scholarly journals Penggunaan Blanko Akta Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dengan Diterbitkannya Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 8 Tahun 2012

Acta Comitas ◽  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ni Luh Putu Swandewi,SH
Keyword(s):  
Land Rights ◽  
The Other ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Agrarian Law ◽  
Legal Consequences

One action of realizing the objective of the enactment of the Basic Agrarian Law is the implementation of land registration by using a Land Deed Official certificates as proof of registration of land. The existence of the certificate forms of the Land Deed Official regulated by the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency Number 3 of 1997 which was then amended by the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency Number 8 of 2012, both of them regulate about the Land Deed Official certificate using the land certificate forms. The legal consequences of the abovementioned fact raises questions of the followings: What is the legal standing of the land certificate forms issued by a Land Deed Official under the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency Number 3 of 1997 which has been used by a Land Deed Official as an evidence of transfer of registration of land rights in the Land Affairs Office after the date of March 31, 2013 by the enactment of the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency Number 8 of 2012 and what efforts should be taken by the Land Deed Officials in the event that the certificate forms of the Land Deed Official issued under the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency Number 3 of 1997 is not acceptable as an evidence of transfer of registration of land rights after the enactment of the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency Number 8 of 2012. The study is an empirical legal research, examining the gap between the theories (das solen) with the practices (das sein) in which in the Head of National Land Agency Regulation Number 8 of 2012 Article II point 1 letter a, stipulates that a land certificate form of the National Land Agency (BPN) can still be used. Whereas, in the letter b states that the land certificate forms of the National Land Agency which are no longer being used, shall be returned. In practice, in the Land Deed Official office, the use of a land certificate form of the Land Deed Official issued under the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency Number 3 of 1997 cannot be accepted in the Agrarian Office. The data and the data sources of this empirical legal research are primary, secondary and tertiary data. The findings of the study indicate the legal standing of the certificate forms of the Land Deed Official issued under the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency Number 3 of 1997 after the date of 31 March 2013 by law (de jure) is no longer considered as the certificate of the Land Deed Official, but as the evidence of the legal acts set forth therein as the perfect evidence. On the other hand, in practice, the certificate cannot be used as registration evidence by the Agrarian Office, and the solution is to summon the parties to re-sign.

scholarly journals Consideration of Official Village Head Given Obligation as Mediator in Solving Land Rights Dispute among Villagers in Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 83-88
Author(s):  
La Ode Munawir ◽  
Rachmad Safa’at ◽  
Tunggul Anshari Setia Negara ◽  
Imam Koeswahyono
Keyword(s):  
Land Rights ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Philosophical Approach ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Registration Process ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Village Governance ◽  
The Village

Village head act as mediator in solving villager’s dispute. However, on the other hand, village head act as implementer of village governance. Therefore, questions arise concerning why village head should become the mediator in solving villagers’ dispute, concerning mediator should be neutral side in reconciliate all related parties. Method used in this study was normative legal research with philosophical approach, concepts, cases, history and statute approach. Theories and concepts used in this dissertation includes legal objectives theory, authorization theory, dispute solving theory. Results and discussion: Consideration of village head given obligation as mediator in solving villager’s land rights dispute, village head act as implementer of village governance, with the authority given by statute and authority based on origins, village head acts as the village reconciliation judge. The existence of village governance was very close with the villagers itself starting from the head’s involvement in land registration process until it was presume that village head was knowledgeable concerning land history within the village border. However, on the other hand, village head has many authorities that should be implemented.   Int. J. Soc. Sc. Manage. Vol. 5, Issue-3: 83-88

scholarly journals The Strength of Evidence (Certificate) in Land Rights Disputes According to Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 Concerning Land Registration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriella Talenta Sekotibo
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
Legal Consequences

The purpose of this study is to provide legal certainty and to resolve disputes over land rights ownership for buyers who are acting in good faith when purchasing and selling inheritance. The research method is normative juridical, employing both a statutory and case-based approach. According to the study's findings, buyers with good intentions receive legal protection in the form of compensation. However, when parties with bad intentions violate Article 1267 of the Civil Code, the legal consequences of buying and selling inherited land are null and void, as they contain elements of fraud, oversight, and ignorance. additional heirs. Keeping in mind that the property being traded is inheritance land that already possesses permanent legal standing and cannot be traded without the approval of other heirs.Keywords: Legal Protection; Good Faith Buyers; and Inheritance Land.

