scholarly journals PENERAPAN PEMBUKTIAN SEDERHANA DALAM KEPAILITAN MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NO 37 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEPAILITAN DAN PKPU (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN NOMOR: 04/PDT.SUS.PAILIT/2015/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST)”

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 875
Author(s):  
Rafael Angelo Dias ◽  
Suyud Margono

In submitting a bankruptcy application, the applicant must submit evidence to prove the existence of a debt. The specialty of proof in the law of bitterness is the existence of simple proof, according to the juridical requirements as referred to in Article 8 paragraph (4) according to the juridical requirements as referred to in article 2 paragraph (1) of the bankruptcy law. This simple proof can also cause problems. One concrete form of the problem that arises in this simple verification in practice is the decision of the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court with the decision number: 04 / Pdt-Sus.Pailit / 2015 / PN.Niaga / JKT.PST between the Service Authority Commissioner Board and PT Asuransi Jiwa Bumi Asih Jaya. The problem is how to apply simple evidence in the case. This writing uses normative legal research methods which are based on primary data and secondary data which are analyzed descriptively with conceptual and legislative approaches. Based on the analysis according to Article 8 paragraph (4) in conjunction with Article 2 paragraph (1) UUKPKPU, it can be stated that the debt of PT Asuransi Jiwa Bumi Asih Jaya has been proven in a simple manner, but the Judges in the decision rejected the application on the grounds that the debt proof was not simple. 8 paragraph (4) UUKPKPU.

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
Samuel Samuel ◽  
Siti Nurbaiti

In principle, the resolution of consumer disputes can be pursued peacefully. through an alternative mediation dispute resolution. In Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Regulation of the Minister of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 / M-DAG / PER / 2017 concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body does not impose limits on the authority of BPSK in handling and adjudicating a consumer dispute. However, in reality many times the decisions of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK) are submitted to the district court and stated that BPSK is not authorized to handle such disputes. How is the authority of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Board in handling disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli and Sari Alamsyah are the issues discussed. The method used in this research is descriptive normative legal research, using secondary data and primary data as supporting data with the law approach. The results of the study illustrate that BPSK is not authorized to handle disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli with Sari Alamsyah, because the business actors in this dispute have submitted a refusal to be resolved through BPSK and not achieving the requirements for consumer disputes. It is recommended that BPSK members pay more attention to the provisions in the Consumer Protection Act and other regulations concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Iman Pasu Marganda Hardianto Purba ◽  
I Made Suwanda ◽  
Agus Satmoko Adi ◽  
Rahmanu Wijaya

ABSTRACTThis study aims to examine the policy synergy between the Provincial Government of East Java and the Central Government in dealing with Covid-19. The urgency of this study is to explain to what extent policies between the Local Governments and the Central Government are in sync. This research uses legal research methods. Primary data includes statutory regulations, especially the Law on Health quarantine and secondary data such as previous research, expert opinion, and other relevant document data. This study concludes that the East Java Provincial Government and the Central Government have a synergy in dealing with Covid-19 in Indonesia. However, neither the legal products that are produced nor policies that are political in nature do not conflict with one another.  ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji sinergitas kebijakan antara Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Timur dengan Pemerintah Pusat dan dalam menghadapi Covid-19. Urgensi penelitian ini adalah menjelaskan sejauhmana kebijakan antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah sinkron. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum. Data primer mencakup peraturan perundang-undangan terutama Undang-undang tentang karantina Kesehatan dan data sekunder seperti penelitian terdahulu, pendapat para pakar, dan data dokumen lain yang relevan. Kajian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Timur maupun Pemerintah Pusat memiliki sinergi dalam menangani Covid-19 di Indonesia. Baik produk hukum yang dihasilkan maupun kebijakan yang bersifat politis, tidak bertentangan satu sama lain. 


