scholarly journals PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN MAKE A MATCH PADA MATERI GLOBALISASI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA SDN BLANG KIREE

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurmasyitah Nurmasyitah.

 This research entitled the application of model of learning make a match in the content ofglobalization on student learning outcomes SD Blang Kiree. The problem in this research ishow student learning outcomes by using cooperative learning models make a match in thecontent of globalization on class IV SD Blang Kiree. This research aims to know the results ofthe learning model cooperative learning using make a match. This research uses qualitativeresearch method. The subjects of the research were grade IV SD Blang Kiree totalling 25persons. The conclusion that the application of the model make a match increases studentlearning results in SD Blang Kiree.

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 789
Author(s):  
Maria Yulianti

The background of this study was the low student learning outcomes of PPKn, from 28 students who achievedthe completeness criteria at least only 11 students (39.29%). The low student learning outcomes are caused bythe high level of individuality between students so that the achievement of competence among studentsexperiences a very distant difference. Based on this, the researchers made improvements to student learningoutcomes through the application of STAD cooperative learning models. This research is a classroom actionresearch, with the subject of class VII of SMP Negeri 3 Teluk Kuantan. The data used in this study is PPKnlearning outcomes data. The results stated that after applying the STAD type cooperative learning model studentlearning outcomes had increased in the initial data the number of students who completed were 11 students, incycle I had an increase with the number of 18 students, and in cycle II the number of students who completedcontinued to increase by the number 22 student.


JURNAL RANDAI ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 62-78
Author(s):  
Paridamiwati

The phenomenon of low student learning outcomes from observations of researchers in the field is caused by several factors, such as: (1) The learning carried out by the teacher still uses conventional learning, namely the teacher lectures in delivering material, questions and answers and assignments, so it does not provide encouragement for students to study seriously ; (2) In delivering learning, the teacher still places students as recipients so that students are passive and only wait for information from the teacher without trying to find it. This can be seen when the teacher asks for students' opinions, only a few students give opinions and ask questions about things that are not understood; (3) This is also due to the lack of teacher knowledge about learning strategies that can activate students; (4) Teachers do not provide opportunities for students to work together in doing their assignments with their friends. This makes researchers feel the need to improve the learning process with efforts made to apply an appropriate learning model, namely the Think Pair Share Type cooperative learning model. This type gives students time to think and respond and help each other. Cooperative learning Think Pair Share is a cooperative learning model that allows students to help each other and cooperate with one another. Through this model students are more enthusiastic in learning so that they can increase the achievement of optimal learning outcomes. The formulation of the problem is as follows: "Does the student learning outcomes increase through the application of the Think Pair Share type of cooperative learning model for fourth grade students of SD Negeri 6 Sukajadi, Pekanbaru City?". The purpose of this study was to determine the improvement of social studies learning outcomes through the application of the Think Pair Share Type Cooperative learning model for class IV SDN 6 Sukajadi, Pekanbaru City. Based on the data that has been presented above, it is concluded that the application of the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning model can improve social studies learning outcomes for fourth grade students of SD Negeri 6 Sukajadi (the average student learning outcomes through cycle I is 62.25, while in the second cycle the average student learning outcomes of 76.25)


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 20-40
Author(s):  
Mahfud Muhammad

The effective learning model is a cornerstone of learning practices that make it easy for students to learn and give students knowledge, values ​​and skills. One learning model is the Make a match type cooperative learning model. Make a match gives students the opportunity to ask questions, have opinions and interact with students who are active in class. The teacher acts as a facilitator. Make a match model is a technique to find a partner using a card that contains the answers to these questions. Therefore, learning the Quran hadith makes it easy for students to memorize the meanings and verses of the Holy Qur'an, one of them by the method of Make a match. The focus of this research is on: a) How is the application of the Make a match cooperative learning model? b) What is the student's interest in learning? c) What are the student learning outcomes? and d) What is the response of students ?. This type of research uses Classroom Action Research, a means for researching, perfecting and evaluating the implementation of teacher assignments. The method for initiating this research data, observation sheets, tests and questionnaires. The results of this study indicate that the interests and learning outcomes of students of the Quran hadith subjects in class IV students are said to be still lacking, indicated by the results of observations in class IV students from pre-cycle 61.15%, after the first cycle of 74.07% and the second cycle increased 85.00%. The application of the Make a match type of cooperative learning model for grade IV students at MI Darul Ulum, Wringinom Gresik, was positive because it was seen from the questionnaire percentage of 88%. With this method, student learning outcomes from pre-cycle of 61.15% then increased by 73.9% in the first cycle and held the second cycle increased by 80.5% seen from an increase in each cycle of student learning outcomes has been maximized because it exceeds the target Minimum completeness criteria (KKM). The learning implementation procedure using the Make a match method has been running smoothly and in accordance with the planned learning implementation (RPP).


