scholarly journals EKSISTENSI DESTINATION BRANDING DALAM UNDANG–UNDANG MEREK DAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 170
Author(s):  
Agus Adi Pranatha ◽  
Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Distinctive Feature ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Destination Branding ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
Specific Regulation

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menunjukkan eksistensi destination branding dalam peraturan tentang merek di Indonesia. Artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang menekankan pembahasan pada pendekatan undang – undang. Dalam artikel ini penulis menggunakan sumber – sumber berupa bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Setelah melalui pembahasan dan analisis dapat dinyatakan bahwa, destination branding dapat diartikan sebagai upaya untuk memberikan sebuah ciri khas atau daya pembeda pada sebuah destinasi. Hingga saat ini memang belum ada pengaturan secara khusus yang menjelaskan tentang destination branding dalam undang – undang No. 20 tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis, namun bukan berarti destination branding tidak dapat didaftarkan ke Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual, karena pada prinsipnya destination branding telah memenuhi unsur – unsur sebagai sebuah merek. This article aims to demonstrate the existence of destination branding in the regulation of brands in Indonesia. This article uses a normative legal research method that emphasizes the discussion of the legal approach. In this article, the author uses sources in the form of primary and secondary legal materials. After going through the discussion and analysis it can be stated that, destination branding can be interpreted as an effort to provide a distinctive feature or distinctive power to a destination. Until now, there is no specific regulation that explains destination branding in Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, but that does not mean that destination branding cannot be registered with the Directorate General of Intellectual Property, because in principle, destination branding fulfills the elements as a brand.

scholarly journals PENDAFTARAN MEREK ASOSIASI SEBAGAI MEREK KOLEKTIF (KAJIAN TERHADAP ASOSIASI RAJUT INDONESIA WILAYAH JAWA TENGAH)

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Yudhitiya Dyah Sukmadewi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Empirical Approach ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Central Java ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
Trademark Registration ◽  
Collective Marks

<p>This study examines the registration of collective marks owned by the<br />Association of Knitting Indonesia Central Java (Java ARI) on the knitting craft<br />products manufactured and marketed independently. In addition, the assessment<br />conducted on the mechanism of collective trademark registration in the relevant<br />institutions. The research method used juridical empirical approach. Juridical<br />aspect is based on Law No.20 of 2016 on Marks and Geographical Indications<br />and related legislation, while reviewing the empirical aspects of the business<br />activities carried on ARI Java. The results showed that ARI Java brand label have<br />met the brand element that can be registered as a collective trademark<br />registration with domicile at the Directorate General of Intellectual Property of<br />the Ministry of Law and Human Rights in Central Java.</p><p> </p>

scholarly journals Problematika Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Di Bidang Merek Bagi Pelaku Usaha Mikro Kecil Menegah

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 42-56
Author(s):  
Zulfikri Toguan
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Community Organization ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Protection Measures ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Trademark Registration ◽  
The Government

Legal protection for a mark of a place or origin of MSMEs can be done by first registering the mark to obtain legal force. In this case the Office/Agency/Community Organization assists by facilitating MSMEs in terms of socialization and assistance for trademark registration. Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications provides improvements to previous laws, especially regarding preventive protection measures, namely registration procedures and registration fees. Brands produced by Indonesian MSMEs can help increase competitiveness in the development of new products. This research is normative or library research method, namely legal research carried out by reviewing and researching library materials in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. This study concludes: First, the problems in the protection of intellectual property rights in the field of branding for MSME products are due to the understanding of MSME actors on brand rights is still low/shallow so that MSME actors do not register the brand of MSME products. Second, efforts to provide brand protection to the MSME industry are by registering MSME brands and the government makes it easy for MSME industry players to register trademarks.

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Perkara Pelanggaran Hak atas Merek

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-71
Author(s):  
I Gede Mahendra Juliana Adiputra ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Mutual Agreement

The existence of competition causes the original brand owner to feel disadvantaged because the sales result has decreased. It is permissible for someone to use another party's mark as long as they ask permission from the trademark owner first. The owner can give trademark rights to other people as agreed in an agreement. The formulation of the problem in this research is as follows: how is the legal protection of trademark rights and how to resolve violations of trademark rights. The research method used in this research is normative legal research. The results of the discussion in this study are as follows: Legal protection of the right to a trademark has been regulated by Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, in the provisions of the Law it is expressly stated that if it has been registered in the law that the right to a trademark has been protected. The sanction imposed on the perpetrator of the crime of trademark rights is a fine of Rp. 20,000,000, - (twenty million rupiah) on condition that if the fine is not paid, he will be subject to imprisonment for 6 (six) months. Settlement of trademark cases can be carried out through institutions that can be used to resolve trademark disputes, including: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration and Courts. Alternative dispute resolution wants the disputing parties to resolve their own dispute with the aim of obtaining a mutual agreement, if the agreement fails, can take arbitration, namely the disputing parties to be able to resolve the dispute to the arbitration institution based on the agreement, furthermore, if the arbitration is successful the last action is through the court, namely the commercial court which has the authority to adjudicate trademark disputes.

