Studi Kasus Penerapan Prinsip Pendaftaran First To File Pada Pembatalan Merek Cap Mawar

Merek pada dasarnya adalah tanda untuk mengidentifikasi asala barang atau jasa darisuatu perusahaan dengan barang atau jasa perusahaan lain dan salah satu faktor penunjang kesuksesan dalam pemasaran barang.Hak kepemilikan merek berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan diperoleh melalui sistem pendaftaran yang bersifat konstitutif dengan prinsip First to File.Sehingga perolehan merek hanya bagi pihak yang pertama kali melakukan pendaftara. Namun pada kenyataanya masih banyak kasus sengketa merek yang dimenangkan oleh pihak yang tidak mendaftarkan mereknya. Pokok permasalahan yang dibahas dalam penulisan ini adalah penerapan dari sistem konstituif dengan prinsip First to File yang seharusnya telah dapat memenuhi perlindungan hukum bagi pihak merek terdaftar. Jenis metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah jenis metode penelitian hukum yuridis – normatif yang terdiri dari pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian pada putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 512 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2016 sengketa merek Cap Mawar, maka dapat dikatakan bahwa hakim kurang memperhatikan konsep gugatan awal yang didasari itikad tidak baik. Oleh karena dalam hal jangka waktu gugatan yang diajukan telah melampaui batas waktu yang ditentukan dan tidak dapat diajukan kapan saja dengan dasar pertimbangan bahwa merek yang menjadi objek gugatan bukanlah merek terkenal. Oleh sebab itu nilai kepastian akan perlindungan sebuah merek dengan dikeluarkanya sertifikat merek tersebut belum sepenuhnya mendapatkan perlindungan sebagaimana mestinya, meskipun telah melalui proses penyaringan dan waktu yang cukup lama. Hal ini dapat menunjukan bahwa kepastian hukum yang hendak dicapai belum sepenuhnya terpenuhi.Brands are basically a sign to identify goods or services from a company with goods or services of other companies and one of the supporting factors for success in marketing goods. The rights of brand ownership based on laws and regulations are obtained through a constitutive registration system with the First to File principle. So that the acquisition of a brand is only for the party who first registered. But in reality there are still many cases of brand disputes won by those who did not register their brands. The main problem discussed in this paper is the application of a constituent system with the principle of First to File that should have been able to fulfill legal protection for registered brands. The type of research method used in this writing is a type of juridical-normative legal research method which consists of the approach of legislation, case approach and conceptual approach. The results of the research on the Supreme Court Decision Number 512 K / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2016 in the Cap Mawar brand dispute, it can be said that the judge did not pay attention to the initial lawsuit concept based on bad faith. Because in the event that the time period for the lawsuit filed has exceeded the prescribed time limit and cannot be submitted at any time on the basis of consideration that the trademark that is the object of the lawsuit is not a well-known brand. Therefore the value of the certainty of the protection of a brand with the issuance of the brand certificate has not fully received the proper protection, even though it has gone through a screening process and a long time. This can indicate that the legal certainty to be achieved has not been fully fulfilled.

Download Full-text

Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Terhadap Pelunasan Piutang Dari Harta Pailit

JURNAL ILMIAH MAHASISWA FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS MALIKUSSALEH ◽

10.29103/jimfh.v1i1.2541 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Hamdi Hamdi ◽

Sulaiman S ◽

Teuku Yudi Afrizal

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Capital Investment ◽

Research Method ◽

Mining Industry ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Supreme Court Decision ◽

District Court ◽

Court Of Appeals ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Debt Payment

The concept of legal protection in bankruptcy has so far been seen as a way out of the problem of accounts receivable debt which coincides with a bankrupt debtor, where the debtor no longer has the ability to repay the debts which are past due to their creditors, so that the steps to submit a request for the determination of bankruptcy status by the Court Commerce of the debtor is a possible step to resolve the bankruptcy case. Bankruptcy was originally regulated in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (UUK and PKPU). Furthermore, if the parties submitting bankruptcy applications, the Commercial Court Judges at the District Court are required to examine and hear the case being submitted. The research method used is the normative legal research method or library research with the statute aprroach approach and the case aprroach approach. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the form of legal protection for creditors against paying off debts from bankrupt assets in the Supreme Court Decision Number 511 / K / Pdt. Yinchenindo Mining Industry (in bankruptcy) by law becomes a guarantee for its debts to preferred creditors, in this case the Head of the Second Foreign Capital Investment Service Tax Office. Furthermore, the UUK and PKPU also guarantee the rights of creditors in bankruptcy, especially the rights of preferred creditors who have a special position with peace efforts and the postponement of obligations to pay debts of bankrupt debtors to their creditors as stipulated in Article 222 of the UUK and PKPU. The concept of the distribution of bankrupt assets distributed to preferred creditors after deducting bankruptcy fees and compensation for curatorial services where the payment process is settled based on the principle of fairness and balance set forth in Article 265 of the UUK and PKPU, where the preferred creditor parties receive the remaining payment of the receivables amounting to 62.5% ( sixty two point five percent) of the bankruptcy assets.It is expected that the Judges of the Commercial Court and the Court of Appeals at the Supreme Court consider the rights of preferred creditors who pay off their receivables first. The Debtor should be able to immediately submit a request to postpone the debt payment obligation so that the remaining outstanding debt receivables cannot be paid off to the preferred creditors through the sale of free assets. Keywords: Protections of the law, creditor, Treasures of starc