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-61
Author(s):  
Fira Zarti ◽  
Khairani Khairani

This study aims to implement the Numbered Head Togerher (NHT) type of cooperative learning model in social studies subjects for grade VII students of SMPN 40 Padang. This research is an experimental research. Research instruments in the form of tests and questionnaires. Data analysis techniques using ANOVA. The results showed (1) student learning outcomes applied to the NHT type cooperative model were higher than student learning outcomes with conventional methods at SMPN 40 Padang. (2) The learning outcomes of students who have high motivation to learn are higher using NHT type cooperative learning models than students who have low motivation with conventional methods. (3) The learning outcomes of students who have lower learning motivation are higher using conventional learning models higher than using NHT learning models. (4) there is an interaction between the use of the Numbered Head Together (NHT) type of cooperative learning model and motivation in influencing student learning outcomes in social studies subjects in class VII SMPN 40 Padang.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurmasyitah Nurmasyitah.

This research entitled the application of models of learning make a match to content Globalization uterhadap student learning outcomes SD Blang Kiree. The problem in this research is how student learning outcomes by using cooperative learning models make a match to content globalization on class IV SD Blang Kiree. This research aims to know the results of the learning model cooperative learning using siswadengan make a match. This research uses qualitative research methods. The subject of research grade IV SD Blang Kiree totalling 25 persons. The conclusion that the application of the model make a match increases student learning results ketuntasan in SD Blang Kiree. 


Author(s):  
Meti Tri Hayati

<p><em>To realize the quality of learning and the quality of graduates at SDN Tiyaran 02, especially class IV,</em><em> it is necessary to use one of the recommended HOTS-oriented learning models in the implementation of the 2013 Curriculum, namely the Cooperative Learning model. Cooperative Learning learning model is a teaching and learning strategy that works on attitudes or helping among others in an organized organization in groups, consisting of two or more people. After implementing integrated thematic learning with the Cooperative Learning model, the authors found that the process and student learning outcomes improved. Better than the previous lesson. When the Cooperative Learning model is applied to other learning materials, it turns out that the process and student learning outcomes are just as good. The writer concludes that this cooperative learning learning practice is successful as a best practice for HOTS learning with the Cooperative Learning model.</em></p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 697
Author(s):  
Diliza Afrila