scholarly journals PERAN PEMERINTAH DALAM MENGANTISIPASI TERJADINYAPERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK JUJUR BERDASARKANUNDANG-UNDANGNOMOR20TAHUN 2016 TENTANG MEREK DAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS

to-ra ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 628
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ferdian
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Sanctions ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
Education Campaigns ◽  
The Government

Abstract Business competition is often found whose business competition is dishonest, especially towards trademarks. In terms of minimizing the occurrence of violations of unfair business competition, the government has a very im- portant role. The government needs to conduct socialization related to fair business competition on trademarks, by: conducting education, campaigns, providing understanding, providing training for of cers in the Directorate General of Intellectual Property, inviting the public in the ght against counterfeiting and imitation, and the exis- tence of monitoring, evaluation , and fostering by the Directorate General of Intellectual Property or the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) and conducting strict reprimands and legal sanctions for business actors who continue to violate their business activities and are proven, then Law Number 20 Year 2016 concern- ing Trademarks and Geographical Indications , speci cally regulates the provision of criminal sanctions that are included in the provisions of Articles 100 and 102.   Keywords: business competition; dishonest; KPPU; legal sanctions.

scholarly journals Valuasi Merek sebagai Jaminan Kredit Perbankan: Relevansi dalam Pembentukan Lembaga Penilai Kekayaan Intelektual

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 767
Author(s):  
I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Creative Economy ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Property Valuation ◽  
The Future

This paper aims to examine the relevance of regulating the Intellectual Property Guarantee Institution as credit to banks in Indonesia in the future. The research method in this paper uses normative legal research, with a statutory approach and developing doctrines, as well as a comparative approach. The result found from this paper is that there is a need for synergy in the guarantee legal system in Indonesia, particularly in regulating intellectual property valuation, including the urgency to form an institution that handles the valuation of movable objects of intangible intellectual property. This is very much needed in encouraging the creative economy which in turn improves the welfare of the Indonesian people. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji relevansinya pengaturan Lembaga Penilai Jaminan Kekayaan Intelektual sebagai kredit pada perbankan di Indonesia di masa mendatang. Metode penelitian dalam tulisan ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan doktrin-doktrin yang berkembang, serta pendekatan perbandingan.  Hasil yang ditemukan dari tulisan ini adalah perlu adanya sinergitas dalam sistem hukum jaminan di Indonesia, khususnya pengaturan valuasi kekayaan intelektual termasuk urgensinya dibentuk sebuah Lembaga yang menangani valuasi benda bergerak tak berwujud kekayaan intelektual. Hal ini sangat dibutuhkan dalam mendorong ekonomi kreatif yang pada akhirnya meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat Indonesia.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Produk Indikasi Geografis dari Tindakan Peniruan

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Ngurah Tresna Adnyana
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Trips Agreement ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Geographical Indication ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Empirical Law

Legal protection of Geographical Indications is necessary to determine whether there are communal or collective people. The communal community character means to belong to the community in the registered Geographical Indication area. This study aims to analyze legal certainty as well as the legal protection of product geographical indications of imitation actions. This research uses empirical law research method. In this case, the authors find that the TRIPs Agreement (Trade-related aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) and the act no 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications are terms used to register. Perlindungan hukum terhadap Indikasi Geografis sangat perlu di perhatikan karena karakter kepemilikannya yang kolektif atau komunal. Karakter kepemilikan yang komunal memiliki arti menjadi milik bersama semua masyarakat dalam wilayah Indikasi Geografis yang telah didaftarkan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kepastian hukum serta perlindungan hukum produk indikasi geografis dari tindakan peniruan. Dalam penelitian ini metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum empiris dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Dalam penelitian ini penulis menemukan bahwa TRIPs Agreement (Trade Related aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) dan Undang-Undang 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis mengatur secara khusus perlindungan bagi produk indikasi geografis yang telah didaftarkan.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP WINE SALAK DESA ADAT SIBETAN KABUPATEN KARANGASEM

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1751
Author(s):  
I Made Sudirga
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Local Economy ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Geographical Indication ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Wine Production

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum terhadap produk wine salak desa sibetan berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah No 51 tahun 2007 tentang Indikasi Geogerafis. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yakni pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa perlindungan hukum terhadap wine salak produksi desa Sibetan, kecamatan Bebandem kabupaten karangasem ditinjau dari Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 51 Tahun 2007 tentang Indikasi-Geografis belum mampu meningkatkan perekonomian masyarakat setempat terbukti belum terdaftarnya sebagai indikasi geografis dan hal ini berdampak pada nilai jual wine tersebut yang terbilang murah seukuran produksi wine serta pemasarannya belum luas hanya sebatas wisatawan yang berkunjung saja. The purpose of this study was to analyze the legal protection of salak wine products in the Sibetan village based on Government Regulation No. 51 of 2007 concerning Geographical Indications. This paper uses an empirical legal research method. The approach used in this research is the statute approach and the conceptual approach. The results showed that the legal protection of salak wine produced in Sibetan village, Bebandem sub-district, Karangasem district in terms of Government Regulation Number 51 of 2007 concerning Geographical Indications has not been able to improve the local economy, it is proven that it has not been registered as a geographical indication and this has an impact on the selling value of the wine. which is relatively inexpensive about the size of wine production and its marketing is not extensive, only limited to visiting tourists.

scholarly journals PATENT RIGHT TRANSFER THROUGH WAQF: WHAT ARE THE REQUIREMENTS?

