scholarly journals PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENIMBUNAN OBAT-OBATAN TERAPI COVID-19

2021 ◽  
pp. 1085
Author(s):  
Marian Marian ◽  
Stella Stella ◽  
Tatang Ruchimat
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Therapeutic Drugs ◽  
Combining Data ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Collective Information ◽  
Source Of Information ◽  
Laws And Regulations

It has been almost two years since the COVID-19 pandemic devastated Indonesia. This, of course, forces the community and the government to face various problems and new polemics. However, the government did not just let go and always tried to overcome it so that the burden on the community during the Covid-19 pandemic could be lighter. This article was created to know the law enforcement carried out by the government by following applicable laws and regulations in overcoming the problem of hoarding Covid-19 therapeutic drugs and to examine the factors that influence the law enforcement process against the criminal act of hoarding Covid-19 therapeutic drugs. The research methodology used is normative legal research, centered on the use of library materials as a source of information. This research uses a qualitative approach by combining data and collective information from various sources which is then developed from a sociological point of view. The perpetrators of hoarding Covid-19 therapeutic drugs can be charged with several articles of criminal law as regulated in-laws and regulations, including Law No. 7 of 2014, Law No. 36 of 2009, and so on, with a maximum prison sentence of 10 years. However, in practice, the law enforcement process is very dependent on several factors, such as legislation, law enforcement officers, the availability of facilities and facilities, as well as the community. The Covid-19 pandemic has put people in a state of panic and the need for medicines has increased drastically, so efforts are urgently needed to deter hoarders and hope that similar incidents will not happen again. Law enforcers need to make legal breakthroughs in cracking down on drug hoarders, and also make other efforts such as revocation of permits, fines, and confiscation of stockpiled drugs to be subsequently given to people in need, also need to consider the characteristics of one case with another by following scale of stockpiling and types of drugs.Hampir dua tahun lamanya Pandemi Covid-19 telah memporakporandakan Indonesia. Hal itu tentu memaksa masyarakat dan juga pemerintah untuk menghadapi berbagai permasalahan hingga polemik baru. Namun pemerintah lantas tak lepas tangan begitu saja dan selalu berusaha untuk mengatasinya agar beban masyarakat di masa pandemi Covid-19 dapat lebih diringankan . Artikel ini dibuat dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui penegakan hukum yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dalam mengatasi masalah penimbunan obat terapi Covid-19 serta menelaah faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh pada proses penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana penimbunan obat terapi Covid-19. Metodologi penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif, berpusat pada penggunaan bahan pustaka sebagai sumber informasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan mengkombinasikan data dan informasi kolektif dari berbagai sumber yang kemudian dikembangkan dengan sudut pandang sosiologis.  Pelaku penimbun obat terapi Covid-19 dapat dijerat dengan beberapa pasal hukum pidana sebagaimana diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, antara lain UU No. 7 Tahun 2014, UU No.36 Tahun 2009,dan lain sebagainya, dengan ancaman hukuman penjara maksimal 10 tahun. Namun pada prakteknya proses penegakan hukum sangat bergantung pada beberapa faktor seperti peraturan perundang-undangan, aparat penegak hukum, ketersediaan sarana dan fasilitas serta  masyarakat. Pandemi Covid-19 telah membuat masyarakat berada dalam kepanikan dan kebutuhan obat-obatan pun meningkat drastis, sehingga sangat diperlukan daya upaya agar para penimbun menjadi jera dan kejadian serupa diharapkan tidak terulang kembali. Penegak hukum perlu melakukan terobosan hukum dalam menindak tegas penimbun obat, dan juga melakukan upaya lain seperti pencabutan izin, sanksi denda, dan penyitaan obat-obatan yang ditimbun untuk selanjutnya diberikan kepada masyarakat yang membutuhkan, juga perlu mempertimbangkan karakteristik kasus satu dengan yang lain sesuai dengan skala penimbunan dan jenis obat-obatannya. 

Penerapan Hukum Wakaf Uang di Indonesia Perspektif Legal System Theory

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masdar Masdar
Keyword(s):  
System Theory ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Muslim Society ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

Cash waqf in Indonesia has been long enough implemented based on some rules enacted by government and other rules defined by The Waqf Board of Indonesia (BWI). However, the implementation of cash waqf has not reached the level of success. Therefore, this article studies the application of cash waqf law in Indonesia according to Friedman’s legal system theory. The legal system theory of Friedman firstly looks at the substance of the law, which is the rules or regulations; and secondly it examines the structure of the law, encompassing the law enforcement agencies, such as judge, prosecutor, police and legal counselors. And lastly the theory examines the element of legal culture, which is a response from Muslim society. The first two examinations indicate that there is nothing to be a problem. But from the last examination there is a problem regarding the trust from Muslim society. From the legal culture point of view, the implementation of cash waqf by the government, which is performed by BWI, needs attracting society’s credentials in order to improve and maximize the performance of cash waqf in Indonesia.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN DIVERSI SEBAGAI IMPLEMENTASI HAK ASASI ANAK BERKONFLIK DENGAN HUKUM