Download Full-text

Analisis Pemberian Wasiat Wajibah terhadap Ahli Waris Beda Agama Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 331 K/Ag/2018

Jurnal Suara Hukum ◽

10.26740/jsh.v1n2.p172-185 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 172

Author(s):

Alip Pamungkas Raharjo ◽

Elok Fauzia Dwi Putri

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Research Method ◽

Islamic Law ◽

Supreme Court Decision ◽

Court Decision ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Before And After ◽

The Republic ◽

A Share

In Article 171 letter (c) Instruction of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1991 concerning Compilation of Islamic Law affirms that the rights of non muslim heirs to the inheritance of Islamic heirs do not obtain inheritance from the inheritor's inheritance. However, in its development because it felt unfair, the Supreme Court through The Supreme Court Decision Number 368.K / AG / 1995 provided a way for joint cooperation of different inheritance through a wasiat wajibah. But in its development, this provision was changed again by a landmark decision from the Supreme Court, namely through the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018 because there was a change in the value of justice in the community. The research method used normative research with constitutional approach, conceptual approach and case approach. This study aims to explain the rights of non muslim heirs to the inheritance of Islamic heirs before and after the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018. The results showed that prior to the Supreme Court Decision Number 331 K / AG / 2018, heirs of non muslim religions were given a share of inheritance in the form of a wasiat wajibah for ¾ of the inheritance inheritance. Post the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018, the amount of wasiat wajibah will change to ¼ from the inheritor's inheritance.

Download Full-text

Analisis Pemberian Wasiat Wajibah terhadap Ahli Waris Beda Agama Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 331 K/Ag/2018

Jurnal Suara Hukum ◽

10.26740/1.jsh.2019.1.2.4865 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 172

Author(s):

Alip Pamungkas Raharjo ◽

Elok Fauzia Dwi Putri

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Research Method ◽

Islamic Law ◽

Supreme Court Decision ◽

Court Decision ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Before And After ◽

The Republic ◽

A Share

Download Full-text

KEDUDUKAN PENYEWA TANAH DALAM PERJANJIAN SEWA MENYEWA TANPA JANGKA WAKTU

Era Hukum - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum ◽

10.24912/erahukum.v17i1.5976 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 17 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Endang Pandamdari ◽

Aldi Pidano

Keyword(s):

Research Methods ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Supreme Court Decision ◽

Research Data ◽

Good Faith ◽

Legal Research ◽

Time Period ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Illegal Acts ◽

Lease Agreement

In carrying out a lease agreement, Article 1570 and 1571 KUHPer regulates the termination of the lease agreement. Although the provisions regarding the existence of an element at a certain time in a lease have been strictly regulated in the KUHPer, in practice there are still many problems in the lease agreement. The problem raised by the author is how the position of the land tenant in the lease agreement without a period of time according to the Supreme Court Decision Number 534 K / PDT / 2016 and how the legal protection of landowners and tenants in the lease agreement rent without time period?. The author examines the problem by using normative legal research methods with the law approach and case approach. The research data shows that the tenant named Maman Kurniawan is not acting in good faith, namely indirectly wanting to take over ownership of other people's property and not returning the goods to others here entering into the main form of illegal acts in the form of illegally possessing objects belonging to another person and the position of Maman Kurniawan in this case is limited to tenants not owners. Then Article 1571 KUHPer is an article that protects the party who rents out in the case of land leasing agreements without a period of time and protection for tenants in the term agreement, namely requesting compensation for land and / or buildings and a certain grace period for tenants to look for other rental places.