Eksistensi Lembaga Pengumuman Terhadap Legalitas Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah (Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematik Lengkap)

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-183
Author(s):  
Mitta Ramadany Wael ◽  
Sarjita Sarjita ◽  
Mujiati Mujiati
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Government ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
Legal Consequences

Abstract: The implementation of the announcement agency in land registration to apply the principle of publicity, but in its implementation according to PP 24 of 1997 and the PTSL regulation there is a difference in both the number of days of implementation and the status of registered parcels. This research used legal research methods is a normative law research methods and empirical juridical law that aims to determine the existence of the announcement agency in the implementation of PTSL and find out the legal consequences of the announcement agency on the legality of the Land Rights Certificate. The result of this research is the existence of the announcement agency in PP No. 24 of 1997 is different from the implementation of PTSL. Explicitly in PP No. 24 of 1997 the announcement was only carried out for customary land for 30 days and the announcement of state land was not implemented while the existence of the announcement agency in PTSL did not differentiate the status of the land, either state land or customary land, the announcement was still held for 14 calendar days. In accordance with the hierarchy of state the Government Regulation has a higher position than the Ministerial Regulation, this causes the making of the regulations below must refer to the regulations above so as not to collide/counter-productive. This rule collision will cause a legal gap if there is a lawsuit in the Administrative Court, so the product can be legally flawed and canceled. Kata Kunci : existence, announcement agency and PTSL Intisari: Pelaksanaan lembaga pengumuman sesuai PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 dan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematik Lengkap (PTSL) terdapat perbedaan baik dalam jumlah hari pelaksanaan maupun status bidang tanah yang didaftarkan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dan hukum yuridis empiris yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui eksistensi lembaga pengumuman dalam pelaksanaan PTSL dan mengetahui konsekuensinya terhadap legalitas sertipikat hak atas tanah. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah eksistensi lembaga pengumuman dalam PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 berbeda dengan pelaksanaan dalam PTSL. Secara tegas dalam PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 pengumuman hanya dilaksanakan untuk tanah adat selama 30 hari dan untuk tanah tanah negara tidak dilaksanakan pengumuman, sedangkan eksistensi lembaga pengumuman dalam PTSL tidak membedakan status tanah, baik itu tanah negara maupun tanah adat tetap dilakukan pengumuman selama 14 hari kalender. Sesuai dengan hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan, peraturan pemerintah memiliki kedudukan lebih tinggi dari peraturan menteri, hal ini menyebabkan pembuatan peraturan yang di bawah harus merujuk kepada peraturan yang ada di atasnya supaya tidak bertabrakan/kontra produktif. Tabrakan aturan ini akan menimbulkan celah hukum apabila terjadinya suatu gugatan di PTUN, sehingga produk yang dihasilkan bisa jadi cacat hukum dan dibatalkan. Kata Kunci : eksistensi, lembaga pengumuman dan PTSL

JUAL BELI TANAH YANG DILAKUKAN TANPA AKTA PPAT

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-107
Author(s):  
Cheri Bayuni Budjang
Keyword(s):  
Everyday Life ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Right ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Buying and selling is a way to transfer land rights according to the provisions in Article 37 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration which must include the deed of the Land Deed Making Official to register the right of land rights (behind the name) to the Land Office to create legal certainty and minimize the risks that occur in the future. However, in everyday life there is still a lot of buying and selling land that is not based on the laws and regulations that apply, namely only by using receipts and trust in each other. This is certainly very detrimental to both parties in the transfer of rights (behind the name), especially if the other party is not known to exist like the Case in Decision Number 42 / Pdt.G / 2010 / PN.Mtp

scholarly journals Peralihan Harta Bersama Melalui Hibah Tanpa Izin Salah Satu Pihak Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-94
Author(s):  
Agustina Dewi Putri ◽  
Darmawan Darmawan ◽  
Teuku Muttaqin Mansur
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Shared Property ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Husband And Wife