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Luh Sri Widi Artini ◽  
Putu Bagus Sabda Pramesti
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
The State ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Special Concern ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

A child who commits a legal offence is a special concern from the state. Diversi is the application of versioning is an effort from the government to protect the child from negative stigmatization and based on the best needs and interests for children, by seeking a version through the approach of Restorative justice. This research aims to determine how the implementation is versioned as a child's human rights implementation and what constraints are faced by related parties in the running of versioning. This research uses a qualitative method of research approach with a literature study technique that is further analyzed qualitatively. Children are trusting and give that must be guarded because the child is the hope of the state as a nation's successor so that children should be protected. The results of this study show that versioning is one of the government's efforts to protect the child's rights from adverse influences and the stigmatization of the community and is done for the best interest of the child. Obstacles faced in the form of lack of the presence and the existence of a sectoral ego between the law enforcement officers so that the version has not run optimally and the need to socialize about the law of the Child criminal system Community.

scholarly journals Law Enforcement of Corruption Cases Through a Participatory Society as an Effort to Protect Constitutional Rights

Corruptio ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-112
Author(s):  
Diya Ul Akmal ◽  
Pipih Ludia Karsa ◽  
Syafrijal Mughni Madda
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Essential Role ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Active Role ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Laws And Regulations

A participatory society can play an essential role in the prosecution of corruption cases. By providing information on alleged corruption, a participatory community can assist anti-corruption institutions so that corruption as an extraordinary crime can be eradicated as a means of enforcing people's constitutional rights. The authors attempt to perceive things by defending constitutional rights from a societal standpoint, a right of citizens who have had their rights violated by acts of corruption. The method used in this research is a normative legal method that refers to the norms in the laws and regulations, court decisions, and social society.  The data used is secondary data obtained from various sources with appropriate and relevant topics so that it becomes chaotic in discussing related problems. The community's active role in uncovering corruption cases is part of the obligation to break the chain of corruption and fulfil citizens' rights to enforce the law. The amount of budget allocated for disclosing corruption cases is leading the government to protect citizens' constitutional rights from the threat of corruption. Although the handling is still considered unsuccessful because many cases have not been revealed, the efforts made deserve to be recognised.

scholarly journals NAWACITA AND THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OF CIVIL STATE APPARATUS IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVES IN INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Jawade Hafidz
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Substantive Law

“Nawacita” and Constitutional Law needs to be a legal approach to make improvements to the legal system, in order to encourage enforcement of the law with justice, then at least have to involve three pillars consisting of: (1) the substantive law (legal substance), which include legislative reform; (2) legal structure (law structure), including human resources law-enforcement officers (human resource), entered in it anyway coordination among law enforcement officers; and (3) the legal culture (legal culture), both culture and public law enforcement officers or citizens in general.Then, constitutional law and can be answered correctly, can be practiced within their Constitutional Act and may be unenforceable government in running the government. The key factor to keep in mind is eliminating ego-sectoral government agencies. Do not stop until the Act, a similar effort was also made to the laws which are in the executive area, such as government regulations, a presidential decree and ministerial regulation

Pengaturan Waralaba Di Indonesia: Perspektif Hukum Bisnis

Liquidity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-166
Author(s):  
Muchtar Riva’i
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Small And Medium Enterprises ◽  
Economic Community ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Medium Enterprises ◽  
Article 5 ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The law arrangement of franchise law was first explicitly regulated by the Government Regulation No. 16 of 1997 which is then updated by Government Regulation No. 42 of 2007 to be created in an agreement that at least contains clauses as stipulated by Article 5 of the Government Regulation. However, franchise arrangements also associated with a variety of other laws and regulations applicable in Indonesia. This article is going to state that the importance of partnerships with small and medium enterprises as an effort to encourage the involvement of the wider economic community.