Download Full-text

The Settlement of Boundary Disputes Through Testing of Legislation in Indonesia

SHS Web of Conferences ◽

10.1051/shsconf/20185401003 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 54 ◽

pp. 01003

Author(s):

Suparto ◽

Rahdiansyah

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Supreme Court Decision ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

Regional Autonomy ◽

Boundary Disputes ◽

Legal Principle ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Long Time ◽

The Government ◽

Settlement Of Disputes

Boundary dispute is a new phenomenon that occurred in the era of regional autonomy followed by the expansion of the region. One of them occurred between Kepulauan Riau and Jambi Provinces related to Berhala Island ownership. Settlement of disputes between these two provinces took quite a long time and also caused tensions between two provinces. Actually, the government through the Ministry of Home Affairs has issued a regulation to solve the boundary problem of this area namely the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No.1 in 2006 and No. 76 in 2012 on Guidelines for Confirmation of the Boundaries, however, is still less effective because although it has been done in such a way the party who feels aggrieved still take another way that is by testing the legislation to the Supreme Court or Mahkamah Konstitusional (Constitutional Court). An example is the boundary dispute between Kepulauan Riau and Jambi Province which was resolved through the examination of legislation to the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. In the case, there were 3 decisions, namely Supreme Court Decision No.49P/HUM/2011, Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 32/PUU-X/2012 and the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 62/PUU-X/2012. Based on the research results obtained as follows 1). Implementation of the principle or legal principle of lex posterior derogat lex priori by the Supreme Court 2). The decision of the Supreme Court was taken into consideration in the decision of the Constitutional Court 3). The cause of the territorial boundary disputes between Kepulauan Riau Province and Jambi Province was the synchronization of 3 related laws namely Indonesian Law no. 31 in 2003, Law no. 25 in 2002 and Law no. 54 of 1999.

Download Full-text

DISSENTING OPINION PUTUSAN SENGKETA MEREK PIERRE CARDIN INDONESIA MELAWAN PIERRE CARDIN PERANCIS DALAM KAJIAN HUKUM ISLAM: Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 557 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015

JURISDICTIE ◽

10.18860/j.v7i3.4335 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

pp. 91

Author(s):

Masrifatun Mahmudah

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Supreme Court Decision ◽

Court Decision ◽

Bad Faith ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Trademark Law ◽

The Supreme Court

This article intents to examine the dissenting opinion in the judges consideration on the Supreme Court Decision No. 557 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015. This article is normative research with statute approach dan conceptual approach. The legal material on this research consist of primery legal materials namely Law No. 15 of 2001 on Trademark and Supreme Court Decision No. 557 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015, while the secondary legal materials are books, journals, research related to trademarks. The judge decide to reject the application of Pierre Cardin because the petition of Pierre Cardin has passed a period of five years from the registration of Pierre Cardin Indonesia. However, the conclusion of this study revealed that Pierre Cardin entitled to be protected because it is a well-known mark. Finally, Pierre Cardin Indonesia has violeted the terms of article 4 jo article 6 paragraph (1) letter b of Trademark Law because he has a bad faith and had imitated the well-known mark.

Download Full-text

The Principle of Control Non Primary Gun System of the Indonesian National Army Protect Soldiers

BESTUUR ◽

10.20961/bestuur.v8i2.43140 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (2) ◽

pp. 152

Author(s):

Said Gunawan

Keyword(s):

Research Method ◽

Analytical Approach ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Armed Forces ◽

Military Operations ◽

Defense System ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Philosophical Approach ◽

Research Show ◽

Second Reconstruction

This study aims to analyze and discover the principle of non-defense equipment regulation as a legal protection effort for members of the Indonesian Armed Forces and to reconstruct non-defense system arrangements in the context of legal protection for members of the TNI based on the value of certainty and justice with dignity. The research method in this research is descriptive juridical using statute approach, conceptual approach, analytical approach, philosophical approach and case approach. These approaches can be combined. The results of the research show that first, the principle of non-defense system regulation is subject to Law Number 34 of 2004 concerning the Indonesian National Army, especially the principle of civilian supremacy. The principle is only included in the basis of consideration. Does not specifically regulate the general provisions and body of the regulation regarding the terms and meaning of non-defense equipment and has not become one of the main tasks of the TNI in non-war military operations. Second, reconstruction of the value of alusista and non-alusista abuse must be subject to sanctions. Keywords: Defense Equipment; Indonesian National Army; Defense.

Download Full-text

The Authority Of Property And Heritage Agency Regarding Making Of Inheritance Certificate For The Decendant Of East Asian

Unram Law Review ◽

10.29303/ulrev.v3i1.54 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. 35-43

Author(s):

Nova Winantika Rindang Kirana ◽

I Nyoman Nurjaya ◽

Herman Suryokumoro

Keyword(s):

Research Method ◽

East Asian ◽

Legal Protection ◽

The State ◽

Conceptual Approach

This study aims to know and analyze which norms are enacted in the making of inheritance certificate and to know the strength of law in the certificate of inheritance made by Property and Heritage Agency after the enactment of Law No. 23 of 2006 on Population Administration. The research method used by the writer is statute approach and conceptual approach. The basis of the authority of Property and Heritage Agency is not in accordance with the state of the nation at this time and also based on the hierarchy of legislation is lower than the position of Law No. 23 of 2006. In addition, the certificate of inheritance made by the Property and Heritage Agency does not guarantee certainty and legal protection for Indonesian citizens because the strength of proof is not as perfect as the deed of inheritance made by the Notary.

