is better than etch-and-rinse adhesive system in terms of long-term sealant retention. In addition, the bonding procedure is simple with relatively short clinical application time therefore it would offer great benefit to clinicians in treating pediatric patients.

scholarly journals Effect of Precuring and Postcuring of Total-etch and Self-etch Bonding Agents on the Microleakage of Fissure Sealants

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahman Seraj ◽  
Ghasem Meighani ◽  
Shabnam Milani ◽  
Mostafa Fatemi
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Dentistry ◽  
Bonding Agent ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Fissure Sealant ◽  
The Third ◽  
Fifth Generation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Self Etch

Objectives: Considering the importance of timesaving in pediatric dentistry, if the efficacy is achieved along with shorter working time and less technical sensitivity, the behavior management of young patients can be anticipated. This study aimed to compare the effect of precuring and postcuring of total-etch and self-etch bonding agents on the microleakage of sealants. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on forty impacted third molars, which were surgically extracted. The samples were divided into five groups: 1. Control (etching and sealant), 2. Precured fifth-generation bonding agent (Adper Single Bond 2) and fissure sealant, 3. Postcured fifth-generation bonding agent (Adper Single Bond 2) and fissure sealant, 4. Precured seventh-generation bonding agent (Single Bond Universal) and fissure sealant, and 5. Postcured seventh-generation bonding agent (Single Bond Universal) and fissure sealant. All specimens were thermocycled (×1000), immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsine solution for 24 hours, sectioned, digitally photographed, and measured using the LAS EZ program. The data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s tests. Results: Leakage in the control group and the third group was significantly lower than that in other groups. In pairwise comparisons, a significant difference was found between the control group and the fifth group and between the third group and the fifth group. Conclusion: The conventional method of sealant placement showed superior results in comparison with the use of an intermediate layer of the bonding agent.

scholarly journals The effect of glycerin on the surface hardness and roughness of nanofill composite

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Diana Zakiyah ◽  
Ruslan Effendy ◽  
Edhie Arif Prasetyo
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Surface Hardness ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Inhibition Layer ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Oxygen Inhibition ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Present research studied the surface hardness and roughness dependence on polymerization. Polymerization of composites occurs through chain reaction that is induced by free radicals. Oxygen in the air decreases the excitability of the photo initiator, causing polymerization interference. Oxygen inhibition layer (OIL) is formed on the surface. OIL can be reduced by curing the composite through by application of glycerin to the surface. Purpose: To determine the effect of glycerin on the surface hardness and roughness of nanofill composite. Material and Methods: 64 specimens of composite (Z350 XT, 3M) were prepared using a disc-shaped acrylic. The groups were divided into group A surface hardness (N=32) and group B surface roughness (N=32). Group A1, the specimen was coated with glycerin and light cured for 20 s and group A2, the specimen was exposed to air and light cured for 20 s. Group B1 was coated with glycerin and light cured for 20 s and Group B2 was exposed to air and light cured for 20 s. The specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 h at 370. Measuring with Vickers and surface roughness tester and. Data were statistically analyzed using Mean-whitney U Test. Results: There were statiscally significant difference between the surface hardness and roughness of nanofill composite coated with glycerin and without glycerin (p<0,05) Conclusion: The surface hardness of nanofill composite resin coated with glycerin is higher than composite without glycerin and the surface roughness of nanofill composite resin coated with glycerin is lower than composite without glycerin

scholarly journals The difference between porcelain and composite resin shear bond strength in the administration of 4% and 19.81% silane

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Ira Widjiastuti ◽  
Dwina Rahmawati Junaedi ◽  
Ruslan Effendy
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Repair Process ◽  
Direct Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

Background: Damage to porcelain restorations such as fractures requires a repair that can be performed either directly or indirectly. Direct repair involves directly performing restoration of fractured porcelain with a composite resin application. This technique has more advantages than indirect repair because it requires no laboratory work and can be completed during a single visit. Silane, on the other hand, has been widely used and is reported to increase porcelain and composite resin attachments during the direct repair process. Purpose: This study aimed to determine the differences in shear bond strength between porcelain and composite resin during the administering of 4% and 19.81% silane. Methods: 27 porcelain samples were divided into three groups, namely: Group A - 4% silane, Group B - 19.81% silane and Group C - no silane, prior to the application of composite resin. Each sample was tested for shear bond strength by means of Autograph and fracture analysis performed through stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope tests. Data analysis was subsequently performed using an ANOVA test. Results: There was a significant difference between the three groups with p=0.000 (p<0.005). The lowest bond strength was found in the group without silane, while the highest was in the group with 4% silane (p<0.005). Conclusion: The use of 4% silane can produce the highest shear bond strength of porcelain and resin composite.

scholarly journals Microleakage of Class I and II Composite Resin Restorations Using a Sonic-resin Placement System

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 653-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Kalmowicz ◽  
JG Phebus ◽  
BM Owens ◽  
WW Johnson ◽  
GT King
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Blue Dye ◽  
Group A ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Level Of Significance ◽  
Group B

SUMMARYObjectivesTo determine microleakage of posterior Class I and II restorations using the SonicFill composite resin system.Methods and MaterialsEighty previously extracted third molars were randomly assigned to four preparation/restoration groups (n=20): Group A: Class I preparations restored with SonicFill system/bulk fill; Group B: Class II preparations restored with SonicFill system/bulk fill; Group C: Class I preparations restored with Herculite Ultra composite resin/incremental technique; and Group D: Class II preparations restored with Herculite Ultra composite resin/incremental technique. Class I preparations were approximately 3.0 mm in width buccolingually and 3.0 mm in depth. Class II preparations were approximately 3.0 mm in width buccolingually, 1.5 mm in axial depth, and 4.0 mm in gingival depth. In all groups, the enamel and dentin surfaces were conditioned with Kerr 37.5% phosphoric acid, followed by application of Optibond Solo Plus adhesive system. Following restoration, the specimens were thermocycled, immersed in methylene blue dye, and embedded in acrylic resin. Specimen blocks were sectioned in the mesiodistal direction, with marginal dye penetration (microleakage) examined using a 20× binocular microscope. Class I and II restoration microleakage was scored separately using a 0-3 ordinal ranking system. Statistical analyses were conducted using nonparametric testing at the p &lt; 0.05 level of significance.ResultsSignificantly less microleakage was associated with both Class I restorative groups (A and C), SonicFill bulk fill and Herculite Ultra incremental fill, compared to the Class II restorative groups (B and D), SonicFill/bulk fill and Herculite Ultra/incremental fill.ConclusionsAccording to the results of this study, the materials (SonicFill vs Herculite Ultra), C-factors, and insertion techniques (bulk vs incremental) did not appear to be significant influences with regard to marginal microleakage; however, the type of preparation cavity (Class I vs Class II) and the subsequent bonding surface (enamel vs dentin [cementum]) proved to be significant factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document