Recommendations of The Ombudsman’s Dilemma: Between Law Enforcement Officials and Protection of Credibility

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Dyah Adriantini Sintha Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Muslim Majority ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The One ◽  
Oversight Body

The Ombudsman as an external oversight body for official performance, in Fikih Siyasah (constitutionality in Islam) is included in the supervision stipulated in legislation (al-musahabah al-qomariyah). Supervision is done so that public service delivery to the community is in accordance with the rights of the community. This is done because in carrying out its duties, officials are very likely to conduct mal administration, which is bad public services that cause harm to the community. The Ombudsman is an institution authorized to resolve the mal administration issue, in which one of its products is by issuing a recommendation. Although Law No. 37 of 2018 on the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia states that the recommendation is mandatory, theombudsman's recommendations have not been implemented. This is due to differences in point of view, ie on the one hand in the context of law enforcement, but on the other hand the implementation of the recommendation is considered as a means of opening the disgrace of officials. Recommendations are the last alternative of Ombudsman's efforts to resolve the mal administration case, given that a win-win solution is the goal, then mediation becomes the main effort. This is in accordance with the condition of the Muslim majority of Indonesian nation and prioritizes deliberation in resolving dispute. Therefore, it is necessary to educate the community and officials related to the implementation of the Ombudsman's recommendations in order to provide good public services for the community, which is the obligation of the government.

Problematic aspects of the use of penitentiary information in the process of disclosure and investigation of crimes

2020 ◽  
pp. 160-165
Author(s):  
Максим Владимирович Кремлев
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Goal Setting ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Difference

Автор, основываясь на ранее проведенных исследованиях, определяет место и роль пенитенциарной информации в процессе раскрытия и расследования преступлений. Указывается, что пенитенциарная информация превращается в процессуальную и, соответственно, в доказательственную посредством поэтапного прохождения через комплекс действий, облеченных в формы пенитенциарного, оперативно-розыскного и процессуального законодательства. Устанавливаются наиболее уязвимые места с точки зрения содержательного наполнения и процессуального оформления получаемых в рамках режимной деятельности сведений. Таковыми выступают места «сочленения» видов деятельности. Основой для подобного рода высказывания выступает разница в нормативном регулировании, в сменяемости и целеполагании исполнителей, а также их представлении о критериях успешности выполненной работы. В качестве подтверждения выдвинутого тезиса приводится пример из правоохранительной практики использования пенитенциарной информации в процессе доказывания, имеющий негативные последствия. Предлагаются направления совершенствования получения пенитенциарной информации с целью усиления ее доказательственного потенциала. In this article, the author, based on previous research determines the place and role of penitentiary information in the process of disclosure and investigation of crimes. It is specified that penitentiary information turns into procedural and, accordingly, into proofs by means of step-by-step passing through a complex of actions exposed in forms of the penitentiary, operational-search and procedural legislation. The most vulnerable places from the point of view of substantial filling and procedural registration of the data received within regime activity are established. These are the places of “articulation” of activities. It is concluded that the basis for this kind of statement is the difference in regulatory regulation, in the turnover and goal-setting of performers, as well as their representation of the criteria for the success of the work performed. As a confirmation of the proposed thesis, an example from the law enforcement practice of using penitentiary information in the process of proving having negative consequences is given. Directions of improvement of receiving penitentiary information for the purpose of strengthening of its evidentiary potential are offered.

scholarly journals Misconception on the Authority Abuse of Power in the Law Enforcement against Corruption

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Sadjijono Sadjijono ◽  
Bagus Teguh Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
Legal Concept ◽  
Abuse Of Power ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Administrative Jurisdiction

Law No. 30/ 2014 on Government Administration brings the strength and the averment on the performance of the governmental functions which include executive, legislative, and juridical in order to provide the public services (bestuurzorg). Such regulation also aims to prevent and to eliminate any kinds of the maladministration done by the government officials/organs in implementing their functions so that good governance can be realized. In implementing their function, the government should rely on the useful performance (doelmatigheid) and the effectiveness (doeltreffenhgeid) according to the norms of each authority. It is a sophism when the ‘authority’ and/or the ‘competence’ mentioned under the Law No. 30/ 2014 on Government Administration are defined differently in the letterlijk gramatikal wet without associating those terms with an understanding of bevoegheid in an administrative legal concept. An idea that distinctively defines the term ‘competence’ as a right and ‘authority’ as a power is considered as an inconsistent idea, which may cause dualism and distortion in the common law enforcement reffering to the administrative law, particularly related to the concept of the authority abuse of power mentioned under the Law No. 31/ 1999 amended by the Law No. 20/ 2001 on deeds against corruption. As the result, when the notion of ‘authority abuse of power’ is defined as a right (as mentioned in article 1, subsection 5 jo. article 17, Law No. 30/ 2014 on Government Administration), it will be characterized into the absolute competence of the administrative jurisdiction, and when the notion of ‘authority abuse of power’ is defined as a power (as mentioned in article 3, Law No. 31/ 1999 on deeds against corruption), it will be characterized into the absolute competence of the corruption-act jurisdiction. Meanwhile, implementing the government’s ‘competence’ and/or ‘authority’ is characterized into one concept based on the norms of the authority power.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document