Menurut Pasal 36 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 1 tahun 1974, mengenai harta bersama, suami atau isteri dapat bertindak atas persetujuan kedua belah pihak. Adanya ketentuan Pasal tersebut di atas, menunjukkan bahwa jika seorang suami atau isteri, bermaksud melakukan perbuatan hukum yang objeknya terkait dengan harta bersama (misalnya menjual, menghibahkan dan lain-lain), baik itu berupa barang bergerak atau barang tidak bergerak, maka perbuatan hukum tersebut harus didasarkan pada persetujuan kedua belah pihak (suami dan isteri). Untuk mengetahui dan menjelaskan akibat hukum dari peralihan harta bersama melalui hibah tanpa izin dari salah satu pihak. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dan Ketiadaan persetujuan baik suami atau isteri memberi akibat hukum bahwa peralihan harta bersama tersebut menjadi batal demi hukum.As for article 36 paragraph (1) mentions that anything regarded to the shared-property should be with the consent of both parties. It is in line with Article 92 about Compilation of Islamic Law which mentions that either husband or wife without any consent of the other partner is not allowed to sell or transfer the ownerships of the shared-property. Provisionsof the article indicate that if the husband or wife intends to carry out a legal act whose object is related to a common asset (for example selling, granting, etc). whether it is movable or immovable property, the legal action must be based on agreement of both parties (husband and wife). To figure out and explain the legal consequences of share assets transfer throght a grant without permission from one of the parties. Research method used in this is normative juridical legal research. To find out and explain the comparison of provisions on the transfer of property with husband and wife based on Law Number 1 Year 1974 and Compilation of Islamic Law Absence of approval from both husband and wife gives legal consequences that transfer of shared property becomes null and void by law.

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI ASAS RETROAKTIF TERHADAP KEABSAHAN AKTA NOTARIS/PPAT DALAM PEMBERIAN HAK GUNA BANGUNAN BAGI PERSEROAN TERBATAS

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
Made Gelgel
Keyword(s):  
Limited Liability ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Delegation Of Authority ◽  
Legal Principle ◽  
Agrarian Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Concept Of Law ◽  
Year 2013