Acta Comitas ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 162
Author(s):  
Raymond Bagus Nurchandra ◽  
Retno Murni

The purpose of this research is to determine the validity of a fiduciary security deed using a motorized vehicle that is still in the indent process as a guarantee. This type of research is empirical legal research which is based on primary data sources and secondary data sources. Then the conclusions are drawn through descriptive analysis techniques. The results show that a motorized vehicle that is still in the pivoting process can be charged with a fiduciary guarantee, but the debtor must attach proof of the order given by the dealer The part that will pay the vehicle in full to the dealer is the bank and after the proof of payment is given in full, the proof must be presented in front of a notary. The debtor must also make his own statement if the BPKB has been issued, it must be immediately submitted to the bank. The validity of a fiduciary guarantee deed that uses a motorized vehicle that is still in the pivot process as evidence is legally recognized because in the provisions of the explanation of article 6 letter c of the Law on Fiduciary Security does not clearly emphasize the existence of BPKB ownership so that proof of purchase orders can already be obtained. used as proof of ownership of a motorized vehicle that is still in the process of being indented.   Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui keabsahan suatu akta jaminan fidusia yang menggunakan kendaraan bermotor yang masih dalam proses inden sebagai jaminannya. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum empiris yang didasarkan pada sumber data primer serta sumber data sekunder kemudian ditarik kesimpulannya melalui teknik analisis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa kendaraan bermotor yang masih didalam proses inden dapat dibebankan dengan jaminan fidusia namun pihak debitor harus melampirkan bukti pemesanan kendaraan bermotor tersebut yang diberikan oleh pihak dealer. Pihak yang akan membayarkan kendaraan tersebut secara lunas kepada dealer adalah pihak bank dan setelah diberikannya tanda bukti pembayaran secara lunas tersebut maka bukti tersebut harus dipaparkan dihadapan pihak Notaris. Pihak debitor juga harus membuat surat pernyataan sendiri jika BPKB sudah terbit maka harus segara diserahkan kepada pihak bank. Keabsahan suatu akta jaminan fidusia yang menggunakan kendaran bermotor yang masih dalam proses inden sebagai alat bukti diakui sah secara hukum karena didalam ketentuan penjelasan Pasal 6 huruf c Undang-Undang tentang Jaminan Fidusia tidak menekankan secara jelas harus adanya kepemilikan BPKB sehingga bukti purchase order saja sudah dapat digunakan sebagai suatu bukti kepemilikan kendaraan bermotor yang masih dalam proses inden.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
. Yuhelson ◽  
. Maryano

<p>Indonesia modern civil law development lasted to align with community life progress. In 1998 made bankruptcy laws reform of colonial legacy, which was revised in 2004 by Law No. 37. Additionally, the bankruptcy law instruments sourced on the Civil Code and some other provisions. After the court decision on bankruptcy declaration, bankruptcy process was arrangement and distribution of wealth the debtor’s bankrupt (boedel bankruptcy) by curator. So far, the difficulty legal curator instrument cared and settled bankruptcy estate. The prioritization of splitting on the preference and separatist creditor. This research was classified as a normative legal research. Basically, the research based on secondary data. The research conclusion, first, completion of settlement the boedel bankruptcy arranged which reflected in a series of activities that sequence according to the stages and institutionally involve the creditor committee, curator, and the supervisory judge; second, the principles of justice that could be applied in determining the division of boedel bankruptcy to creditors, particularly the preferred and separatist creditors, namely the principle of pari passu and pro rata, the principle of balance, the principle of proportional, and the principles of fairness; third, instruments of Indonesia bankruptcy law consists of elements of civil law (Civil Code), bankruptcy law and suspension of debt payments (Act No. 37 of 2004), a variety of laws and regulations under the law, occasionally based on the policy elements. This condition reduces the level of security in the application of the law.</p><p>Keywords: bankruptcy, boedel bankruptcy, preferred creditors, separatist creditors <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> </p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-110
Author(s):  
Abdul Jamil ◽  
Sufriadi