Download Full-text

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Saham Minoritas Pada Perseroan Terbatas Yang Melakukan Merger

Jurnal Analogi Hukum ◽

10.22225/ah.2.1.1618.59-62 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 59-62

Author(s):

I Kadek Sridana ◽

I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽

I Putu Gede Seputra

Keyword(s):

Research Method ◽

Government Regulation ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Limited Liability ◽

Limited Liability Company ◽

Minority Shareholders ◽

Legal Position ◽

The Law ◽

A Company

Abstract-Mergers can be said as a strategy or one way to increase a company, therefore there is a need for legal protection for minority shareholders if they do not agree with the merger but the merger is still implemented, and the shareholders are forced to accept the merger. The formulation of the problem in this case is (1) what is the position of the minority shareholders for the limited liability company that merges? (2) What is the legal protection of minority shareholders in a limited liability company that merges? This research method uses a normative research method by approaching the problem in the form of a draft law that relates to the problem under study. The sources of legal material to be used are sourced from research, the literature in the form of primary legal material and secondary legal material. The result of this study are the legal position of the minority shareholders of the company (PT) that carried out the merger has been regulated in Law number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies and in Government Regulation Number 27 of 1998 concerning merger, consolidation and takeover of the interests of minority shareholders. In general, the law of limited liability companies is a guideline in the framework of protecting minority shareholders. Protection of minority shares is one of the important things, especially when the company conducts legal actions such as mergers, both preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection. Keywords: Legal protection, shareholders, mergers Abstrak- Merger dapat dikatakan sebagai strategi atau salah satu cara untuk meningkatkan suatu perusahaan oleh karena itu perlu adanya perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang saham minoritas apabila mereka tidak setuju dengan merger namun merger tetap dilaksanakan, dan pemegang saham tersebut dipaksakan untuk menerima merger tersebut. Adapun rumusan masalah dalam hal ini (1) Bagaimanakah kedudukan pemegang saham minoritas bagi perseroan terbatas yang melakukan merger? (2) Bagaimanakah perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang saham minoritas pada perseroan terbatas yang melakukan merger? Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan melakukan pendekatan masalah berupa pedekatan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan masalah yang dikaji. Adapun sumber bahan hukum yang akan digunakan yakni bersumber dari penelitian, kepustakaan berupa bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini adalah kedudukan hukum pemegang saham minoritas terhadap perusahaan (PT) yang melakukan merger, sudah diatur dalam Undang-undang nomor 40 tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan terbatas serta dalam Peraturan pemerintah Nomor 27 Tahun 1998 tentang penggabungan, peleburan, dan pengambilalihan tentang kepentingan pemegang saham minoritas. Secara umum hukum perseroan terbatas menjadi pedoman dalam rangka perlindungan pemegang saham minoritas. Perlindungan terhadap saham minoritas merupakan salah satu hal yang penting terutama saat persroan melakukan perbuatan hukum seperti merger baik perlindungan hukum secara preventif maupun perlindungan hukum secara represif. Kata kunci: Perlindungan hukum, Pemegang saham, Merger

Download Full-text

DIALEKTIKA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI GURU DALAM MENDISIPLINKAN SISWA DI SEKOLAH

Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies ◽

10.31000/ijlp.v1i1.2634 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 55

Author(s):

Fokky Fuad ◽

Istiqomah Istiqomah ◽

Suparji Achmad

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Child Protection ◽

Research Method ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Theoretical Framework ◽

Community Treatment ◽

Educational Goals ◽

Legal Method ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Optimal Protection

Teachers as educators are often in a dilemmatic position, between the demands of the profession and community treatment. Teachers are required to be able to deliver students to achieve educational goals. However, when teachers try to punish students in order to enforce discipline. spontaneously parents and society categorize it as an act that violates human rights and child protection laws. The formulation of the problem in this study are: First, how to protect the rights of teachers in disciplining students? Second, Has the Court Decision related to the teacher's efforts to discipline students provided protection for teachers or vice versa? The research method used is to use the normative legal method. The theoretical framework used is to use the theory of legal protection developed by Satjipto Rahardjo. The conclusions generated in this study: First, in the context of the dialectics between norms that meet each other, a legal synthesis appears through the presence of the Supreme Court's Decision which is able to provide protection for teachers. Second, that the Supreme Court Decree No. 1554 K / PID / 2013 has been able to provide optimal protection for teachers to carry out their functions as educators.

Download Full-text