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 301
Author(s):  
Chrisna Bagus Edhita Praja ◽  
Mulyadi Mulyadi ◽  
Budi Agus Riswandi ◽  
Kuni Nasihatun Arifah
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Patent Protection ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Use Value ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Patent Owner ◽  
Internal Conflicts

<p>This study aims to examine and identify criteria for patents that can be used as waqf assets. Patents are very potential as waqf asset because of a large number of patent holders in Indonesia with the requirements of productive waqf. Patents are a type of Intellectual Property with the provision of a specified period and are still a debate related to the period of waqf which is always a pro and contradiction, some scholars consider waqf property to be forever but in the waqf law is allowed a waqf property with a specified period. This research method uses a normative legal research method with a Law approach and concept approach as well as secondary data review. The Act used is the Patent Law and the Waqf Act. The results show that the patent that can be used as an waqf asset refers to the provision of waqf property which includes (1) legal ownership of the patent owner and evidenced by a patent certificate (2) is not controversial which means not in a legal dispute until in Kracht van gewijsde or not in internal conflicts for patents owned by several inventors (3) have economic value and use value so that it can benefit the community. Patents can be used as an waqf asset because in the Waqf Law it is explained that the waqf property may be for a specified period. The period in the patent waqf in the deed of the waqf pledge must be adjusted to the period of patent protection.</p>

scholarly journals Desain Tata Letak Sirkuit Terpadu sebagai Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Hukum Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-38
Author(s):  
Sanusi Bintang
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Integrated Circuits ◽  
Integrated Circuit ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Cellular Phone ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Enforcement

Desain tata letak sirkuit terpadu sebagai cetak biru untuk sirkuit terpadu, digunakan dalam berbagai produk teknologi informasi, seperti komputer, telepon selular, dan peralatan komunikasi, memiliki ciri khas tersendiri yang tidak sesuai untuk ditempatkan dalam rezim hukum hak kekayaan intelektual yang ada, karena itu, perlu diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan khusus (sui generis). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan mengaplikasikan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan perbandingan. Indonesia telah mengundangkan hukum tentang Desain Tata Letak Sirkuit Terpadu, tetapi undang-undang ini memiliki beberapa kelemahan. Kelemahan yang ada berkaitan dengan kelengkapan dan kualitas norma serta penegakan hukumnya. Kelemahan tersebut tidak hanya dari aspek teknik perancangan peraturan perundang-undangan, tetapi juga berakar pada budaya hukum. Design of Integrated Circuits as Intellectual Property Rights in Indonesian Laws Design of integrated circuits as blue prints for integrated circuit used in various products of information technology, such as computer, cellular phone, and telecomunication media, has its own characteristics which is not fit to be put under the previous intellectual property law regimes, therefore, it needs to be regulate under a specific legislation (sui generis). This research utilizes doctrinal legal research method by applying statute approach and comparative approach. Indonesia has enacted laws on Design of Integrated Circuits, but the law has certain limitations. The limitations is regarding the adequacy of subject matter, the quality of norms, and the legal enforcement. The limitations is not only from the aspect of technical legal drafting, but also rooted on legal culture.

scholarly journals Intellectual Property Rights Protection of Mandar Coconut Oil through Geographical Indications

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erlika Sari ◽  
Hasbir Paserangi ◽  
Marwah ◽  
Achmad Zulfikar ◽  
Irmawati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Coconut Oil ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights Protection ◽  
Property Rights Protection ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
The Government

Intellectual property rights support the economic development of a country.Indonesia, with its extraordinary natural resources, has not been able to optimize protection of intellectual property rights. Only 65 kinds of geographical indications were recorded registered on the Directorate General of Intellectual Property by hundreds or even thousands of products with Indonesian characteristics. This article uses a type of socio legal research with data sourced from literature review. This article concludes that Mandar coconut oil is one of the Indonesia resources as the biggest producer coconut oil in the world. This oil has some advantages so it is worth to get the legal geographical indications. The steps which can take of community and the government refers to Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademark and Geographical Indications. The writers recommend that the government of West Sulawesi Province, PolewaliMandar Regency and Majene Regency Government providesupporttowardsMandar coconut oil, so it can get legal protection through geographical indications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document