Further and deeper research into the validity of the Retroactive Principle is required in order to provide assertiveness about the arrangement of Retroactive Principles in the field of agreement law in the Indonesian legal system, especially the Building Rights Agreement in Agrarian Law and the existence of obscure legal norms in the case of the legal Notary / PPAT to the granting right of building use for a period of validity is reviewed according to the provisions of Article 28 of Regulation of Head of National Land Agency Number 2 Year 2013 concerning the Delegation of Authority of Land Rights and Land Registration Activity and by using case approach of PT. Pan Pacific Nirwana Resort. This research is a normative legal research that is derived from the existence of obscurity of legal principle and legal norm contained in the provisions of Law Number 5 Year 1960 on Basic Agrarian Law Basic (UUPA) in the provisions of Article 30 and Article 28 Regulation of Head of National Land Agency No. 2 of 2013 on the Delegation of Authority of Land Rights and Land Registration Activities. The conclusion of this research in Agrarian Law there is legal uncertainty in the concept of law building rights agreement with a period of time that is still running and the future is approved by a new regulation by the government which caused the previous agreement to occur normatively contradictory whether using retroactive or non-retroactive principle and the validity of deed Notary / PPAT in the granting of right to building to limited liability company which is still valid time is reviewed according to UUPA, Article 28 Regulation of Head of National Land Agency Number 2 Year 2013 regarding Delegation of Authority of Land Rights and Land Registration Activity and Article 1320 Privat Law and by using approach case PT. Pan Pacific Nirwana Resort is not valid. Penelitian lebih lanjut dan mendalam terhadap keberlakuan Asas Retroaktif diperlukan dalam rangka memberikan ketegasan  tentang pengaturan Asas Retroaktif [1] di bidang hukum perjanjian dalam sistem hukum Indonesia khususnya perjanjian Hak Guna Bangunan dalam Hukum Agraria serta masih adanya kekaburan norma hukum dalam hal keabsahan akte Notaris/PPAT terhadap Perseroan Terbatas dalam  pemberian Hak Guna Bangunan yang jangka waktunya masih berlaku dikaji menurut ketentuan Pasal 28 Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 2 Tahun 2013 tentang Pelimpahan Kewenangan Pemberian Hak Atas Tanah Dan Kegiatan Pendaftaran Tanah serta dengan menggunakan pendekatan kasus PT. Pan Pasific Nirwana Resort. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yakni beranjak dari adanya kekaburan asas hukum dan norma hukum yang terdapat di dalam ketentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-pokok Agraria (UUPA) dalam ketentuan Pasal 30 dan Pasal 28 Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional No. 2 Tahun 2013 tentang Pelimpahan Kewenangan Pemberian Hak Atas Tanah Dan Kegiatan Pendaftaran Tanah. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini dalam Hukum Agraria terdapat ketidakpastian hukum dalam konsep hukum perjanjian Hak Guna Bangunan dengan jangka waktu yang masih berjalan dan ke depannya di sahkan suatu peraturan baru oleh pemerintah yang menyebabkan perjanjian sebelumnya terjadi pertentangan secara normatif apakah menggunakan asas retroaktif atau non retroaktif dan keabsahan Akta Notaris/PPAT dalam Pemberian Hak Guna Bangunan terhadap Perseroan Terbatas yang jangka waktunya masih berlaku dikaji menurut UUPA, Pasal 28 Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 2 Tahun 2013 tentang Pelimpahan Kewenangan Pemberian Hak Atas Tanah Dan Kegiatan Pendaftaran Tanah jo Pasal 1320 KUH Perdata serta dengan menggunakan pendekatan kasus PT. Pan Pasific Nirwana Resort adalah tidak sah.

scholarly journals Identifying ‘Illat through Munasabah in Islamic Law: A Perspective of Imam Al-Ghazali

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 598
Author(s):  
Khairuddin Hasballah ◽  
Andi Darna ◽  
Wardana Said ◽  
Hajarul Akbar ◽  
Ihdi Karim Makinara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Legal History ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Analytical Tool ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
History Approach ◽  
The Way

This study discusses the way in determining ‘illat through the munasabah method proposed by Imam al-Ghazali in the perspective of Islamic law. The study focuses on two main problems: the identification of ‘illat through munasabah and the legal formulation to utilize hikmat to obtain ‘illat according to al-Ghazali. This normative legal research used a legal history approach as an analytical tool to examine the Islamic scholars’ thoughts on concepts, theories and ways of doing istinbath. The study concluded that according to al-Ghazali there are three kinds of munasabah in determining ‘illat, consisting of munasib mu’atstsir, munasab mula’im, and munasib gharib. In munasib mu’atstsir, there is no issue found in seeking ‘illat because the ‘illat is understood directly from the nash or ijma’. Therefore, munasabah is no longer needed in the determining ‘illat. Here, the munasabah method focuses on munasib mula’im and munasib gharib in identifying ‘illat. Munasib mula’im seeks for the genus ‘illat, an ‘illat drawn from every event that has been predetermined by the nash, by examining the same hikmah in each of the events. Such hikmah is then used as the genus ‘illat which will later be applied as qiyas for other events that have been legally stipulated by the nash. On the other hand, munasib gharib seeks for the species ‘illat, an ‘illat obtained from an event that has been predetermined by the nash, with no comparison found in other events. ‘Illat determined from munasib gharib is also hikmah, having no concrete nature. In the perspective of legal history, this method of seeking ‘illat is inseparable from kalam and philosophy as was the development of the Islamic sciences at the time. As such, this had also affected al-Ghazali’s mastery in Islamic law as well as in other Islamic disciplines. 

scholarly journals Legal Vacancies in the Transfer of Rights to Class III State Houses in the Form of Flats