This study aimed to examine two objectives: first, legal considerations of court decision Number 05/G/2011/PTUN.Yk regarding state administrative decision on intermittent termination and replacement (PAW) a member of the Bantul Regional Representative Council (DPRD), and second, panel of judges rationale concluded that the decision on PAW was not absolute competence of PTUN. This research is classified as normative legal research using  both  primary  data by conducting interviews with PTUN judges and the expert, and secondary data in the form of legal material. The results showed: first, there are three main legal considerations used by judges: 1. the decision on PAW is a decision in the field of politics and constitutionality; 2. the decision on PAW does not fullfil the unilateral will element; 3. the existence of jurisprudence. Second, the judge's judgments rested on the conclusion that the decision did not fulfill the 'state administration' element and was emphasized in the 'initial process' of the PAW stage series, not to the 'final process' in the form of issuing decisions. The judgments put forward the interpretation based on doctrine, while if compared with the provisions of the Law on Administrative Court, the decision on PAW had actually been fulfilled as the KTUN which was the absolute competence of PTUN.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 871
Author(s):  
Pulung Jati Kusuma ◽  
Akhmad Khisni

Premarital agreements on joint property made before or during the marriage took place, the parties may determine the contents of the agreement, especially respect the innate property of each party in a premarital agreement. In Act No. 1 of 1974 About the Marriage of Article 29 paragraph (1) confirms that at the time or before the marriage took place two parties by mutual consent may submit a written agreement authorized by the employee registrar of marriage, after which it shall also apply to third parties lodged. Having made premarital agreement then the next must be registered in the district court clerk's office in legal marriages were held, the purpose of such registration in order to satisfy the principle of publicity. Background of the problem, authors conducted a study entitled "Juridical Study Of Premarital On Joint Property Which Made By Notary And Legal Consequences In The District Of Kudus". This study raises the issue of implementation of joint property on premarital agreement made by the notary in Kudus and the legal consequences of the implementation of a premarital agreement. The purpose of this study is to investigate the implementation of the agreement For Premarital of joint property made by a notary in Kudus and to know the legal consequences of a premarital agreement made by the notary. The data used in this study are primary data, secondary data and data that can support tertiary study, which was then analyzed by descriptive analysis method. Based on the results of data analysis concluded that Premarital agreements about the estate property that is made before a notary in the Kudus District by husband and wife time before or after the course of the marriage as provided for in Article 29 of Act No. 1 of 1974 About Marriage asserts that the agreement must not violate limits of the law, religion and morality. Agreement it means the contents can be related to any of any one of them the separation of joint property during the agreement was detrimental to the parties and does not conflict with the nature and purpose of marriage. The legal consequences premarital agreement made by a notary it is binding and valid as the Law for the parties. If the premarital agreement that has been made by the husband and wife there was a violation.Keywords: Juridical Study; Premarital Agreements; Joint Property.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 310
Author(s):  
Stefanie Waringga Y. ◽  
Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims to review the responsibilities of a notary who has a position as an Acting Land Acting  Officer (PPAT) in making a Power of Attorney to Charge Mortgage. This legal research uses empirical research methods, namely examining primary data in the field then proceed with secondary data. SKMHT must be made with a notary deed or deed of Land Deed Maker (PPAT), this is in line with what has been written and stipulated in Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Underwriting Rights (UUHT). Making SKMHT made by a notary is guided by Article 38 of Act Number 2 of 2014 juncto Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position, whereas if the manufacture is carried out by PPAT then follow the rules stated in the Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency Number 8 2012 (Perkaban 8/2012). The implementation of related regulations that have been written and stipulated is in fact there is a conflict issue, namely that there is a provision of notaries required to make SKMHT using the SKMHT format which is regulated in Perkaban Number 8 of 2012.<br />Keywords: Responsible; Notary; PPAT; Deed of Power of Attorney to Charge Mortgage</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan mengkaji mengenai tanggung jawab notaris yang memiliki jabatan sebagai Pejabat  Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) di dalam membuat Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan (SKMHT). Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan metode penelitian empiris, yaitu meneliti data primer di lapangan kemudian dilanjutkan dengan data sekunder. SKMHT wajib dibuat dengan akta notaris atau akta Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT), hal ini selaras dengan yang telah tertulis dan ditetapkan di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan (UUHT). Pembuatan SKMHT yang dibuat oleh notaris berpedoman pada Pasal 38 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 juncto UndangUndang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, sedangkan apabila pembuatannya dilakukan oleh PPAT maka mengikuti aturan yang telah tertera di dalam Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 (Perkaban 8/2012). Implementasi regulasi terkait yang telah ditulis dan ditetapkan tersebut nyatanya justru terdapat persoalan, yakni bahwa ada ketentuan notaris diwajibkan membuat SKMHT dengan menggunakan format SKMHT yang diatur di dalam Perkaban Nomor 8 Tahun 2012.<br />Kata Kunci: Tanggung Jawab; Notaris; PPAT;  Akta SKMHT</p>


FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-92
Author(s):  
Merry Tjoanda

This research aims to determine and analyze the law consequences of overmacht in credit agreements due to the Covid-19 Pandemic and as legal remedies for settlement of the credit agreement due to the Covid-19 Pandemic. This research is socio-legal research, a combination research method between doctrinal law research methods and empirical legal research methods. This research was conducted in banking institutions and financing institutions in Ambon City, namely at Bank Mandiri Ambon Branch Office, BCA Ambon Branch Office, Bank Artha Graha Ambon Branch Office, and BFI Limited Company Ambon Branch Office. The types of research data are primary data and secondary data, obtained through literature study and interviews. Based on the results of the research, the Covid-19 Pandemic is a non-natural disaster, so it is categorized as a relative overmacht, so the result of the comparative overmacht law in the credit agreement due to the Covid-19 Pandemic in Ambon City has not changed the risk burden in the sense that the Debtor still fulfills their achievements after the outbreak of Covid - 19 Pandemic is over. The legal effort that can be taken to settle credit agreements due to Covid-19 Pandemic in Ambon City is through credit restructuring in the form of lowering interest rates, extending the period, reducing principal arrears, and reducing interest arrears as determined by the government to be implemented by the bank or financing institutions with debtors.


Author(s):  
I Dewa Made Suartha

How is the implementation of duties and authorities of supervisors andobservers judges of Denpasar District Court in founding the convict? What areobstacles that occur in implementation of duties and authorities of supervisorsand observers judges of Denpasar District Court in founding the convict? The method used in this research was empirical legal research. Itscharacteristic is descriptive.  The data sources that used are primary data,secondary data and tertiary data. The primary data / field data were obtained byinterviewing the relevant law enforcement officer that has been determined as asample. The secondary data were obtained of literature studies. The data wasanalyzed by qualitative descriptive analysis to get the vivid conclusion anddescription in discussing the problems in this research. Conclusions derived from this study include: implementation of duties andauthorities of supervisors and observers judges of Denpasar District Court infounding the convict are not running optimally in accordance with the legislationin force. The factor that obstruct are the numbers of supervisors and observersjudges of Denpasar District Court were not adequate, that was one person, therewas no special fund (Operational fund) and there were no strict sanctions forthose when they could not do the duties according to the applicable law; theycould only appeal to the law enforcement agencies / officers of Class IIADenpasar Penitentiary founding the convict.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1087
Author(s):  
Takenia Tifany ◽  
Anna Maria Tri Anggraini

Consumer Protection Law regulates the legal protection of consumer and including Consumer Dispute Completion Firm who autorhized to resolve consumer disputes who feel harmed over the acts of business from people that sometimes arbitrary, but decisions taken by Consumer Dispute Completion Firm often incriminate business actors, and usually seem to exceed the limit of their authority even wrong in applying the law. Consumer Dispute Completion Firm’s authority to adjudicate and decide a dispute is induced by Supreme Court’s decision which makes Consumer Dispute Completion Firm’s authority to limited. Therefore, the writer proposed an issue about how are the limits of Consumer Dispute Completion Firm’s authority in adjudicate and decide a consumer disputes? And how are the implementation and Supreme Court’s views regarding the limitation of Consumer Dispute Completion Firm’s authority? The writer examines the problem using normative legal research methods that use secondary data. From the results of the research, it can be concluded that the limits of Consumer Dispute Completion Firm authority in solving consumer disputes are limited to the agreement between both parties. In sense the Supreme Court believes that all transactions based on an agreement become the jurisdiction of the court


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document