This study aims to determine (1) Student learning outcomes in the Political Economy course taught using cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing are higher than students taught using conventional learning models in the Economic Education Study Program, (2) Student learning outcomes in the Political Economy course who has high learning motivation which is taught by using the cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing is higher than students who have high learning motivation who are taught using conventional learning models in the Economic Education Study Program, (3) Student learning outcomes in the Political Economy courses who have low learning motivation who are taught using the cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing are higher than students who have low learning motivation who are taught using conventional learning models in the Education Study Program Economics, and (4) the interaction between cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing and learning motivation towards student learning outcomes in the Political Economy course in the Economic Education Study Program. This type of research is a quasi experiment. The study population was 27 students of the Economic Education Study Program Semester VI / A1 and VI / A2 Academic Year 2019/2020. The sampling technique was purposive sampling (purposive sampling). The results showed that (1) Student learning outcomes in the Political Economy course taught by using the cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing were higher than those taught using conventional learning models. This is indicated by the t value of 2.159 and the probability value of 0.041. So that the probability value of 0.041 < 0.05 then H0 is rejected, (2) Student learning outcomes in the Political Economy course who have high learning motivation who are taught using the cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing are higher than students who have high learning motivation being taught with conventional learning models. This is indicated by the t value of 7.260 and the probability value of 0.001. Thus, the probability value of 0.001 < 0.05 then H0 is rejected, (3) The learning outcomes of students in the Political Economy course who have low learning motivation who are taught using cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing are higher than students who have low learning motivation which taught by conventional learning models. This is indicated by the t value of 1.532 and the probability value of 0.006. Thus, the probability value of 0.006 < 0.05 then H0 is rejected, and (4) There is no interaction between the cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing and learning motivation on student learning outcomes in the Political Economy course. This is indicated by the Sig level of 0.205. This means that the value of Sig is greater than the value of α = 0.05 (sig α), so the null hypothesis (Ho) is accepted.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 146
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi daripada kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan pragmatis. (3) interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi 180 orang, dengan cluster random sampling berjumlah 80 orang yang terdiri dari 40 orang kelas A dan B. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen, desain faktorial 2 x 2. Uji statistik dengan statistik deskriptif, dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 dilanjutkan uji Scheffe. Sebelumnya dilakukan uji persyaratan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa. Hipotesis ini menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tepat dari pada model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa, dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis akan memperoleh hasil yang lebih baik dari pada mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis pembelajaran yang tepat digunakan adalah strategi pembelajaran Direct Instructional.            Kata Kunci: pengantar bisnis, kooperatif tipe TST, NHT, gaya belajar Abstract: The purpose of this study is to find out: (1) the results of introductory business learning of students taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than that of the NHT cooperative type. (2) introductory student learning outcomes that have theoretical and pragmatic learning styles. (3) the interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. The research was conducted at Methodist University in Indonesia. A population of 180 people, with a cluster random sampling of 80 people consisting of 40 people class A and B. Quasi-experimental research methods, factorial design 2 x 2. Statistical tests with descriptive statistics, followed by inferential statistics two-way ANOVA with a significant level α = 0.05 continued with the Scheffe test. Previously performed requirements testing. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning of students taught with the cooperative learning model of the TSTS type were higher than that of the NHT type of cooperative; (2) the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have higher theoretical learning styles than pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. This hypothesis shows that the TSTS type of cooperative learning model is more appropriate than the NHT type of cooperative learning model in improving student business introductory learning outcomes, and students who have a theoretical learning style will get better results than students who have appropriate pragmatic learning styles of learning used is the Direct Instructional learning strategy. Keywords: business introduction, cooperative TST type, NHT, learning style


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-47
Author(s):  
Yannika Nidiasari

Abstract Objectives are to determine : 1) The difference in students' creativity by using cooperative learning model type STAD than conventional learning models., 2) The difference in student learning outcomes using models STAD cooperative learningcompared to conventional learning models., and 3) Their learning outcome of students using cooperative learning model STAD. This type of research this thesis is an experiment involving two classes, namely class with treatment (cooperative learning model STAD) and classes that are not in treatment (conventional learning models). The research data were processed using SPSS software version 16 is the normality test, homogetas, Mann-Whitney and t. The results obtained in this study were 1) There is no difference in the creativity of students by using cooperative learning model type STAD than conventional learning models., 2) There is a difference in student learning outcomes using STAD type of cooperative learning model compared to conventional learning models, which is the average value of the class STAD 63.63 and 48.71 whereas conventional classroom, and 3) are improving student learning outcomes with using cooperative learning model STAD. value nGain STAD grade of 0.27 while the conventional classroom 0,03. Keywords: Model of STAD, creativity in learning and learning outcomes properties of objects and their changes


Author(s):  
Dinda Widyastika ◽  
Ajat Sudrajat ◽  
Abdul Murad

This study aims to determine: student learning outcomes using collaborative and scientific inquiry learning model are higher than direct learning models (Direct Instruction) on style material, student learning outcomes that have high scientific attitudes are better than students who have low scientific attitudes on material style; and the interaction of collaborative inquiry learning model and scientific attitudes towards student learning outcomes in style material. This research is a quasi-experimental study. The population in this study are 28 class IV-A students and 28 class IV-B students. The sample in this study is selected by total sampling of two classes. The instrument consisted of a style of learning outcomes test in the form of multiple choice tests and a scientific attitude questionnaire. Data analysis using two-way ANAVA at the level of α = 0.05 with the help of IBM SPSS Statistics 25 and Excel 2013. The results shows that: the learning outcomes of student style material taught using the Collaborative Based Inquiry learning model 82.96 higher than the average the learning outcomes of style material using the Direct Instruction learning model of 74.67, the learning outcomes of students who have high scientific attitudes have an average of 83.67 and the learning outcomes of students who have low scientific attitudes on average 72.76, and there are the interaction between learning models and scientific attitudes in influencing student learning outcomes material style.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document