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adi Jatmika
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The Other ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Shared Objects ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Impact

Class III state houses are in the form of flats including those whose rights can be transferred either independently and / or in the form of Apartment Units with or without their land by means of leasing, there are sectoral regulations that regulate these matters such as rules regarding state houses, flats, state property, and land registration have the impact of disharmony and legal vacancies. The research method used is the juridical-normative research method. The final part of this research concludes that the validity of Class III State Houses in the Form of Flats must meet the requirements stipulated in statutory regulations, including the status of land rights, the distribution of apartment elements such as shared land, shared objects, and parts together as regulated in the Law on Flats, the existence of the Association of Owners and Occupants of Apartment Units (<em>PPPSRS</em>) which is formed by the agency concerned, as well as the issuance of the Occupancy Permit of Class III State Houses in the Form of Flats. Holders of occupancy permits have rights, namely SIP Holders of State Houses of Category III can apply for transfer of Class III State Houses to the relevant Minister, protection of efforts to apply for transfer of these rights is preventive based on positive law in Indonesia which regulates the transfer can be carried out. There was a vacuum and disharmony in the Legislation regarding the Transfer of Rights to Group III State Houses in the Form of Flats, seen from the existence of Regulations that govern the transfer as in Presidential Regulation Number 11 of 2008, on the other hand there are no regulations governing the transfer of Class III State Houses. In the form of a Flat with the implications regarding the status of the Flat Ownership Unit (<em>SHM Sarusun</em>) as well as the status of joint shares, common objects, and common land, whether it can be transferred and managed by the Association of Owners and Residents of Flats (<em>PPPSRS</em>) or still become State Property

scholarly journals WEAKNESSES OF THE NEGATIVE PUBLICATION SYSTEM WITH POSITIVE ELEMENTS IN AGRARIAN LAW IN INDONESIA

1970 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-248
Author(s):  
Suharyono Suharyono
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Real ◽  
Positive Elements ◽  
Agrarian Law ◽  
Implementation Level

In the negative publication system with positive elements in agrarian law in Indonesia at the implementation level, there are still a number of weaknesses, both weaknesses from the aspect of the norms for the purpose of land registration, aspects of legal responsibility and the system of imposing sanctions. There will be 3 (three) weaknesses in the Negative Publication System (positive elements) which are used as the basis for Land Registration by Government Regulation/PP Number 24 of 1997, namely: first; the norming system because it is imperative (norm imperative) and open (openbaar norm) which provides an opportunity for other parties to prove that they are the real owners of the land, thus resulting in legal disputes that must be resolved through the courts; second; the norm of legal responsibility for BPN/Kakan Land Officials who make mistakes in the implementation of land registration is not regulated in a negative publication system with positive elements, so that BPN/Land Office officials are not legally responsible when a certificate of land rights is canceled or declared invalid by a court decision; and third; norms and system for imposing sanctions for Land Registration Officers (BPN officials) who make mistakes in the implementation of land registration in Government Regulation/PP Number 24 of 1997 is not regulated. Keywords: Negative Publications, Positive Elements, and Agrarian Law.

scholarly journals Pendidikan Multikultural dalam Budaya Nemui Nyimah

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-97
Author(s):  
Muhammad Candra Syahputra
Keyword(s):  
Multicultural Education ◽  
Formal Education ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
The Other ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Depth Analysis

Indonesia is a country that consist of various tribes, cultures, customs, religions and beliefs. This has become a special asset for the Indonesian people, but on the other hand it has also been disastrous because it can cause conflict with the another. Therefore the need to instill multicultural in people’s lives, certainly through education. Multicultural education should be taken from existing local wisdom, in here the author will take the local wisdom of Lampung which is called nemui nyimah as the basis of multicultural education in Lampung. This research uses a qualitative approach, with the literature study method, with in-depth analysis based on available data sources. The resukts of this study that the culture of nemui nyimah contained multicultural values such as sharing with guests, being friendly to guests, good manners, being generous with guests, which later could be developed in a formal education environtment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document